攒竹、鱼腰透刺配合申脉直刺对面神经炎患者眼轮匝肌的影响

目的:探讨攒竹、鱼腰透刺配合申脉直刺对面神经炎患者眼睑闭合不全的疗效。方法:将64例符合纳入标准的面神经炎患者随机分为治疗组、对照组,每组32例。治疗组患侧攒竹、鱼腰透刺,配合双侧申脉直刺,患侧阳白四透,地仓、颊车透刺,迎香与下关之间排刺,翳风、健侧合谷直刺,每次留针10~30 min,每日1次,10 d为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程;对照组给予醋酸泼尼松30 mg/d,连用5 d减至10 mg/d,再连续服用1周后停用,肌肉注射维生素B120.5 mg、维生素B10.1 g,1次/d,10 d后改为口服维生素B110 mg/次,3次/d,共10 d。记录治疗前后House-Brackmann(H-B)面神经功能分级、上下眼睑距离、手法肌力分级、眼睑闭合程度、肌电图来分析比较两组临床疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率96.9%(31/32),优于对照组的84.4%(27/32,P<0.05)。治疗后,治疗组上下眼睑距离、眼睑闭合程度评分、运动神经传导潜伏期、患侧瞬目反射潜伏期均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01),手法肌力分级、运动神经传导波幅较治疗前均升高(P<0.05);对照组上下眼睑距离、眼睑闭合程度评分、运动神经传导潜伏期、患侧瞬目反射潜伏期均显著低于治疗前(P<0.01),手法肌力分级较治疗前改善(P<0.05);治疗后,治疗组上下眼睑距离、眼睑闭合程度评分、运动神经传导潜伏期、患侧瞬目反射潜伏期均低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01),手法肌力分级、运动神经传导波幅均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:攒竹、鱼腰透刺,配合申脉直刺能够更好地促进面神经炎患者眼轮匝肌的恢复,减少并发症的出现,具有很好的临床疗效。

Treatment of acne vulgaris with auricular acupoint pricking-bloodletting plus auricular point sticking therapy: a randomized controlled study

Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of auricular point pricking-bloodletting plus auricular point sticking therapy for acne vulgaris. Methods: A total of 66 patients with acne vulgaris were randomized into an observation group and a control group by the random number table, with 33 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with auricular point pricking-bloodletting plus auricular point sticking therapy, and the control group was treated only with auricular point sticking therapy. The treatments of both groups were performed twice a week, 4 weeks as a course of treatment, for 3 courses in total. The scores of skin lesions and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) scores were recorded before and after treatment to assess the clinical efficacy. Results: During the trial, there were 3 cases of drop-out both in the observation group and the control group. After 3 courses of treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 96.7%, while that of the control group was 76.7%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). The intra-group comparison showed that the scores of skin lesion and DLQI were both decreased with the increase of treatment times, that was, the scores were lower than those at the previous time point (allP<0.05). After 1, 2, and 3 courses of treatment, the scores of skin lesion and DLQI of both groups were statistically different from those of the same group before treatment (allP<0.05). At every time point during the treatment, the scores of skin lesion and DLQI of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Auricular point pricking-bloodletting plus auricular point sticking has a better curative effect than auricular point sticking therapy alone in the treatment of acne vulgaris, and has a time-effect correlation.