[Objectives]To determine relationship of the adverse drug reaction(ADR)occurrence of the single use and combined use of Huangkui Capsule and Haikun Shenxi Capsule.[Methods]To determine relationship of the ADR occurren...[Objectives]To determine relationship of the adverse drug reaction(ADR)occurrence of the single use and combined use of Huangkui Capsule and Haikun Shenxi Capsule.[Methods]To determine relationship of the ADR occurrence of the single use and combined use of Huangkui Capsule and Haikun Shenxi Capsule.[Results]The main adverse drug reactions of the single use of Huangkui Capsule or Haikun Shenxi Capsule was severe diarrhea(n=7,n=9),however the combined use of the two resulted in more occurrence of adverse drug reactions(n=23)with significant difference in contrast to the single use group(P=0.0015,P=0.0069).[Conclusions]When traditional Chinese patent medicines are used in combination to treat kidney damp-heat syndrome and damp-turbid syndrome,it is necessary to pay close attention to the occurrence of adverse drug reactions,especially the digestive system.展开更多
目的研究靶向抗肿瘤口服药品不良反应(adverse drug reaction,ADR)发生特点和数量,挖掘其ADR可疑信号,为临床安全用药提供借鉴。方法对某市药品不良反应监测中心2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日收到的141例靶向抗肿瘤药所致ADR报告中的患...目的研究靶向抗肿瘤口服药品不良反应(adverse drug reaction,ADR)发生特点和数量,挖掘其ADR可疑信号,为临床安全用药提供借鉴。方法对某市药品不良反应监测中心2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日收到的141例靶向抗肿瘤药所致ADR报告中的患者年龄、性别、原患疾病、ADR发生时间、ADR严重程度及转归、ADR累及系统-器官、ADR临床表现及发生例次等进行分析,并运用报告比值比(reporting odds ratio,ROR)法挖掘ADR信号。结果141例中共涉及23个药品,共发生164例次ADR,累及13个系统-器官。发生例次排名前3位的ADR为皮疹(28例次,17.07%)、高血压(16例次,9.76%)、腹泻(14例次,8.54%)。共挖掘到8个药物的13个可疑ADR信号。其中安罗替尼的可疑信号为3个:高血压、口腔溃疡、手足综合征;阿帕替尼的可疑信号为3个:高血压、手足综合征、蛋白尿;奥希替尼的可疑信号为2个:皮疹、腹泻;阿法替尼、达可替尼、吉非替尼和伊马替尼的可疑信号均为1个:皮疹;瑞戈非尼的可疑信号为1个:腹泻。结论在患者使用靶向抗肿瘤口服药期间,应重点监护老年人群等特殊群体;重点关注首次用药1个月内的患者;重点监测皮疹、高血压、腹泻、手足综合征、口腔溃疡、蛋白尿等ADR并做好防治工作。展开更多
针对单层关联规则在精神障碍患者药品不良反应(Adverse Drug Reaction,ADR)风险检测与预警中存在的不足,提出一种基于多层关联规则和概念层次树的ADR风险检测与预警系统框架。该系统结合精神障碍患者ADR报告实际数据,通过领域知识构建...针对单层关联规则在精神障碍患者药品不良反应(Adverse Drug Reaction,ADR)风险检测与预警中存在的不足,提出一种基于多层关联规则和概念层次树的ADR风险检测与预警系统框架。该系统结合精神障碍患者ADR报告实际数据,通过领域知识构建概念层次树,并采用多层关联规则挖掘方法找出ADR临床症状与不同相关因素(用药人群、用药情况等)组合之间较高概念层次的强关联规则。结果表明,与单层关联规则相比,多层关联规则能够为ADR风险检测与预警提供更好的临床用药辅助决策。展开更多
Background: The Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) of the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) of the United States of America (US), known as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), is a mechanism for collectin...Background: The Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) of the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) of the United States of America (US), known as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), is a mechanism for collecting information on safety concerns associated with the use of drugs for redress, as they are used on large scale. The data which is the subject of this paper came from the FAERS database. This paper reports on the analysis of data covering 2013 to 2018 period, but compares the observed trends in the variables during this period with that of the 2007 to 2012 period to ascertain whether the trends change over time;as this paper is, in a sense, a sequel to an earlier one with a similar title as this but covering the period 2007 to 2012. Objectives: The objectives of the study reported in this paper were to: i) explore the trends in the variables involved with the adverse events problem in the 2013 to 2018 period and compare these trends with that found in the study covering the 2007 to 2012 period;ii) determine whether or not the level of missing variable values in the 2013 to 2018 period is lower than, the same or higher than it was in the 2007 to 2012 period;iii) find out how the first twenty principal suspect drugs most cited to be involved in adverse events occurring during drug use in the 2013 to 2018 period compare with that of the 2007 to 2012 period. Methods: The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) makes extracts from the FAERS database freely available to the public on quarterly basis. Fourteen (14) out of over fifty (50) variables contained in these extracts were reckoned to be connected with the objectives of the study and were examined using the tools of frequencies, proportions and averages, on account of the nature of the data. Results: For the period 2013 to 2018, adverse events reports submitted to the FDA (US) more than doubled (2.1 times), accounting for an annual average growth rate of 15.8 %, which is considerably lower than the annual average growth rate of 22.1% for the 2007 to 2012 period. However, the reported number of cases for 2015 was 53.8% more than that of 2014. Consistent with the results for 2007 to 2012 period, the 2013 to 2018 period saw Female subjects accounting for over 60% of the annual and the overall number of reports. Overall, non-health professionals appear to have a slight edge over health professionals in reporting adverse drug events in the 2013 to 2018 period, with an indication that reports from non-health professionals are on the decline and that from health professionals is on the rise. Non-health professionals and health professionals were almost equally likely to report adverse events in the 2007 to 2012 period. Also, the findings for the 2013 to 2018 period suggest that the older one gets the more vulnerable one becomes to adverse events associated with drug use, which is consistent with the findings for the 2007 to 2012 period. Conclusion: The dangers that come with the use of drugs is an evolving one and therefore there is the need to examine SRS data from time to time so that emerging drug safety concerns can be dealt with timeously.展开更多
基金Supported by the Medical Project of Jiangsu Commission of Health(M2021094)Gusu Health Key Talents Program Training Project in Suzhou(GSWS2022107)。
文摘[Objectives]To determine relationship of the adverse drug reaction(ADR)occurrence of the single use and combined use of Huangkui Capsule and Haikun Shenxi Capsule.[Methods]To determine relationship of the ADR occurrence of the single use and combined use of Huangkui Capsule and Haikun Shenxi Capsule.[Results]The main adverse drug reactions of the single use of Huangkui Capsule or Haikun Shenxi Capsule was severe diarrhea(n=7,n=9),however the combined use of the two resulted in more occurrence of adverse drug reactions(n=23)with significant difference in contrast to the single use group(P=0.0015,P=0.0069).[Conclusions]When traditional Chinese patent medicines are used in combination to treat kidney damp-heat syndrome and damp-turbid syndrome,it is necessary to pay close attention to the occurrence of adverse drug reactions,especially the digestive system.
文摘目的研究靶向抗肿瘤口服药品不良反应(adverse drug reaction,ADR)发生特点和数量,挖掘其ADR可疑信号,为临床安全用药提供借鉴。方法对某市药品不良反应监测中心2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日收到的141例靶向抗肿瘤药所致ADR报告中的患者年龄、性别、原患疾病、ADR发生时间、ADR严重程度及转归、ADR累及系统-器官、ADR临床表现及发生例次等进行分析,并运用报告比值比(reporting odds ratio,ROR)法挖掘ADR信号。结果141例中共涉及23个药品,共发生164例次ADR,累及13个系统-器官。发生例次排名前3位的ADR为皮疹(28例次,17.07%)、高血压(16例次,9.76%)、腹泻(14例次,8.54%)。共挖掘到8个药物的13个可疑ADR信号。其中安罗替尼的可疑信号为3个:高血压、口腔溃疡、手足综合征;阿帕替尼的可疑信号为3个:高血压、手足综合征、蛋白尿;奥希替尼的可疑信号为2个:皮疹、腹泻;阿法替尼、达可替尼、吉非替尼和伊马替尼的可疑信号均为1个:皮疹;瑞戈非尼的可疑信号为1个:腹泻。结论在患者使用靶向抗肿瘤口服药期间,应重点监护老年人群等特殊群体;重点关注首次用药1个月内的患者;重点监测皮疹、高血压、腹泻、手足综合征、口腔溃疡、蛋白尿等ADR并做好防治工作。
文摘针对单层关联规则在精神障碍患者药品不良反应(Adverse Drug Reaction,ADR)风险检测与预警中存在的不足,提出一种基于多层关联规则和概念层次树的ADR风险检测与预警系统框架。该系统结合精神障碍患者ADR报告实际数据,通过领域知识构建概念层次树,并采用多层关联规则挖掘方法找出ADR临床症状与不同相关因素(用药人群、用药情况等)组合之间较高概念层次的强关联规则。结果表明,与单层关联规则相比,多层关联规则能够为ADR风险检测与预警提供更好的临床用药辅助决策。
文摘Background: The Spontaneous Reporting System (SRS) of the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) of the United States of America (US), known as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), is a mechanism for collecting information on safety concerns associated with the use of drugs for redress, as they are used on large scale. The data which is the subject of this paper came from the FAERS database. This paper reports on the analysis of data covering 2013 to 2018 period, but compares the observed trends in the variables during this period with that of the 2007 to 2012 period to ascertain whether the trends change over time;as this paper is, in a sense, a sequel to an earlier one with a similar title as this but covering the period 2007 to 2012. Objectives: The objectives of the study reported in this paper were to: i) explore the trends in the variables involved with the adverse events problem in the 2013 to 2018 period and compare these trends with that found in the study covering the 2007 to 2012 period;ii) determine whether or not the level of missing variable values in the 2013 to 2018 period is lower than, the same or higher than it was in the 2007 to 2012 period;iii) find out how the first twenty principal suspect drugs most cited to be involved in adverse events occurring during drug use in the 2013 to 2018 period compare with that of the 2007 to 2012 period. Methods: The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) makes extracts from the FAERS database freely available to the public on quarterly basis. Fourteen (14) out of over fifty (50) variables contained in these extracts were reckoned to be connected with the objectives of the study and were examined using the tools of frequencies, proportions and averages, on account of the nature of the data. Results: For the period 2013 to 2018, adverse events reports submitted to the FDA (US) more than doubled (2.1 times), accounting for an annual average growth rate of 15.8 %, which is considerably lower than the annual average growth rate of 22.1% for the 2007 to 2012 period. However, the reported number of cases for 2015 was 53.8% more than that of 2014. Consistent with the results for 2007 to 2012 period, the 2013 to 2018 period saw Female subjects accounting for over 60% of the annual and the overall number of reports. Overall, non-health professionals appear to have a slight edge over health professionals in reporting adverse drug events in the 2013 to 2018 period, with an indication that reports from non-health professionals are on the decline and that from health professionals is on the rise. Non-health professionals and health professionals were almost equally likely to report adverse events in the 2007 to 2012 period. Also, the findings for the 2013 to 2018 period suggest that the older one gets the more vulnerable one becomes to adverse events associated with drug use, which is consistent with the findings for the 2007 to 2012 period. Conclusion: The dangers that come with the use of drugs is an evolving one and therefore there is the need to examine SRS data from time to time so that emerging drug safety concerns can be dealt with timeously.
