Safety of Overnight Hospitalization after Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Background: Monopolar transurethral resection of prostate has long been a standard method of managements of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The safe and superior efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) always argues strongly for maintaining it as the primary mode of therapy for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There is a trend toward early catheter removal after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) even to the extent of performing it as a day case. We explored the safety and feasibility of early catheter removal and discharging the patient without catheter after TURP. Materials and methods: Forty patients who underwent monopolar TURP were included in a prospective study. The decision to remove catheters on the first morning after surgery was based on the color of the catheter effluent, absence of clots, normal vital signs and adequate urine output. Patients who voided successfully were discharged on the same day as catheter removal. Results: Among the forty patients whose catheters were removed on first postoperative day, 38 patients (95%) voided successfully, and were discharged on the same day. However, two out of forty patients (5%) were recatheterized due to urethral discomfort during micturition. The catheter was removed on the next day. Mean overall duration of catheterization was 18.36 hours, and overall length of patient hospitalization was 21.68 hours. Conclusions: Overnight hospitalization and early catheter removal after transurethral prostatectomy are an appropriate, safe and effective way of patient care with minimal morbidity.

Validity of virtual reality simulator in training of transurethral resection of prostate

Objective To assess the face and construct validity of a full procedural transurethral prostate resection simulator ( TURPSimTM ) in training of transurethral resection of prostate. Methods Ten experienced and thirteen inexperienced urologists ( TURP experience ≥ 30 and

Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: Short-Term Outcome Evaluation in Regional Hospital in Senegal

Introduction: Transurethral resection of the prostate is still the most popular procedure that use for the surgical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction in developed countries. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) is a recent technique in our urological practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate our preliminary results on the use of a B-TURP in Kolda (Senegal) in a benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods: This was a 15-month, retrospective and descriptive study from June 2021 to August 31, 2022. It examined the records of patients who had BPH requiring surgical treatment and who received Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) during the study period at the Kolda Regional Hospital in Senegal. We used a Karl STORZ bipolar endoscopy column with a 26 sheath and 30˚ optics. The parameters studied were the civil status of the patients, the clinical and para-clinical data as well as the operative indications. The data were entered and analyzed using Epi-info 3.5.1.1. Results: A total of 31 patients underwent bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate during the study period. The mean age of patients was 68.5 ± 12.6 years (range, 56 - 77 years). The mean total PSA was 4 ± 2.3 ng/ml (range, 0.5 - 11 ng/ml). The mean prostate size assessed by ultrasound was 54 ± 12.3 ml (range, 30 - 90 ml). The operative indication was dominated by BPH with impact on the upper urinary tract. The mean of bladder irrigation time was 21.4 ± 3.9 hours (range, 12 - 26 hours). In the immediate post-operative period, blood transfusions were performed in 2 patients (6.5%). In the medium-term follow-up, we noted one 1 (3.2%) case of urine retention requiring bladder catheterization. Conclusion: Bipolar Transurethral resection of the prostate B-TURP in saline system is efficacious and safe. The results of this preliminary study of B-TURP are satisfactory with a low complication rate. B-TURP decreases the duration of the hospitalization and the port of the probe. Our perspectives are oriented towards endoscopy of the upper urinary tract.

Comparation of the predictive value between ultrasonography and urodynamics for the efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients

Background Transurethral resection of prostate （TURP） has been widely used as a golden standard therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia for over 40 years. However, not all patients achieved favorable outcome postoperatively. Since the level of bladder outlet obstruction and the dysfunction of detrusor （overactive and underactive） were both found to affect surgical efficacy, urodynamics was recommended as routine preoperative examination in selecting proper surgical candidates by International Continence Society in spite of its invasiveness and high cost. The aim of this research was to compare the predictive value between ultrasonography and urodynamics for TURP efficacy and determine if preoperative urodynamic test could be replaced by ultrasonography.Methods Two hundred and seventy-one patients took part in the retrospective analysis. All the subjects had preoperative evaluation of symptoms, life quality, and combined examination of ultrasonography and urodynamics. Surgical efficacy was measured according to the recovery of international prostate symptom score, quality of life score, and maximal flow rate 6 months after TURP. Fisher’s linear discriminant analysis was applied to establish the predictive models of surgical efficacy by choosing parameters from ultrasonography or urodynamics as independent factors. Receiver’s operating characteristic curve was then plotted to compare the values between the models.Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of models consisting of parameters from both ultrasonography and urodynamics were favorable. Corresponding models of ultrasonography and urodynamics were found to have non-significant difference in area under curve （P〉0.05）.Conclusions Preoperative ultrasonography has as strong value as urodynamics does in predicting surgical outcome of patients undergone TURP and might take the place of urodynamics in selecting surgical candidates. Further prospective analysis with larger popularity and longer period of follow up should be launched to verify the result of this research.

Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with ＂button-type＂ electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Background Transurethral resection of prostate （TURP） has been considered as the standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. However, issues that have not yet been overcome for TURP include bleeding and absorption of irrigation fluid. Thus, novel improvement of the surgery is necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate （BPVP） with ＂button-type＂ electrode against standard TURP for BPH.

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia(2021 Edition)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline “2018 Standard Edition”. However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons’ surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy;the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons’ skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

Necrosis zone depth after bipolar plasma vaporization and resection in the human prostate

Objectives:To compare the depth of thermal necrosis after use of bipolar resection and vaporization technique comparing intra-individually bipolar loop and bipolar button electrodes.Methods:Transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate was performed in 55 male patients(260 specimens in total).In a standardized procedure,a bipolar resection loop was used for resection,and a bipolar button electrode was used for vaporization.Both electrodes were applied in each patient,either in the left or in the right lateral lobe.The depth of necrotic zones in the resected or vaporized tissue of each patient was measured in a standardized way by light microscopy.Results:The mean depth with standard deviation of thermal injury caused by the loop electrode was 0.0495±0.0274 mm.The vaporization electrode caused a mean thermal depth with standard deviation of 0.0477±0.0276 mm.The mean difference of necrosis zone depths between the two types of electrodes(PlasmaButtoneresection loop)was 0.0018 mm(p=0.691).Conclusion:For the first time,we present directly measured values of the absolute necrosis zone depth after application of plasma in the transurethral treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.The measured values were lower than in all other transurethral procedures.Standardized procedures of measurement and evaluation allow a statistically significant statement that the low necrosis depth in bipolar procedures is independent of the applied electrodes.

Analysis of 3 cases of bladder explosion in transurethral plasma prostatectomy

Objective:To investigate the causes of bladder explosion during transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate and to explore effective measures to reduce the risk of bladder explosion.Methods:The treatment process of bladder rupture(2cases)and bladder muscle layer laceration(1case)during transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Two cases with intra-peritoneal rupture were cured by open surgery,and 1case with bladder muscle layer laceration was cured by conservative treatment.The main cause of bladder explosion is that:the flammable gas produced during the resection of prostate tissue mixed with the gas from the outside into the bladder to a certain proportion,in the action of electric spark,causing gas explosion.Conclusions:Using dorsal elevated position,shortening operative time,and reducing gas entering the bladder are three key points to prevent bladder explosion.

Erectile dysfunction after transurethral prostatectomy for lower urinary tract symptoms:results from a center with over 500 patients

Aim： To identify possible risk factors for erectile dysfunction （ED） after transurethral resection of prostate （TURP） for benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. Methods： Between March 1999 and March 2004, 629 patients underwent TURP in our department for the treatment of symptomatic BPH. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound examination. In addition, the flow rate, urine residue, International Prostate Symptom Score （IPSS） and quality of life （QOL） were recorded for those who presented without a catheter. Finally, the erectile function of the patient was evaluated according to the International Index of Erectile Function Instrument （IIEF-5） questionnaire. It was determined that ED existed where there was a total score of less than 21. The flow rate, IPSS and QOL assessment were performed at 3 and 6 months post-treatment. The IIEF-5 assessment was repeated at a 6-month follow-up. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential risk factors for ED. Results： At baseline, 522 （83 %） patients answered the IIEF-5 questionnaire. The mean patient age was （63.7 ± 9.7） years. The ED rate was 65%. After 6 months, 459 （88%） out of the 522 patients returned the IIEF questionnaire. The rest of the group was excluded from the statistical analysis. Six months after TURP, the rate of patients reporting ED increased to 77 %. Statistical analysis revealed that the only important factors associated with newly reported ED after TURP were diabetes mellitus （P = 0.003, r = 3.67） and observed intraoperative capsular perforation （P = 0.02, r = 1.12）. Conclusion： The incidence of postoperative, newly reported ED after TURP was 12%. Risk factors for its occurrence were diabetes mellitus and intraoperative capsular perforation. （Asian J Androl 2006 Jan; 8： 69-74）

Management of urethral strictures and stenosis caused by the endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasiad-a single-center experience

Objective:Urethral stricture disease after endo-urological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a sparsely described complication.We describe management of five categories of these strictures in this retrospective observational case series.Methods:One hundred and twenty-one patients presenting with symptoms of bladder outflow obstruction after endo-urological intervention for BPH from February 2016 to March 2019 were evaluated.Among them,76 were eligible for this study and underwent reconstructive surgery.Preoperative and postoperative assessments were done with symptom scores,uroflowmetry,ultrasound for post-void residue,and urethrogram.Any intervention during follow-up was classed as a failure.The recurrence and 95%confidence interval for recurrence percentage were calculated.Results:The following five categories of patients were identified:Bulbo-membranous(33[43.4%]),navicular fossa(21[27.6%]),penile/peno-bulbar(8[10.5%]),bladder neck stenosis(6[7.9%]),and multiple locations(8[10.5%]).The average age was 69 years(range:60-84 years).Overall average symptom score,flow rate,and post-void residue changed from 21 to 7,6 mL/s to 19 mL/s,and 210 mL to 20 mL,respectively.The average follow-up was 34 months(range:12-58 months).Overall recurrence and complication rates were 10.5%and 9.2%,respectively.The recurrence in each category was seen in 3,1,2,1,and 1 patient,respectively.Overall 95% confidence interval for recurrence percentage was 4.66-19.69.Conclusion:Urethral stricture disease is a major long-term complication of endo-urological treatment of BPH.The bulbo-membranous strictures need continence preserving approach.Navicular fossa strictures require minimally invasive and cosmetic consideration.Peno-bulbar strictures require judicious use of grafts and flaps.Bladder neck stenosis in this cohort could be treated with endoscopic measures.Multiple locations need treatment based on their sites in single-stage as far as possible.

A rare cause of acute urinary retention-Primary malignant melanoma of prostate

Acute urinary retention is commonly seen in elderly male patient due to benign enlargement of prostate.We report a 65-year-old male presenting with acute urinary retention diagnosed to have primary malignant melanoma of prostate.Primary malignant melanoma of genitourinary tract is very uncommon diagnosis in urology and prostate involvement is extremely rare.Till now only five cases have been reported.

An update on transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction

Clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is one of the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms and transurethral resection of prostate(TURP)has been the gold standard technique for surgical treatment of benign prostate obstruction(BPO)over the last 2 decades.Although monopolar TURP is considered a safe and effective option for surgical management of BPO,there are some disadvantages,namely bleeding,transurethral resection syndrome,incompleteness of treatment.This review aims to highlight these problems,and describe the advances in technology and techniques that have evolved to minimise such complications.With the advent of lasers and bipolar technology,as well as enucleative techniques to remove the prostatic adenoma/adenomata,the problems of bleeding,transurethral resection syndrome and incomplete treatment are significantly minimised.Monopolar TURPwill likely be replaced by such technology and techniques in the near future such that transurethral surgery of the prostate remain a safe and effective option in alleviating the harmful effects of BPO.

Plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate versus 160-W laser photoselective vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate （PKEP） for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） compared with 160-W lithium triboride laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate （PVP）. From February 2011 to July 2012, a prospective nonrandomized study was performed. One-hundred one patients underwent PKEP, and 110 underwent PVP. No severe intraoperative complications were recorded, and none of the patients in either group required a blood transfusion. Shorter catheterization time （38.14 ± 23.64 h vs 72.54 ± 28.38 h, P 〈 0.001） and hospitalization （2.32 ± 1.25 days vs 4.07±1.23 days, P 〈 0.001） were recorded in the PVP group. At 12-month postoperatively, the PKEP group had a maintained and statistically improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score （IPSS） （4.07 ±2.07 vs 5.00 ±2.10; P〈 0.001）, quality of life （QoL） （1.08 ± 0.72 vs 1.35 ± 0.72; P= 0.007）, maximal urinary flow rate （Qmax） （24.75±5.87 ml s^-1 vs 22.03 ±5.04 ml s^-1; P 〈 0.001）, postvoid residual urine volume （PVR） （14,29 ± 6,97 ml vs 17.00±6.11 ml; P = 0,001）, and prostate-specific antigen （PSA） value （0.78 ±0.57 ng ml^-1 vs 1.27 ±1.07 ng ml^-1; P 〈 0.001）. Both PKEP and PVP relieve low urinary tract symptoms （LUTS） due to BPH with low complication rates. PKEP can completely remove prostatic adenoma while the total amount of tissue removed by PVP is less than that can be removed by PKER Based on our study of the follow-up, PKEP provides better postoperative outcomes than PVP.

Update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP)became the gold standard surgical treatment for benign prostatic obstruction without undergoing randomized controlled trials against the predecessor standard in open suprapubic prostatectomy.TURP has historically been associated with significant morbidity and this has fuelled the development of minimally invasive surgical treatment options.Improvements in perioperative morbidity for TURP has been creating an ever increasing standard that must be met by any new technologies that are to be compared to this gold standard.Over recent years,there has been the emergence of novel minimally invasive treatments such as the prostatic urethral lift(PUL;UroLift System),convective WAter Vapor Energy(WAVE;Rezum System),Aquablation(AQUABEAM System),Histotripsy(Vortx Rx System)and temporary implantable nitinol device(TIND).Intraprostatic injections(NX-1207,PRX-302,botulinum toxin A,ethanol)have mostly been used with limited efficacy,but may be suitable for selected patients.This review evaluates these novel minimally invasive surgical options with special reference to the literature published in the past 5 years.

Retrospective analysis of the changes in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia during an 11-year period: a single-center experience

The present study aimed to determine whether the number of patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)who preferred surgery decreased during the past 11 years at our center(West China Hospital,Chengdu,China),and whether this change affected the timing of surgery and the physical condition of surgical patients.This retrospective study included 57557 patients with BPH treated from January 2008 to December 2018.Of these,5427 patients were treated surgically.Surgical patients were divided into two groups based on the time of treatment(groups 8-13 and groups 13-18).The collected data comprised the percentage of all patients with BPH who underwent surgery,baseline characteristics of surgical patients,rehabilitation time,adverse events,and hospitalization costs.The surgery rates in groups 8-13 and groups 13-18 were 10.5%and 8.5%(P<0.001),respectively.The two groups did not clinically differ regarding patient age and prostate volume.The rates of acute urinary retention and renal failure decreased from 15.0%to 10.6%(P<0.001)and from 5.2%to 3.1%(P<0.001),respectively.In groups 8-13 and groups 13-18,the mean catheterization times were 4.0±1.7 days and 3_3±1.6 days(P<0.001),respectively,and the mean postoperative hospitalization times were 5.1±2.4 days and 4.2±1.8 days(P<0.001),respectively.The incidences of unplanned second surgery and death reduced during the study period.The surgery rate decreased over time,which suggests that medication was chosen over surgery.However,the percentage of late complications of BPH also decreased over time,which indicates that the timing of surgery was not delayed.