Background： Aerosolized amikacin （AA） is a current option for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia （VAP） caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria （MDR-GNB）, as it is reported that AA co...Background： Aerosolized amikacin （AA） is a current option for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia （VAP） caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria （MDR-GNB）, as it is reported that AA could increase the alveolar level of the drug without increasing systemic toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA as an adjunctive therapy for VAP caused by MDR-GNB. Methods： In this single-center, double-blind study conducted in a 36-bed general Intensive Care Unit （ICU） in a tertiary hospital from June 2014 to June 2016, 52 ICU patients with confirmed MDR-GNB VAP were randomized to two groups （AA group, n - 27 and placebo group, n = 25）. Amikacin （400 rag, q8h） or saline placebo （4 ml, q8h） was aerosolized for 7 days. The attending physician determined the administration of systemic antibiotics for VAP. Patients were tbllowed up for 28 days. Bacteriological eradication, clinical pulmonary infection score （CP1S）, and serum creatinine were assessed on day 7 of therapy. New resistance to amikacin, cure rate of VAP, weaning rate, and mortality were assessed on day 28. Results： The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. At the end of the treatment, 13 of the 32 initially detected bacterial isolates were eradicated in AA group, compared to 4 of 28 in placebo group （41% vs. 14%, P - 0.024）. As for patients, 11 of 27 patients treated with AA and 4 of 25 patients treated with placebo have eradication （41% vs. 16%, P = 0.049）. The adjunction of AA reduced CPIS （4.2 ± 1.6 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1, P = 0.007）. New drug resistance to amikacin and the change in serum creatinine were not detected in AA group. No significant differences in the clinical cure rate in survivors （48% vs. 35%, P = 0.444）, weaning rate （48% vs. 32%, P = 0.236）, and mortality （22% vs. 32%, P = 0.427） were detected between the two groups on day 28. Conclusions： As an adjunctive therapy of MDR-GNB VAP, AA successfully eradicated existing MDR organisms without inducing new resistance to amikacin or change in serum creatinine. However, the improvement of mortality was not found.展开更多
文摘Background： Aerosolized amikacin （AA） is a current option for the management of ventilator-associated pneumonia （VAP） caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria （MDR-GNB）, as it is reported that AA could increase the alveolar level of the drug without increasing systemic toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AA as an adjunctive therapy for VAP caused by MDR-GNB. Methods： In this single-center, double-blind study conducted in a 36-bed general Intensive Care Unit （ICU） in a tertiary hospital from June 2014 to June 2016, 52 ICU patients with confirmed MDR-GNB VAP were randomized to two groups （AA group, n - 27 and placebo group, n = 25）. Amikacin （400 rag, q8h） or saline placebo （4 ml, q8h） was aerosolized for 7 days. The attending physician determined the administration of systemic antibiotics for VAP. Patients were tbllowed up for 28 days. Bacteriological eradication, clinical pulmonary infection score （CP1S）, and serum creatinine were assessed on day 7 of therapy. New resistance to amikacin, cure rate of VAP, weaning rate, and mortality were assessed on day 28. Results： The baseline characteristics of patients in both groups were similar. At the end of the treatment, 13 of the 32 initially detected bacterial isolates were eradicated in AA group, compared to 4 of 28 in placebo group （41% vs. 14%, P - 0.024）. As for patients, 11 of 27 patients treated with AA and 4 of 25 patients treated with placebo have eradication （41% vs. 16%, P = 0.049）. The adjunction of AA reduced CPIS （4.2 ± 1.6 vs. 5.8 ± 2.1, P = 0.007）. New drug resistance to amikacin and the change in serum creatinine were not detected in AA group. No significant differences in the clinical cure rate in survivors （48% vs. 35%, P = 0.444）, weaning rate （48% vs. 32%, P = 0.236）, and mortality （22% vs. 32%, P = 0.427） were detected between the two groups on day 28. Conclusions： As an adjunctive therapy of MDR-GNB VAP, AA successfully eradicated existing MDR organisms without inducing new resistance to amikacin or change in serum creatinine. However, the improvement of mortality was not found.
