Since taking office, the Trump administration's anti-terrorism policy has become increasingly clear. Its anti-terrorism measures and its internal and external anti-terrorism policies have introduced new features t...Since taking office, the Trump administration's anti-terrorism policy has become increasingly clear. Its anti-terrorism measures and its internal and external anti-terrorism policies have introduced new features that are distinct from those of the Obama administration. These include linking terrorism to Islam, violating traditional political correctness in order to enhance homeland security, sending large-scale troops to the Middle East, and delegating more authority to the US Defense Department and the Armed Forces. Trump's anti-terrorism policies have made obvious progress both at home and abroad. Along with the adjustment of its national security strategy, the status of the anti-terrorism policy in Trump's national security strategy and national defense strategy will decline.However, for the foreseeable future, anti-terrorism will remain an important issue for the Trump Administration, and in some circumstances,the investment for it may increase.展开更多
The September 11 event upset Japan’s diplomatic agenda and ushered in a strategic restructuring with the focus on anti-terrorism and the top priority given to ties with Washington. Its new diplomacy against terror st...The September 11 event upset Japan’s diplomatic agenda and ushered in a strategic restructuring with the focus on anti-terrorism and the top priority given to ties with Washington. Its new diplomacy against terror stresses three aspects: policy towards Washington for ensuring strategic center展开更多
This article briefly outlines how anti-terrorism struggles became linked and their relationship thereafter with human rights issues in international political life. With equal relevance and value to human development,...This article briefly outlines how anti-terrorism struggles became linked and their relationship thereafter with human rights issues in international political life. With equal relevance and value to human development, anti-terrorism efforts and human rights protection are themselves not mutually exclusive or contradictory. Their conflict in everyday life has sometimes resulted from the fact that they are both manipulated in the service of certain political ends. What's more, there has never been p erfect human rights protection in the world so far, which often makes human rights problems an easy charge against almost every government. No anti-terrorist activities in either the US or Europe have been really constrained by the idea of human rights no matter how beautiful their rhetoric has been. Now both human rights and anti-terrorism have been made into a tool of diplomacy and international politics. With the war in Afghanistan over, the United States is enhancing its human rights diplomacy together with its anti-terrorism diplomacy. Truly efficient, comprehensive international cooperation on anti-terrorism is still far away.展开更多
The relation between Anti-terrorism and human rights Protection is rather complicated. Based on the practices in Africa, this article analyses the conflicts and contradictions between the two. While countering terrori...The relation between Anti-terrorism and human rights Protection is rather complicated. Based on the practices in Africa, this article analyses the conflicts and contradictions between the two. While countering terrorism, governments have to take the duty of human rights protection as well. Rights are of key importance in preventing and countering terrorism. Integrating human rights construction into antiterrorism mechanism is rather helpful in eliminating various moods of dissatisfaction which are easy to breed terrorism.展开更多
“The inferiority complex after being accused”is one of the typical cultural psychologies of some people currently in the judicial field at the grassroots society in China.It is mainly manifested in their reluctance ...“The inferiority complex after being accused”is one of the typical cultural psychologies of some people currently in the judicial field at the grassroots society in China.It is mainly manifested in their reluctance to be sued or cooperated with the investigation,and keep away from grass-roots judicial field as far as possible in terms of geographical location and behavior.Once someone else are called by the real judiciary or individuals or organizations pretending to the judiciary,it is easy to trigger the illusion that they may have done something wrong in past times,then they can easily fall into a state of depression and confusion,and even be deceived by other malicious people.Obviously,similar psychology is not conducive to the rule by law and modernization of grassroots society,and it is not conducive to the construction of a harmonious police-civilian relationship.Based on humanistic care and universal law,it is necessary to achieve fine justice based on the perspectives of language culture,costume culture,public psychology,etc.,and gradually guide the traditional people to correctly face the phenomenon of the“inferiority complex after being accused”,so it can help they integrate themselves into the modern society ruled by law smoothly.展开更多
In the case of The King and Kwok Leung & Others [HKLRD] Centenary Supplement 1,the evidence was not translated to the accused,this was the case which didn't respect the accused's language right and human r...In the case of The King and Kwok Leung & Others [HKLRD] Centenary Supplement 1,the evidence was not translated to the accused,this was the case which didn't respect the accused's language right and human rights.And there is an irregularity in the criminal proceedings,it should be a mistrial.This essay will study this case and discuss it from the perspective language right and human right of the accused in criminal proceedings in Hong Kong.展开更多
文摘Since taking office, the Trump administration's anti-terrorism policy has become increasingly clear. Its anti-terrorism measures and its internal and external anti-terrorism policies have introduced new features that are distinct from those of the Obama administration. These include linking terrorism to Islam, violating traditional political correctness in order to enhance homeland security, sending large-scale troops to the Middle East, and delegating more authority to the US Defense Department and the Armed Forces. Trump's anti-terrorism policies have made obvious progress both at home and abroad. Along with the adjustment of its national security strategy, the status of the anti-terrorism policy in Trump's national security strategy and national defense strategy will decline.However, for the foreseeable future, anti-terrorism will remain an important issue for the Trump Administration, and in some circumstances,the investment for it may increase.
文摘The September 11 event upset Japan’s diplomatic agenda and ushered in a strategic restructuring with the focus on anti-terrorism and the top priority given to ties with Washington. Its new diplomacy against terror stresses three aspects: policy towards Washington for ensuring strategic center
文摘This article briefly outlines how anti-terrorism struggles became linked and their relationship thereafter with human rights issues in international political life. With equal relevance and value to human development, anti-terrorism efforts and human rights protection are themselves not mutually exclusive or contradictory. Their conflict in everyday life has sometimes resulted from the fact that they are both manipulated in the service of certain political ends. What's more, there has never been p erfect human rights protection in the world so far, which often makes human rights problems an easy charge against almost every government. No anti-terrorist activities in either the US or Europe have been really constrained by the idea of human rights no matter how beautiful their rhetoric has been. Now both human rights and anti-terrorism have been made into a tool of diplomacy and international politics. With the war in Afghanistan over, the United States is enhancing its human rights diplomacy together with its anti-terrorism diplomacy. Truly efficient, comprehensive international cooperation on anti-terrorism is still far away.
文摘The relation between Anti-terrorism and human rights Protection is rather complicated. Based on the practices in Africa, this article analyses the conflicts and contradictions between the two. While countering terrorism, governments have to take the duty of human rights protection as well. Rights are of key importance in preventing and countering terrorism. Integrating human rights construction into antiterrorism mechanism is rather helpful in eliminating various moods of dissatisfaction which are easy to breed terrorism.
文摘“The inferiority complex after being accused”is one of the typical cultural psychologies of some people currently in the judicial field at the grassroots society in China.It is mainly manifested in their reluctance to be sued or cooperated with the investigation,and keep away from grass-roots judicial field as far as possible in terms of geographical location and behavior.Once someone else are called by the real judiciary or individuals or organizations pretending to the judiciary,it is easy to trigger the illusion that they may have done something wrong in past times,then they can easily fall into a state of depression and confusion,and even be deceived by other malicious people.Obviously,similar psychology is not conducive to the rule by law and modernization of grassroots society,and it is not conducive to the construction of a harmonious police-civilian relationship.Based on humanistic care and universal law,it is necessary to achieve fine justice based on the perspectives of language culture,costume culture,public psychology,etc.,and gradually guide the traditional people to correctly face the phenomenon of the“inferiority complex after being accused”,so it can help they integrate themselves into the modern society ruled by law smoothly.
文摘In the case of The King and Kwok Leung & Others [HKLRD] Centenary Supplement 1,the evidence was not translated to the accused,this was the case which didn't respect the accused's language right and human rights.And there is an irregularity in the criminal proceedings,it should be a mistrial.This essay will study this case and discuss it from the perspective language right and human right of the accused in criminal proceedings in Hong Kong.
