Objective To establish allergic airway inflammation model in late-phase airway reaction of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Methods Thirty-six SD rats were randomly divided into three groups-, control group (Group Ⅰ) ,singl...Objective To establish allergic airway inflammation model in late-phase airway reaction of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Methods Thirty-six SD rats were randomly divided into three groups-, control group (Group Ⅰ) ,single challenge group (Group Ⅱ ),consecutive challenge group (Group Ⅲ). The rats in Group Ⅱ and Group Ⅲ were sensitized twice by injection of ovalbumin (OA) together with aluminum hydroxide and Bordetella pertussis as adjuvants, followed by challenge with aerosolized OA for 20 min once in Group Ⅱ or one time on each day for one week in, Group Ⅲ. The rats in Group Ⅰ received 0. 9% saline by injection and inhalation. Results Compared with group Ⅰ , there were positive symptoms observed in the group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ; the amount of total leucocytes and eosinophil percentage in brochoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) significantly increased (P<0.05 or P<0. 01 respectively) in Group Ⅱ or Ⅲ ; histopathologic changes of lung showed acute allergic inflammation changes in Group Ⅱ: Disrupted epithelium damaged subepithelial structure and eosinophil infiltration in the airway wall. As for the Group Ⅲ, there were allergen- induced characteristic features of chronic allergic airways inflammation: hypertrophy and hyperplasia of bronchial smooth muscle, goblet cell hyperplasia, basement membrane thickening, eosinophil in filtration, edema. Conclusion The model of allergic airway inflammation in late-phase response of SD rats was successfully established by OA sensitization (twice) and consecutive challenge.展开更多
基金Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK2001160)
文摘Objective To establish allergic airway inflammation model in late-phase airway reaction of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Methods Thirty-six SD rats were randomly divided into three groups-, control group (Group Ⅰ) ,single challenge group (Group Ⅱ ),consecutive challenge group (Group Ⅲ). The rats in Group Ⅱ and Group Ⅲ were sensitized twice by injection of ovalbumin (OA) together with aluminum hydroxide and Bordetella pertussis as adjuvants, followed by challenge with aerosolized OA for 20 min once in Group Ⅱ or one time on each day for one week in, Group Ⅲ. The rats in Group Ⅰ received 0. 9% saline by injection and inhalation. Results Compared with group Ⅰ , there were positive symptoms observed in the group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ; the amount of total leucocytes and eosinophil percentage in brochoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) significantly increased (P<0.05 or P<0. 01 respectively) in Group Ⅱ or Ⅲ ; histopathologic changes of lung showed acute allergic inflammation changes in Group Ⅱ: Disrupted epithelium damaged subepithelial structure and eosinophil infiltration in the airway wall. As for the Group Ⅲ, there were allergen- induced characteristic features of chronic allergic airways inflammation: hypertrophy and hyperplasia of bronchial smooth muscle, goblet cell hyperplasia, basement membrane thickening, eosinophil in filtration, edema. Conclusion The model of allergic airway inflammation in late-phase response of SD rats was successfully established by OA sensitization (twice) and consecutive challenge.
