Medical practitioners are concerned with the selection of delivery mode after caesarean delivery.Several researchers have developed numerous models for predicting vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.This study sele...Medical practitioners are concerned with the selection of delivery mode after caesarean delivery.Several researchers have developed numerous models for predicting vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.This study selected seven widely used and representative advanced models,such as those of Grobman,Troyer and Parisi,Schoorel,Flamm,Gonen,Weinstain and Smith et al.,analysed the constitutions and clinical applications of the models and identified the factors associated with patients to provide midwives a scientific reference for vaginal delivery evaluation of pregnant women after caesarean delivery.展开更多
Background: The rising caesarean section rate worldwide is an increasing source of concern to all. A significant contributor to this is a previous caesarean delivery. One strategy in the armamentarium of obstetricians...Background: The rising caesarean section rate worldwide is an increasing source of concern to all. A significant contributor to this is a previous caesarean delivery. One strategy in the armamentarium of obstetricians for reducing this is vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC). The safety, outcome and complications of this procedure in our Center which is in a developing country had never been studied hence the need for this work. Aim: To find out the outcome and complications of vaginal births after one caesarean delivery in our Center. Method: A retrospective study involving a ten-year review of all cases of trials of labour after one caesarean delivery in our Center was done. Result: Of the 305 trials of labour after one caesarean delivery, 221 women had vaginal birth giving a vaginal birth after one caesarean section rate of 72.5%. Majority of the babies 303 (99.2%) were alive and had good Apgar scores while 2 (0.7%) died giving a perinatal mortality rate of 7 per 1000 babies. There were complications in 21 (6.7%) of the women with retained placenta, in 7 (2.3%) of the women as the commonest, followed by postpartum haemorrhage in 6 (1.96%). Five (1.62%) women had scar dehiscence while 3 (0.98%) had uterine rupture. Conclusion: Vaginal birth after one caesarean section is safe in well selected cases even in our resource poor settings. It offers our women a culturally-acceptable option of fulfilling long-held dreams of vaginal delivery even after one caesarean section and should be offered to our women whenever possible.展开更多
BACKGROUND With the increasing trend of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery(VBAC),evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a second VBAC with grand multiparity is worth considering.Intrapartum uterine rupture is...BACKGROUND With the increasing trend of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery(VBAC),evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a second VBAC with grand multiparity is worth considering.Intrapartum uterine rupture is diagnosed in approximately one-fifth of all VBAC cases following successful vaginal delivery.To our knowledge,no report is available on the application of laparoscopy to repair postpartum uterine rupture after a successful second VBAC in China.CASE SUMMARY A 31-year-old woman(gravida 5,para 2)at 39 wk and 5 d of gestation was admitted to the hospital in labour.After a successful VBAC and observation for approximately 13 h,the patient complained of progressive abdominal pain.Given the symptoms,signs,and auxiliary examination results,intraperitoneal bleeding was considered.Because the patient was stable and ultrasound imaging was the only method available to assess the possibility of rupture,we recommended laparoscopy to clarify the diagnosis and for prompt laparoscopic uterine repair or exploratory laparotomy if necessary.Operative findings included transverse uterine scar rupture at the lower uterine segment of approximately 5.0 cm in length and 800 mL of intraoperative pelvic haemoperitoneum.Finally,she successfully underwent laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture and recovered very well according to three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 42 d postpartum.CONCLUSION Routine postpartum intrauterine exploration is not beneficial to the mother and may even increase the risk of rupture.This case highlights a laparoscopic approach for repairing uterine rupture in the immediate postpartum period.展开更多
Background: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) has long been accepted as a safe option for women with previous cesarean delivery. Previous efforts have been exerted in trials to predict the success rates o...Background: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) has long been accepted as a safe option for women with previous cesarean delivery. Previous efforts have been exerted in trials to predict the success rates of TOLAC according to specific parameters related to previous cesarean section and before TOLAC. We aimed to investigate the different indications of previous cesarean delivery as independent predictors for successful vaginal birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Armed Forces Hospitals of the Southern Region between December 15, 2019, and July 1, 2020. The included 566 patients with previous cesarean section who were willing to undergo a trial of labor were divided into two groups according to the success of vaginal birth (VBAC). Results: The nonrecurring indications for previous cesarean delivery were higher in the successful group (fetal distress 54.7% vs 41.1%, malpresentation 26% vs 21.4%, multifetal pregnancy 3.8% vs 2.7%). Additionally, the successful VBAC group had a significantly higher percentage of previous successful VBAC (47.7% vs 21.9%) and prior vaginal deliveries (58.5% vs 44.2%) and less coincidence of medical disorders and meconium-stained liquor (18.1% vs 26.3% and 3.2% vs 8.2%, respectively) than the unsuccessful group. Conclusion: During counseling regarding trial of labor after cesarean section, indications for previous cesarean section not related to arrest of labor can predict higher success of VBAC. Moreover, previous successful vaginal delivery or VBAC improves the success rates.展开更多
Background: Trial of labour after Caesarean section (TOLAC) refers to an attempt at vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section. Outcome is influenced by a number of factors which are important in patient’s s...Background: Trial of labour after Caesarean section (TOLAC) refers to an attempt at vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section. Outcome is influenced by a number of factors which are important in patient’s selection. Objectives: The aim of this study was to find out the incidence and feto-maternal outcome of the practice of Trial of labour after Caesarean section. Methodology: This is a retrospective study of cases of vaginal birth after Caesarean section Data were retrieved from the case notes of patients who attempted vaginal birth after Caesarean section from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017, a period of five years. Result: There were 10,669 deliveries, 3179 of which were through Caesarean section. This gave a Caesarean section rate of 29.8%. A total of 217 patients attempted vaginal birth after Caesarean section and 83 ended up as repeat Caesarean section (38.2%) while 138 (61.8%) had successful vaginal birth after Caesarean section. Patients with previous vaginal delivery, age range 25 - 29 years and interdelivery interval of greater than or equal to 2 years were more successful at achieving vaginal birth after Caesarean section. The leading indications for the repeat Caesarean section include cephalopelvic disproportion (45.8%), poor progress of labour (19.3%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.4%). Conclusion: Vaginal birth after Caesarean section was successful in most of the parturients that attempted it in this study especially in patients within the age range of 25 - 29 years, those that have had previous vaginal delivery and with interdelivery interval of greater than or equal to 2 years.展开更多
文摘Medical practitioners are concerned with the selection of delivery mode after caesarean delivery.Several researchers have developed numerous models for predicting vaginal birth after caesarean delivery.This study selected seven widely used and representative advanced models,such as those of Grobman,Troyer and Parisi,Schoorel,Flamm,Gonen,Weinstain and Smith et al.,analysed the constitutions and clinical applications of the models and identified the factors associated with patients to provide midwives a scientific reference for vaginal delivery evaluation of pregnant women after caesarean delivery.
文摘Background: The rising caesarean section rate worldwide is an increasing source of concern to all. A significant contributor to this is a previous caesarean delivery. One strategy in the armamentarium of obstetricians for reducing this is vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC). The safety, outcome and complications of this procedure in our Center which is in a developing country had never been studied hence the need for this work. Aim: To find out the outcome and complications of vaginal births after one caesarean delivery in our Center. Method: A retrospective study involving a ten-year review of all cases of trials of labour after one caesarean delivery in our Center was done. Result: Of the 305 trials of labour after one caesarean delivery, 221 women had vaginal birth giving a vaginal birth after one caesarean section rate of 72.5%. Majority of the babies 303 (99.2%) were alive and had good Apgar scores while 2 (0.7%) died giving a perinatal mortality rate of 7 per 1000 babies. There were complications in 21 (6.7%) of the women with retained placenta, in 7 (2.3%) of the women as the commonest, followed by postpartum haemorrhage in 6 (1.96%). Five (1.62%) women had scar dehiscence while 3 (0.98%) had uterine rupture. Conclusion: Vaginal birth after one caesarean section is safe in well selected cases even in our resource poor settings. It offers our women a culturally-acceptable option of fulfilling long-held dreams of vaginal delivery even after one caesarean section and should be offered to our women whenever possible.
基金Supported by International Peace Maternal and Child Health Institute Clinical Research Program,No.YN201910Translational Medicine Cross Fund from Shanghai Jiao Tong University,No.YG2017QN38.
文摘BACKGROUND With the increasing trend of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery(VBAC),evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a second VBAC with grand multiparity is worth considering.Intrapartum uterine rupture is diagnosed in approximately one-fifth of all VBAC cases following successful vaginal delivery.To our knowledge,no report is available on the application of laparoscopy to repair postpartum uterine rupture after a successful second VBAC in China.CASE SUMMARY A 31-year-old woman(gravida 5,para 2)at 39 wk and 5 d of gestation was admitted to the hospital in labour.After a successful VBAC and observation for approximately 13 h,the patient complained of progressive abdominal pain.Given the symptoms,signs,and auxiliary examination results,intraperitoneal bleeding was considered.Because the patient was stable and ultrasound imaging was the only method available to assess the possibility of rupture,we recommended laparoscopy to clarify the diagnosis and for prompt laparoscopic uterine repair or exploratory laparotomy if necessary.Operative findings included transverse uterine scar rupture at the lower uterine segment of approximately 5.0 cm in length and 800 mL of intraoperative pelvic haemoperitoneum.Finally,she successfully underwent laparoscopic repair of uterine rupture and recovered very well according to three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 42 d postpartum.CONCLUSION Routine postpartum intrauterine exploration is not beneficial to the mother and may even increase the risk of rupture.This case highlights a laparoscopic approach for repairing uterine rupture in the immediate postpartum period.
文摘Background: Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) has long been accepted as a safe option for women with previous cesarean delivery. Previous efforts have been exerted in trials to predict the success rates of TOLAC according to specific parameters related to previous cesarean section and before TOLAC. We aimed to investigate the different indications of previous cesarean delivery as independent predictors for successful vaginal birth. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Armed Forces Hospitals of the Southern Region between December 15, 2019, and July 1, 2020. The included 566 patients with previous cesarean section who were willing to undergo a trial of labor were divided into two groups according to the success of vaginal birth (VBAC). Results: The nonrecurring indications for previous cesarean delivery were higher in the successful group (fetal distress 54.7% vs 41.1%, malpresentation 26% vs 21.4%, multifetal pregnancy 3.8% vs 2.7%). Additionally, the successful VBAC group had a significantly higher percentage of previous successful VBAC (47.7% vs 21.9%) and prior vaginal deliveries (58.5% vs 44.2%) and less coincidence of medical disorders and meconium-stained liquor (18.1% vs 26.3% and 3.2% vs 8.2%, respectively) than the unsuccessful group. Conclusion: During counseling regarding trial of labor after cesarean section, indications for previous cesarean section not related to arrest of labor can predict higher success of VBAC. Moreover, previous successful vaginal delivery or VBAC improves the success rates.
文摘Background: Trial of labour after Caesarean section (TOLAC) refers to an attempt at vaginal delivery after a previous caesarean section. Outcome is influenced by a number of factors which are important in patient’s selection. Objectives: The aim of this study was to find out the incidence and feto-maternal outcome of the practice of Trial of labour after Caesarean section. Methodology: This is a retrospective study of cases of vaginal birth after Caesarean section Data were retrieved from the case notes of patients who attempted vaginal birth after Caesarean section from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017, a period of five years. Result: There were 10,669 deliveries, 3179 of which were through Caesarean section. This gave a Caesarean section rate of 29.8%. A total of 217 patients attempted vaginal birth after Caesarean section and 83 ended up as repeat Caesarean section (38.2%) while 138 (61.8%) had successful vaginal birth after Caesarean section. Patients with previous vaginal delivery, age range 25 - 29 years and interdelivery interval of greater than or equal to 2 years were more successful at achieving vaginal birth after Caesarean section. The leading indications for the repeat Caesarean section include cephalopelvic disproportion (45.8%), poor progress of labour (19.3%) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (8.4%). Conclusion: Vaginal birth after Caesarean section was successful in most of the parturients that attempted it in this study especially in patients within the age range of 25 - 29 years, those that have had previous vaginal delivery and with interdelivery interval of greater than or equal to 2 years.
