Objective:To observe the clinical effect of articular cavity injection combined with bite splint therapy for the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction(ADDWoR).Methods:The research subjects for this...Objective:To observe the clinical effect of articular cavity injection combined with bite splint therapy for the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction(ADDWoR).Methods:The research subjects for this study were 30 patients with ADDWoR treated in the temporomandibular joint specialist outpatient clinic from November 2018 to November 2019,with a disease duration of 1 to 6 months.The treatment group was treated with an articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate+bite splint.The control group was treated with a simple articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate.The two groups were followed up once every 2 weeks to evaluate the treatment effect and observe the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 24.0.t-test and general linear regression analysis were carried out to compare the data of both groups,andχ^(2)-test and binary logistic regression analysis were performed for pain index comparison.Results:There was no significant difference in terms of the efficacy of the treatment received by both groups.The mouth opening and joint pain of patients in both groups were significantly improved after treatment(P<0.001).Conclusion:Articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate and occlusal splint therapy are both effective and safe methods for treating ADDWoR.展开更多
目的通过MRI评估稳定型咬合板治疗伴偏侧咀嚼单侧不可复性盘前移位患者的疗效。方法选取在解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科就诊,经过临床检查及影像学检查诊断为单侧不可复性颞下颌关节盘前移位患者34例,根据其是否存在偏侧咀嚼习惯,将...目的通过MRI评估稳定型咬合板治疗伴偏侧咀嚼单侧不可复性盘前移位患者的疗效。方法选取在解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科就诊,经过临床检查及影像学检查诊断为单侧不可复性颞下颌关节盘前移位患者34例,根据其是否存在偏侧咀嚼习惯,将其分为伴偏侧咀嚼组(17例)和无偏侧咀嚼组(17例),分析患者最大开口度、疼痛指数、关节盘长度、盘分界角、关节盘位置以及翼外肌特点。采用SPSS25.0软件对结果进行统计分析。结果稳定型咬合板治疗前,伴偏侧咀嚼(chewing side preference,CSP)组患者同侧关节盘-髁突角度(61.13±10.54°)大于无CSP组(51.12±17.27°);伴CSP组同侧、对侧关节盘-髁突角度差值(52.52±10.91°)大于无CSP组差值(41.26±17.78°);伴CSP组同侧、对侧翼外肌下头面积差值(-0.43±3.66mm2)小于无CSP组同侧、对侧翼外肌下头面积差值(0.288±4.57mm2),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经稳定型咬合板治疗后两组患者疼痛及最大开口度均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较两组治疗后疼痛及最大开口度无明显统计学差异(P>0.05);稳定型咬合板治疗后两组患者关节盘-髁突角度、关节盘长度减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组稳定型咬合板治疗后翼外肌上、下头长度、厚度和面积的平均值接近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,MMO(OR=0.743)与偏侧咀嚼存在相关性(P<0.05)。结论MRI能无创诊断ADDWoR,伴CSP的单侧ADDWoR患者患侧关节移位更加显著,且单侧ADDWoR患者MMO与CSP存在相关性,通过稳定型咬合板治疗能显著改善ADDWoR患者开口度及疼痛症状,缓解关节盘受压及关节盘移位程度。展开更多
目的:探讨义齿咬合板联合综合物理疗法治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位(anterior disc displacement without reduction,ADDwoR)的疗效。方法:选择2019年1月—2020年12月衡水市人民医院口腔正畸修复科就诊的牙列缺损或牙重度磨耗并诊断...目的:探讨义齿咬合板联合综合物理疗法治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位(anterior disc displacement without reduction,ADDwoR)的疗效。方法:选择2019年1月—2020年12月衡水市人民医院口腔正畸修复科就诊的牙列缺损或牙重度磨耗并诊断为ADDwoR患者60例,根据治疗方法不同,随机分为义齿咬合板组(A组)和义齿咬合板+综合物理疗法组(B组)。治疗前、治疗时每3周记录患者最大主动开口度(maximum mouth opening,MMO)、视觉模拟量表疼痛评分(visual analog pain score,VAS)。治疗前及治疗后3个月拍摄锥形束CT(CBCT),分析2组患者治疗前、后临床疗效指标变化及颞下颌关节CBCT三维数据差异。采用SPSS 26.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:治疗后3周,2组VAS和治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)且B组VAS降低较多;治疗后3周起,B组MMO、VAS和治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后9周起,A组MMO与治疗前相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但A组与B组MMO、VAS无统计学差异(P>0.05)。CBCT显示,治疗后关节前间隙变窄,关节后间隙增宽,关节上间隙增大,髁突水平角减小,关节结节斜度、髁突高度增大(P<0.05);关节窝深度、髁突前后径、内外径相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与A组相比,B组治疗后关节前、上、后间隙,髁突水平角,关节结节斜度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:义齿咬合板可有效改善ADDwoR症状,义齿咬合板联合综合物理疗法能迅速改善患者开口度,减轻患者关节区疼痛。展开更多
目的:通过Meta分析,比较手法复位联合咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者疼痛与最大张口度疗效是否优于仅进行手法或仅进行咬合板治疗。方法:计算机检索Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、维普(VIP)、中国知网(CNKI)、...目的:通过Meta分析,比较手法复位联合咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者疼痛与最大张口度疗效是否优于仅进行手法或仅进行咬合板治疗。方法:计算机检索Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、维普(VIP)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方中手法复位联合咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的随机对照试验(RCTs)文献,并参考Cochrane手册评估文献质量,运用RevMan5.4软件分析结局指标。结果:本研究纳入6个RCTs,患者共计393例。Meta分析结果显示,对于颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者,观察组进行手法复位联合咬合板治疗,在降低疼痛评分[SMD=-0.34,95%CI(-0.54,-0.13),P=0.001]与改善最大张口度[SMD=0.51,95%CI(0.31,0.71),P<0.00001]方面疗效均比对照组较优,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手法复位联合咬合板治疗改善颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者疼痛和最大张口度疗效优于单独使用手法复位或单独佩戴咬合板。展开更多
In this manuscript, the authors have studied the Disc Displacement (DD) status of patients with acute Closed Lock (CL) to determine differences between DD with Reduction (DDwR) and DD without Reduction (DDwoR). Among ...In this manuscript, the authors have studied the Disc Displacement (DD) status of patients with acute Closed Lock (CL) to determine differences between DD with Reduction (DDwR) and DD without Reduction (DDwoR). Among the acute CL patients who visited our hospital within 2 weeks of the onset of CL, we studied 10 patients whose CL was released (DDwR) and 13 patients whose CL was not released (DDwoR). The DDwoR group was significantly older than the DDwR group. Although the mouth opening distance was significantly greater in the DDwoR group than in the DDwR group, the two groups were identical in the duration of CL. Sagittal MRI images showed no significant differences between the two groups in disc length and disc thickness (anterior band, intermediate zone, and posterior band). Multisection sagittal and coronal images identified lateral DD in 7 of the 10 patients in the DDwR group, although no specific direction of the DD was observed in the DDwoR group. Furthermore, deformation of the medial disc was common in the DDwoR group but uncommon in the DDwR group.展开更多
文摘Objective:To observe the clinical effect of articular cavity injection combined with bite splint therapy for the treatment of anterior disc displacement without reduction(ADDWoR).Methods:The research subjects for this study were 30 patients with ADDWoR treated in the temporomandibular joint specialist outpatient clinic from November 2018 to November 2019,with a disease duration of 1 to 6 months.The treatment group was treated with an articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate+bite splint.The control group was treated with a simple articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate.The two groups were followed up once every 2 weeks to evaluate the treatment effect and observe the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 24.0.t-test and general linear regression analysis were carried out to compare the data of both groups,andχ^(2)-test and binary logistic regression analysis were performed for pain index comparison.Results:There was no significant difference in terms of the efficacy of the treatment received by both groups.The mouth opening and joint pain of patients in both groups were significantly improved after treatment(P<0.001).Conclusion:Articular cavity injection of sodium hyaluronate and occlusal splint therapy are both effective and safe methods for treating ADDWoR.
文摘目的通过MRI评估稳定型咬合板治疗伴偏侧咀嚼单侧不可复性盘前移位患者的疗效。方法选取在解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科就诊,经过临床检查及影像学检查诊断为单侧不可复性颞下颌关节盘前移位患者34例,根据其是否存在偏侧咀嚼习惯,将其分为伴偏侧咀嚼组(17例)和无偏侧咀嚼组(17例),分析患者最大开口度、疼痛指数、关节盘长度、盘分界角、关节盘位置以及翼外肌特点。采用SPSS25.0软件对结果进行统计分析。结果稳定型咬合板治疗前,伴偏侧咀嚼(chewing side preference,CSP)组患者同侧关节盘-髁突角度(61.13±10.54°)大于无CSP组(51.12±17.27°);伴CSP组同侧、对侧关节盘-髁突角度差值(52.52±10.91°)大于无CSP组差值(41.26±17.78°);伴CSP组同侧、对侧翼外肌下头面积差值(-0.43±3.66mm2)小于无CSP组同侧、对侧翼外肌下头面积差值(0.288±4.57mm2),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经稳定型咬合板治疗后两组患者疼痛及最大开口度均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较两组治疗后疼痛及最大开口度无明显统计学差异(P>0.05);稳定型咬合板治疗后两组患者关节盘-髁突角度、关节盘长度减小,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间比较无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。两组稳定型咬合板治疗后翼外肌上、下头长度、厚度和面积的平均值接近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,MMO(OR=0.743)与偏侧咀嚼存在相关性(P<0.05)。结论MRI能无创诊断ADDWoR,伴CSP的单侧ADDWoR患者患侧关节移位更加显著,且单侧ADDWoR患者MMO与CSP存在相关性,通过稳定型咬合板治疗能显著改善ADDWoR患者开口度及疼痛症状,缓解关节盘受压及关节盘移位程度。
文摘目的:通过Meta分析,比较手法复位联合咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者疼痛与最大张口度疗效是否优于仅进行手法或仅进行咬合板治疗。方法:计算机检索Web of Science、PubMed、Cochrane Library、维普(VIP)、中国知网(CNKI)、万方中手法复位联合咬合板治疗颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的随机对照试验(RCTs)文献,并参考Cochrane手册评估文献质量,运用RevMan5.4软件分析结局指标。结果:本研究纳入6个RCTs,患者共计393例。Meta分析结果显示,对于颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者,观察组进行手法复位联合咬合板治疗,在降低疼痛评分[SMD=-0.34,95%CI(-0.54,-0.13),P=0.001]与改善最大张口度[SMD=0.51,95%CI(0.31,0.71),P<0.00001]方面疗效均比对照组较优,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手法复位联合咬合板治疗改善颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位患者疼痛和最大张口度疗效优于单独使用手法复位或单独佩戴咬合板。
文摘In this manuscript, the authors have studied the Disc Displacement (DD) status of patients with acute Closed Lock (CL) to determine differences between DD with Reduction (DDwR) and DD without Reduction (DDwoR). Among the acute CL patients who visited our hospital within 2 weeks of the onset of CL, we studied 10 patients whose CL was released (DDwR) and 13 patients whose CL was not released (DDwoR). The DDwoR group was significantly older than the DDwR group. Although the mouth opening distance was significantly greater in the DDwoR group than in the DDwR group, the two groups were identical in the duration of CL. Sagittal MRI images showed no significant differences between the two groups in disc length and disc thickness (anterior band, intermediate zone, and posterior band). Multisection sagittal and coronal images identified lateral DD in 7 of the 10 patients in the DDwR group, although no specific direction of the DD was observed in the DDwoR group. Furthermore, deformation of the medial disc was common in the DDwoR group but uncommon in the DDwR group.
