Background Central venous pressure （CVP） and intrathoracic blood volume index （ITBVI） were used to assess the fluid status. It has previously been shown that CVP is not as accurate as ITBVI for all the shock patie...Background Central venous pressure （CVP） and intrathoracic blood volume index （ITBVI） were used to assess the fluid status. It has previously been shown that CVP is not as accurate as ITBVI for all the shock patients. We therefore hypothesized that the change of CVP has the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in some clinical cases of shock. Methods From September 1st 2009 to September 1st 2011, sixty-three patients with shock from different Intensive Care Unit （ICU） were collected into this retrospective study. All the patients received fluid challenge strategy （infusing 300 ml hydroxyethyl starch in 20 minutes）, were monitored with CVP and pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output （PICCO）. The correlation between changes in cardiac index （ACI）, CVP （ACVP） and ITBVI （AITBVI） were analyzed. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI 〉10%. Receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curves were generated for ACVP and AITBVI. Results For all the patients, there was no correlation between ACI and ACVP （P=0.073）, but in the subgroup analysis, the correlation between ACI and ACVP was significant in those younger than 60 years old （P=0.018） and those with hypovolemic shock （P=0.001）. The difference of areas under the ROC curves of ACVP and AITBVI were not statistically significant in the group younger than 60 years old or hypovolemic shock group （P 〉0.05, respectively）. However, no similar results can be found in the group older than 60 years old and the other two shock type groups from ROC curves of ACVP and AITBVI. Conclusions ACVP is not suitable for evaluating the volume status of the shock patients with fluid resuscitation regardless of their condition. However, in some ways, ACVP have the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in the younger shock patients or in the hypovolemic shock patients.展开更多
To assess the in-hospital clinical course and the long-term evolution of acute massive pulmonary embolism after thrombolytic therapy and to identify predictors of adverse clinical outcome Methods A total of 260 pati...To assess the in-hospital clinical course and the long-term evolution of acute massive pulmonary embolism after thrombolytic therapy and to identify predictors of adverse clinical outcome Methods A total of 260 patients hospitalized from January 1989 to October 1998 were retrospectively reviewed and followed up for 3 9 to 8 4 years Baseline characteristics and variables pre- and post-thrombolysis were identified Particular attention was paid to the clinical events, including death, recurrent thromboembolism, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and major bleeding attributable to the use of anticoagulants Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves were generated Univariate analysis by means of the log-rank test was used to test each candidate variable for association with clinical outcome Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine independent predictors of the long-term outcome Results The in-hospital mortality rate was 8 5%, with 68 2% due to pulmonary embolism itself, and the follow-up mortality rate was 31 7%, with 29 2% due to recurrent embolism Factors associated with an adverse outcome in univariate analysis were: (1) prior thromboembolic diseases; (2) duration of anticoagulant therapy <6 months; (3) inferior vena caval filter placement; (4) acute right ventricular dysfunction/dilation detected echocardiographically after thrombolysis; (5) Doppler recording of pulmonary artery systolic pressure >50 mmHg after thrombolysis; and (6) greater than 30% obstruction of pulmonary vasculature identified by pulmonary ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy before hospital discharge Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of poor long-term outcome for patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism after thrombolysis; which were: (1) Doppler recording of pulmonary artery systolic pressure >50 mm Hg, with relative risk of 3 78 and a 95% confidence interval of 2 70 to 4 86; (2) echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction/dilatation (relative risk: 2 18; 95% confidence interval: 1 48 to 2 88); and (3) greater than 30% obstruction of pulmonary vasculature documented by lung scan (relative risk: 1 99; 95% confidence interval: 1 25 to 2 70) Conclusion The study showed that Doppler echocardiographic assessments after thrombolytic therapy and ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy prior to hospital discharge are valuable to establishment of new baseline characteristics, which is informative for risk stratification and prognostication of the long-term outcome for patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism展开更多
文摘Background Central venous pressure （CVP） and intrathoracic blood volume index （ITBVI） were used to assess the fluid status. It has previously been shown that CVP is not as accurate as ITBVI for all the shock patients. We therefore hypothesized that the change of CVP has the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in some clinical cases of shock. Methods From September 1st 2009 to September 1st 2011, sixty-three patients with shock from different Intensive Care Unit （ICU） were collected into this retrospective study. All the patients received fluid challenge strategy （infusing 300 ml hydroxyethyl starch in 20 minutes）, were monitored with CVP and pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output （PICCO）. The correlation between changes in cardiac index （ACI）, CVP （ACVP） and ITBVI （AITBVI） were analyzed. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI 〉10%. Receiver operating characteristic （ROC） curves were generated for ACVP and AITBVI. Results For all the patients, there was no correlation between ACI and ACVP （P=0.073）, but in the subgroup analysis, the correlation between ACI and ACVP was significant in those younger than 60 years old （P=0.018） and those with hypovolemic shock （P=0.001）. The difference of areas under the ROC curves of ACVP and AITBVI were not statistically significant in the group younger than 60 years old or hypovolemic shock group （P 〉0.05, respectively）. However, no similar results can be found in the group older than 60 years old and the other two shock type groups from ROC curves of ACVP and AITBVI. Conclusions ACVP is not suitable for evaluating the volume status of the shock patients with fluid resuscitation regardless of their condition. However, in some ways, ACVP have the ability to predict fluid responsiveness in the younger shock patients or in the hypovolemic shock patients.
文摘To assess the in-hospital clinical course and the long-term evolution of acute massive pulmonary embolism after thrombolytic therapy and to identify predictors of adverse clinical outcome Methods A total of 260 patients hospitalized from January 1989 to October 1998 were retrospectively reviewed and followed up for 3 9 to 8 4 years Baseline characteristics and variables pre- and post-thrombolysis were identified Particular attention was paid to the clinical events, including death, recurrent thromboembolism, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and major bleeding attributable to the use of anticoagulants Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves were generated Univariate analysis by means of the log-rank test was used to test each candidate variable for association with clinical outcome Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine independent predictors of the long-term outcome Results The in-hospital mortality rate was 8 5%, with 68 2% due to pulmonary embolism itself, and the follow-up mortality rate was 31 7%, with 29 2% due to recurrent embolism Factors associated with an adverse outcome in univariate analysis were: (1) prior thromboembolic diseases; (2) duration of anticoagulant therapy <6 months; (3) inferior vena caval filter placement; (4) acute right ventricular dysfunction/dilation detected echocardiographically after thrombolysis; (5) Doppler recording of pulmonary artery systolic pressure >50 mmHg after thrombolysis; and (6) greater than 30% obstruction of pulmonary vasculature identified by pulmonary ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy before hospital discharge Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of poor long-term outcome for patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism after thrombolysis; which were: (1) Doppler recording of pulmonary artery systolic pressure >50 mm Hg, with relative risk of 3 78 and a 95% confidence interval of 2 70 to 4 86; (2) echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction/dilatation (relative risk: 2 18; 95% confidence interval: 1 48 to 2 88); and (3) greater than 30% obstruction of pulmonary vasculature documented by lung scan (relative risk: 1 99; 95% confidence interval: 1 25 to 2 70) Conclusion The study showed that Doppler echocardiographic assessments after thrombolytic therapy and ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy prior to hospital discharge are valuable to establishment of new baseline characteristics, which is informative for risk stratification and prognostication of the long-term outcome for patients with acute massive pulmonary embolism
