目的观察郑氏手法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的治疗效果。方法将2021年8月—2022年1月该院筋伤科门诊收治的60例肱骨外上髁炎病人按照纳入顺序用随机数字表随机分类法随机分成两组,每组30例,治疗组30例病人予郑氏手法治疗,对照组30例病人予局部...目的观察郑氏手法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的治疗效果。方法将2021年8月—2022年1月该院筋伤科门诊收治的60例肱骨外上髁炎病人按照纳入顺序用随机数字表随机分类法随机分成两组,每组30例,治疗组30例病人予郑氏手法治疗,对照组30例病人予局部封闭治疗,两组疗程均是2周。疗程结束后评估两组总体疗效,治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)评分,治疗前后Mayo肘关节功能评分,治疗前后美国特种外科医院(Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS)肘关节功能评分,治疗前后肘关节局部压痛阈值。结果治疗组的总有效率为88.89%(24/27),优于对照组总有效率81.48%(22/27)(P<0.05);两组治疗后VAS评分均降低,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后Mayo肘关节评分和HSS肘关节评分均增高,治疗组评分明显高于封闭组(P<0.05);两组治疗后Mayo肘关节评分和HSS肘关节评分均增高,治疗组评分明显高于封闭组(P<0.05);两组治疗后肘关节局部压痛阈值较治疗前均有提升,治疗组肘关节局部压痛阈值明显高于封闭组(P<0.05)。结论郑氏手法治疗肱骨外上髁炎疗效优于局部封闭治疗,值得临床推广应用。展开更多
Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy and action mechanism of Jin＇s three-needle acupuncture plus Long＇s chiropractic tuina manipulations in treating cervical vertigo. Methods： By adopting a randomized contr...Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy and action mechanism of Jin＇s three-needle acupuncture plus Long＇s chiropractic tuina manipulations in treating cervical vertigo. Methods： By adopting a randomized controlled method, 80 eligible patients were randomized into an observation group of 41 cases and a control group of 39 cases. The control group was intervened by Jin＇s cervical three-needle acupuncture plus acupuncture at the vertigo-pain points and Fengchi （GB 20）; the observation group was by Long＇s chiropractic tuina manipulations in addition to the treatment given to the control. For both groups, the intervention was given once a day, 7 sessions as a treatment course, with a 1-day interval after a course, for 2 courses in total. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated after the first session and the second treatment course, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Results： After the first session, the recovery plus markedly effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group （P〈0.01）; the rate was markedly higher in the observation group than that in the control group after 2 treatment courses （P〈0.01）; at the 3-month follow-up, the relapse rate was 2.5% in the observation group versus 23.5% in the control, and the between-group difference was statistically insignificant （P〉0.05）; the 6-month follow-up study showed that the relapse rate was 5.0% in the observation group versus 21.6% in the control group, and the between-group difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）; at the 6-month follow-up, the total relapse rate was 7.5% in the observation group versus 35.1% in the control group, and the inter-group difference was statistically significant （P〈O.01）. Conclusion： The two treatment protocols are both effective in treating cervical vertigo. However, due to its more significant efficacy, more efficient action and lower relapse rate compared to acupuncture alone, acupuncture plus tuina can be regarded as a verified protocol for cervical vertigo.展开更多
文摘目的观察郑氏手法治疗肱骨外上髁炎的治疗效果。方法将2021年8月—2022年1月该院筋伤科门诊收治的60例肱骨外上髁炎病人按照纳入顺序用随机数字表随机分类法随机分成两组,每组30例,治疗组30例病人予郑氏手法治疗,对照组30例病人予局部封闭治疗,两组疗程均是2周。疗程结束后评估两组总体疗效,治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(visual analog scale,VAS)评分,治疗前后Mayo肘关节功能评分,治疗前后美国特种外科医院(Hospital for Special Surgery,HSS)肘关节功能评分,治疗前后肘关节局部压痛阈值。结果治疗组的总有效率为88.89%(24/27),优于对照组总有效率81.48%(22/27)(P<0.05);两组治疗后VAS评分均降低,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后Mayo肘关节评分和HSS肘关节评分均增高,治疗组评分明显高于封闭组(P<0.05);两组治疗后Mayo肘关节评分和HSS肘关节评分均增高,治疗组评分明显高于封闭组(P<0.05);两组治疗后肘关节局部压痛阈值较治疗前均有提升,治疗组肘关节局部压痛阈值明显高于封闭组(P<0.05)。结论郑氏手法治疗肱骨外上髁炎疗效优于局部封闭治疗,值得临床推广应用。
文摘Objective： To observe the clinical efficacy and action mechanism of Jin＇s three-needle acupuncture plus Long＇s chiropractic tuina manipulations in treating cervical vertigo. Methods： By adopting a randomized controlled method, 80 eligible patients were randomized into an observation group of 41 cases and a control group of 39 cases. The control group was intervened by Jin＇s cervical three-needle acupuncture plus acupuncture at the vertigo-pain points and Fengchi （GB 20）; the observation group was by Long＇s chiropractic tuina manipulations in addition to the treatment given to the control. For both groups, the intervention was given once a day, 7 sessions as a treatment course, with a 1-day interval after a course, for 2 courses in total. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated after the first session and the second treatment course, at the 3-month and 6-month follow-ups. Results： After the first session, the recovery plus markedly effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group （P〈0.01）; the rate was markedly higher in the observation group than that in the control group after 2 treatment courses （P〈0.01）; at the 3-month follow-up, the relapse rate was 2.5% in the observation group versus 23.5% in the control, and the between-group difference was statistically insignificant （P〉0.05）; the 6-month follow-up study showed that the relapse rate was 5.0% in the observation group versus 21.6% in the control group, and the between-group difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）; at the 6-month follow-up, the total relapse rate was 7.5% in the observation group versus 35.1% in the control group, and the inter-group difference was statistically significant （P〈O.01）. Conclusion： The two treatment protocols are both effective in treating cervical vertigo. However, due to its more significant efficacy, more efficient action and lower relapse rate compared to acupuncture alone, acupuncture plus tuina can be regarded as a verified protocol for cervical vertigo.
