Objective: Conservative restoration principles that accurately reduce plaque accumulation are the goals of restorative dentistry. Correct and perfect restoration has an important effect on health of periodontious tiss...Objective: Conservative restoration principles that accurately reduce plaque accumulation are the goals of restorative dentistry. Correct and perfect restoration has an important effect on health of periodontious tissues. This study was done to compare the methods of oral hygiene, over hanged removal and restoration changing on periodontal health and alveolar bone height of restored mandible molars with proximal over hanged amalgam. Materials and Methods: All patients with over hanged amalgam restoration were randomly divided into three groups. In order to survey the effect of over hanged removal on gingival and bleeding indices and alveolar bone height adjacent to mandible molar teeth, these indices were determined according to recurrent radio-graphical early signs of alveolar bone loss during three months. Sixty patients, 20 in each group, were studied. In the group I, overhang was removed with ultrasonic scale or bur and oral hygiene methods as usual were continued. In the group II, over-hang was left, but plaque controls as the prophylaxis and flossing were done. In the group III, restoration was changed and oral hygiene was done as usual. Plaque index and bleeding index were measured at the beginning of study and three months later. Findings: Statistical analysis of studied indices at the beginning and three months after treatment using paired test has shown significant differences in gingival inflammation, in all groups. Statistical analysis of indices using Tukey HSD test has also shown significant differences in decreasing gingival inflammation measure when the over hanged restoration was removed. While there is no difference between the other two groups. Conclusion: The results showed that plaque control causes subsidence of gingival inflammation and increasing of alveolar bone support, and it is more effective when the over hanged restoration is changed.展开更多
目的探讨成人骨型Ⅲ类患者矫治前后上下前牙区牙槽高度和宽度变化以及前牙区牙根位置变化。方法选取2020年5月—2022年11月在中山市小榄人民医院口腔科正畸掩饰治疗的成人骨型Ⅲ类患者50例,比较正畸治疗前后患者上下颌前牙牙槽骨厚度和...目的探讨成人骨型Ⅲ类患者矫治前后上下前牙区牙槽高度和宽度变化以及前牙区牙根位置变化。方法选取2020年5月—2022年11月在中山市小榄人民医院口腔科正畸掩饰治疗的成人骨型Ⅲ类患者50例,比较正畸治疗前后患者上下颌前牙牙槽骨厚度和高度,其中包括上前牙槽骨厚度(upper anterior alveolar bonethickness,UA)、上后牙槽骨厚度(upper posterior alveolar bone thickness,UP)、上牙槽骨总厚度(upper alveolar bone width,UW)、下前牙槽骨厚度(lower anterior alveolar bone thickness,LA)、下后牙槽骨厚度(lower posterior alveolar bone thickness,LP)、下牙槽骨总厚度(lower alveolar bone width,LW)、根中水平上前牙槽骨厚度(upper anterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UA-m)、根中水平上后牙槽骨厚度(upper posterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UP-m)、根中水平上牙槽骨总厚度(upper alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UW-m)、根中水平下前牙槽骨厚度(lower anterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LA-m)、根中水平下后牙槽骨厚度(lower posterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LP-m)、根中水平下牙槽骨总厚度(lower alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LW-m)以及上前牙槽骨高度(upper anterior alveolar bone height,UAH)和下前牙槽骨高度(lower anterior alveolarbone height,LAH)。结果正畸治疗前后患者UA、UP-m测量值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者UP、UW、UA-m、UW-m测量值均显著降低(P<0.05)。正畸治疗后患者LP、LA-m测量值与正畸治疗前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者LA、LW、LP-m、LW-m测量值均降低(P<0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者UAH、LAH测量值均显著降低(P<0.05)。正畸治疗后,患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度分别为(10.62±0.57)mm、(9.65±0.48)mm,正畸治疗前患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度分别为(11.01±0.58)mm、(10.37±0.48)mm,与正畸治疗前比较,患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度明显减小(P<0.05)。结论成人骨型Ⅲ类患者进行正畸掩饰治疗后,牙槽形态会发生相应改变,患者上下前牙牙槽骨厚度和高度会一定程度地减少。因此,在矫治过程中应当对患者牙槽形态的变化给予密切关注,尽量避免上下前牙发生代偿性移动,从而降低不良反应情况发生的风险。展开更多
文摘Objective: Conservative restoration principles that accurately reduce plaque accumulation are the goals of restorative dentistry. Correct and perfect restoration has an important effect on health of periodontious tissues. This study was done to compare the methods of oral hygiene, over hanged removal and restoration changing on periodontal health and alveolar bone height of restored mandible molars with proximal over hanged amalgam. Materials and Methods: All patients with over hanged amalgam restoration were randomly divided into three groups. In order to survey the effect of over hanged removal on gingival and bleeding indices and alveolar bone height adjacent to mandible molar teeth, these indices were determined according to recurrent radio-graphical early signs of alveolar bone loss during three months. Sixty patients, 20 in each group, were studied. In the group I, overhang was removed with ultrasonic scale or bur and oral hygiene methods as usual were continued. In the group II, over-hang was left, but plaque controls as the prophylaxis and flossing were done. In the group III, restoration was changed and oral hygiene was done as usual. Plaque index and bleeding index were measured at the beginning of study and three months later. Findings: Statistical analysis of studied indices at the beginning and three months after treatment using paired test has shown significant differences in gingival inflammation, in all groups. Statistical analysis of indices using Tukey HSD test has also shown significant differences in decreasing gingival inflammation measure when the over hanged restoration was removed. While there is no difference between the other two groups. Conclusion: The results showed that plaque control causes subsidence of gingival inflammation and increasing of alveolar bone support, and it is more effective when the over hanged restoration is changed.
文摘目的探讨成人骨型Ⅲ类患者矫治前后上下前牙区牙槽高度和宽度变化以及前牙区牙根位置变化。方法选取2020年5月—2022年11月在中山市小榄人民医院口腔科正畸掩饰治疗的成人骨型Ⅲ类患者50例,比较正畸治疗前后患者上下颌前牙牙槽骨厚度和高度,其中包括上前牙槽骨厚度(upper anterior alveolar bonethickness,UA)、上后牙槽骨厚度(upper posterior alveolar bone thickness,UP)、上牙槽骨总厚度(upper alveolar bone width,UW)、下前牙槽骨厚度(lower anterior alveolar bone thickness,LA)、下后牙槽骨厚度(lower posterior alveolar bone thickness,LP)、下牙槽骨总厚度(lower alveolar bone width,LW)、根中水平上前牙槽骨厚度(upper anterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UA-m)、根中水平上后牙槽骨厚度(upper posterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UP-m)、根中水平上牙槽骨总厚度(upper alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,UW-m)、根中水平下前牙槽骨厚度(lower anterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LA-m)、根中水平下后牙槽骨厚度(lower posterior alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LP-m)、根中水平下牙槽骨总厚度(lower alveolar bone thickness at the mid-root level,LW-m)以及上前牙槽骨高度(upper anterior alveolar bone height,UAH)和下前牙槽骨高度(lower anterior alveolarbone height,LAH)。结果正畸治疗前后患者UA、UP-m测量值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者UP、UW、UA-m、UW-m测量值均显著降低(P<0.05)。正畸治疗后患者LP、LA-m测量值与正畸治疗前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者LA、LW、LP-m、LW-m测量值均降低(P<0.05)。与正畸治疗前比较,正畸治疗后患者UAH、LAH测量值均显著降低(P<0.05)。正畸治疗后,患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度分别为(10.62±0.57)mm、(9.65±0.48)mm,正畸治疗前患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度分别为(11.01±0.58)mm、(10.37±0.48)mm,与正畸治疗前比较,患者上下颌前牙解剖牙根长度明显减小(P<0.05)。结论成人骨型Ⅲ类患者进行正畸掩饰治疗后,牙槽形态会发生相应改变,患者上下前牙牙槽骨厚度和高度会一定程度地减少。因此,在矫治过程中应当对患者牙槽形态的变化给予密切关注,尽量避免上下前牙发生代偿性移动,从而降低不良反应情况发生的风险。
