A new partitioning methodology is presented to accelerate 130nm and beyond large scale alternating phase shift mask(Alt PSM) design flow.This method deals with granularity self adaptively.Phas...A new partitioning methodology is presented to accelerate 130nm and beyond large scale alternating phase shift mask(Alt PSM) design flow.This method deals with granularity self adaptively.Phase conflicts resolution approaches are described and strategies guaranteeing phase compatible during layout compaction are also discussed.An efficient CAD prototype for dark field Alt PSM based on these algorithms is implemented.The experimental results on several industry layouts show that the tool can successfully cope with the rapid growth of phase conflicts with good quality and satisfy lower resource consumption with different requirements of precision and speedup.展开更多
目的研究在声场测试中,头戴式耳机和插入式耳机对不同频率声音的衰减作用。方法选取40名健听人,在声场条件下测试双耳裸耳听阈及双耳分别佩戴头戴式和插入式耳机双耳听阈,耳机均不给声。比较在声场条件下不同类型耳机对不同频率声音的...目的研究在声场测试中,头戴式耳机和插入式耳机对不同频率声音的衰减作用。方法选取40名健听人,在声场条件下测试双耳裸耳听阈及双耳分别佩戴头戴式和插入式耳机双耳听阈,耳机均不给声。比较在声场条件下不同类型耳机对不同频率声音的衰减作用。结果头戴式耳机在0.25~8 kHz每倍频程的声音衰减值分别为6.13±2.40 dB HL、7.00±3.36 dB HL、12.50±3.92 dB HL、18.75±5.03 dB HL、28.25±6.56 dB HL、17.50±5.99 dB HL;插入式耳机在0.25~8 kHz每倍频程的声音衰减值分别为16.88±5.27 dB HL、18.13±5.27 dB HL、22.38±4.08 dB HL、31.25±4.49 dB HL、36.13±5.49 dB HL、35.50±6.68 dB HL。结论两种不同类型耳机对不同频率声音的衰减均有显著效果,对声音的衰减值随着频率的升高而增加,在1~8 kHz范围内效果更显著,插入式耳机的衰减效果明显优于头戴式耳机。展开更多
文摘A new partitioning methodology is presented to accelerate 130nm and beyond large scale alternating phase shift mask(Alt PSM) design flow.This method deals with granularity self adaptively.Phase conflicts resolution approaches are described and strategies guaranteeing phase compatible during layout compaction are also discussed.An efficient CAD prototype for dark field Alt PSM based on these algorithms is implemented.The experimental results on several industry layouts show that the tool can successfully cope with the rapid growth of phase conflicts with good quality and satisfy lower resource consumption with different requirements of precision and speedup.
文摘目的研究在声场测试中,头戴式耳机和插入式耳机对不同频率声音的衰减作用。方法选取40名健听人,在声场条件下测试双耳裸耳听阈及双耳分别佩戴头戴式和插入式耳机双耳听阈,耳机均不给声。比较在声场条件下不同类型耳机对不同频率声音的衰减作用。结果头戴式耳机在0.25~8 kHz每倍频程的声音衰减值分别为6.13±2.40 dB HL、7.00±3.36 dB HL、12.50±3.92 dB HL、18.75±5.03 dB HL、28.25±6.56 dB HL、17.50±5.99 dB HL;插入式耳机在0.25~8 kHz每倍频程的声音衰减值分别为16.88±5.27 dB HL、18.13±5.27 dB HL、22.38±4.08 dB HL、31.25±4.49 dB HL、36.13±5.49 dB HL、35.50±6.68 dB HL。结论两种不同类型耳机对不同频率声音的衰减均有显著效果,对声音的衰减值随着频率的升高而增加,在1~8 kHz范围内效果更显著,插入式耳机的衰减效果明显优于头戴式耳机。
