AIM: To evaluate the use of translumenal pancreatography with placement of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct.METHODS: This study enrolled all consecutive patients between June 2002...AIM: To evaluate the use of translumenal pancreatography with placement of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct.METHODS: This study enrolled all consecutive patients between June 2002 and April 2014 who underwent EUSguided pancreatography and subsequent placement of a drain and had symptomatic retention of fluid in the pancreatic duct after one or more previous unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic retrograde cannulation of the pancreatic duct. In all,94 patients underwent 111 interventions with one of three different approaches:(1) EUS-endoscopic retrograde drainage with a rendezvous technique;(2) EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct; and(3) EUS-guided,internal,antegrade drainage of the pancreatic duct.RESULTS: The mean duration of the interventions was 21 min(range,15-69 min). Mean patient age was 54 years(range,28-87 years); the M:F sex ratio was 60:34. The technical success rate was 100%,achieving puncture of the pancreatic duct including pancreatography in 94/94 patients. In patients requiring drainage,initial placement of a drain wassuccessful in 47/83 patients(56.6%). Of these,26 patients underwent transgastric/transbulbar positioning of a stent for retrograde drainage; plastic prostheses were used in 11 and metal stents in 12. A ring drain(antegrade internal drainage) was placed in three of these 26 patients because of anastomotic stenosis after a previous surgical intervention. The remaining 21 patients with successful drain placement had transpapillary drains using the rendezvous technique; the majority(n = 19) received plastic prostheses,and only two received metal stents(covered self-expanding metal stents). The median follow-up time in the 21 patients with transpapillary drainage was 28 mo(range,1-79 mo),while that of the 26 patients with successful transgastric/transduodenal drainage was 9.5 mo(range,1-82 mo). Clinical success,as indicated by reduced or absence of further pain after the EUS-guided intervention was achieved in 68/83 patients(81.9%),including several who improved without drainage,but with manipulation of the access route.CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct is a safe,feasible alternative to endoscopic retrograde drainage when the papilla cannot be reached endoscopically or catheterized.展开更多
We describe a case of gastric aberrant pancreas with acute pancreatitis followed up with subsequent endoscopic ultrasound. A 20-year-old woman known to have aberrant pancreas in the stomach was admitted to our hospita...We describe a case of gastric aberrant pancreas with acute pancreatitis followed up with subsequent endoscopic ultrasound. A 20-year-old woman known to have aberrant pancreas in the stomach was admitted to our hospital because of severe epigastralgia. Laboratory tests showed slight C reactive protein elevation without hyperamylasemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a swollen submucosal lesion (SML) to a greater degree compared with the previous findings. Subsequent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a swollen lesion of 35 mm in diameter. The internal echo-pattern was more hypoechoic than in the previous EUS. The border between the fourth layer (muscularis propria) and the SML was unclear. The anechoic lumen in the mass, considered as the ductal lumen, was dilated. Based on these results, we diagnosed the patient as having acute inflammation, resembling pancreatitis, in the aberrant pancreas.展开更多
The treatment option for gastric cancer is usually based on preoperative staging by imaging modalities. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) have been used as the diagnostic modality of choice...The treatment option for gastric cancer is usually based on preoperative staging by imaging modalities. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) have been used as the diagnostic modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been employed in several studies, and (<sup>18</sup>F) 2-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has emerged as a new promising imaging modality. The purpose of this article is to provide summarized information on preoperative staging using EUS, multi-detector row CT (MDCT), MRI and PET for gastric cancer. In T staging, both EUS and MDCT show high accuracy. MRI seemed to have better performance, but the number of MRI studies is limited. FDG-PET is not able to properly evaluate the depth of invasion. In N staging, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS, MDCT and MRI is not sufficient. In preoperative M staging, MDCT and FDG-PET showed similar diagnostic accuracies. FDG-PET/CT fusion could be expected to show better performance in the future. Physicians should keep in mind that each diagnostic modality has advantages and limitations and choose an appropriate diagnostic strategy tailored for each patient.展开更多
OBJECTIVE: To study the sonographic features and patterns of cystic renal carcinomas. METHODS: Thirteen cases of cystic renal carcinoma confirmed by operation and pathology were examined by ultrasonography, and the cy...OBJECTIVE: To study the sonographic features and patterns of cystic renal carcinomas. METHODS: Thirteen cases of cystic renal carcinoma confirmed by operation and pathology were examined by ultrasonography, and the cystic walls, septa and solid mural nodules were studied. RESULTS: Solid mural nodules of some cases and irregular thickening of the cystic walls and septa were characteristic findings for the ultrasonic diagnosis of cystic renal carcinomas. According to their pathologic mechanisms and sonographic features, cystic renal carcinomas were classified into 3 patterns: unilocular cystic mass, multiloculated cystic mass and cystic-solid mass. CONCLUSIONS: Typical cystic renal carcinomas can be well diagnosed, while atypical cases may be misdiagnosed as benign renal cysts by ultrasonography. Color Doppler ultrasonography and needle aspiration guided by ultrasonography are helpful in the diagnosis of these atypical cases.展开更多
文摘AIM: To evaluate the use of translumenal pancreatography with placement of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct.METHODS: This study enrolled all consecutive patients between June 2002 and April 2014 who underwent EUSguided pancreatography and subsequent placement of a drain and had symptomatic retention of fluid in the pancreatic duct after one or more previous unsuccessful attempts at endoscopic retrograde cannulation of the pancreatic duct. In all,94 patients underwent 111 interventions with one of three different approaches:(1) EUS-endoscopic retrograde drainage with a rendezvous technique;(2) EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct; and(3) EUS-guided,internal,antegrade drainage of the pancreatic duct.RESULTS: The mean duration of the interventions was 21 min(range,15-69 min). Mean patient age was 54 years(range,28-87 years); the M:F sex ratio was 60:34. The technical success rate was 100%,achieving puncture of the pancreatic duct including pancreatography in 94/94 patients. In patients requiring drainage,initial placement of a drain wassuccessful in 47/83 patients(56.6%). Of these,26 patients underwent transgastric/transbulbar positioning of a stent for retrograde drainage; plastic prostheses were used in 11 and metal stents in 12. A ring drain(antegrade internal drainage) was placed in three of these 26 patients because of anastomotic stenosis after a previous surgical intervention. The remaining 21 patients with successful drain placement had transpapillary drains using the rendezvous technique; the majority(n = 19) received plastic prostheses,and only two received metal stents(covered self-expanding metal stents). The median follow-up time in the 21 patients with transpapillary drainage was 28 mo(range,1-79 mo),while that of the 26 patients with successful transgastric/transduodenal drainage was 9.5 mo(range,1-82 mo). Clinical success,as indicated by reduced or absence of further pain after the EUS-guided intervention was achieved in 68/83 patients(81.9%),including several who improved without drainage,but with manipulation of the access route.CONCLUSION: EUS-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct is a safe,feasible alternative to endoscopic retrograde drainage when the papilla cannot be reached endoscopically or catheterized.
文摘We describe a case of gastric aberrant pancreas with acute pancreatitis followed up with subsequent endoscopic ultrasound. A 20-year-old woman known to have aberrant pancreas in the stomach was admitted to our hospital because of severe epigastralgia. Laboratory tests showed slight C reactive protein elevation without hyperamylasemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a swollen submucosal lesion (SML) to a greater degree compared with the previous findings. Subsequent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) revealed a swollen lesion of 35 mm in diameter. The internal echo-pattern was more hypoechoic than in the previous EUS. The border between the fourth layer (muscularis propria) and the SML was unclear. The anechoic lumen in the mass, considered as the ductal lumen, was dilated. Based on these results, we diagnosed the patient as having acute inflammation, resembling pancreatitis, in the aberrant pancreas.
文摘The treatment option for gastric cancer is usually based on preoperative staging by imaging modalities. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) have been used as the diagnostic modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been employed in several studies, and (<sup>18</sup>F) 2-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has emerged as a new promising imaging modality. The purpose of this article is to provide summarized information on preoperative staging using EUS, multi-detector row CT (MDCT), MRI and PET for gastric cancer. In T staging, both EUS and MDCT show high accuracy. MRI seemed to have better performance, but the number of MRI studies is limited. FDG-PET is not able to properly evaluate the depth of invasion. In N staging, the diagnostic accuracy of EUS, MDCT and MRI is not sufficient. In preoperative M staging, MDCT and FDG-PET showed similar diagnostic accuracies. FDG-PET/CT fusion could be expected to show better performance in the future. Physicians should keep in mind that each diagnostic modality has advantages and limitations and choose an appropriate diagnostic strategy tailored for each patient.
文摘OBJECTIVE: To study the sonographic features and patterns of cystic renal carcinomas. METHODS: Thirteen cases of cystic renal carcinoma confirmed by operation and pathology were examined by ultrasonography, and the cystic walls, septa and solid mural nodules were studied. RESULTS: Solid mural nodules of some cases and irregular thickening of the cystic walls and septa were characteristic findings for the ultrasonic diagnosis of cystic renal carcinomas. According to their pathologic mechanisms and sonographic features, cystic renal carcinomas were classified into 3 patterns: unilocular cystic mass, multiloculated cystic mass and cystic-solid mass. CONCLUSIONS: Typical cystic renal carcinomas can be well diagnosed, while atypical cases may be misdiagnosed as benign renal cysts by ultrasonography. Color Doppler ultrasonography and needle aspiration guided by ultrasonography are helpful in the diagnosis of these atypical cases.
