AIM:To compare effectiveness,safety,and cost of photodynamic therapy(PDT)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)in treatment of Barrett’s dysplasia(BD).METHODS:Consecutive case series of patients undergoing either PDT or RF...AIM:To compare effectiveness,safety,and cost of photodynamic therapy(PDT)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)in treatment of Barrett’s dysplasia(BD).METHODS:Consecutive case series of patients undergoing either PDT or RFA treatment at single center by a single investigator were compared.Thirty-three patients with high-grade dysplasia(HGD)had treatment with porfimer sodium photosensitzer and 630 nm laser(130 J/cm),with maximum of 3 treatment sessions.Fifty-three patients with BD(47 with low-grade dysplasia-LGD,6 with HGD)had step-wise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system with maximum of 4 treatment sessions.Both groups received proton pump inhibitors twice daily.Endoscopic biopsies were acquired at 2 and 12 mo after enrollment,with 4-quadrant biopsies every 1 cm of the original BE extent.A complete histological resolution response of BD(CR-D)was defined as all biopsies at the last endoscopy session negative for BD.Fisher’s exact test was used to assess differences between the two study groups for primary outcomes.For all outcomes,a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.RESULTS:Thirty(91%)PDT patients and 39(74%)RFA were men(P=0.05).The mean age was 70.7±12.2 and 65.4±12.7(P=0.10)year and mean length of BE was 5.4±3.2 cm and 5.7±3.2 cm(P=0.53)for PDT and RFA patients,respectively.The CR-D was(18/33)54.5%with PDT vs(47/53)88.7%with RFA(P=0.001).One patient with PDT had an esophageal perforation and was managed with non-surgical measures and no perforation was seen with RFA.PDT was five times more costly than RFA at our institution.The two groups were not randomized and had different BD grading are the limitations of the study.CONCLUSION:In our experience,RFA had higher rate of CR-D without any serious adverse events and was less costly than PDT for endoscopic treatment of BD.展开更多
Compare the effects of locomotion therapy and pelvis traction therapy to treat Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture.Methods Ninety-two cases with Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture were selecte...Compare the effects of locomotion therapy and pelvis traction therapy to treat Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture.Methods Ninety-two cases with Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture were selected and divided into 2 groups with locomotion therapy and pelvis traction thepapy respectively.Results Thoracolumbar height was measured according to X-ray results after 1 year follow-up.The height was (17.2±2.3)mm preoperatively and (24.4±3.1)mm postoperatively in locomotion therapy group while (16.8±2.6)mm preoperatively and (23.9±2.7)mm postoperatively in the pelvis traction therapy group.Conclusion There is no significant difference between effects on two groups.5 refs.展开更多
目的:比较碳离子二维放射治疗(two-dimensional carbon-ion radiotherapy,2D-CIRT)计划与光子容积调强放射治疗(volume modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌中剂量学优劣,为临床碳离子治疗提供依据。方法:选取我中心13...目的:比较碳离子二维放射治疗(two-dimensional carbon-ion radiotherapy,2D-CIRT)计划与光子容积调强放射治疗(volume modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌中剂量学优劣,为临床碳离子治疗提供依据。方法:选取我中心13例Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者,使用相同的处方剂量及危及器官约束条件,分别在Ciplan计划系统上设计2D-CIRT计划和Eclipse计划系统上设计VMAT计划,比较剂量-体积直方图,评价靶区剂量分布及危及器官受量。采用SPSS 22.0软件进行数据分析。结果:CIRT和VMAT计划肿瘤覆盖率均较好,PTV1的D_(98)、D_(95)、D_(50)差异无统计学意义,两种计划的均匀性指数(homogeneity index,HI)相似(CIRT与VMAT:0.39 Gy与0.38 Gy,P>0.05)。PTV2两种方案在D_(95)、D_(98)、D_(50)、D_(2)均有显著性差异,PTV2采用CIRT的HI也明显优于VMAT(CIRT vs VMAT:0.08 Gy vs 0.16 Gy,P=0.003)。与光子VMAT相比,CIRT计划中健侧肺的V_(5)、V_(10)、V_(20)、V_(30)、V_(40)和D_(mean)明显降低。患侧肺中CIRT的V_(5)低于VMAT(CIRT vs VMAT:53.00 vs 64.41,P=0.003),V_(10)、V_(20)、V_(30)、V_(40)、D_(mean)两种计划均无统计学差异;CIRT有较低的脊髓D max(CIRT vs VMAT:18.61 Gy vs 43.03 Gy,P=0.000)、食管D_(mean)(CIRT vs VMAT:16.25 Gy vs 20.38 Gy,P=0.031)和V_(5)0(CIRT vs VMAT:4.49 Gy vs 11.43 Gy,P=0.005)、骨V_(10)和V_(30),以及气管和支气管树的V_(5)0。结论:与光子VMAT相比,2D-CIRT被动束流扫描技术在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌治疗中显著降低了对危及器官的辐射剂量,对正常组织有更好的保护作用。展开更多
文摘AIM:To compare effectiveness,safety,and cost of photodynamic therapy(PDT)and radiofrequency ablation(RFA)in treatment of Barrett’s dysplasia(BD).METHODS:Consecutive case series of patients undergoing either PDT or RFA treatment at single center by a single investigator were compared.Thirty-three patients with high-grade dysplasia(HGD)had treatment with porfimer sodium photosensitzer and 630 nm laser(130 J/cm),with maximum of 3 treatment sessions.Fifty-three patients with BD(47 with low-grade dysplasia-LGD,6 with HGD)had step-wise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system with maximum of 4 treatment sessions.Both groups received proton pump inhibitors twice daily.Endoscopic biopsies were acquired at 2 and 12 mo after enrollment,with 4-quadrant biopsies every 1 cm of the original BE extent.A complete histological resolution response of BD(CR-D)was defined as all biopsies at the last endoscopy session negative for BD.Fisher’s exact test was used to assess differences between the two study groups for primary outcomes.For all outcomes,a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.RESULTS:Thirty(91%)PDT patients and 39(74%)RFA were men(P=0.05).The mean age was 70.7±12.2 and 65.4±12.7(P=0.10)year and mean length of BE was 5.4±3.2 cm and 5.7±3.2 cm(P=0.53)for PDT and RFA patients,respectively.The CR-D was(18/33)54.5%with PDT vs(47/53)88.7%with RFA(P=0.001).One patient with PDT had an esophageal perforation and was managed with non-surgical measures and no perforation was seen with RFA.PDT was five times more costly than RFA at our institution.The two groups were not randomized and had different BD grading are the limitations of the study.CONCLUSION:In our experience,RFA had higher rate of CR-D without any serious adverse events and was less costly than PDT for endoscopic treatment of BD.
文摘Compare the effects of locomotion therapy and pelvis traction therapy to treat Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture.Methods Ninety-two cases with Ⅰ～Ⅱ° thoracolumbar compression fracture were selected and divided into 2 groups with locomotion therapy and pelvis traction thepapy respectively.Results Thoracolumbar height was measured according to X-ray results after 1 year follow-up.The height was (17.2±2.3)mm preoperatively and (24.4±3.1)mm postoperatively in locomotion therapy group while (16.8±2.6)mm preoperatively and (23.9±2.7)mm postoperatively in the pelvis traction therapy group.Conclusion There is no significant difference between effects on two groups.5 refs.
文摘目的:比较碳离子二维放射治疗(two-dimensional carbon-ion radiotherapy,2D-CIRT)计划与光子容积调强放射治疗(volume modulated arc therapy,VMAT)计划在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌中剂量学优劣,为临床碳离子治疗提供依据。方法:选取我中心13例Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者,使用相同的处方剂量及危及器官约束条件,分别在Ciplan计划系统上设计2D-CIRT计划和Eclipse计划系统上设计VMAT计划,比较剂量-体积直方图,评价靶区剂量分布及危及器官受量。采用SPSS 22.0软件进行数据分析。结果:CIRT和VMAT计划肿瘤覆盖率均较好,PTV1的D_(98)、D_(95)、D_(50)差异无统计学意义,两种计划的均匀性指数(homogeneity index,HI)相似(CIRT与VMAT:0.39 Gy与0.38 Gy,P>0.05)。PTV2两种方案在D_(95)、D_(98)、D_(50)、D_(2)均有显著性差异,PTV2采用CIRT的HI也明显优于VMAT(CIRT vs VMAT:0.08 Gy vs 0.16 Gy,P=0.003)。与光子VMAT相比,CIRT计划中健侧肺的V_(5)、V_(10)、V_(20)、V_(30)、V_(40)和D_(mean)明显降低。患侧肺中CIRT的V_(5)低于VMAT(CIRT vs VMAT:53.00 vs 64.41,P=0.003),V_(10)、V_(20)、V_(30)、V_(40)、D_(mean)两种计划均无统计学差异;CIRT有较低的脊髓D max(CIRT vs VMAT:18.61 Gy vs 43.03 Gy,P=0.000)、食管D_(mean)(CIRT vs VMAT:16.25 Gy vs 20.38 Gy,P=0.031)和V_(5)0(CIRT vs VMAT:4.49 Gy vs 11.43 Gy,P=0.005)、骨V_(10)和V_(30),以及气管和支气管树的V_(5)0。结论:与光子VMAT相比,2D-CIRT被动束流扫描技术在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌治疗中显著降低了对危及器官的辐射剂量,对正常组织有更好的保护作用。
