For the suppliers of concerned services, theories about infrastructure pricing: SAT (Stand Alone economists such as Laffont, Tirole, etc. developed Test), ECPR (Efficient Component Pricing Rule). Especially, Sida...For the suppliers of concerned services, theories about infrastructure pricing: SAT (Stand Alone economists such as Laffont, Tirole, etc. developed Test), ECPR (Efficient Component Pricing Rule). Especially, Sidak, Spulber, put forward M-ECPR (Market Efficient Component Pricing Rule) method for bottleneck infrastructures. In this article, we bring the M-ECPR principles into the study of Chinese railways pricing of its network infrastructures. Combined with our Engineer Model and Opportunity Cost Model, we analyzed the special conditions faced by Chinese railways, and developed a model for sharing infrastructure fees among freight and passenger transportations. Engineer Model split Variable Cost (VC) and Fixed Cost (FC) into freight and passenger activities, and Opportunity Cost Model take the insufficient supply of infrastructure capacity into consideration. Of course, the subsidy from the government greatly affected the price standard for bottleneck facilities, or so-called network infrastructures.展开更多
文摘For the suppliers of concerned services, theories about infrastructure pricing: SAT (Stand Alone economists such as Laffont, Tirole, etc. developed Test), ECPR (Efficient Component Pricing Rule). Especially, Sidak, Spulber, put forward M-ECPR (Market Efficient Component Pricing Rule) method for bottleneck infrastructures. In this article, we bring the M-ECPR principles into the study of Chinese railways pricing of its network infrastructures. Combined with our Engineer Model and Opportunity Cost Model, we analyzed the special conditions faced by Chinese railways, and developed a model for sharing infrastructure fees among freight and passenger transportations. Engineer Model split Variable Cost (VC) and Fixed Cost (FC) into freight and passenger activities, and Opportunity Cost Model take the insufficient supply of infrastructure capacity into consideration. Of course, the subsidy from the government greatly affected the price standard for bottleneck facilities, or so-called network infrastructures.