This study focused on the performance of where elements analysing techniques were used to detect the elements in granite stones. These techniques are NAA （neutron activation analysis） and XRF （X-ray fluorescence）....This study focused on the performance of where elements analysing techniques were used to detect the elements in granite stones. These techniques are NAA （neutron activation analysis） and XRF （X-ray fluorescence）. They were applied to detect the elements in samples which had been chosen from different areas of Pulua Penang in Malaysia collected by geophysics group which helped to describe and identify the elements found in the granite stone that were used in the study procedures to control the analytical results. The integration of both methods has enabled the researcher to determine 40 elements in the samples. The numbers of elements detected by XRF analysis method are 12 elements （Ar, K, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn）; while, the elements detected by NAA method have three folds of elements with XRF analysis method were 35 elements （Na, AI, Si, K, Ca, Sc,Ti, Mn, Fe, Co, Ga, Ce, As, Br, Rb, Zr, Sb, I, Cs, Ba, La, Nd, Sm, Eu,Tb, Dy, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Au, Pa and Np）. Seven common elements were detected in both techniques： K, Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Fe and Co. Si has a higher concentration in NAA technique which is 331.8 ppm. Sc has a lower concentration in XRF technique which is 0.25 ppm. Nd has a lower concentration in NAA technique which is 3.09 - 10-5 ppm. Finally, it is found that the NAA is better to detect the elements than XRF.展开更多
The thesis had a deep research about the fiberglass filter paper＇s influence on the PM2.5 assaying. It has chosen XRF to make a quantitative analysis. Based on multiple regression theory it regard fiberglass filter p...The thesis had a deep research about the fiberglass filter paper＇s influence on the PM2.5 assaying. It has chosen XRF to make a quantitative analysis. Based on multiple regression theory it regard fiberglass filter paper＇s quality, element content and the quality of the loaded sample as independent variable, while the element＇s quality that the sample has collected as dependent variable. Furthermore, it has established four multiple quadric response surface models which concerning Ca by using of Mathematica and Matlab： Y = 0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2 -1.375x3-10.58x1x2＋8.53x1x3＋1.549x2x3-3.443x1^2＋6.555x2^2＋6. 547x3^2; Y = 0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2-1.375x3; Y = 0.8649 -2.094x2-2.08x2-1.375x3-3.443x1^2＋6.525x2^2＋6.547x3^2 ; Y =0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2-1.375x3-10.58x1x2＋8.53x1x3＋1.549x2x3. After comparison it has finally found the best model. In combining with the sample it present a multiple data fitting analysis method which could adjust the fiberglass filter paper model accordingly.展开更多
文摘This study focused on the performance of where elements analysing techniques were used to detect the elements in granite stones. These techniques are NAA （neutron activation analysis） and XRF （X-ray fluorescence）. They were applied to detect the elements in samples which had been chosen from different areas of Pulua Penang in Malaysia collected by geophysics group which helped to describe and identify the elements found in the granite stone that were used in the study procedures to control the analytical results. The integration of both methods has enabled the researcher to determine 40 elements in the samples. The numbers of elements detected by XRF analysis method are 12 elements （Ar, K, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn）; while, the elements detected by NAA method have three folds of elements with XRF analysis method were 35 elements （Na, AI, Si, K, Ca, Sc,Ti, Mn, Fe, Co, Ga, Ce, As, Br, Rb, Zr, Sb, I, Cs, Ba, La, Nd, Sm, Eu,Tb, Dy, Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Au, Pa and Np）. Seven common elements were detected in both techniques： K, Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Fe and Co. Si has a higher concentration in NAA technique which is 331.8 ppm. Sc has a lower concentration in XRF technique which is 0.25 ppm. Nd has a lower concentration in NAA technique which is 3.09 - 10-5 ppm. Finally, it is found that the NAA is better to detect the elements than XRF.
文摘The thesis had a deep research about the fiberglass filter paper＇s influence on the PM2.5 assaying. It has chosen XRF to make a quantitative analysis. Based on multiple regression theory it regard fiberglass filter paper＇s quality, element content and the quality of the loaded sample as independent variable, while the element＇s quality that the sample has collected as dependent variable. Furthermore, it has established four multiple quadric response surface models which concerning Ca by using of Mathematica and Matlab： Y = 0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2 -1.375x3-10.58x1x2＋8.53x1x3＋1.549x2x3-3.443x1^2＋6.555x2^2＋6. 547x3^2; Y = 0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2-1.375x3; Y = 0.8649 -2.094x2-2.08x2-1.375x3-3.443x1^2＋6.525x2^2＋6.547x3^2 ; Y =0.8649-2.094x1-2.08x2-1.375x3-10.58x1x2＋8.53x1x3＋1.549x2x3. After comparison it has finally found the best model. In combining with the sample it present a multiple data fitting analysis method which could adjust the fiberglass filter paper model accordingly.
