To quantify drug-drug-interactions (DDIs) encountered in patients prescribed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, the interventions made, and the time spent in this process.METHODSAs standard of care, a clinical pharmac...To quantify drug-drug-interactions (DDIs) encountered in patients prescribed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, the interventions made, and the time spent in this process.METHODSAs standard of care, a clinical pharmacist screened for DDIs in patients prescribed direct acting antiviral (DAA) HCV treatment between November 2013 and July 2015 at the University of Colorado Hepatology Clinic. HCV regimens prescribed included ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV), simeprevir/sofosbuvir (SIM/SOF), and sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SOF/RBV). This retrospective analysis reviewed the work completed by the clinical pharmacist in order to measure the aims identified for the study. The number and type of DDIs identified were summarized with descriptive statistics.RESULTSSix hundred and sixty four patients (83.4% Caucasian, 57% male, average 56.7 years old) were identified; 369 for LDV/SOF, 48 for OBV/PTV/r + DSV, 114 for SIM/SOF, and 133 for SOF/RBV. Fifty-one point five per cent of patients were cirrhotic. Overall, 5217 medications were reviewed (7.86 medications per patient) and 781 interactions identified (1.18 interactions per patient). The number of interactions were fewest for SOF/RBV (0.17 interactions per patient) and highest for OBV/PTV/r + DSV (2.48 interactions per patient). LDV/SOF and SIM/SOF had similar number of interactions (1.28 and 1.48 interactions per patient, respectively). Gastric acid modifiers and vitamin/herbal supplements commonly caused interactions with LDV/SOF. Hypertensive agents, analgesics, and psychiatric medications frequently caused interactions with OBV/PTV/r + DSV and SIM/SOF. To manage these interactions, the pharmacists most often recommended discontinuing the medication (28.9%), increasing monitoring for toxicities (24.1%), or separating administration times (18.2%). The pharmacist chart review for each patient usually took approximately 30 min, with additional time for more complex patients.CONCLUSIONDDIs are common with HCV medications and management can require medication adjustments and increased monitoring. An interdisciplinary team including a clinical pharmacist can optimize patient care.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assi...AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assignment, unblinded study, we treated fifty-six menopausal women with HCV-G1, 46% F3-F4, and previous PEG-α/RBV failure(7% null, 41% non-responder, and 52% relapser) with 4 wk lead-in with PEG-IFNα2b/RBV followed by PEGIFNα2b/RBV+Boceprevir for 32 wk, with an additional 12 wk of PEG-IFN-α-2b/RBV if patients were HCV-RNApositive by week 8. In previous null-responders, 44 wk of triple therapy was used. The primary objective of retreatment was to verify whether a sustained virological response(SVR)(HCV RNA undetectable at 24 wk of follow-up) rate of at least 20% could be obtained. The secondary objective was the evaluation of the percent of patients with negative HCV RNA at week 4(RVR), 8(RVR BOC), 12(EVR), or at the end-of-treatment(ETR) that reached SVR. To assess the relationship between SVR and clinical and biochemical parameters, multiple logistic regression analysis was used.RESULTS: After lead-in, only two patients had RVR; HCV-RNA was unchanged in all but 62% who had ≤1 log10 decrease. After Boceprevir, HCV RNA became undetectable at week 8 in 32/56(57.1%) and at week 12 in 41/56(73.2%). Of these, 53.8% and 52.0%, respectively, achieved SVR. Overall, SVR was obtained in 25/56(44.6%). SVR was achieved in 55% previous relapsers vs. 41% non-responders(P = 0.250), in 44% F0-F2 vs 54% F3-F4(P = 0.488), and in 11/19(57.9%) of patients with cirrhosis. At univariate analysis for baseline predictors of SVR, only previous response to antiviral therapy(OR = 2.662, 95%CI: 0.957-6.881, P = 0.043), was related with SVR. When considering "on treatment" factors, 1 log10 HCV RNA decline at week 4(3.733, 95%CI: 1.676-12.658, P = 0.034) and achievement of RVR BOC(7.347, 95%CI: 2.156-25.035, P = 0.001) were significantly related with the SVR, although RVR BOC only(6.794, 95%CI: 1.596-21.644, P = 0.010) maintained significance at multivariate logistic regression analysis. Anemia and neutropenia were managed with Erythropoietin and Filgrastim supplementation, respectively. Only six patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Boceprevir obtained high SVR response independent of previous response, RVR or baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis. RVR BOC was the only independent predictor of SVR.展开更多
Human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV)share the same transmission routes;therefore,coinfection is frequent.An estimated 5-10 million individuals alone in the western world are infected with both v...Human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV)share the same transmission routes;therefore,coinfection is frequent.An estimated 5-10 million individuals alone in the western world are infected with both viruses.The majority of people acquire HCV by injection drug use and,to a lesser extent,through blood transfusion and blood products.Recently,there has been an increase in HCV infections among men who have sex with men.In the context of effective antiretroviral treatment,liver-related deaths are now more common than Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromerelated deaths among HIV-HCV coinfected individuals.Morbidity and mortality rates from chronic HCV infection will increase because the infection incidence peaked in the mid-1980s and because liver disease progresses slowly and is clinically silent to cirrhosis and end-stage-liver disease over a 15-20 year time period for 15%-20%of chronically infected individuals.HCV treatment has rapidly changed with the development of new direct-acting antiviral agents;therefore,cure rates have greatly improved because the new treatment regimens target different parts of the HCV life cycle.In this review,we focus on the epidemiology,diagnosis and the natural course of HCV as well as current and future strategies for HCV therapy in the context of HIV-HCV coinfection in the western world.展开更多
Injection drug users(IDUs)are at risk of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection,due to needle and syringe sharing.Chronic HCV infection is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality but can be cured with antivira...Injection drug users(IDUs)are at risk of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection,due to needle and syringe sharing.Chronic HCV infection is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality but can be cured with antiviral treatment leading to sustained viral response(SVR).It is well demonstrated that,when close cooperation between specialists in drug addiction and psychiatrists is assured,patients on maintenance treatment with methadone/buprenorphine can be treated for HCV with response rate,tolerability and side effects similar to those reported in non-IDUs.Current guidelines recommend that active injection drug use should not exclude patients from HCV treatment,but many services remain reluctant to treat IDUs.No significant pharmacodynamic interactions were reported between approved direct anti-viral agents(DAAs)and buprenorphine or methadone.Dose adjustments are not recommended;therefore DAAs appear to be the"perfect"therapy for patients taking opiate substitutive therapy.These suggestions have been recently recognized by the European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL)and included in EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2016.Guidelines confirm that HCV treatment for IDUs should be considered on an individualized basis and delivered within a multidisciplinary team setting;a history of intravenous drug use and recent drug use at treatment initiation are not associated with reduced SVR and decisions to treat must be made on a case-by-case basis.展开更多
Hepatitis associated anti-tuberculous treatment（HATT） has been a main obstacle in managing patients co-infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus（HBV）. Therefore, we evaluated the factors relat...Hepatitis associated anti-tuberculous treatment（HATT） has been a main obstacle in managing patients co-infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus（HBV）. Therefore, we evaluated the factors related to the severity of adverse effects during HATT, especially those associated with liver failure. A retrospective study was carried out at Tongji Hospital from 2007 to 2012. Increases in serum transaminase levels of 〉3, 5, and 10 times the upper limit of normal（ULN） were used to define liver damage as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Patients with elevated total bilirubin（TBil） levels that were more than 10 times the ULN（〉171 μmol/L） with or without decreased（〈40%） prothrombin activity（PTA） were diagnosed with liver failure. A cohort of 87 patients was analyzed. The incidence of liver damage and liver failure was 59.8%（n=52） and 25.3%（n=22）, respectively. The following variables were correlated with the severity of hepatotoxicity： albumin（ALB） levels, PTA, platelet counts（PLT）, and the use of antiretroviral therapies（P〈0.05）. Hypo-proteinemia and antiretroviral therapy were significantly associated with liver failure, and high viral loads were a significant risk factor with an odds ratio（OR） of 2.066. Judicious follow-up of clinical conditions, liver function tests, and coagulation function, especially in patients with high HBV loads and hypoalbuminemia is recommended. It may be advisable to reconsider the use of antiviral drugs failure during the course of anti-tuberculous treatment of HBV infection patients to avoid the occurrence of furious liver failure.展开更多
文摘To quantify drug-drug-interactions (DDIs) encountered in patients prescribed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, the interventions made, and the time spent in this process.METHODSAs standard of care, a clinical pharmacist screened for DDIs in patients prescribed direct acting antiviral (DAA) HCV treatment between November 2013 and July 2015 at the University of Colorado Hepatology Clinic. HCV regimens prescribed included ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), paritaprevir/ritonavir/ombitasvir/dasabuvir (OBV/PTV/r + DSV), simeprevir/sofosbuvir (SIM/SOF), and sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SOF/RBV). This retrospective analysis reviewed the work completed by the clinical pharmacist in order to measure the aims identified for the study. The number and type of DDIs identified were summarized with descriptive statistics.RESULTSSix hundred and sixty four patients (83.4% Caucasian, 57% male, average 56.7 years old) were identified; 369 for LDV/SOF, 48 for OBV/PTV/r + DSV, 114 for SIM/SOF, and 133 for SOF/RBV. Fifty-one point five per cent of patients were cirrhotic. Overall, 5217 medications were reviewed (7.86 medications per patient) and 781 interactions identified (1.18 interactions per patient). The number of interactions were fewest for SOF/RBV (0.17 interactions per patient) and highest for OBV/PTV/r + DSV (2.48 interactions per patient). LDV/SOF and SIM/SOF had similar number of interactions (1.28 and 1.48 interactions per patient, respectively). Gastric acid modifiers and vitamin/herbal supplements commonly caused interactions with LDV/SOF. Hypertensive agents, analgesics, and psychiatric medications frequently caused interactions with OBV/PTV/r + DSV and SIM/SOF. To manage these interactions, the pharmacists most often recommended discontinuing the medication (28.9%), increasing monitoring for toxicities (24.1%), or separating administration times (18.2%). The pharmacist chart review for each patient usually took approximately 30 min, with additional time for more complex patients.CONCLUSIONDDIs are common with HCV medications and management can require medication adjustments and increased monitoring. An interdisciplinary team including a clinical pharmacist can optimize patient care.
文摘AIM: To investigate the safety/efficacy of Boceprevirbased triple therapy in hepatitis C virus(HCV)-G1 menopausal women who were historic relapsers, partial-responders and null-responders. METHODS: In this single-assignment, unblinded study, we treated fifty-six menopausal women with HCV-G1, 46% F3-F4, and previous PEG-α/RBV failure(7% null, 41% non-responder, and 52% relapser) with 4 wk lead-in with PEG-IFNα2b/RBV followed by PEGIFNα2b/RBV+Boceprevir for 32 wk, with an additional 12 wk of PEG-IFN-α-2b/RBV if patients were HCV-RNApositive by week 8. In previous null-responders, 44 wk of triple therapy was used. The primary objective of retreatment was to verify whether a sustained virological response(SVR)(HCV RNA undetectable at 24 wk of follow-up) rate of at least 20% could be obtained. The secondary objective was the evaluation of the percent of patients with negative HCV RNA at week 4(RVR), 8(RVR BOC), 12(EVR), or at the end-of-treatment(ETR) that reached SVR. To assess the relationship between SVR and clinical and biochemical parameters, multiple logistic regression analysis was used.RESULTS: After lead-in, only two patients had RVR; HCV-RNA was unchanged in all but 62% who had ≤1 log10 decrease. After Boceprevir, HCV RNA became undetectable at week 8 in 32/56(57.1%) and at week 12 in 41/56(73.2%). Of these, 53.8% and 52.0%, respectively, achieved SVR. Overall, SVR was obtained in 25/56(44.6%). SVR was achieved in 55% previous relapsers vs. 41% non-responders(P = 0.250), in 44% F0-F2 vs 54% F3-F4(P = 0.488), and in 11/19(57.9%) of patients with cirrhosis. At univariate analysis for baseline predictors of SVR, only previous response to antiviral therapy(OR = 2.662, 95%CI: 0.957-6.881, P = 0.043), was related with SVR. When considering "on treatment" factors, 1 log10 HCV RNA decline at week 4(3.733, 95%CI: 1.676-12.658, P = 0.034) and achievement of RVR BOC(7.347, 95%CI: 2.156-25.035, P = 0.001) were significantly related with the SVR, although RVR BOC only(6.794, 95%CI: 1.596-21.644, P = 0.010) maintained significance at multivariate logistic regression analysis. Anemia and neutropenia were managed with Erythropoietin and Filgrastim supplementation, respectively. Only six patients discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Boceprevir obtained high SVR response independent of previous response, RVR or baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis. RVR BOC was the only independent predictor of SVR.
文摘Human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV)share the same transmission routes;therefore,coinfection is frequent.An estimated 5-10 million individuals alone in the western world are infected with both viruses.The majority of people acquire HCV by injection drug use and,to a lesser extent,through blood transfusion and blood products.Recently,there has been an increase in HCV infections among men who have sex with men.In the context of effective antiretroviral treatment,liver-related deaths are now more common than Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromerelated deaths among HIV-HCV coinfected individuals.Morbidity and mortality rates from chronic HCV infection will increase because the infection incidence peaked in the mid-1980s and because liver disease progresses slowly and is clinically silent to cirrhosis and end-stage-liver disease over a 15-20 year time period for 15%-20%of chronically infected individuals.HCV treatment has rapidly changed with the development of new direct-acting antiviral agents;therefore,cure rates have greatly improved because the new treatment regimens target different parts of the HCV life cycle.In this review,we focus on the epidemiology,diagnosis and the natural course of HCV as well as current and future strategies for HCV therapy in the context of HIV-HCV coinfection in the western world.
文摘Injection drug users(IDUs)are at risk of hepatitis C virus(HCV)infection,due to needle and syringe sharing.Chronic HCV infection is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality but can be cured with antiviral treatment leading to sustained viral response(SVR).It is well demonstrated that,when close cooperation between specialists in drug addiction and psychiatrists is assured,patients on maintenance treatment with methadone/buprenorphine can be treated for HCV with response rate,tolerability and side effects similar to those reported in non-IDUs.Current guidelines recommend that active injection drug use should not exclude patients from HCV treatment,but many services remain reluctant to treat IDUs.No significant pharmacodynamic interactions were reported between approved direct anti-viral agents(DAAs)and buprenorphine or methadone.Dose adjustments are not recommended;therefore DAAs appear to be the"perfect"therapy for patients taking opiate substitutive therapy.These suggestions have been recently recognized by the European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL)and included in EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2016.Guidelines confirm that HCV treatment for IDUs should be considered on an individualized basis and delivered within a multidisciplinary team setting;a history of intravenous drug use and recent drug use at treatment initiation are not associated with reduced SVR and decisions to treat must be made on a case-by-case basis.
基金supported in part by the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China 2015“sunshine of the west”visiting scholar program(No.2903)
文摘Hepatitis associated anti-tuberculous treatment（HATT） has been a main obstacle in managing patients co-infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and hepatitis B virus（HBV）. Therefore, we evaluated the factors related to the severity of adverse effects during HATT, especially those associated with liver failure. A retrospective study was carried out at Tongji Hospital from 2007 to 2012. Increases in serum transaminase levels of 〉3, 5, and 10 times the upper limit of normal（ULN） were used to define liver damage as mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. Patients with elevated total bilirubin（TBil） levels that were more than 10 times the ULN（〉171 μmol/L） with or without decreased（〈40%） prothrombin activity（PTA） were diagnosed with liver failure. A cohort of 87 patients was analyzed. The incidence of liver damage and liver failure was 59.8%（n=52） and 25.3%（n=22）, respectively. The following variables were correlated with the severity of hepatotoxicity： albumin（ALB） levels, PTA, platelet counts（PLT）, and the use of antiretroviral therapies（P〈0.05）. Hypo-proteinemia and antiretroviral therapy were significantly associated with liver failure, and high viral loads were a significant risk factor with an odds ratio（OR） of 2.066. Judicious follow-up of clinical conditions, liver function tests, and coagulation function, especially in patients with high HBV loads and hypoalbuminemia is recommended. It may be advisable to reconsider the use of antiviral drugs failure during the course of anti-tuberculous treatment of HBV infection patients to avoid the occurrence of furious liver failure.
