The advent of minimally invasive surgery and the advances in endoluminal flexible endoscopy have converged to generate a new concept in digestive surgery,whose acronym natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(N...The advent of minimally invasive surgery and the advances in endoluminal flexible endoscopy have converged to generate a new concept in digestive surgery,whose acronym natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES),has become a familiar term in the surgical community.NOTES has been performed through the mouth,the bladder,the rectum and the vagina.Of these four approaches,the vagina has gained most popularity for several reasons.It is not only readily accessible and easy to decontaminate but it also provides safe entry and simple closure.The transvaginal approach has been described in the experimental and the clinical setting as an option for cholecystectomy,nephrectomy,splenectomy,segmental gastrectomy,retroperitoneal exploration and bariatric surgery.However,larger series are needed to delineate the exact risks of this approach,and to transcend cultural barriers that impede its wider introduction.Prospective randomized trials will shed light on the definitive role of the vaginal approach in minimal invasive surgery of the future.展开更多
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES),as a minimally invasive surgery technique,applies CO_(2) for creating pneumoperitoneum,and uses a closed system to through smoke evacuation from a d...Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES),as a minimally invasive surgery technique,applies CO_(2) for creating pneumoperitoneum,and uses a closed system to through smoke evacuation from a dedicated outlet or port.It has the potential to generate aerosol in the operation room,which can lead to an increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2.This technical note introduces a new technique of gasless pure vNOTES to hysterectomy using silicone face mask as a modified vNOTES port.展开更多
Objective:To describe the Chinese experience of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)in urology.Methods:From December 2008 to May 2017,35 animal experiments and 305 clinical surgeries of NOTES or natu...Objective:To describe the Chinese experience of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)in urology.Methods:From December 2008 to May 2017,35 animal experiments and 305 clinical surgeries of NOTES or natural orifices specimen extractions(NOSE)were performed in China.The animal experiments included five kidney biopsies,24 nephrectomies and six partial nephrectomies.The clinical surgeries included 12 transvaginal NOSE(TV-NOSE),266 hybrid transvaginal NOTES(TV-NOTES)and 27 pure TV-NOTES.The TV-NOSE procedure was performed in five transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site(U-LESS)nephrectomies,four suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(SA-LESS)nephroureterectomies,and three laparoscopic radical cystectomies.The hybrid TV-NOTES procedure included 210 nephrectomies,31 adrenalectomies,eight nephroureterectomies,13 partial nephrectomies,and four heminephrectomies.The pure TV-NOTES procedure included five renal cyst decortications and 22 nephrectomies.Results:A total of 29 animal experiments were successfully performed.One partial nephrectomy was converted to standard laparoscopic surgery.Two kidney biopsies and two nephrectomies were unsuccessful.A total of 297 clinical surgeries were successfully performed.Six patients who underwent hybrid TV-NOTES were converted to open surgery.Two patients who underwent pure TV-NOTES were converted to SA-LESS.There were 22 major complications,16 occurred intraoperatively and six postoperatively.The mean visual analog score(VAS)of 48 h after the operation was 2.5 points in TV-NOSE,2.3 points in hybrid TV-NOTES and 1.7 points in pure TV-NOTES.The mean follow-up of 50.6(3.0-87.0)months showed that all patients were in good condition.The umbilicus scars were nearly invisible in TV-NOSE and hybrid TV-NOTES.The vaginal incision healed well.Conclusions:TV-NOSE and TV-NOTES are feasible,safe,and effective with little injury,low pain,fast recovery,and good cosmetic outcomes in properly selected patients.They are worth consideration for urological clinical practice.展开更多
Background The infection risk of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery （NOTES） is of concern. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of NOTES by investigating the intraperitoneal bacterial load dur...Background The infection risk of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery （NOTES） is of concern. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of NOTES by investigating the intraperitoneal bacterial load during transgastric and transvaginal procedures with antiseptic or controling perioperative preparation.Methods Forty-five female pigs were randomly assigned to five equal groups： the transgastric （TG） control group （group A）, the TG middle volume gastric lavage group （group B）, the TG high volume lavage group （group C）, the transvaginal （TV） control group （group D） and the TV study group （group E）. The study groups received gastric or vaginal lavage and abdominal antimicrobial irrigation, while the control groups received neither. All animals were administered intravenous antibiotics, underwent NOTES peritoneoscopy and transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy under NOTES view with sterile instruments. The viscerotomy was closed by laparoscopic suture. The animals were observed until necropsy was performed 14 days postoperatively. Quantitative bacteriologic cultures were taken from the gastric or vaginal aspirate before and after lavage; peritoneal fluid was collected before and after peritoneal irrigation and at necropsy. Results The surgical procedures were completed for all the pigs and all of them survived. The mean operative time of the TG group and the TV group was （81±27） minutes and （66±12） minutes, respectively. All animals survived for 14 days.At necropsy, significantly more peritoneal infections were noted in group A than in group D （5：9 vs. 0：9; P 〈0.05）. Nogross evidence of intra-peritoneal infection was found in groups B, C, D and E. Bacteriological evidence was seen in all pigs in group A, 7 pigs in group B, 6 pigs in group D, and none in groups C and E.Conclusions Without gastric or vaginal lavage and antibiotic peritoneal irrigation, the TG procedure has a higher infection rate than the TV access. After antiseptic preparation, the bacterial load significantly decreased in the TG group,which seems as safe as the sterile TV approach.展开更多
目的比较经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,v-NOTES)、经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery,TU-LESS)及传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效...目的比较经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,v-NOTES)、经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery,TU-LESS)及传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效与差异。方法回顾性选取2019年6月至2022年6月扬州大学医学院附属扬州市妇幼保健院收治的异位妊娠患者121例,根据手术方式不同将纳入患者分为传统腹腔镜组(49例)、TU-LESS组(43例)和v-NOTES组(29例)。观察各组患者的年龄、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)、手术时间、术中出血、术后排气时间、术后24h视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、术后住院时间和满意度。结果v-NOTES组患者的排气时间、术后住院时间均显著短于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组,术后24h VAS评分显著低于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组(P<0.05);三组患者的术后满意度比较差异有统计学意义(H=57.364,P<0.001),且v-NOTES组>TU-LESS组>传统腹腔镜组。结论与TU-LESS和传统腹腔镜手术比较,v-NOTES治疗异位妊娠术后恢复快,疼痛轻,更加美观,但需要手术者熟练掌握。展开更多
目的评价经阴道单孔腹腔镜手术(transvaginal single port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,vNOTES)在输卵管异位妊娠治疗中的可行性、有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年8月因输卵管妊娠于北京医院行...目的评价经阴道单孔腹腔镜手术(transvaginal single port natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,vNOTES)在输卵管异位妊娠治疗中的可行性、有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年8月因输卵管妊娠于北京医院行患侧输卵管切除或输卵管开窗术患者的病历资料,根据手术方式分为vNOTES组(26例)和传统腹腔镜组(29例)。记录患者年龄、体重指数、孕次、产次及妊娠物B超最大径线。通过对比vNOTES与传统腹腔镜组的手术成功率、手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后24h视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)、术后并发症情况及术后3个月瘢痕评分等指标,评价经阴道单孔腹腔镜输卵管妊娠手术的安全性及可行性。结果vNOTES组均顺利完成手术,无中转传统腹腔镜或开腹手术,术后随访无并发症发生。vNOTES组和传统腹腔镜组的手术时间和术中出血量比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05);vNOTES组术后排气时间和术后24h VAS评分显著低于传统腹腔镜组,差异有显著性(P均=0.000)。术后3个月门诊复查,vNOTES组瘢痕评分[(1.15±0.56)分]显著低于传统腹腔镜组[(4.54±0.76)分],差异有显著性(t=-3.987,P=0.000)。结论经阴道单孔腹腔镜可安全有效地完成输卵管妊娠保守性输卵管开窗及输卵管切除术,经阴道单孔手术创伤小且术后无痕效果好,更有利于患者术后的康复。展开更多
文摘The advent of minimally invasive surgery and the advances in endoluminal flexible endoscopy have converged to generate a new concept in digestive surgery,whose acronym natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES),has become a familiar term in the surgical community.NOTES has been performed through the mouth,the bladder,the rectum and the vagina.Of these four approaches,the vagina has gained most popularity for several reasons.It is not only readily accessible and easy to decontaminate but it also provides safe entry and simple closure.The transvaginal approach has been described in the experimental and the clinical setting as an option for cholecystectomy,nephrectomy,splenectomy,segmental gastrectomy,retroperitoneal exploration and bariatric surgery.However,larger series are needed to delineate the exact risks of this approach,and to transcend cultural barriers that impede its wider introduction.Prospective randomized trials will shed light on the definitive role of the vaginal approach in minimal invasive surgery of the future.
文摘Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(vNOTES),as a minimally invasive surgery technique,applies CO_(2) for creating pneumoperitoneum,and uses a closed system to through smoke evacuation from a dedicated outlet or port.It has the potential to generate aerosol in the operation room,which can lead to an increased risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2.This technical note introduces a new technique of gasless pure vNOTES to hysterectomy using silicone face mask as a modified vNOTES port.
基金the National High Technology Research and Development Program(“863”Program)of China(2012AA021100)Ganpo 555 Talents Program of Jiangxi Province+2 种基金the Major Science and Technology Support Project from the Department of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province(20132BAB205007)the Science and Technology Floor Project from the Department of Education of Jiangxi Province(KJLD12044)the Science and Technology Program from the Department of Health of Jiangxi Province(20121095).
文摘Objective:To describe the Chinese experience of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)in urology.Methods:From December 2008 to May 2017,35 animal experiments and 305 clinical surgeries of NOTES or natural orifices specimen extractions(NOSE)were performed in China.The animal experiments included five kidney biopsies,24 nephrectomies and six partial nephrectomies.The clinical surgeries included 12 transvaginal NOSE(TV-NOSE),266 hybrid transvaginal NOTES(TV-NOTES)and 27 pure TV-NOTES.The TV-NOSE procedure was performed in five transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site(U-LESS)nephrectomies,four suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery(SA-LESS)nephroureterectomies,and three laparoscopic radical cystectomies.The hybrid TV-NOTES procedure included 210 nephrectomies,31 adrenalectomies,eight nephroureterectomies,13 partial nephrectomies,and four heminephrectomies.The pure TV-NOTES procedure included five renal cyst decortications and 22 nephrectomies.Results:A total of 29 animal experiments were successfully performed.One partial nephrectomy was converted to standard laparoscopic surgery.Two kidney biopsies and two nephrectomies were unsuccessful.A total of 297 clinical surgeries were successfully performed.Six patients who underwent hybrid TV-NOTES were converted to open surgery.Two patients who underwent pure TV-NOTES were converted to SA-LESS.There were 22 major complications,16 occurred intraoperatively and six postoperatively.The mean visual analog score(VAS)of 48 h after the operation was 2.5 points in TV-NOSE,2.3 points in hybrid TV-NOTES and 1.7 points in pure TV-NOTES.The mean follow-up of 50.6(3.0-87.0)months showed that all patients were in good condition.The umbilicus scars were nearly invisible in TV-NOSE and hybrid TV-NOTES.The vaginal incision healed well.Conclusions:TV-NOSE and TV-NOTES are feasible,safe,and effective with little injury,low pain,fast recovery,and good cosmetic outcomes in properly selected patients.They are worth consideration for urological clinical practice.
文摘Background The infection risk of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery （NOTES） is of concern. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of NOTES by investigating the intraperitoneal bacterial load during transgastric and transvaginal procedures with antiseptic or controling perioperative preparation.Methods Forty-five female pigs were randomly assigned to five equal groups： the transgastric （TG） control group （group A）, the TG middle volume gastric lavage group （group B）, the TG high volume lavage group （group C）, the transvaginal （TV） control group （group D） and the TV study group （group E）. The study groups received gastric or vaginal lavage and abdominal antimicrobial irrigation, while the control groups received neither. All animals were administered intravenous antibiotics, underwent NOTES peritoneoscopy and transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy under NOTES view with sterile instruments. The viscerotomy was closed by laparoscopic suture. The animals were observed until necropsy was performed 14 days postoperatively. Quantitative bacteriologic cultures were taken from the gastric or vaginal aspirate before and after lavage; peritoneal fluid was collected before and after peritoneal irrigation and at necropsy. Results The surgical procedures were completed for all the pigs and all of them survived. The mean operative time of the TG group and the TV group was （81±27） minutes and （66±12） minutes, respectively. All animals survived for 14 days.At necropsy, significantly more peritoneal infections were noted in group A than in group D （5：9 vs. 0：9; P 〈0.05）. Nogross evidence of intra-peritoneal infection was found in groups B, C, D and E. Bacteriological evidence was seen in all pigs in group A, 7 pigs in group B, 6 pigs in group D, and none in groups C and E.Conclusions Without gastric or vaginal lavage and antibiotic peritoneal irrigation, the TG procedure has a higher infection rate than the TV access. After antiseptic preparation, the bacterial load significantly decreased in the TG group,which seems as safe as the sterile TV approach.
文摘目的比较经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,v-NOTES)、经脐单孔腹腔镜手术(transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery,TU-LESS)及传统腹腔镜手术治疗异位妊娠的疗效与差异。方法回顾性选取2019年6月至2022年6月扬州大学医学院附属扬州市妇幼保健院收治的异位妊娠患者121例,根据手术方式不同将纳入患者分为传统腹腔镜组(49例)、TU-LESS组(43例)和v-NOTES组(29例)。观察各组患者的年龄、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)、手术时间、术中出血、术后排气时间、术后24h视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、术后住院时间和满意度。结果v-NOTES组患者的排气时间、术后住院时间均显著短于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组,术后24h VAS评分显著低于传统腹腔镜组和TU-LESS组(P<0.05);三组患者的术后满意度比较差异有统计学意义(H=57.364,P<0.001),且v-NOTES组>TU-LESS组>传统腹腔镜组。结论与TU-LESS和传统腹腔镜手术比较,v-NOTES治疗异位妊娠术后恢复快,疼痛轻,更加美观,但需要手术者熟练掌握。
