Acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis(AOSC) due to biliary lithiasis is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent biliary decompression. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) with s...Acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis(AOSC) due to biliary lithiasis is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent biliary decompression. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) with stent placement is the current gold standard for biliary decompression, it can sometimes be difficult because of failed biliary cannulation. In this retrospective case series, we describe three cases of successful biliary drainage with recovery from septic shock after urgent endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) was performed for AOSC due to biliary lithiasis. In all three cases, technical success in inserting the stents was achieved and the patients completely recovered from AOSC with sepsis in a few days after EUS-CDS. There were no procedure-related complications. When initial ERCP fails, EUS-CDS can be an effective life-saving endoscopic biliary decompression procedure that shortens the procedure time and prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, particularly in patients with AOSC-induced sepsis.展开更多
目的探讨内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎(AOSC)患者的疗效。方法2020年1月~2023年1月我院收治的AOSC患者103例,其中观察组58例接受ERCP治疗,对照组45例接受开腹手术治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度...目的探讨内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎(AOSC)患者的疗效。方法2020年1月~2023年1月我院收治的AOSC患者103例,其中观察组58例接受ERCP治疗,对照组45例接受开腹手术治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,采用ELISA法检测血清白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-1、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果观察组术中出血量、手术时间、术后3 d VAS评分和术后住院日分别为(30.7±4.6)mL、(74.3±8.8)min、(3.1±0.8)分和(7.2±1.4)d,均显著短于或少于对照组【分别为(85.4±10.2)mL、(117.6±12.5)min、(4.9±1.1)分和(13.3±3.7)d,P<0.05】;在术后5 d,观察组血清ALT和GGT水平分别为(48.2±4.1)U/L和(163.9±17.2)U/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(66.9±5.3)U/L和(189.6±21.5)U/L,P<0.05】;观察组血清IL-6、IL-1、TNF-α和CRP水平分别为(82.6±8.3)ng/L、(20.9±4.0)ng/L、(16.2±3.5)ng/L和(18.1±2.2)mg/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(100.7±11.2)ng/L、(32.7±5.3)ng/L、(23.6±4.3)ng/L和(32.9±4.8)mg/L,P<0.05】;观察组并发症发生率为5.1%,显著低于对照组的17.8%(P<0.05)。结论采用ERCP治疗AOSC患者效果好,术后恢复快,并发症发生率低,值得临床应用。展开更多
目的评价内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)与经皮经肝胆管穿刺引流术(PTCD)两种胆道引流方式对急性重症胆管炎的临床疗效并探讨其临床应用价值。方法检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台数据库中发...目的评价内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)与经皮经肝胆管穿刺引流术(PTCD)两种胆道引流方式对急性重症胆管炎的临床疗效并探讨其临床应用价值。方法检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台数据库中发表的关于急性重症胆管炎行ENBD与PTCD治疗效果比较的临床研究。检索时间为2010年1月1日至2023年8月31日。观察指标包括手术时间、住院时间、有效率、病死率及总并发症发生率,提取相关数据后用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。结果共纳入符合标准的5篇回顾性队列研究,文献累计样本量为345例,其中ENBD组191例,PTCD组154例。meta分析结果显示,两组住院时间[WMD=-0.96,95%CI(-1.92,0.01),P=0.05]、病死率[OR=0.87,95%CI(0.43,1.73),P=0.68]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ENBD组有效率高于PTCD组[OR=2.43,95%CI(1.09,5.44),P=0.03],PTCD组总并发症发生率高于ENBD组[OR=0.33,95%CI(0.14,0.74),P=0.007],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于急性重症胆管炎患者行ENBD临床治疗效果优于PTCD,是一种安全、有效的胆管引流方式。展开更多
基金Supported by The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Japanese Foundation for the Research and Promotion of Endoscopy,No.22590764 and 25461035
文摘Acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis(AOSC) due to biliary lithiasis is a life-threatening condition that requires urgent biliary decompression. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) with stent placement is the current gold standard for biliary decompression, it can sometimes be difficult because of failed biliary cannulation. In this retrospective case series, we describe three cases of successful biliary drainage with recovery from septic shock after urgent endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS) was performed for AOSC due to biliary lithiasis. In all three cases, technical success in inserting the stents was achieved and the patients completely recovered from AOSC with sepsis in a few days after EUS-CDS. There were no procedure-related complications. When initial ERCP fails, EUS-CDS can be an effective life-saving endoscopic biliary decompression procedure that shortens the procedure time and prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, particularly in patients with AOSC-induced sepsis.
文摘目的探讨内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗急性梗阻性化脓性胆管炎(AOSC)患者的疗效。方法2020年1月~2023年1月我院收治的AOSC患者103例,其中观察组58例接受ERCP治疗,对照组45例接受开腹手术治疗。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛程度,采用ELISA法检测血清白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-1、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果观察组术中出血量、手术时间、术后3 d VAS评分和术后住院日分别为(30.7±4.6)mL、(74.3±8.8)min、(3.1±0.8)分和(7.2±1.4)d,均显著短于或少于对照组【分别为(85.4±10.2)mL、(117.6±12.5)min、(4.9±1.1)分和(13.3±3.7)d,P<0.05】;在术后5 d,观察组血清ALT和GGT水平分别为(48.2±4.1)U/L和(163.9±17.2)U/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(66.9±5.3)U/L和(189.6±21.5)U/L,P<0.05】;观察组血清IL-6、IL-1、TNF-α和CRP水平分别为(82.6±8.3)ng/L、(20.9±4.0)ng/L、(16.2±3.5)ng/L和(18.1±2.2)mg/L,均显著低于对照组【分别为(100.7±11.2)ng/L、(32.7±5.3)ng/L、(23.6±4.3)ng/L和(32.9±4.8)mg/L,P<0.05】;观察组并发症发生率为5.1%,显著低于对照组的17.8%(P<0.05)。结论采用ERCP治疗AOSC患者效果好,术后恢复快,并发症发生率低,值得临床应用。
文摘目的评价内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)与经皮经肝胆管穿刺引流术(PTCD)两种胆道引流方式对急性重症胆管炎的临床疗效并探讨其临床应用价值。方法检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台数据库中发表的关于急性重症胆管炎行ENBD与PTCD治疗效果比较的临床研究。检索时间为2010年1月1日至2023年8月31日。观察指标包括手术时间、住院时间、有效率、病死率及总并发症发生率,提取相关数据后用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。结果共纳入符合标准的5篇回顾性队列研究,文献累计样本量为345例,其中ENBD组191例,PTCD组154例。meta分析结果显示,两组住院时间[WMD=-0.96,95%CI(-1.92,0.01),P=0.05]、病死率[OR=0.87,95%CI(0.43,1.73),P=0.68]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ENBD组有效率高于PTCD组[OR=2.43,95%CI(1.09,5.44),P=0.03],PTCD组总并发症发生率高于ENBD组[OR=0.33,95%CI(0.14,0.74),P=0.007],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于急性重症胆管炎患者行ENBD临床治疗效果优于PTCD,是一种安全、有效的胆管引流方式。
