OBJECTIVE To decrease radiation injury of the esophagus and lungs by utilizing a CT scan in combination with PET tumor imaging in order to minimize the clinical target area of locally advanced non-small cell lung can-...OBJECTIVE To decrease radiation injury of the esophagus and lungs by utilizing a CT scan in combination with PET tumor imaging in order to minimize the clinical target area of locally advanced non-small cell lung can-cer, without preventive radiation on the lymphatic drainage area. METHODS Of 76 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 32 received a PET examination before radiotherapy. Preventive radiation was not conducted in the mediastinum area without lymphatic metastasis, which was confirmed by CT and PET. For the other 44 patients, preventive radiation was performed in the lymphatic drainage area. PET examinations showed that the clinical target volume of the patients was decreased on average to about one third. The radiation therapy for patients of the two groups was the same, i.e. the dose for accelerated fractionated irradiation was 3 Gy/time and 5 time/week. The preventive dose was 42 to 45 Gy/time, 14 to 15 time/week, with 3-week treatment, and the therapeu- tic dose was 60 to 63 Gy/time, 20 to 21 time/week, with a period of 4 to 5 weeks. RESULTS The rate of missed lymph nodes beyond the irradiation field was 6.3% and 4.5% respectively in the group with and without PET exami- nation (P = 0.831). The incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis was 15.6 % and 45.5% in the two groups respectively (P = 0.006). The incidence of acute radiation pneumonia and long-term pulmonary fibrosis in the two groups was 6.3% and 9.1%, and 68.8% and 75.0%, respectively (P = 0.982 and P = 0.547). CONCLUSION The recurrence rate in the lymph nodes beyond the tar-get area was not increased after minimizing the clinical target volume (CTV), whereas radioactive injury to the lungs and esophageal injury was reduced, and especially with a significant decrease in the rate of acute radioactive esophagitis. The method of CT in combination with PET for minimizing the mediastinal CTV is superior to the conventional preventive radiation of the mediastinum.展开更多
In this case; mesothelioma was likely diagnosed in 7 years old male mix breed dog which was brought to Veterinary Research and Teaching Hospital of Istanbul University with complaints of general weakness and severe dy...In this case; mesothelioma was likely diagnosed in 7 years old male mix breed dog which was brought to Veterinary Research and Teaching Hospital of Istanbul University with complaints of general weakness and severe dyspnea. The dog had been misdiagnosed with faryngitis and hernia diaphragmatica before it was brought to our faculty clinic. Apparent abdominal respiration was inspected and supressed heart sounds, abnormal respiratory sounds and pleural rub were detected by auscultation of thorax. Radiographic examination and blood analysis were performed. Chest X-ray examination demonstrates both sided pleural effusion. Leukocytosis （WBC = 36.2 × 10^3μL） was detected on blood count. By thoracocentesis, 40 mL fluid was drained and cytologic examination was performed. Numerous pleomorphic, atypical, multinuclear or multinucleolar mesothelial cells were observed and cytologic findings were pretty compatible with mesothelioma. The dog died before medication and the owner of the dog didn＇t give the confirmation for necropsy. In our clinical case we did not confirm any contact of the dog with asbestos or larger amount of pesticides, which are described as etiological factors of mesothelioma. As mesothelioma is a very rare health condition for dogs, it might be lead up to misdiagnosis.展开更多
AIM: The optimal treatment for bile duct stones (in terms of cost, complications and accuracy) is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine the predictive factors for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiop...AIM: The optimal treatment for bile duct stones (in terms of cost, complications and accuracy) is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine the predictive factors for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).METHODS: Patients undergoing preoperative ERCP (≤90 d before laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were evaluated in this retrospective study from the 1^st of January 1996 to the 31^st of December 2002. The indications for ERCP were elevated serum bilirubin, elevated liver function tests (LFT), dilated bile duct (≥8 mm) and/or stone at US examination, coexisting acute pancreatitis and/or acute pancreatitis or jaundice in patient's history. Suspected prognostic factors and the combination of factors were compared to the result of ERCRRESULTS: Two hundred and six preoperative ERCPs were performed during the observed period. The rate of successful cannulation for ERC was (97.1%). Bile duct stones were detected in 81 patients (39.3%), and successfully removed in 79 (97.5%). The number of prognostic factors correlated with the presence of bile duct stones. The positive predictive value for one prognostic factor was 1.2%, for two 43%,for three 72.5%, for four or more 91.4%.CONCLUSION: Based on our data preoperative ERCP is highly recommended in patients with three or more positive factors (high risk patients). In contrast, ERCP is not indicated in patients with zero or one factor (low risk patients).Preoperative ERCP should be offered to patients with two positive factors (moderate risk patients), however the practice should also be based on the local conditions (e.g.skill of the endoscopist, other diagnostic tools).展开更多
文摘OBJECTIVE To decrease radiation injury of the esophagus and lungs by utilizing a CT scan in combination with PET tumor imaging in order to minimize the clinical target area of locally advanced non-small cell lung can-cer, without preventive radiation on the lymphatic drainage area. METHODS Of 76 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 32 received a PET examination before radiotherapy. Preventive radiation was not conducted in the mediastinum area without lymphatic metastasis, which was confirmed by CT and PET. For the other 44 patients, preventive radiation was performed in the lymphatic drainage area. PET examinations showed that the clinical target volume of the patients was decreased on average to about one third. The radiation therapy for patients of the two groups was the same, i.e. the dose for accelerated fractionated irradiation was 3 Gy/time and 5 time/week. The preventive dose was 42 to 45 Gy/time, 14 to 15 time/week, with 3-week treatment, and the therapeu- tic dose was 60 to 63 Gy/time, 20 to 21 time/week, with a period of 4 to 5 weeks. RESULTS The rate of missed lymph nodes beyond the irradiation field was 6.3% and 4.5% respectively in the group with and without PET exami- nation (P = 0.831). The incidence of acute radioactive esophagitis was 15.6 % and 45.5% in the two groups respectively (P = 0.006). The incidence of acute radiation pneumonia and long-term pulmonary fibrosis in the two groups was 6.3% and 9.1%, and 68.8% and 75.0%, respectively (P = 0.982 and P = 0.547). CONCLUSION The recurrence rate in the lymph nodes beyond the tar-get area was not increased after minimizing the clinical target volume (CTV), whereas radioactive injury to the lungs and esophageal injury was reduced, and especially with a significant decrease in the rate of acute radioactive esophagitis. The method of CT in combination with PET for minimizing the mediastinal CTV is superior to the conventional preventive radiation of the mediastinum.
文摘In this case; mesothelioma was likely diagnosed in 7 years old male mix breed dog which was brought to Veterinary Research and Teaching Hospital of Istanbul University with complaints of general weakness and severe dyspnea. The dog had been misdiagnosed with faryngitis and hernia diaphragmatica before it was brought to our faculty clinic. Apparent abdominal respiration was inspected and supressed heart sounds, abnormal respiratory sounds and pleural rub were detected by auscultation of thorax. Radiographic examination and blood analysis were performed. Chest X-ray examination demonstrates both sided pleural effusion. Leukocytosis （WBC = 36.2 × 10^3μL） was detected on blood count. By thoracocentesis, 40 mL fluid was drained and cytologic examination was performed. Numerous pleomorphic, atypical, multinuclear or multinucleolar mesothelial cells were observed and cytologic findings were pretty compatible with mesothelioma. The dog died before medication and the owner of the dog didn＇t give the confirmation for necropsy. In our clinical case we did not confirm any contact of the dog with asbestos or larger amount of pesticides, which are described as etiological factors of mesothelioma. As mesothelioma is a very rare health condition for dogs, it might be lead up to misdiagnosis.
文摘AIM: The optimal treatment for bile duct stones (in terms of cost, complications and accuracy) is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine the predictive factors for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).METHODS: Patients undergoing preoperative ERCP (≤90 d before laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were evaluated in this retrospective study from the 1^st of January 1996 to the 31^st of December 2002. The indications for ERCP were elevated serum bilirubin, elevated liver function tests (LFT), dilated bile duct (≥8 mm) and/or stone at US examination, coexisting acute pancreatitis and/or acute pancreatitis or jaundice in patient's history. Suspected prognostic factors and the combination of factors were compared to the result of ERCRRESULTS: Two hundred and six preoperative ERCPs were performed during the observed period. The rate of successful cannulation for ERC was (97.1%). Bile duct stones were detected in 81 patients (39.3%), and successfully removed in 79 (97.5%). The number of prognostic factors correlated with the presence of bile duct stones. The positive predictive value for one prognostic factor was 1.2%, for two 43%,for three 72.5%, for four or more 91.4%.CONCLUSION: Based on our data preoperative ERCP is highly recommended in patients with three or more positive factors (high risk patients). In contrast, ERCP is not indicated in patients with zero or one factor (low risk patients).Preoperative ERCP should be offered to patients with two positive factors (moderate risk patients), however the practice should also be based on the local conditions (e.g.skill of the endoscopist, other diagnostic tools).
