Mechanisms of antinociceptive effects of ouabain in combination with neostigmine in the rat

BACKGROUND： It has been previously shown that intrathecal administration of either ouabain or neosdgmine can produce antinociceptive effects. Moreover, ouabain and neostigmine are differently associated with acetylcholine. OBJECTIVE： It has been hypothesized that intrathecal administration of ouabain, in combination with neostigmine, can produce antinociceptive synergistic effects. Atropine, as a competitive antagonist, was pre-injected to verify the mechanisms of action. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING： This study was a randomized, controlled, animal experiment, performed at the State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China between May 2006 and February 2007. MATERIALS： A total of 102 healthy, adult, Sprague Dawley rats were included. Ouabain and neostigmine （Sigma, USA）, as well as atropine （Tanabe Seiyaku, Japan）, were also used. METHODS： Varied doses of ouabain, neostigmine, and a combination of the two were intrathecally injected into rats. Six rats were allotted for each dose group. Intrathecal pretreatment with atropine was tested 10 minutes prior to intrathecal administration of neostigmine or the combination of ouabain and neostigmine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： Tail-flick tests were performed to measure tail-flick latency （seconds） prior to and after administration. The response in the tail-flick test was expressed as the percentage of maximum possible effect （% MPE）, where % MPE = [tail-flick latency after administration （seconds） -mean baseline value for tail-flick latency]/[ 10 seconds - the mean baseline value for tail-flick latency （seconds）] x 100%. RESULTS： Rat spinal intrathecal administration of either ouabain or neostigmine alone produced antinociceptive effects in a dose-dependent manner. Intrathecally administration of neostigmine （0.05, 0.1, 0.3 μg ） in combination with ouabain （1 μ g ） produced enhanced antinociceptive effects, with a % MPE of 29%, 78%, and 95%, respectively （P 〈 0.05）. Intrathecally administration of 0.3μg neostigmine （% MPE： 45%）, in combination with 1 μ g ouabain （% MPE： 27%） produced potent antinociceptive effects （% MPE： 95%）. Intrathecally pre-injected atropine antagonized the antinociceptive effects of neostigmine （3 μg）, or a combination of ouabain （1 μg） and neostigmine （0.3 μg） （P 〈 0.01）. CONCLUSION： Rat spinal intrathecal administration of either ouabain or neostigmine alone produced dose-dependent andnociceptive effects. Ouabain enhanced the antinociceptive effects of neostigmine. Atropine antagonized the antinociceptive effects of neostigmine or the combination of ouabain and neostigmine. This occurs possibly due to the fact that atropine is a competitive antagonist of the muscarinic acetylcboline receptors.

The Effect of Tramadol on Blood Glucose Levels in Rats

The Background: Tramadol, is a central acting analgesic that possesses weak affinity for the μ-opioid receptor and modifies transmission of nociceptive impulses through inhibition of monoamine reuptake. This study was designed to determine the effect of tramadol on blood glucose levels and also to investigate whether or not alpha-2 adrenergic receptors were responsible for this effect. Methods: Twenty-five Wistar male rats were assigned to four groups to receive: Group I: saline;Group II: tramadol (1 mg·kg-1);Group III and Group IV: pretreatment with a2-receptor antagonist drugs yohimbine (1 mg·kg-1) or idazoxan (1 mg·kg-1), 30 min before administration of tramadol (1 mg·kg-1). Samples for plasma glucose measurement were withdrawn at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes of the experiment. Results: A significant rise in blood glucose levels was observed following administration of i.v. tramadol. Pretreatment with both yohimbine and idazoxan (1 mg·kg-1) significantly attenuated tramadol-induced hyperglycemia. Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that, tramadol administered at an analgesic dose of 1 mg·kg-1 produces hyperglycemia in diethyl ether anesthetized rats. Reversal of this effect with a2-adrenoceptor blocking agents suggests that monoaminergic pathways which contribute to the analgesic action of tramadol, may have a role in the hyperglycemic action of the drug.