Transcranial magnetic stimulation,a type of noninvasive brain stimulation,has become an ancillary therapy for motor function rehabilitation.Most previous studies have focused on the effects of repetitive transcranial ...Transcranial magnetic stimulation,a type of noninvasive brain stimulation,has become an ancillary therapy for motor function rehabilitation.Most previous studies have focused on the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)on motor function in stroke patients.There have been relatively few studies on the effects of different modalities of rTMS on lower extremity motor function and corticospinal excitability in patients with stroke.The MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane Library,ISI Science Citation Index,Physiotherapy Evidence Database,China National Knowledge Infrastructure Library,and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched.Parallel or crossover randomized controlled trials that addressed the effectiveness of rTMS in patients with stroke,published from inception to November 28,2019,were included.Standard pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using R version 3.6.1 with the“meta”package.Bayesian network analysis using the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rTMS protocol interventions.Network meta-analysis results of 18 randomized controlled trials regarding lower extremity motor function recovery revealed that low-frequency rTMS had better efficacy in promoting lower extremity motor function recovery than sham stimulation.Network meta-analysis results of five randomized controlled trials demonstrated that highfrequency rTMS led to higher amplitudes of motor evoked potentials than low-frequency rTMS or sham stimulation.These findings suggest that rTMS can improve motor function in patients with stroke,and that low-frequency rTMS mainly affects motor function,whereas high-frequency rTMS increases the amplitudes of motor evoked potentials.More highquality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.The work was registered in PROSPERO(registration No.CRD42020147055)on April 28,2020.展开更多
BACKGROUND: In the natural evolution of cerebrovascular disease, unconscious use of affected extremity during drug treatment and daily life can improve the function of affected upper extremity partially, but it is ver...BACKGROUND: In the natural evolution of cerebrovascular disease, unconscious use of affected extremity during drug treatment and daily life can improve the function of affected upper extremity partially, but it is very slow and also accompanied by the formation of abnormal mode. Therefore, functional training should be emphasized in recovering the motor function of extremity. OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of combination of motor relearning program and Bobath method on motor function of upper extremity of patients with stroke. DESIGN: Comparison of therapeutic effects taking stroke patients as observation subjects. SETTING: Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Beijing Jingmei Group. PARTICIPANTS: Totally 120 stroke patients, including 60 males and 60 females, averaged (59±3) years, who hospitalized in the Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Beijing Jingmei Group between January 2005 and June 2006 were recruited. The involved patients met the following criteria: Stroke attack within 2 weeks; diagnosis criteria of cerebral hemorrhage or infarction made in the 4th National Cerebrovascular Disease Conference; confirmed by skull CT or MRI; Informed consents of therapeutic regimen were obtained. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to their wills: rehabilitation group and control group, with 30 males and 30 females in each group. Patients in rehabilitation group averaged (59±2)years old, and those in the control group averaged (58±2)years old. METHODS: ① Patients in two groups received routine treatment in the Department of Neurology. When the vital signs of patients in the rehabilitation group were stable, individualized treatment was conducted by combined application of motor relearning program and Bobath method. Meanwhile, training of activity of daily living was performed according to the disease condition changes of patients at different phases, including the nursing and instruction of body posture, the maintenance of good extremity position, bed exercise, bedside sit up and sitting position balance, sit up exercise, dynamic and static balance exercise, walking exercise, active training and passive training. The strength, time and speed of training were increased gradually according to their physical abilities. Patients were trained 45 to 60 minutes once, 5 times a week, within 2 weeks. ② Evaluation criteria of therapeutic effect: The motor function of upper extremity was evaluated by Fugl-Meyer method on the day of beginning and end of treatment. Higher points indicated better function of upper extremity. ③ t test and paired t test were used for comparing the difference of intergroup and intragroup measurement data, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in Fugl-Meyer scoring of two groups before and after treatment. RESULTS: Totally 120 stroke patients participated in the final analysis. Before treatment, Fugl-Meyer scoring was close between rehabilitation group and control group [(14.47±2.38),(14.16±2.39) points, P > 0.05]; Fugl-Meyer scoring of rehabilitation group after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment and that of control group[(37.93±2.67),(18.36±2.43) points, t =11.053, 5.408, P < 0.01]; There were no significant differences in Fugl-Meyer scoring between before treatment in the control group and control group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined application of motor relearning program and Bobath method can significantly improve the motor function of upper extremity of patients with stroke.展开更多
[Objectives]To observe the effect of motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on the motor function of lower extremities in patients with cerebral infarction,and to observe its effect on ...[Objectives]To observe the effect of motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on the motor function of lower extremities in patients with cerebral infarction,and to observe its effect on gait by 3D gait analysis.[Methods]60 patients with cerebral infarction who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the order of treatment(n=20).Group A received motor relearning treatment,group B received transcranial direct current stimulation treatment,group C received motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation,and the curative effect was observed after 5 courses of treatment.[Results]Before treatment,FMA,MBI,spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,stride length,gait speed,stride length deviation,double support)and lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,maximum knee extension,stance phase,swing phase)were compared among the three groups.After treatment,the FMA and MBI of the three groups increased,and the spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,gait speed,double support)and the lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,swing phase)were all improved,while the spatio-temporal parameters(stride length and stride length deviation)and the lower limb joint motion parameters(maximum knee extension and stance phase)decreased.Compared with those before treatment,there were significant differences among the three groups(P<0.05).Through the comparison between groups,it was found that the FMA,MBI,spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,gait speed,double support)and lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,swing phase)in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and B,while the spatio-temporal parameters(stride length and stride length deviation)and lower limb joint motion parameters(maximum knee extension and stance phase)in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).[Conclusions]Motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation could increase MBI and FMA,improve gait spatio-temporal parameters and lower limb joint motion parameters,and correct abnormal gait in patients with cerebral infarction.展开更多
目的:运用Meta分析方法系统评价康复外骨骼机器人对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的康复疗效,并比较不同下肢外骨骼机器人的疗效差异,为脑卒中下肢运动功能障碍患者选择适合的外骨骼机器人提供科学理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library...目的:运用Meta分析方法系统评价康复外骨骼机器人对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的康复疗效,并比较不同下肢外骨骼机器人的疗效差异,为脑卒中下肢运动功能障碍患者选择适合的外骨骼机器人提供科学理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、维普和万方数据库的相关文献,收集从建库至2022年11月发表的关于探讨下肢康复外骨骼机器人改善脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的随机对照临床试验。由2名研究人员进行文献检索与筛选,使用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具和Jadad量表对纳入文献进行质量评价。采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果:①最终纳入22篇文献,Jadad评分显示均为高质量文献,共865例患者,试验组436例、对照组429例。②Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,外骨骼机器人可显著提高脑卒中患者下肢运动功能(Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity,FMA-LE)评分(MD=2.63,95%CI:1.87-3.38,P<0.05)、平衡功能(Berg Balance Scale,BBS)评分(MD=3.62,95%CI:1.21-6.03,P<0.05)、站起-走测试量表(Timed Up and Go,TUG)评分(MD=-2.77,95%CI:-4.48至-1.05,P<0.05)和步频(MD=3.15,95%CI:1.57-4.72,P<0.05),但对功能性步行量表(Functional Ambulation Category Scale,FAC)评分(MD=0.30,95%CI:-0.01-0.61,P>0.05)和6 min步行测试(6-minute walk test,6MWT)评分(MD=3.77,95%CI:-6.60-14.14,P>0.05)的提高不明显。③网状Meta分析结果显示,FMA-LE评分:平地行走式外骨骼(MD=10.23,95%CI:3.81-27.49,P<0.05)和减重式外骨骼(MD=33.66,95%CI:11.49-98.54,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比均能改善FMA-LE评分,排序结果为减重式外骨骼>平地行走式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;BBS评分:减重式外骨骼(MD=79.86,95%CI:2.34-2725.99,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比能显著改善BBS评分,排序结果为减重式外骨骼>平地行走式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;FAC评分:平地行走式外骨骼(MD=1.38,95%CI:1.00-1.90,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比能显著改善FAC评分,排序结果为平地行走式外骨骼>减重式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;TUG评分:减重式外骨骼与常规康复治疗相比(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.01-0.51,P<0.05)能显著改善TUG评分,排序结果为平地行走式外骨骼>减重式外骨骼>常规康复治疗。结论:康复外骨骼机器人可以改善脑卒中患者平衡、步行以及日常生活活动能力,其中减重式外骨骼在提高下肢运动功能和平衡功能方面疗效更优,平地行走式外骨骼在提高功能性步行和转移能力方面疗效更佳。展开更多
目的系统评价上肢强化训练对脑瘫儿童上肢运动功能的效果。方法构建PICO架构,检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普和万方数据库,搜集关于上肢强化训练改善脑瘫儿童...目的系统评价上肢强化训练对脑瘫儿童上肢运动功能的效果。方法构建PICO架构,检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普和万方数据库,搜集关于上肢强化训练改善脑瘫儿童上肢运动功能的随机对照试验,检索时限均为2010年1月至2024年3月。按照Cochrane系统评价手册和物理治疗证据数据库量表对纳入文献进行质量评价,由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0进行网状Meta分析。结果共纳入27篇文献,包括1173例患者,涉及3种上肢强化训练。强制性运动疗法、改良强制性运动疗法和手-臂双侧强化训练均可提高辅助手功能评分与Peabody精细运动功能评分;强制性运动疗法和改良强制性运动疗法可提高上肢技能质量量表评分;手-臂双侧强化训练可提高儿童生活功能量表评分。在提高辅助手功能、上肢技能质量量表评分和Peabody精细运动功能评分方面,强制性运动疗法为最佳干预方式;在提高儿童生活功能量表评分方面,手-臂双侧强化训练为最佳干预方式。结论上肢强化训练可显著改善脑瘫儿童的上肢运动功能、精细运动功能和日常生活活动能力,强制性运动疗法在改善上肢运动功能和精细运动功能方面效果最好,手-臂双侧强化训练在提高日常生活活动能力方面疗效最佳。展开更多
目的:研究镜像神经元康复策略(Mirror Neuron System,MNS)联合经颅磁刺激(Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation,TMS)对卒中后神经与功能康复的作用。方法:选取2019年1月至2023年6月某部队康复中心收治的198例卒中后遗留有运动功能障碍患...目的:研究镜像神经元康复策略(Mirror Neuron System,MNS)联合经颅磁刺激(Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation,TMS)对卒中后神经与功能康复的作用。方法:选取2019年1月至2023年6月某部队康复中心收治的198例卒中后遗留有运动功能障碍患者,采用随机数字表法分为三组,各66例。三组均给予常规康复指导,磁刺激组给予TMS治疗,镜像组给予MNS治疗,联合组给予TMS+MNS治疗。比较三组干预前、干预2周后、干预4周后神经功能(NIHSS)、上下肢运动功能(FMA)、日常生活能力(ADL)、平衡能力(BBS)、上肢与下肢肌张力(MAS)、健患侧步长差、患侧负重时间百分比及语言功能。结果:联合组干预2周、4周后NIHSS评分低于磁刺激组、镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),磁刺激组、镜像组组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后FMA-上肢、FMA-下肢评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组高于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后ADL评分、BBS评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组高于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预4周后上肢和下肢MAS分级0~1级患者占比高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且磁刺激组高于镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后健患侧步长差低于磁刺激组、镜像组,患侧负重时间百分比高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组变化幅度大于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后语言功能中阅读理解、复述、流畅度、命名评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且磁刺激组高于镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MNS联合TMS能促进卒中后神经与功能康复,有利于改善患者日常生活能力,且二者各有优势,互相补充,联合治疗效果显著,值得临床推广。展开更多
基金supported by the 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,China,No.2020HXFH051(to QG).
文摘Transcranial magnetic stimulation,a type of noninvasive brain stimulation,has become an ancillary therapy for motor function rehabilitation.Most previous studies have focused on the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS)on motor function in stroke patients.There have been relatively few studies on the effects of different modalities of rTMS on lower extremity motor function and corticospinal excitability in patients with stroke.The MEDLINE,Embase,Cochrane Library,ISI Science Citation Index,Physiotherapy Evidence Database,China National Knowledge Infrastructure Library,and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched.Parallel or crossover randomized controlled trials that addressed the effectiveness of rTMS in patients with stroke,published from inception to November 28,2019,were included.Standard pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using R version 3.6.1 with the“meta”package.Bayesian network analysis using the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rTMS protocol interventions.Network meta-analysis results of 18 randomized controlled trials regarding lower extremity motor function recovery revealed that low-frequency rTMS had better efficacy in promoting lower extremity motor function recovery than sham stimulation.Network meta-analysis results of five randomized controlled trials demonstrated that highfrequency rTMS led to higher amplitudes of motor evoked potentials than low-frequency rTMS or sham stimulation.These findings suggest that rTMS can improve motor function in patients with stroke,and that low-frequency rTMS mainly affects motor function,whereas high-frequency rTMS increases the amplitudes of motor evoked potentials.More highquality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion.The work was registered in PROSPERO(registration No.CRD42020147055)on April 28,2020.
文摘BACKGROUND: In the natural evolution of cerebrovascular disease, unconscious use of affected extremity during drug treatment and daily life can improve the function of affected upper extremity partially, but it is very slow and also accompanied by the formation of abnormal mode. Therefore, functional training should be emphasized in recovering the motor function of extremity. OBJECTIVE: To observe the effects of combination of motor relearning program and Bobath method on motor function of upper extremity of patients with stroke. DESIGN: Comparison of therapeutic effects taking stroke patients as observation subjects. SETTING: Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Beijing Jingmei Group. PARTICIPANTS: Totally 120 stroke patients, including 60 males and 60 females, averaged (59±3) years, who hospitalized in the Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Beijing Jingmei Group between January 2005 and June 2006 were recruited. The involved patients met the following criteria: Stroke attack within 2 weeks; diagnosis criteria of cerebral hemorrhage or infarction made in the 4th National Cerebrovascular Disease Conference; confirmed by skull CT or MRI; Informed consents of therapeutic regimen were obtained. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to their wills: rehabilitation group and control group, with 30 males and 30 females in each group. Patients in rehabilitation group averaged (59±2)years old, and those in the control group averaged (58±2)years old. METHODS: ① Patients in two groups received routine treatment in the Department of Neurology. When the vital signs of patients in the rehabilitation group were stable, individualized treatment was conducted by combined application of motor relearning program and Bobath method. Meanwhile, training of activity of daily living was performed according to the disease condition changes of patients at different phases, including the nursing and instruction of body posture, the maintenance of good extremity position, bed exercise, bedside sit up and sitting position balance, sit up exercise, dynamic and static balance exercise, walking exercise, active training and passive training. The strength, time and speed of training were increased gradually according to their physical abilities. Patients were trained 45 to 60 minutes once, 5 times a week, within 2 weeks. ② Evaluation criteria of therapeutic effect: The motor function of upper extremity was evaluated by Fugl-Meyer method on the day of beginning and end of treatment. Higher points indicated better function of upper extremity. ③ t test and paired t test were used for comparing the difference of intergroup and intragroup measurement data, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in Fugl-Meyer scoring of two groups before and after treatment. RESULTS: Totally 120 stroke patients participated in the final analysis. Before treatment, Fugl-Meyer scoring was close between rehabilitation group and control group [(14.47±2.38),(14.16±2.39) points, P > 0.05]; Fugl-Meyer scoring of rehabilitation group after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment and that of control group[(37.93±2.67),(18.36±2.43) points, t =11.053, 5.408, P < 0.01]; There were no significant differences in Fugl-Meyer scoring between before treatment in the control group and control group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined application of motor relearning program and Bobath method can significantly improve the motor function of upper extremity of patients with stroke.
基金Supported by Scientific Research Project of Chinese Medicine of Hubei Provincial Health Commission(ZY2021Q015)Project of Taihe Hospital(2021JJXM077,2019JJXM099,2016JJXM023)。
文摘[Objectives]To observe the effect of motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on the motor function of lower extremities in patients with cerebral infarction,and to observe its effect on gait by 3D gait analysis.[Methods]60 patients with cerebral infarction who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into 3 groups according to the order of treatment(n=20).Group A received motor relearning treatment,group B received transcranial direct current stimulation treatment,group C received motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation,and the curative effect was observed after 5 courses of treatment.[Results]Before treatment,FMA,MBI,spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,stride length,gait speed,stride length deviation,double support)and lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,maximum knee extension,stance phase,swing phase)were compared among the three groups.After treatment,the FMA and MBI of the three groups increased,and the spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,gait speed,double support)and the lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,swing phase)were all improved,while the spatio-temporal parameters(stride length and stride length deviation)and the lower limb joint motion parameters(maximum knee extension and stance phase)decreased.Compared with those before treatment,there were significant differences among the three groups(P<0.05).Through the comparison between groups,it was found that the FMA,MBI,spatio-temporal parameters for 3D gait analysis(gait frequency,gait cycle,gait speed,double support)and lower limb joint motion parameters(affected side stride length,maximum hip flexion,maximum hip extension,maximum knee flexion,swing phase)in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and B,while the spatio-temporal parameters(stride length and stride length deviation)and lower limb joint motion parameters(maximum knee extension and stance phase)in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and group B,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).[Conclusions]Motor relearning combined with transcranial direct current stimulation could increase MBI and FMA,improve gait spatio-temporal parameters and lower limb joint motion parameters,and correct abnormal gait in patients with cerebral infarction.
文摘目的:运用Meta分析方法系统评价康复外骨骼机器人对脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的康复疗效,并比较不同下肢外骨骼机器人的疗效差异,为脑卒中下肢运动功能障碍患者选择适合的外骨骼机器人提供科学理论依据。方法:计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、维普和万方数据库的相关文献,收集从建库至2022年11月发表的关于探讨下肢康复外骨骼机器人改善脑卒中患者下肢运动功能的随机对照临床试验。由2名研究人员进行文献检索与筛选,使用Cochrane 5.1.0偏倚风险评估工具和Jadad量表对纳入文献进行质量评价。采用RevMan 5.4和Stata 17.0软件对结局指标进行Meta分析。结果:①最终纳入22篇文献,Jadad评分显示均为高质量文献,共865例患者,试验组436例、对照组429例。②Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,外骨骼机器人可显著提高脑卒中患者下肢运动功能(Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity,FMA-LE)评分(MD=2.63,95%CI:1.87-3.38,P<0.05)、平衡功能(Berg Balance Scale,BBS)评分(MD=3.62,95%CI:1.21-6.03,P<0.05)、站起-走测试量表(Timed Up and Go,TUG)评分(MD=-2.77,95%CI:-4.48至-1.05,P<0.05)和步频(MD=3.15,95%CI:1.57-4.72,P<0.05),但对功能性步行量表(Functional Ambulation Category Scale,FAC)评分(MD=0.30,95%CI:-0.01-0.61,P>0.05)和6 min步行测试(6-minute walk test,6MWT)评分(MD=3.77,95%CI:-6.60-14.14,P>0.05)的提高不明显。③网状Meta分析结果显示,FMA-LE评分:平地行走式外骨骼(MD=10.23,95%CI:3.81-27.49,P<0.05)和减重式外骨骼(MD=33.66,95%CI:11.49-98.54,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比均能改善FMA-LE评分,排序结果为减重式外骨骼>平地行走式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;BBS评分:减重式外骨骼(MD=79.86,95%CI:2.34-2725.99,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比能显著改善BBS评分,排序结果为减重式外骨骼>平地行走式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;FAC评分:平地行走式外骨骼(MD=1.38,95%CI:1.00-1.90,P<0.05)与常规康复治疗相比能显著改善FAC评分,排序结果为平地行走式外骨骼>减重式外骨骼>常规康复治疗;TUG评分:减重式外骨骼与常规康复治疗相比(MD=0.07,95%CI:0.01-0.51,P<0.05)能显著改善TUG评分,排序结果为平地行走式外骨骼>减重式外骨骼>常规康复治疗。结论:康复外骨骼机器人可以改善脑卒中患者平衡、步行以及日常生活活动能力,其中减重式外骨骼在提高下肢运动功能和平衡功能方面疗效更优,平地行走式外骨骼在提高功能性步行和转移能力方面疗效更佳。
文摘目的:研究镜像神经元康复策略(Mirror Neuron System,MNS)联合经颅磁刺激(Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation,TMS)对卒中后神经与功能康复的作用。方法:选取2019年1月至2023年6月某部队康复中心收治的198例卒中后遗留有运动功能障碍患者,采用随机数字表法分为三组,各66例。三组均给予常规康复指导,磁刺激组给予TMS治疗,镜像组给予MNS治疗,联合组给予TMS+MNS治疗。比较三组干预前、干预2周后、干预4周后神经功能(NIHSS)、上下肢运动功能(FMA)、日常生活能力(ADL)、平衡能力(BBS)、上肢与下肢肌张力(MAS)、健患侧步长差、患侧负重时间百分比及语言功能。结果:联合组干预2周、4周后NIHSS评分低于磁刺激组、镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),磁刺激组、镜像组组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后FMA-上肢、FMA-下肢评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组高于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后ADL评分、BBS评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组高于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预4周后上肢和下肢MAS分级0~1级患者占比高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且磁刺激组高于镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后健患侧步长差低于磁刺激组、镜像组,患侧负重时间百分比高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且镜像组变化幅度大于磁刺激组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组干预2周、4周后语言功能中阅读理解、复述、流畅度、命名评分高于磁刺激组、镜像组,且磁刺激组高于镜像组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MNS联合TMS能促进卒中后神经与功能康复,有利于改善患者日常生活能力,且二者各有优势,互相补充,联合治疗效果显著,值得临床推广。
文摘目的:探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激(transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation,taVNS)联合任务导向性训练对卒中后偏瘫患者上肢功能及脑可塑性的影响。方法:将40例卒中后偏瘫患者随机分配至试验组(n=20)或对照组(n=20)。试验组接受taVNS联合任务导向性训练,而对照组仅接受任务导向性训练。在基线、治疗结束后分别用运动诱发电位(motor evoked potentials,MEP)、上肢Fugl-Meyer运动功能评估量表(Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity,FMA-UE)、偏瘫上肢功能测试香港版(functional test for the hemiplegic upper extremity,FTHUE)、手臂动作调查测试(action research arm test,ARAT)、改良Barthel指数(modified Barthel index,MBI)、疲劳严重度量表(fatigue severity scale,FSS)对患者进行评定,同时对治疗过程中患者出现的不良反应进行监测。结果:两组FMA-UE、FTHUE、ARAT、MBI、FSS评分在基线无显著性差异(P>0.05),经21天治疗后,两组除FSS外其余指标均较基线提高(P<0.05),且试验组FMA-UE、FTHUE、ARAT、MBI(作业能力)得分优于对照组(P<0.05)。两组健侧MEP潜伏期、波幅以及患侧MEP引出率在基线无显著差异(P>0.05),治疗后试验组健侧MEP潜伏期较对照组缩短(P<0.05),患侧MEP引出率高于对照组(P<0.05),而两组间波幅无显著差异;试验组健侧MEP潜伏期缩短与FMA-UE、FTHUE、MBI(作业能力)改善程度的相关系数分别为-0.705、-0.458、-0.654,具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:taVNS联合任务导向性训练可以通过调节运动皮层的可塑性改善卒中后偏瘫患者的上肢运动功能。
