Combining of chemotherapy with targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Targeted therapy(TT)has resulted in controversial efficacy as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer(BTC).More efficacy comparisons are required to clarify the overall effects of chemotherapy(CT)combined with TT and CT alone on advanced BTC.AIM To conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence on the efficacy of CT combined with TT for advanced BTC.METHODS The PubMed,EMBASE,ClinicalTrials,Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies published from inception to August 2022.Only randomized clinical trials(RCTs)including comparisons between the combination of gemcitabine-based CT with TT and CT alone as firstline treatment for advanced BTC were eligible(PROSPERO-CRD42022313001).The odds ratios(ORs)for the objective response rate(ORR)and hazard ratios(HRs)for both progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)were calculated and analyzed.Subgroup analyses based on different targeted agents,CT regimens and tumor locations were prespecified.RESULTS Nine RCTs with a total of 1361 individuals were included and analyzed.The overall analysis showed a significant improvement in ORR in patients treated with CT+TT compared to those treated with CT alone(OR=1.43,95%CI:1.11-1.86,P=0.007)but no difference in PFS or OS.Similar trends were observed in the subgroup treated with agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor(OR=1.67,95%CI:1.17-2.37,P=0.004)but not in the subgroups treated with agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor or mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor.Notably,patients who received a CT regimen of gemcitabine+oxaliplatin in the CT+TT arm had both a higher ORR(OR=1.75,95%CI:1.20-2.56,P=0.004)and longer PFS(HR=0.83,95%CI:0.70-0.99,P=0.03)than those in the CT-only arm.Moreover,patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with CT+TT had significantly increased ORR and PFS(ORR,OR=2.06,95%CI:1.27-3.35,PFS,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.66-0.94).CONCLUSION CT+TT is a potential first-line treatment for advanced BTC that leads to improved tumor control and survival outcomes,and highlighting the importance of CT regimens and tumor types in the application of TT.

Impact of biliary stent-related events in patients diagnosed with advanced pancreatobiliary tumours receiving palliative chemotherapy

AIM: To determine the impact (morbidity/mortality) of biliary stent-related events (SRE) (cholangitis or stent obstruction) in chemotherapy-treated pancreatico-biliary patients.METHODS: All consecutive patients with advanced pancreatobiliary cancer and a biliary stent in-situ prior to starting palliative chemotherapy were identified retrospectively from local electronic case-note records (Jan 13 to Jan 15). The primary end-point was SRE rate and the time-to-SRE (defined as time from first stenting before chemotherapy to date of SRE). Progression-free survival and overall survival were measured from the time of starting chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier, Cox and Fine-Gray regression (univariate and multivariable) analyses were employed, as appropriate. For the analysis of time-to-SRE, death was considered as a competing event.RESULTS: Ninety-six out of 693 screened patients were eligible; 89% had a metal stent (the remainder were plastic). The median time of follow-up was 9.6 mo (range 2.2 to 26.4). Forty-one patients (43%) developed a SRE during follow-up [cholangitis (39%), stent obstruction (29%), both (32%)]. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the SRE group and no-SRE groups. Recorded SRE-consequences were: none (37%), chemotherapy delay (24%), discontinuation (17%) and death (22%). The median time-to-SRE was 4.4 mo (95%CI: 3.6-5.5). Patients with severe comorbidities (P < 0.001) and patients with ≥ 2 baseline stents/biliary procedures [HR = 2.3 (95%CI: 1.2-4.44), P = 0.010] had a shorter time-to-SRE on multivariable analysis. Stage was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.029) in the multivariable analysis adjusted for primary tumour site, performance status and development of SRE (SRE group vs no-SRE group).CONCLUSION: SREs are common and impact on patient’s morbidity. Our results highlight the need for prospective studies exploring the role of prophylactic strategies to prevent/delay SREs.