目的使用指南研究与评价工具Ⅱ(AGREEⅡ)评价儿童青少年维生素D(VD)临床实践指南(VD指南),反映目前儿童青少年补充VD的基本共识和存在的争议。方法制定VD指南的纳入标准和检索策略,检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万...目的使用指南研究与评价工具Ⅱ(AGREEⅡ)评价儿童青少年维生素D(VD)临床实践指南(VD指南),反映目前儿童青少年补充VD的基本共识和存在的争议。方法制定VD指南的纳入标准和检索策略,检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库、美国国立指南文库(NGC)、指南国际网络(G-I-N)等相关指南数据库,按纳入标准纳入有关儿童青少年VD指南,提取和描述VD指南AGREEⅡ评价信息,使用AGREEⅡ评价纳入指南质量,使用组内相关系数(ICC)进行评价员间一致性检验。分析比较不同VD指南推荐内容的共识和差异。结果共纳入9篇VD指南,分别来自美国、中国、加拿大、法国、波兰和澳大利亚/新西兰。发表年度从2006至2012年。3篇为循证指南,其中2篇采用GRADE证据分级系统,1篇采用AHRQ证据分级系统;其余6篇为非循证指南。①指南质量经AGREEⅡ评分显示:6大领域的评分中,范围和目的、清晰性和应用性的总体平均得分均>50%,指南制定的参与人员、制定的严谨性和编辑的独立性有待加强(平均得分分别为48%、42%和28%);循证指南在指南的参与人员、制定的严谨性、编辑的独立性方面优于非循证指南。②总体归纳不同VD指南之间在推荐内容上有5个方面的主要差异。VD预防建议:各指南基本认同的是0～1岁婴儿400IU·d-1的VD缺乏预防量是安全的;VD治疗建议:美国(ES)指南推荐2000 IU·d-1(1～18岁),维持6周;阳光照射:美国和澳大利亚/新西兰的指南持不同推荐意见;VD2或VD3:不同指南推荐意见不同;25羟维生素D(25OHD)水平:各指南基本认同25OHD水平<30nmol·L-1时,佝偻病的患病率增加;孕妇及哺乳期妇女:各指南推荐这一人群要注意及时补充VD,或维持适宜的25OHD水平。结论①纳入VD指南整体质量仍有待提高。循证指南质量在指南的参与人员、制定的严谨性、编辑独立性方面优于非循证指南。②纳入VD指南推荐内容虽有一定的差异,但对于0～18岁人群400 IU·d-1的VD缺乏预防量被认为是安全的剂量。③中国VD指南推荐内容参考了国外高质量的指南,改编和制定国内高质量的指南迫在眉睫。展开更多
Cholangiocarcinoma(CC)is the second most common primary liver tumour.High-quality guidelines are essential for effective patient stratification and individualised treatment.This study aimed to appraise the methodologi...Cholangiocarcinoma(CC)is the second most common primary liver tumour.High-quality guidelines are essential for effective patient stratification and individualised treatment.This study aimed to appraise the methodological quality of existing guidelines for the resection of CC using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research&Evaluation(AGREE II)instrument.A systematic search of the literature in Cochrane,PubMed,Google Scholar,and Embase was performed.Assessment of the clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)and consensuses was performed using the AGREE II instrument by four clinicians experienced in surgical practice and the AGREE II appraisal method.Literature searches identified 13 guidelines of highly variable quality according to the AGREE II criteria.The guidelines scored well in certain domains such as scope&purpose(median score across all guidelines;65%),clarity of presentation(76%),and editorial independence(56%).However,they scored poorly for applicability(13%),rigour of development(30%),and stakeholder involvement(39%).None of the 13 guidelines was recommended universally for use without modification.Overall,the methodological quality of guidelines on the surgical management of CC is poor.Future updates should address and modify shortcomings detected by the AGREE II instrument,thereby facilitating better patient stratification and individualised treatment strategies.展开更多
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for headache produced over the last two decades, including those covering specific interventions using Traditional Chinese M...OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for headache produced over the last two decades, including those covering specific interventions using Traditional Chinese Medicine.METHODS: The guidelines on headache disorders were obtained by searching a number of databases, including Pub Med, EMBASE, Web of Science,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang database, three guideline-related databases [Guideline-International Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Medlive], and the records of organizations that develop guidelines. The publication date was limited to the period from January 1996 to June 2015. The search terms "headache", "headache disorders", "cephalalgia", "migraine", "tension-type headache", "practice guideline", "consensus ", "statement", "regulation", and "recommendation" were used in the "Me SH" and "Free-text" fields. The guidelines were independently appraised by four researchers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ instrument.RESULTS: A total of 23 guidelines published between 1998 and 2014 were reviewed. The overall consistency of the four appraisers was good [interclass correlation coefficient 0.84; 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.82-0.86]. The mean(standard deviation) scores for scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence were 52.1(18.0), 39.5(17.1), 33.4(21.0), 49.8(21.9),23.8(19.3), and 24.2(23.7). Only two guidelines were recommended, 12 were recommended with modification, and nine were not recommended.CONCLUSION: Physical Traditional Chinese Medicine therapies were recommended to treat headache. The overall quality of headache guidelines was low in China, but evidence-based guidelines are gradually becoming mainstream. Guideline developers should carefully consider, in particular,three domains: rigor of development, applicability,and editorial independence.展开更多
文摘目的使用指南研究与评价工具Ⅱ(AGREEⅡ)评价儿童青少年维生素D(VD)临床实践指南(VD指南),反映目前儿童青少年补充VD的基本共识和存在的争议。方法制定VD指南的纳入标准和检索策略,检索PubMed、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库、美国国立指南文库(NGC)、指南国际网络(G-I-N)等相关指南数据库,按纳入标准纳入有关儿童青少年VD指南,提取和描述VD指南AGREEⅡ评价信息,使用AGREEⅡ评价纳入指南质量,使用组内相关系数(ICC)进行评价员间一致性检验。分析比较不同VD指南推荐内容的共识和差异。结果共纳入9篇VD指南,分别来自美国、中国、加拿大、法国、波兰和澳大利亚/新西兰。发表年度从2006至2012年。3篇为循证指南,其中2篇采用GRADE证据分级系统,1篇采用AHRQ证据分级系统;其余6篇为非循证指南。①指南质量经AGREEⅡ评分显示:6大领域的评分中,范围和目的、清晰性和应用性的总体平均得分均>50%,指南制定的参与人员、制定的严谨性和编辑的独立性有待加强(平均得分分别为48%、42%和28%);循证指南在指南的参与人员、制定的严谨性、编辑的独立性方面优于非循证指南。②总体归纳不同VD指南之间在推荐内容上有5个方面的主要差异。VD预防建议:各指南基本认同的是0～1岁婴儿400IU·d-1的VD缺乏预防量是安全的;VD治疗建议:美国(ES)指南推荐2000 IU·d-1(1～18岁),维持6周;阳光照射:美国和澳大利亚/新西兰的指南持不同推荐意见;VD2或VD3:不同指南推荐意见不同;25羟维生素D(25OHD)水平:各指南基本认同25OHD水平<30nmol·L-1时,佝偻病的患病率增加;孕妇及哺乳期妇女:各指南推荐这一人群要注意及时补充VD,或维持适宜的25OHD水平。结论①纳入VD指南整体质量仍有待提高。循证指南质量在指南的参与人员、制定的严谨性、编辑独立性方面优于非循证指南。②纳入VD指南推荐内容虽有一定的差异,但对于0～18岁人群400 IU·d-1的VD缺乏预防量被认为是安全的剂量。③中国VD指南推荐内容参考了国外高质量的指南,改编和制定国内高质量的指南迫在眉睫。
文摘Cholangiocarcinoma(CC)is the second most common primary liver tumour.High-quality guidelines are essential for effective patient stratification and individualised treatment.This study aimed to appraise the methodological quality of existing guidelines for the resection of CC using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research&Evaluation(AGREE II)instrument.A systematic search of the literature in Cochrane,PubMed,Google Scholar,and Embase was performed.Assessment of the clinical practice guidelines(CPGs)and consensuses was performed using the AGREE II instrument by four clinicians experienced in surgical practice and the AGREE II appraisal method.Literature searches identified 13 guidelines of highly variable quality according to the AGREE II criteria.The guidelines scored well in certain domains such as scope&purpose(median score across all guidelines;65%),clarity of presentation(76%),and editorial independence(56%).However,they scored poorly for applicability(13%),rigour of development(30%),and stakeholder involvement(39%).None of the 13 guidelines was recommended universally for use without modification.Overall,the methodological quality of guidelines on the surgical management of CC is poor.Future updates should address and modify shortcomings detected by the AGREE II instrument,thereby facilitating better patient stratification and individualised treatment strategies.
基金Supported by the Special Research Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Hospital of Chinese Medicine(No.YN2015MS22)the Science planning project of Guangzhou(No.2014Y2-00040)
文摘OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines for headache produced over the last two decades, including those covering specific interventions using Traditional Chinese Medicine.METHODS: The guidelines on headache disorders were obtained by searching a number of databases, including Pub Med, EMBASE, Web of Science,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang database, three guideline-related databases [Guideline-International Network, National Guideline Clearinghouse, and Medlive], and the records of organizations that develop guidelines. The publication date was limited to the period from January 1996 to June 2015. The search terms "headache", "headache disorders", "cephalalgia", "migraine", "tension-type headache", "practice guideline", "consensus ", "statement", "regulation", and "recommendation" were used in the "Me SH" and "Free-text" fields. The guidelines were independently appraised by four researchers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Ⅱ instrument.RESULTS: A total of 23 guidelines published between 1998 and 2014 were reviewed. The overall consistency of the four appraisers was good [interclass correlation coefficient 0.84; 95% confidence interval(CI) 0.82-0.86]. The mean(standard deviation) scores for scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence were 52.1(18.0), 39.5(17.1), 33.4(21.0), 49.8(21.9),23.8(19.3), and 24.2(23.7). Only two guidelines were recommended, 12 were recommended with modification, and nine were not recommended.CONCLUSION: Physical Traditional Chinese Medicine therapies were recommended to treat headache. The overall quality of headache guidelines was low in China, but evidence-based guidelines are gradually becoming mainstream. Guideline developers should carefully consider, in particular,three domains: rigor of development, applicability,and editorial independence.
