Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MSCPOR used in China.Methods:45 subjects with OCD,35 subjects with phobias and 35 subjects with anxiety were selected as patient group,and 44 healthy persons w...Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MSCPOR used in China.Methods:45 subjects with OCD,35 subjects with phobias and 35 subjects with anxiety were selected as patient group,and 44 healthy persons were selected as control group.All subjects were rated according to the Chinese version of the MSCPOR,the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale(Y-BOCS)and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA).Two or three weeks after the first rating,16 health persons were re=rated by MSCPOR;12 patients were re-rated with MSCPOR,Y-BOCS and HAMA.15 subjects were rated with MSCPOR and scored by two independent raters at the same time.Results:Test-retest reliability was 0.72～0.99;the homogeneity reliability(Chronbach’s α )in the OCD group were 0.82～0.88 and in phobias group 0.78～0.82;Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.35～0.94 in OCD group and 0.30～0.84 in phobias group;the inter-rater reliability(kappa index) were 0.53～1.For validity,correlation coefficients( γ )among different dimension of MSCPOR in OCD group was 0.36～0.92 and 0.10～0.80 in phobias group.Spearman correlation coefficients between MSCPOR vs Y-BOCS scores and MSCPOR vs HAMA were 0.62 and 0.41～0.44.The results of discriminate analysis showed that diagnosis error for MSCPOR was 40.1%.Conclusion:The reliability and validity of MSCPOR used in China were satisfactory;MSCPOR isn’t a suitable instrument for diagnosis but good for symptom assessment.展开更多
文摘Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the MSCPOR used in China.Methods:45 subjects with OCD,35 subjects with phobias and 35 subjects with anxiety were selected as patient group,and 44 healthy persons were selected as control group.All subjects were rated according to the Chinese version of the MSCPOR,the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale(Y-BOCS)and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA).Two or three weeks after the first rating,16 health persons were re=rated by MSCPOR;12 patients were re-rated with MSCPOR,Y-BOCS and HAMA.15 subjects were rated with MSCPOR and scored by two independent raters at the same time.Results:Test-retest reliability was 0.72～0.99;the homogeneity reliability(Chronbach’s α )in the OCD group were 0.82～0.88 and in phobias group 0.78～0.82;Spearman correlation coefficients were 0.35～0.94 in OCD group and 0.30～0.84 in phobias group;the inter-rater reliability(kappa index) were 0.53～1.For validity,correlation coefficients( γ )among different dimension of MSCPOR in OCD group was 0.36～0.92 and 0.10～0.80 in phobias group.Spearman correlation coefficients between MSCPOR vs Y-BOCS scores and MSCPOR vs HAMA were 0.62 and 0.41～0.44.The results of discriminate analysis showed that diagnosis error for MSCPOR was 40.1%.Conclusion:The reliability and validity of MSCPOR used in China were satisfactory;MSCPOR isn’t a suitable instrument for diagnosis but good for symptom assessment.
