Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not been investigated among Iranian industrial workers. The present paper aimed to study the influence of the socio-demographic, health and work-related factors on HRQOL amon...Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not been investigated among Iranian industrial workers. The present paper aimed to study the influence of the socio-demographic, health and work-related factors on HRQOL among Iranian industrial workers. In this cross-sectional study, participants were 280 workers of two factories. The Persian version of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to assess the HRQOL. A questionnaire was developed to assess the socio-demographic, health and work-related factors. Results showed that the means (SD) of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment domains of HRQOL were 13.2 (2.7), 13.3 (2.6), 14.2 (3.5) and 12.6 (2.5), respectively. A multiple linear regression showed that types of job, exercise activity, working schedule, sleep quality, smoking, and conflict between work and social life were significantly associated with physical health domain;whereas, working schedule, marital status, working demand, sleep quality, BMI, and conflict between work and individual life were significantly associated with psychological health domain. Working schedule, working demand, sleep quality, conflict between work and individual life, and having children over two years were significantly associated with social relationship domain;however, working demand, working schedule, smoking, sleep quality, working hour, job satisfaction, marital status and exercise activity were significantly associated with environment domain. Collectively, work-related factors including unhealthy working conditions, unsafe working environments, long working hours, irregular working schedules, and the lack of occupational training may negatively influence the HRQOL of workers. To improve workers’ HRQOL, intervention programs should focus on improving work environment, working schedule, occupational training and restricting working hours.展开更多
Depressed patients with scores of 17 or more on the 17 items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were treated with the antidepressant drug paroxetine. They also underwent verum acupuncture or electroacupuncture at...Depressed patients with scores of 17 or more on the 17 items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were treated with the antidepressant drug paroxetine. They also underwent verum acupuncture or electroacupuncture at Baihui （GV20） and Yintang （GV29）. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version showed a significant increase in the total scores of patients who underwent verum acupuncture and electroacupuncture for 6 weeks compared with those who were given paroxetine only; significantly increased physical domain and social relationship scores in verum acupuncture patients compared with paroxetine only; and significantly elevated psychological domain scores with electroacupuncture compared with paroxetine only. These results indicate that both verum acupuncture and electroacupuncture can improve quality of life in depressed patients undergoing paroxetine treatment,展开更多
目的:检验世界卫生组织残疾人生存质量量表一般残疾版本(WHOQOL-DIS Scales for PD)中文版的可接受性、信度和效度,以便用于中国残疾人的生存质量的研究。方法:采用多阶段分层随机抽样的方法,从广州市抽取一般残疾人(除智力残疾的其他...目的:检验世界卫生组织残疾人生存质量量表一般残疾版本(WHOQOL-DIS Scales for PD)中文版的可接受性、信度和效度,以便用于中国残疾人的生存质量的研究。方法:采用多阶段分层随机抽样的方法,从广州市抽取一般残疾人(除智力残疾的其他残疾人)807名。间隔1周后,对自愿进行重复调查的109人进行重测。对量表进行可接受性、信度和效度检验,并以生活满意度量表(SWLS)为校标。结果:量表回收率为99.2%,除了性生活满意度条目缺失率为35.7%,其余条目的缺失率均小于5.0%。量表5个领域的Cronbachα系数为0.77～0.84;间隔1周后重测ICC为0.82～0.91。量表条目与所属领域得分的秩相关系数为0.30～0.84,高于与其他领域的相关性;验证性因子分析显示量表的拟合较好(χ2=2405.57,df=569,RM SEA=0.06,GFI=0.85,CFI=0.87);量表5个领域得分与SWLS得分呈正相关(r=0.15～0.45,均P<0.05)。结论:世界卫生组织残疾人生存质量量表一般残疾版本中文版具有较好的可接受性、信度和效度,可用于中国残疾人生存质量的研究。展开更多
目的研究首发抑郁症患者的生活质量与临床症状之间的关联。方法按照严格的筛选及剔除标准,纳入首发未治疗的抑郁症患者(n=36)和接受药物治疗的抑郁症患者(n=71),并按照相应的入组标准纳入年龄、性别和教育相应的对照组(n=59)。采用世界...目的研究首发抑郁症患者的生活质量与临床症状之间的关联。方法按照严格的筛选及剔除标准,纳入首发未治疗的抑郁症患者(n=36)和接受药物治疗的抑郁症患者(n=71),并按照相应的入组标准纳入年龄、性别和教育相应的对照组(n=59)。采用世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief,WHOQOL-BREF)和社会适应自我评价量表(The Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale,SASS)评估所有受试者,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale,HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(The Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)以及蒙哥马利-斯伯格抑郁评定量表(Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS)对患者进行评估。结果各组之间年龄、教育程度未发现显著差异。首发组和治疗组抑郁症患者生活质量未发现显著性差异,且均明显低于对照组;相关分析发现,抑郁首发组及治疗组的生理、环境和生活质量总分与HAMD、HAMA、MADRS评分均呈负相关。SASS与生理、心理、环境和生活质量总分呈正相关。结论首发组和治疗组抑郁患者的生活质量及社会适应均明显下降,且抑郁症状越重,生活质量越差,而社会适应更好的患者,生活质量更好。展开更多
文摘Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has not been investigated among Iranian industrial workers. The present paper aimed to study the influence of the socio-demographic, health and work-related factors on HRQOL among Iranian industrial workers. In this cross-sectional study, participants were 280 workers of two factories. The Persian version of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to assess the HRQOL. A questionnaire was developed to assess the socio-demographic, health and work-related factors. Results showed that the means (SD) of physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment domains of HRQOL were 13.2 (2.7), 13.3 (2.6), 14.2 (3.5) and 12.6 (2.5), respectively. A multiple linear regression showed that types of job, exercise activity, working schedule, sleep quality, smoking, and conflict between work and social life were significantly associated with physical health domain;whereas, working schedule, marital status, working demand, sleep quality, BMI, and conflict between work and individual life were significantly associated with psychological health domain. Working schedule, working demand, sleep quality, conflict between work and individual life, and having children over two years were significantly associated with social relationship domain;however, working demand, working schedule, smoking, sleep quality, working hour, job satisfaction, marital status and exercise activity were significantly associated with environment domain. Collectively, work-related factors including unhealthy working conditions, unsafe working environments, long working hours, irregular working schedules, and the lack of occupational training may negatively influence the HRQOL of workers. To improve workers’ HRQOL, intervention programs should focus on improving work environment, working schedule, occupational training and restricting working hours.
基金supported by the National Science and Technology Support Project No.2006BAI12B05-2the Key Subject Construction Program"211 Project"of Guangdong Province
文摘Depressed patients with scores of 17 or more on the 17 items of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale were treated with the antidepressant drug paroxetine. They also underwent verum acupuncture or electroacupuncture at Baihui （GV20） and Yintang （GV29）. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version showed a significant increase in the total scores of patients who underwent verum acupuncture and electroacupuncture for 6 weeks compared with those who were given paroxetine only; significantly increased physical domain and social relationship scores in verum acupuncture patients compared with paroxetine only; and significantly elevated psychological domain scores with electroacupuncture compared with paroxetine only. These results indicate that both verum acupuncture and electroacupuncture can improve quality of life in depressed patients undergoing paroxetine treatment,
文摘目的:检验世界卫生组织残疾人生存质量量表一般残疾版本(WHOQOL-DIS Scales for PD)中文版的可接受性、信度和效度,以便用于中国残疾人的生存质量的研究。方法:采用多阶段分层随机抽样的方法,从广州市抽取一般残疾人(除智力残疾的其他残疾人)807名。间隔1周后,对自愿进行重复调查的109人进行重测。对量表进行可接受性、信度和效度检验,并以生活满意度量表(SWLS)为校标。结果:量表回收率为99.2%,除了性生活满意度条目缺失率为35.7%,其余条目的缺失率均小于5.0%。量表5个领域的Cronbachα系数为0.77～0.84;间隔1周后重测ICC为0.82～0.91。量表条目与所属领域得分的秩相关系数为0.30～0.84,高于与其他领域的相关性;验证性因子分析显示量表的拟合较好(χ2=2405.57,df=569,RM SEA=0.06,GFI=0.85,CFI=0.87);量表5个领域得分与SWLS得分呈正相关(r=0.15～0.45,均P<0.05)。结论:世界卫生组织残疾人生存质量量表一般残疾版本中文版具有较好的可接受性、信度和效度,可用于中国残疾人生存质量的研究。
文摘目的研究首发抑郁症患者的生活质量与临床症状之间的关联。方法按照严格的筛选及剔除标准,纳入首发未治疗的抑郁症患者(n=36)和接受药物治疗的抑郁症患者(n=71),并按照相应的入组标准纳入年龄、性别和教育相应的对照组(n=59)。采用世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief,WHOQOL-BREF)和社会适应自我评价量表(The Social Adaptation Self-evaluation Scale,SASS)评估所有受试者,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale,HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(The Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)以及蒙哥马利-斯伯格抑郁评定量表(Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale,MADRS)对患者进行评估。结果各组之间年龄、教育程度未发现显著差异。首发组和治疗组抑郁症患者生活质量未发现显著性差异,且均明显低于对照组;相关分析发现,抑郁首发组及治疗组的生理、环境和生活质量总分与HAMD、HAMA、MADRS评分均呈负相关。SASS与生理、心理、环境和生活质量总分呈正相关。结论首发组和治疗组抑郁患者的生活质量及社会适应均明显下降,且抑郁症状越重,生活质量越差,而社会适应更好的患者,生活质量更好。
