Background:Degradable magnesium implants are promising for clinical fracture treatment,providing less stress-shielding mechanical support and superior bone-strengthening benefits to traditional materials.The quality o...Background:Degradable magnesium implants are promising for clinical fracture treatment,providing less stress-shielding mechanical support and superior bone-strengthening benefits to traditional materials.The quality of preclinical research is essential for developing Mg implants;however,there are considerable variations in the model selection and study design in published studies,posing challenges for safe and effective clinical translation of lab discoveries.Objective:The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the current progress on in vivo research of Mg implants for fracture treatment,focusing on model selection,Mg materials,implant design,methodological and analyzing techniques,aiming to provide comprehensive guidance for future preclinical research.Materials and methods:Pub Med and Embase online databases were searched to identify researches investigating Mg implants in animal models of fracture from 1960 to December 2019,using a combination of keywords:magnesium and fracture.Eligible studies were included without language restriction.Data extraction was conducted for qualitative analysis.Meta-analysis was not performed due to extensive heterogeneities among studies.Results:Twenty studies published from 2014 to 2019 were included.Publication information,animal model,methodological quality,implants preparation,and evaluation techniques were extracted.The methodological assessment revealed low to high risk of bias among studies.Both rodent and non-rodent species were selected,and the anatomical sites for inducing fractures included both cranial-facial and limb bones.Pure Mg and alloys with or without surface modification were evaluated,covering implant designs of both intra-medullary and extra-medullary fixation.Radiological and histological evaluations were commonly conducted.Conclusions:Published in vivo evidence confirmed the role of Mg-based implants in promoting fracture healing.However,considering heterogeneity in animal selection,implant preparation,and evaluation methods,there still lacks a standardized reference model.By analyzing the information extracted from included studies,the systematic review may facilitate planning and conducting preclinical research with translational perspective.展开更多
Periodontitis is a prevalent oral disease. It can cause tooth loss and has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. While existing treatments can only slow the progression of periodontitis, they are unable ...Periodontitis is a prevalent oral disease. It can cause tooth loss and has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. While existing treatments can only slow the progression of periodontitis, they are unable to achieve complete regeneration and functional reconstruction of periodontal tissues. As a result, regenerative therapies based on biomaterials have become a focal point of research in the field of periodontology. Despite numerous studies reporting the superiority of new materials in periodontal regeneration, limited progress has been made in translating these findings into clinical practice. This may be due to the lack of appropriate animal models to simulate the tissue defects caused by human periodontitis. This review aims to provide an overview of established animal models for periodontal regeneration, examine their advantages and limitations, and outline the steps for model construction. The objective is to determine the most relevant animal models for periodontal regeneration based on the hypothesis and expected outcomes.展开更多
Animal studies play a vital role in validating the concept,feasibility,safety,performance and efficacy of biomaterials products during their bench-to-clinic translation.This article aims to share regulatory considerat...Animal studies play a vital role in validating the concept,feasibility,safety,performance and efficacy of biomaterials products during their bench-to-clinic translation.This article aims to share regulatory considerations for animal studies of biomaterial products.After briefly emphasizing the importance of animal studies,issues of animal studies during biomaterial products’translation are discussed.Animal studies with unclear purposes,flawed design and poor reporting quality could significantly reduce the translation efficiency and create regulatory challenges.Regulatory perspectives on the purpose,principle,quality and regulatory science of animal studies are also presented.Animal studies should have clear purposes,follow principles of 3R+DQ(replacement,reduction,refinement,design and quality)and execute under an efficiently operating quality management system.With the advancement of regulatory science,National Medical Products Administration of China has been developing a series of standards and guidance documents on animal studies of medical devices.Case studies of making decisions on whether to conduct animal studies are provided in the end with drug-eluting stents as examples.In summary,animal studies of biomaterial products should pay close attention to the rationale,design and quality in order to achieve their purposes.展开更多
Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality,leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society,while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration(IDD).H...Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality,leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society,while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration(IDD).However,the existing treatments,such as medicines,chiropractic adjustments and surgery,cannot achieve ideal disc regeneration.Therefore,advanced bioactive therapies are implemented,including stem cells delivery,bioreagents administration,and implantation of biomaterials etc.Among these researches,few reported unsatisfying regenerative outcomes.However,these advanced therapies have barely achieved successful clinical translation.The main reason for the inconsistency between satisfying preclinical results and poor clinical translation may largely rely on the animal models that cannot actually simulate the human disc degeneration.The inappropriate animal model also leads to difficulties in comparing the efficacies among biomaterials in different reaches.Therefore,animal models that better simulate the clinical charateristics of human IDD should be acknowledged.In addition,in vivo regenerative outcomes should be carefully evaluated to obtain robust results.Nevertheless,many researches neglect certain critical characteristics,such as adhesive properties for biomaterials blocking annulus fibrosus defects and hyperalgesia that is closely related to the clinical manifestations,e.g,low back pain.Herein,in this review,we summarized the animal models established for IDD,and highlighted the proper models and parameters that may result in acknowledged IDD models.Then,we discussed the existing biomaterials for disc regeneration and the characteristics that should be considered for regenerating different parts of discs.Finally,well-established assays and parameters for in vivo disc regeneration are explored.展开更多
Diabetic wounds are a common complication in diabetes patients.Due to peripheral nerve damage and vascular dysfunction,diabetic wounds are prone to progress to local ulcers,wound gangrene and even to require amputatio...Diabetic wounds are a common complication in diabetes patients.Due to peripheral nerve damage and vascular dysfunction,diabetic wounds are prone to progress to local ulcers,wound gangrene and even to require amputation,bringing huge psychological and economic burdens to patients.However,the current treatment methods for diabetic wounds mainly include wound accessories,negative pressure drainage,skin grafting and surgery;there is still no ideal treatment to promote diabetic wound healing at present.Appropriate animal models can simulate the physiological mechanism of diabetic wounds,providing a basis for translational research in treating diabetic wound healing.Although there are no animal models that can fully mimic the pathophysiological mechanisms of diabetic wounds in humans,it is vital to explore animal simulation models used in basic research and preclinical studies of diabetic wounds.In addition,hydrogel materials are regarded as a promising treatment for diabetic wounds because of their good antimicrobial activity,biocompatibility,biodegradation and appropriate mechanical properties.Herein,we review and discuss the different animal models used to investigate the pathological mechanisms of diabetic wounds.We further discuss the promising future application of hydrogel biomaterials in diabetic wound healing.展开更多
Clinical therapeutics for the regeneration of osteochondral defects(OCD)in the early stages of osteoarthritis remain an enormous challenge in orthopaedics.For in-depth studies of tissue engineering and regenerative me...Clinical therapeutics for the regeneration of osteochondral defects(OCD)in the early stages of osteoarthritis remain an enormous challenge in orthopaedics.For in-depth studies of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in terms of OCD treatment,the utility of an optimal OCD animal model is crucial for assessing the effects of implanted biomaterials on the repair of damaged osteochondral tissues.Currently,the most frequently used in vivo animal models for OCD regeneration include mice,rats,rabbits,dogs,pigs,goats,sheep,horses and nonhuman primates.However,there is no single“gold standard”animal model to accurately recapitulate human disease in all aspects,thus understanding the benefits and limitations of each animal model is critical for selecting the most suitable one.In this review,we aim to elaborate the complex pathological changes in osteoarthritic joints and to summarise the advantages and limitations of OCD animal models utilised for biomaterial testing along with the methodology of outcome assessment.Furthermore,we review the surgical procedures of OCD creation in different species,and the novel biomaterials that promote OCD regeneration.Above all,it provides a significant reference for selection of an appropriate animal model for use in preclinical in vivo studies of biomaterial-assisted osteochondral regeneration in osteoarthritic joints.展开更多
背景:镁合金材料依靠其优良的生物相容性和可降解性被誉为“革命性的金属材料”,其降解对内皮化的影响具有重大研究意义。目的:综述镁合金材料的研究进展。方法:利用计算机检索PubMed、中国知网数据库、Web of Science和Elsevier等数据...背景:镁合金材料依靠其优良的生物相容性和可降解性被誉为“革命性的金属材料”,其降解对内皮化的影响具有重大研究意义。目的:综述镁合金材料的研究进展。方法:利用计算机检索PubMed、中国知网数据库、Web of Science和Elsevier等数据库中的相关文献,以“金属生物材料,镁合金材料,血管支架,内皮化,动物实验,体外实验”为中文主题检索词,以“Metallic biomaterials,Magnesium alloys,Vascular stents,Endothelialization,Animal experiments,In vitro”为英文检索词进行检索,检索时限为2015-2022年,通过阅读文题和摘要进行初步筛选,最终纳入116篇文献进行结果分析。结果与结论:镁合金材料降解形成的含一定浓度镁离子的微环境有利于内皮细胞及平滑肌细胞的增殖,镁离子对内皮化的作用基本被认可。但降解速率过快是镁合金的最大问题,镁离子浓度过高会出现细胞毒性,因此目前的研究多集中于改善其降解,提高生物相容性。目前常见的改善镁合金降解的方法有纯化、合金化、表面改性,均可提高其耐腐蚀性,并且不同元素的合金化对镁合金的改善是不同方面,未来可能针对不同需求来选择不同合金化的镁合金以适应临床患者的情况,除引入其他元素外,改进镁合金的制作工艺改善降解问题也可能是一种值得尝试的方法。展开更多
Osteochondral defects are caused by injury to both the articular cartilage and subchondral bone within skeletal joints. They can lead to irreversible joint damage and increase the risk of progression to osteoarthritis...Osteochondral defects are caused by injury to both the articular cartilage and subchondral bone within skeletal joints. They can lead to irreversible joint damage and increase the risk of progression to osteoarthritis. Current treatments for osteochondral injuries are not curative and only target symptoms, highlighting the need for a tissue engineering solution. Scaffold-based approaches can be used to assist osteochondral tissue regeneration, where biomaterials tailored to the properties of cartilage and bone are used to restore the defect and minimise the risk of further joint degeneration. This review captures original research studies published since 2015, on multiphasic scaffolds used to treat osteochondral defects in animal models. These studies used an extensive range of biomaterials for scaffold fabrication, consisting mainly of natural and synthetic polymers. Different methods were used to create multiphasic scaffold designs, including by integrating or fabricating multiple layers, creating gradients, or through the addition of factors such as minerals, growth factors, and cells. The studies used a variety of animals to model osteochondral defects, where rabbits were the most commonly chosen and the vast majority of studies reported small rather than large animal models. The few available clinical studies reporting cell-free scaffolds have shown promising early-stage results in osteochondral repair, but long-term follow-up is necessary to demonstrate consistency in defect restoration. Overall, preclinical studies of multiphasic scaffolds show favourable results in simultaneously regenerating cartilage and bone in animal models of osteochondral defects, suggesting that biomaterials-based tissue engineering strategies may be a promising solution.展开更多
文摘Background:Degradable magnesium implants are promising for clinical fracture treatment,providing less stress-shielding mechanical support and superior bone-strengthening benefits to traditional materials.The quality of preclinical research is essential for developing Mg implants;however,there are considerable variations in the model selection and study design in published studies,posing challenges for safe and effective clinical translation of lab discoveries.Objective:The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the current progress on in vivo research of Mg implants for fracture treatment,focusing on model selection,Mg materials,implant design,methodological and analyzing techniques,aiming to provide comprehensive guidance for future preclinical research.Materials and methods:Pub Med and Embase online databases were searched to identify researches investigating Mg implants in animal models of fracture from 1960 to December 2019,using a combination of keywords:magnesium and fracture.Eligible studies were included without language restriction.Data extraction was conducted for qualitative analysis.Meta-analysis was not performed due to extensive heterogeneities among studies.Results:Twenty studies published from 2014 to 2019 were included.Publication information,animal model,methodological quality,implants preparation,and evaluation techniques were extracted.The methodological assessment revealed low to high risk of bias among studies.Both rodent and non-rodent species were selected,and the anatomical sites for inducing fractures included both cranial-facial and limb bones.Pure Mg and alloys with or without surface modification were evaluated,covering implant designs of both intra-medullary and extra-medullary fixation.Radiological and histological evaluations were commonly conducted.Conclusions:Published in vivo evidence confirmed the role of Mg-based implants in promoting fracture healing.However,considering heterogeneity in animal selection,implant preparation,and evaluation methods,there still lacks a standardized reference model.By analyzing the information extracted from included studies,the systematic review may facilitate planning and conducting preclinical research with translational perspective.
文摘Periodontitis is a prevalent oral disease. It can cause tooth loss and has a significant impact on patients’ quality of life. While existing treatments can only slow the progression of periodontitis, they are unable to achieve complete regeneration and functional reconstruction of periodontal tissues. As a result, regenerative therapies based on biomaterials have become a focal point of research in the field of periodontology. Despite numerous studies reporting the superiority of new materials in periodontal regeneration, limited progress has been made in translating these findings into clinical practice. This may be due to the lack of appropriate animal models to simulate the tissue defects caused by human periodontitis. This review aims to provide an overview of established animal models for periodontal regeneration, examine their advantages and limitations, and outline the steps for model construction. The objective is to determine the most relevant animal models for periodontal regeneration based on the hypothesis and expected outcomes.
文摘Animal studies play a vital role in validating the concept,feasibility,safety,performance and efficacy of biomaterials products during their bench-to-clinic translation.This article aims to share regulatory considerations for animal studies of biomaterial products.After briefly emphasizing the importance of animal studies,issues of animal studies during biomaterial products’translation are discussed.Animal studies with unclear purposes,flawed design and poor reporting quality could significantly reduce the translation efficiency and create regulatory challenges.Regulatory perspectives on the purpose,principle,quality and regulatory science of animal studies are also presented.Animal studies should have clear purposes,follow principles of 3R+DQ(replacement,reduction,refinement,design and quality)and execute under an efficiently operating quality management system.With the advancement of regulatory science,National Medical Products Administration of China has been developing a series of standards and guidance documents on animal studies of medical devices.Case studies of making decisions on whether to conduct animal studies are provided in the end with drug-eluting stents as examples.In summary,animal studies of biomaterial products should pay close attention to the rationale,design and quality in order to achieve their purposes.
基金supported by the Major Research Plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.91649204)the National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2016YFC1100100)+2 种基金the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81974352)the Scientific Research Training Program for Young Talents from Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82002333)Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(No.LQ21H060004).
文摘Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality,leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society,while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration(IDD).However,the existing treatments,such as medicines,chiropractic adjustments and surgery,cannot achieve ideal disc regeneration.Therefore,advanced bioactive therapies are implemented,including stem cells delivery,bioreagents administration,and implantation of biomaterials etc.Among these researches,few reported unsatisfying regenerative outcomes.However,these advanced therapies have barely achieved successful clinical translation.The main reason for the inconsistency between satisfying preclinical results and poor clinical translation may largely rely on the animal models that cannot actually simulate the human disc degeneration.The inappropriate animal model also leads to difficulties in comparing the efficacies among biomaterials in different reaches.Therefore,animal models that better simulate the clinical charateristics of human IDD should be acknowledged.In addition,in vivo regenerative outcomes should be carefully evaluated to obtain robust results.Nevertheless,many researches neglect certain critical characteristics,such as adhesive properties for biomaterials blocking annulus fibrosus defects and hyperalgesia that is closely related to the clinical manifestations,e.g,low back pain.Herein,in this review,we summarized the animal models established for IDD,and highlighted the proper models and parameters that may result in acknowledged IDD models.Then,we discussed the existing biomaterials for disc regeneration and the characteristics that should be considered for regenerating different parts of discs.Finally,well-established assays and parameters for in vivo disc regeneration are explored.
基金supported by National Natural Sciences Foundation of China(Nos.82002313,82072444)Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Oral and Maxillofacial Development and Regeneration(No.2020kqhm008).
文摘Diabetic wounds are a common complication in diabetes patients.Due to peripheral nerve damage and vascular dysfunction,diabetic wounds are prone to progress to local ulcers,wound gangrene and even to require amputation,bringing huge psychological and economic burdens to patients.However,the current treatment methods for diabetic wounds mainly include wound accessories,negative pressure drainage,skin grafting and surgery;there is still no ideal treatment to promote diabetic wound healing at present.Appropriate animal models can simulate the physiological mechanism of diabetic wounds,providing a basis for translational research in treating diabetic wound healing.Although there are no animal models that can fully mimic the pathophysiological mechanisms of diabetic wounds in humans,it is vital to explore animal simulation models used in basic research and preclinical studies of diabetic wounds.In addition,hydrogel materials are regarded as a promising treatment for diabetic wounds because of their good antimicrobial activity,biocompatibility,biodegradation and appropriate mechanical properties.Herein,we review and discuss the different animal models used to investigate the pathological mechanisms of diabetic wounds.We further discuss the promising future application of hydrogel biomaterials in diabetic wound healing.
基金This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(No.2021YFA1102600)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82002315).
文摘Clinical therapeutics for the regeneration of osteochondral defects(OCD)in the early stages of osteoarthritis remain an enormous challenge in orthopaedics.For in-depth studies of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine in terms of OCD treatment,the utility of an optimal OCD animal model is crucial for assessing the effects of implanted biomaterials on the repair of damaged osteochondral tissues.Currently,the most frequently used in vivo animal models for OCD regeneration include mice,rats,rabbits,dogs,pigs,goats,sheep,horses and nonhuman primates.However,there is no single“gold standard”animal model to accurately recapitulate human disease in all aspects,thus understanding the benefits and limitations of each animal model is critical for selecting the most suitable one.In this review,we aim to elaborate the complex pathological changes in osteoarthritic joints and to summarise the advantages and limitations of OCD animal models utilised for biomaterial testing along with the methodology of outcome assessment.Furthermore,we review the surgical procedures of OCD creation in different species,and the novel biomaterials that promote OCD regeneration.Above all,it provides a significant reference for selection of an appropriate animal model for use in preclinical in vivo studies of biomaterial-assisted osteochondral regeneration in osteoarthritic joints.
基金support from the National Health and Medical Research Council(NHMRC)of Australia(GNT1120249).
文摘Osteochondral defects are caused by injury to both the articular cartilage and subchondral bone within skeletal joints. They can lead to irreversible joint damage and increase the risk of progression to osteoarthritis. Current treatments for osteochondral injuries are not curative and only target symptoms, highlighting the need for a tissue engineering solution. Scaffold-based approaches can be used to assist osteochondral tissue regeneration, where biomaterials tailored to the properties of cartilage and bone are used to restore the defect and minimise the risk of further joint degeneration. This review captures original research studies published since 2015, on multiphasic scaffolds used to treat osteochondral defects in animal models. These studies used an extensive range of biomaterials for scaffold fabrication, consisting mainly of natural and synthetic polymers. Different methods were used to create multiphasic scaffold designs, including by integrating or fabricating multiple layers, creating gradients, or through the addition of factors such as minerals, growth factors, and cells. The studies used a variety of animals to model osteochondral defects, where rabbits were the most commonly chosen and the vast majority of studies reported small rather than large animal models. The few available clinical studies reporting cell-free scaffolds have shown promising early-stage results in osteochondral repair, but long-term follow-up is necessary to demonstrate consistency in defect restoration. Overall, preclinical studies of multiphasic scaffolds show favourable results in simultaneously regenerating cartilage and bone in animal models of osteochondral defects, suggesting that biomaterials-based tissue engineering strategies may be a promising solution.