Determinants for inadequate glycaemic control in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs alone

Background Prevalence of inadequate glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus （T2DM） remains high. We assessed glycaemic control in the real-life practice among people with T2DM in metropolises in China who were treated with oral antidiabetic drugs （OAD） alone and to determine factors associated with inadequate glycaemic control in this population. Methods An observational, cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted in 16 metropolitan medical centers. People with T2DM who had been followed-up before the index visit which occurred from January to September 2007 were included in the study. All subjects were 〉30 years of age at the time of T2DM diagnosis and had received monotherapy or combination therapy of OAD for at least 6 months. Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records. The main study outcome was the inadequate glucose control rate, which was calculated by the proportion of patients with haemoglobin Alc （HbAlc） 〉6.5% detected on the index visit. Results In this cohort of 455 patients with T2DM whose mean age was 60.6 years and mean disease duration was 6.1 years, 45.5% had inadequate glycaemic control. The mean （SD） HbA1c was 6.7% （1.3）. Multivariate Logistic regression showed that physical inactivity, disease duration 〉10 years, body mass index （BMI） ≥24 kg/m2, low homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function （HOMA-13） index, less frequency of medical visit and hypertriglyceridaemia were independent determinants of inadequate glycaemic control. Higher incidence of self-reported hypoglycemia experience （47.1% vs. 34.8%, P=0.008） and more fear of hypoglycemia quantified by Worry subscale of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey （HFS） II were happened in subjects with good glycemic control. Conclusion Approximately one half of these outpatients with T2DM from the metropolitan medical centers in China had inadequate glycaemic control treated with OAD alone, which raises the need for more effective educational and therapeutic approaches on management of hypertriglycemia, enhancing physical exercise and weight control, and at the same time. Iowerina the hvooalvcemic risk and diminishina the hvooalvcemic fear of oatients.

Effectiveness of drug interventions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease:A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is a major chronic liver disorder worldwide,and there is no established treatment for this disease.We conducted a network meta-analysis(NMA)to compare existing treatments,which include four classes of antidiabetic drugs,and examined the optimum treatments for NAFLD.AIM To compare the effectiveness of different treatments for NAFLD.METHODS An NMA was conducted using Stata 14.0(Corporation LLC,College Station,United States)and R(X643.6.3 version)in this study.Eligible randomized controlled trials(RCTs)were searched in the PubMed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Medline and Web of Science databases from database inception to April 2021.Two researchers independently screened the available studies in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria.The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies.The variables with and without dimensional differences were calculated as the standardized mean difference and weighted mean difference,respectively.An inconsistency model and“nodesplitting”technique were used to test for inconsistency.Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias.RESULTS Twenty-two eligible RCTs involving 1377 participants were eventually included in our analysis.Data were pooled using a random-effects model.Our NMA results revealed that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1RAs)were the most effective treatment,yielding improvements in hepatic fat content(HFC),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),serumγ-glutamyl transferase(GGT)and body weight[surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)=99.6%,92.6%,82.8%,92.3%and 99.6%,respectively],while thiazolidinediones(TZDs)were the best intervention for reducing the NAFLD activity score(NAS;SUCRA=98.9%).In addition,moderate performance was observed for the sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors groups(SUCRA=25.1%,66.2%,63.5%,58.2%and 71.9%for HFC,ALT,AST,GGT and body weight,respectively).However,metformin performed poorly according to most indicators(SUCRA=54.5%,0.3%,19.5%,33.7%,57.7%and 44.3%for HFC,NAS,ALT,AST,GGT and body weight,respectively).CONCLUSION GLP-1RAs may be the optimum choice for most patients with NAFLD.However,TZDs are considered the most effective therapies in NAFLD patients with histological disease activity.

Potential therapeutic targets for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease:Glucagon-like peptide 1

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)is the most rapidly growing contributor to liver mortality and morbidity.Hepatocellular injury in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH)is caused by an increase in metabolic substrates(glucose,fructose,and fatty acids),leading fatty acids to participate in pathways that cause cellular injury and a poor response to injury.The pathogenesis of this disease is largely associated with obesity,type 2 diabetes,and increasing age.To date,there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for NAFLD/NASH or its associated fibrosis.Since one of the pathogenic drivers of NASH is insulin resistance,therapies approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes are being evaluated in patients with NASH.Currently,the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist(GLP-1RA)semaglutide is a safe,well-studied therapeutic for NAFLD/NASH patients.Existing research demonstrates that semaglutide can increase the resolution of NASH but not improve fibrosis.However,improving the fibrosis of NAFLD is the only way to improve the long-term prognosis of NAFLD.Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH,combining therapies with complementary mechanisms may be beneficial.Researchers have conducted trials of semaglutide in combination with antifibrotic drugs.However,the results have not fully met expectations,and it cannot be ruled out that the reason is the short trial time.We should continue to pay increasing attention to GLP-1RAs.

Critical review of bone health,fracture risk and management of bone fragility in diabetes mellitus

The risk of fracture is increased in both type 1 diabetes mellitus(T1DM)and type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).However,in contrast to the former,patients with T2DM usually possess higher bone mineral density.Thus,there is a considerable difference in the pathophysiological basis of poor bone health between the two types of diabetes.Impaired bone strength due to poor bone microarchitecture and low bone turnover along with increased risk of fall are among the major factors behind elevated fracture risk.Moreover,some antidiabetic medications further enhance the fragility of the bone.On the other hand,antiosteoporosis medications can affect the glucose homeostasis in these patients.It is also difficult to predict the fracture risk in these patients because conventional tools such as bone mineral density and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool score assessment can underestimate the risk.Evidence-based recommendations for risk evaluation and management of poor bone health in diabetes are sparse in the literature.With the advancement in imaging technology,newer modalities are available to evaluate the bone quality and risk assessment in patients with diabetes.The purpose of this review is to explore the patho-physiology behind poor bone health in diabetic patients.Approach to the fracture risk evaluation in both T1DM and T2DM as well as the pragmatic use and efficacy of the available treatment options have been discussed in depth.

Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is expected to increase gradually with the prolongation of population aging and life expectancy. In addition to macrovascular and microvascular complications of elderly patients of diabetes mellitus, geriatric syndromes such as cognitive impairment, depression, urinary incontinence,falling and polypharmacy are also accompanied by aging. Individual functional status in the elderly shows heterogeneity so that in these patients, there are many unanswered questions about the management of diabetes treatment. The goals of diabetes treatment in elderly patients include hyperglycemia and risk factors, as in younger patients. comorbid diseases and functional limitations of individuals should be taken into consideration when setting treatment targets. Thus, treatment should be individualized. In the treatment of diabetes in vulnerable elderly patients, hypoglycemia, hypotension, and drug interactions due to multiple drug use should be avoided. Since it also affects the ability to self-care in these patients, management of other concurrent medical conditions is also important.

Holistic perspective of the role of gut microbes in diabetes mellitus and its management

The gut microbiota(GM)plays a role in the development and progression of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM)and its complications.Gut dysbiosis contributes to the pathogenesis of DM.The GM has been shown to influence the efficacy of different antidiabetic medications.Intake of gut biotics,like prebiotics,probiotics and synbiotics,can improve the glucose control as well as the metabolic profile associated with DM.There is some preliminary evidence that it might even help with the cardiovascular,ophthalmic,nervous,and renal complications of DM and even contribute to the prevention of DM.More large-scale research studies are needed before wide spread use of gut biotics in clinical practice as an adjuvant therapy to the current management of DM.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,diabetes medications and blood pressure

New glucose-lowering agents reduce liver enzyme levels and blood pressure(BP).Whether this finding can be extended to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD)patients,in whom a bidirectional association of NAFLD measures and BP has been also demonstrated,remains by and large unknown.