Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the non-placement of a drainage tube in transvestibular endoscopic thyroid papillary carcinoma surgery by applying the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery. Meth...Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the non-placement of a drainage tube in transvestibular endoscopic thyroid papillary carcinoma surgery by applying the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery. Methods: 106 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Department of Head and Neck of Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed, and the observation group (n = 43) 1 who underwent endoscopic surgery without negative pressure drainage tube in the hospital from January 2019 to March 2023 were selected. The control group (n = 63) underwent the same operation at the same time and placed the negative pressure drainage tube. Postoperative hematoma, incision infection, subcutaneous effusion, and use of painkillers were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P > 0.05). No postoperative hematoma or incision infection occurred between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of subcutaneous effusion and the use rate of painkillers between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: No drainage tube in patients undergoing endoscopic thyroid surgery through oral vestibular approach will not increase the probability of complications such as postoperative hematoma, incision infection, subcutaneous effusion, and the use of painkillers, but can improve the comfort of patients in the concept of rapid rehabilitation.展开更多
Advances in imaging for preoperative localization have propelled the widespread adoption of minimally invasive/focused parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism.Though it is performed through a relatively small...Advances in imaging for preoperative localization have propelled the widespread adoption of minimally invasive/focused parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism.Though it is performed through a relatively small incision,studies have shown that the presence of a neck scar increases attentional bias towards the neck resulting in compromised quality of life.Transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy vestibular approach(TOEPVA)eliminates a neck scar.While indications for TOEPVA are the same as that of minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy,confident preoperative localization of the parathyroid with a surgeon performed ultrasound along with concordant localization with SPECT CT is an essential prerequisite before offering patients this approach for parathyroidectomy.Early data has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of this approach.展开更多
目的:分析经颏下前庭入路腔镜术式与胸乳入路腔镜术式在甲状腺单侧良性肿瘤切除术中的应用疗效。方法:选择2022年1月至2023年6月收治的44例行腔镜手术的单侧甲状腺肿瘤患者,按手术方式分为颏下前庭入路组(22例)与胸乳入路组(22例)。比较...目的:分析经颏下前庭入路腔镜术式与胸乳入路腔镜术式在甲状腺单侧良性肿瘤切除术中的应用疗效。方法:选择2022年1月至2023年6月收治的44例行腔镜手术的单侧甲状腺肿瘤患者,按手术方式分为颏下前庭入路组(22例)与胸乳入路组(22例)。比较2组手术相关指标、并发症发生率、疼痛程度、术后颈部舒适度、美容效果及主观满意度评分等。结果:颏下前庭入路组在降低手术时长、减少术中出血量、术后第1天引流量方面较胸乳入路组存在优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组在手术前后甲状旁腺素差值、血钙差值、术后总引流量、拔管时间、住院时间、肿瘤的病理性质、并发症发生率等方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在减少疼痛程度方面,颏下前庭入路组较胸乳入路组存在优势,2组术后6 h、24 h、72 h VAS疼痛评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组术后患者主观颈部舒适度、主观满意度评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后美容效果比较,颏下前庭组温哥华瘢痕评分优于胸乳入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:2种手术方式均安全可行,但在控制手术时长、减轻手术创伤、提高手术满意度方面,颏下前庭入路可能比胸乳入路具有优势。展开更多
文摘Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the non-placement of a drainage tube in transvestibular endoscopic thyroid papillary carcinoma surgery by applying the concept of rapid rehabilitation surgery. Methods: 106 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Department of Head and Neck of Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively analyzed, and the observation group (n = 43) 1 who underwent endoscopic surgery without negative pressure drainage tube in the hospital from January 2019 to March 2023 were selected. The control group (n = 63) underwent the same operation at the same time and placed the negative pressure drainage tube. Postoperative hematoma, incision infection, subcutaneous effusion, and use of painkillers were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P > 0.05). No postoperative hematoma or incision infection occurred between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of subcutaneous effusion and the use rate of painkillers between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: No drainage tube in patients undergoing endoscopic thyroid surgery through oral vestibular approach will not increase the probability of complications such as postoperative hematoma, incision infection, subcutaneous effusion, and the use of painkillers, but can improve the comfort of patients in the concept of rapid rehabilitation.
文摘Advances in imaging for preoperative localization have propelled the widespread adoption of minimally invasive/focused parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism.Though it is performed through a relatively small incision,studies have shown that the presence of a neck scar increases attentional bias towards the neck resulting in compromised quality of life.Transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy vestibular approach(TOEPVA)eliminates a neck scar.While indications for TOEPVA are the same as that of minimally invasive open parathyroidectomy,confident preoperative localization of the parathyroid with a surgeon performed ultrasound along with concordant localization with SPECT CT is an essential prerequisite before offering patients this approach for parathyroidectomy.Early data has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of this approach.
文摘目的:分析经颏下前庭入路腔镜术式与胸乳入路腔镜术式在甲状腺单侧良性肿瘤切除术中的应用疗效。方法:选择2022年1月至2023年6月收治的44例行腔镜手术的单侧甲状腺肿瘤患者,按手术方式分为颏下前庭入路组(22例)与胸乳入路组(22例)。比较2组手术相关指标、并发症发生率、疼痛程度、术后颈部舒适度、美容效果及主观满意度评分等。结果:颏下前庭入路组在降低手术时长、减少术中出血量、术后第1天引流量方面较胸乳入路组存在优势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组在手术前后甲状旁腺素差值、血钙差值、术后总引流量、拔管时间、住院时间、肿瘤的病理性质、并发症发生率等方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在减少疼痛程度方面,颏下前庭入路组较胸乳入路组存在优势,2组术后6 h、24 h、72 h VAS疼痛评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组术后患者主观颈部舒适度、主观满意度评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后美容效果比较,颏下前庭组温哥华瘢痕评分优于胸乳入路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:2种手术方式均安全可行,但在控制手术时长、减轻手术创伤、提高手术满意度方面,颏下前庭入路可能比胸乳入路具有优势。
