<b>Background:</b>The objective of this work was to evaluate the first results of the radio ablation of the great saphenous vein in the processing of chronic venous insufficiency. <b>Method: </b&g...<b>Background:</b>The objective of this work was to evaluate the first results of the radio ablation of the great saphenous vein in the processing of chronic venous insufficiency. <b>Method: </b>This is a monocentric retrospective study of radio ablation of the great saphenous vein using VNUS Closure<sup>®</sup> FAST for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein, between January 2012 and December 2014. <b>Results:</b> 42 patients (57 limbs) were operated on with this technology. There were 33 women and 9 men (mean age: 46.5 years). Thirty-nine patients (92. 8%) were symptomatic. Thirty-two patients (76.1%) were classified CEAP 2. The average diameter of the saphenous vein was 8.5 ± 1.5 mm. Three patients (7.1%) had a percutaneous approach. A perfect occlusion of the saphenous vein was observed in all patients. No incident or undesirable event was observed during the procedure. One case of delayed deep-vein thrombosis was observed. At one month of follow-up, six patients (14.2%) had induration opposite to the occluded vein. Forty-three percent of the pati<span style="letter-spacing:-0.1pt;">ents stated they were very satisfied with the procedure. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effectiveness, security and simplicity of the closure method are real. More studies are necessary to assess the long-term results of this procedure.</span>展开更多
Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose ...Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose veins have changed dramatically due to the rise of minimally invasive endovascular techniques.The literature was systematically searched on Medline without language restrictions.All papers on the treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency with different procedures were included and reviewed.Endovenous laser ablation(EVLA)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)both are same safe and effective in terms of occlusion rate,and time to return to normal activity.In comparison with RFA or EVLT,Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l’Insufficience Veineuse en Ambulatoire(CHIVA)may cause more bruising and make little or no difference to rates of limb infection,superficial vein thrombosis,nerve injury,or hematoma.In terms of recurrence of varicose veins,there is little or no difference between CHIVA and stripping,RFA,or EVLT.Great saphenous vein recanalization is highest in the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy(FS)group(51%)during 1 year of follow-up.The 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines recommend surgery as a third-line therapeutic option after EVLA or RFA and sclerotherapy.Although the mechanochemical endovenous ablation(MOCA)is a non-thermal,non-tumescent option and appears to be of similar efficacy to stab avulsion with no potential risk of nerve damage,the overall success rate of MOCA is lower than those of other procedures such as EVLA,RFA,or high ligation and stripping.EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option,with RFA being a close second for the treatment of patients with varicose veins.Endovenous thermal ablation(EVLA or RFA)is recommended as a first-line treatment for varicose veins and has substituted the high ligation of saphenofemoral junctional reflux and stripping of varicose veins.Ultrasound-guided FS is associated with a high recurrence rate and can be used in conjunction with other procedures.MOCA and cyanoacrylate embolization appear promising,but evidence of their effectiveness is required.展开更多
目的探讨日间手术模式下射频消融(RFA)闭合术治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效及安全性。方法收集2021年12月至2022年5月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的日间手术模式下治疗的101例大隐静脉曲张患者(112条肢体)的临床资料,按照手术方法的不...目的探讨日间手术模式下射频消融(RFA)闭合术治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效及安全性。方法收集2021年12月至2022年5月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的日间手术模式下治疗的101例大隐静脉曲张患者(112条肢体)的临床资料,按照手术方法的不同将患者分为高位结扎组(n=50)和RFA组(n=51)。比较两组患者围手术期相关指标、围手术期并发症发生率及术后3个月大隐静脉主干闭塞率。结果RFA组患者的术前禁食、禁水时间,手术时间,术后禁食、禁水时间,术后下床时间均短于高位结扎组患者,术中出血量少于高位结扎组患者,术中VAS评分高于高位结扎组患者,术后6 h VAS评分低于高位结扎组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月,RFA组患者的大隐静脉主干闭合率为98.2%(56/57),高位结扎组患者的大隐静脉主干闭合率为100%(55/55)。两组患者围手术期并发症的总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论RFA在日间手术模式下治疗下肢静脉曲张安全、有效,能够缩短术前禁食、禁水时间,手术时间,术后禁食、禁水时间,术后下床时间,减少术中出血量和术后疼痛程度,且不会增加围手术期相关并发症。展开更多
文摘<b>Background:</b>The objective of this work was to evaluate the first results of the radio ablation of the great saphenous vein in the processing of chronic venous insufficiency. <b>Method: </b>This is a monocentric retrospective study of radio ablation of the great saphenous vein using VNUS Closure<sup>®</sup> FAST for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein, between January 2012 and December 2014. <b>Results:</b> 42 patients (57 limbs) were operated on with this technology. There were 33 women and 9 men (mean age: 46.5 years). Thirty-nine patients (92. 8%) were symptomatic. Thirty-two patients (76.1%) were classified CEAP 2. The average diameter of the saphenous vein was 8.5 ± 1.5 mm. Three patients (7.1%) had a percutaneous approach. A perfect occlusion of the saphenous vein was observed in all patients. No incident or undesirable event was observed during the procedure. One case of delayed deep-vein thrombosis was observed. At one month of follow-up, six patients (14.2%) had induration opposite to the occluded vein. Forty-three percent of the pati<span style="letter-spacing:-0.1pt;">ents stated they were very satisfied with the procedure. <b>Conclusion:</b> The effectiveness, security and simplicity of the closure method are real. More studies are necessary to assess the long-term results of this procedure.</span>
文摘Patients with varicose veins can be treated with conservative or surgical approaches based on the clinical conditions and patient preferences.In the recent decade,the recommendations for managing symptomatic varicose veins have changed dramatically due to the rise of minimally invasive endovascular techniques.The literature was systematically searched on Medline without language restrictions.All papers on the treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency with different procedures were included and reviewed.Endovenous laser ablation(EVLA)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)both are same safe and effective in terms of occlusion rate,and time to return to normal activity.In comparison with RFA or EVLT,Cure conservatrice et Hemodynamique de l’Insufficience Veineuse en Ambulatoire(CHIVA)may cause more bruising and make little or no difference to rates of limb infection,superficial vein thrombosis,nerve injury,or hematoma.In terms of recurrence of varicose veins,there is little or no difference between CHIVA and stripping,RFA,or EVLT.Great saphenous vein recanalization is highest in the ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy(FS)group(51%)during 1 year of follow-up.The 2013 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines recommend surgery as a third-line therapeutic option after EVLA or RFA and sclerotherapy.Although the mechanochemical endovenous ablation(MOCA)is a non-thermal,non-tumescent option and appears to be of similar efficacy to stab avulsion with no potential risk of nerve damage,the overall success rate of MOCA is lower than those of other procedures such as EVLA,RFA,or high ligation and stripping.EVLA is the most cost-effective therapeutic option,with RFA being a close second for the treatment of patients with varicose veins.Endovenous thermal ablation(EVLA or RFA)is recommended as a first-line treatment for varicose veins and has substituted the high ligation of saphenofemoral junctional reflux and stripping of varicose veins.Ultrasound-guided FS is associated with a high recurrence rate and can be used in conjunction with other procedures.MOCA and cyanoacrylate embolization appear promising,but evidence of their effectiveness is required.
文摘目的探讨日间手术模式下射频消融(RFA)闭合术治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效及安全性。方法收集2021年12月至2022年5月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的日间手术模式下治疗的101例大隐静脉曲张患者(112条肢体)的临床资料,按照手术方法的不同将患者分为高位结扎组(n=50)和RFA组(n=51)。比较两组患者围手术期相关指标、围手术期并发症发生率及术后3个月大隐静脉主干闭塞率。结果RFA组患者的术前禁食、禁水时间,手术时间,术后禁食、禁水时间,术后下床时间均短于高位结扎组患者,术中出血量少于高位结扎组患者,术中VAS评分高于高位结扎组患者,术后6 h VAS评分低于高位结扎组患者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3个月,RFA组患者的大隐静脉主干闭合率为98.2%(56/57),高位结扎组患者的大隐静脉主干闭合率为100%(55/55)。两组患者围手术期并发症的总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论RFA在日间手术模式下治疗下肢静脉曲张安全、有效,能够缩短术前禁食、禁水时间,手术时间,术后禁食、禁水时间,术后下床时间,减少术中出血量和术后疼痛程度,且不会增加围手术期相关并发症。
