Water conveyance tunnels usually experience high internal water pressures and complex soil conditions.Therefore,shield tunnels with double-lining structure have been adopted because of their high bearing capacity.The ...Water conveyance tunnels usually experience high internal water pressures and complex soil conditions.Therefore,shield tunnels with double-lining structure have been adopted because of their high bearing capacity.The effect of the interface between the segmental and inner linings on the bearing capacity has been widely investigated;however,the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity has not been emphasized enough.Therefore,in this study,model tests and an analytical solution are presented to elucidate the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity.First,model tests are conducted on double-lining models under sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstone conditions.The internal force and earth pressure under these different soil conditions are then compared to reveal the contribution of soil to the internal water pressure bearing capacity.Following this,an analytical solution,considering the soil–double-lining interaction,is proposed to further investigate the contribution of the soil.The analytical solution is verified with model tests.The analytical solution is in good agreement with the model test results and can be used to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the double-lining and soil contribution.The effect of soil on the bearing capacity is found to be related with the elastic modulus of the soil and the deformation state of the double-lining.Before the double-lining cracks,the sandy soil contributes 3.7%of the internal water pressure but the contribution of the soil rises to 10.4%when it is the highly weathered argillaceous siltstone.After the double-lining cracks,the soil plays an important role in bearing internal water pressure.The soil contributions of sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstones are 10.5%and 27.8%,respectively.The effect of soil should be considered in tunnel design with the internal water pressure.展开更多
为了研究钢筋缠绕钢筒混凝土压力管(BCCP)在内水压作用下的承载破坏特征,设计了三个不同管径的BCCP内水压现场原型试验.在管径1800 mm BCCP的钢筒、钢筋和混凝土保护层上布置环向应变片,逐级施加内水压至2.5 MPy,得到了各部位在内水压...为了研究钢筋缠绕钢筒混凝土压力管(BCCP)在内水压作用下的承载破坏特征,设计了三个不同管径的BCCP内水压现场原型试验.在管径1800 mm BCCP的钢筒、钢筋和混凝土保护层上布置环向应变片,逐级施加内水压至2.5 MPy,得到了各部位在内水压作用下的受力变化规律.主要结论如下:BCCP从生产时施加预应力到承受内水压至最终破坏的受力过程可分为5个阶段.1)管芯受预应力钢筋环向作用力阶段.缠筋后,钢筒与混凝土形成的管芯受到一个初始预压应力;2)保护层开裂前整管承受内水压弹性阶段.对应于试验中内水压小于1.5 MPa的阶段,管芯依然受压,而预应力钢筋和外混凝土保护层受拉;3)保护层开裂,管芯承受内水压弹性阶段.试验中当内水压达到1.6 MPa后,保护层开始达到抗拉强度开裂,混凝土管芯也从初始的受压慢慢转变为受拉,依然处于弹性状态;4)管芯开裂,钢筒和钢筋受拉弹性阶段.当内水压达到2.2 MPa后,管芯径向开裂,但是钢筒和钢筋的应力随内水压依然稳步增长;5)管道破坏阶段.钢筒和预应力钢筋达到最终屈服强度,整管丧失承载能力.研究成果可为BCCP在输调水工程中的推广使用以及相关标准的制定提供依据.展开更多
提出一种静压钢管注浆微型桩成桩工艺,包括混合注浆液(磷尾矿砂、水泥两种粉料与水混合)的配比设计与微型桩成桩施工方法。通过配比试验,分析水灰比(w/c)、磷尾矿砂与水泥质量比(s/c)对抗压强度的影响。通过现场7根短桩、6根长桩的注浆...提出一种静压钢管注浆微型桩成桩工艺,包括混合注浆液(磷尾矿砂、水泥两种粉料与水混合)的配比设计与微型桩成桩施工方法。通过配比试验,分析水灰比(w/c)、磷尾矿砂与水泥质量比(s/c)对抗压强度的影响。通过现场7根短桩、6根长桩的注浆与抗压承载力试验,研究注浆液类型、两阶段注浆工艺、注浆体积与微型桩抗压极限承载力之间的关系,将实测结果与现行桩基规范及FHWA(Federal High Way Administration)微型桩施工手册和施工指导手册的计算结果进行了比较,研究结果表明,混合注浆液比水泥净浆早期硬化快,28d强度相当,配比为w/c=0.6、s/c=0.5时可以满足强度与注浆工艺要求;注浆后微型钢管桩抗压极限承载力提高了75%~150%;注浆量为3倍钢管体积的微型桩,极限承载力实测值约是现行规范计算值的1.33倍,与FHWA计算结果接近。展开更多
基金the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission(No.2019-01-0700-07-456 E00051)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.51978517,52090082,and 52108381)the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Program(Nos.21DZ1200601 and 20DZ1201404)。
文摘Water conveyance tunnels usually experience high internal water pressures and complex soil conditions.Therefore,shield tunnels with double-lining structure have been adopted because of their high bearing capacity.The effect of the interface between the segmental and inner linings on the bearing capacity has been widely investigated;however,the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity has not been emphasized enough.Therefore,in this study,model tests and an analytical solution are presented to elucidate the effect of soil on the internal water pressure bearing capacity.First,model tests are conducted on double-lining models under sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstone conditions.The internal force and earth pressure under these different soil conditions are then compared to reveal the contribution of soil to the internal water pressure bearing capacity.Following this,an analytical solution,considering the soil–double-lining interaction,is proposed to further investigate the contribution of the soil.The analytical solution is verified with model tests.The analytical solution is in good agreement with the model test results and can be used to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the double-lining and soil contribution.The effect of soil on the bearing capacity is found to be related with the elastic modulus of the soil and the deformation state of the double-lining.Before the double-lining cracks,the sandy soil contributes 3.7%of the internal water pressure but the contribution of the soil rises to 10.4%when it is the highly weathered argillaceous siltstone.After the double-lining cracks,the soil plays an important role in bearing internal water pressure.The soil contributions of sandy soil and highly weathered argillaceous siltstones are 10.5%and 27.8%,respectively.The effect of soil should be considered in tunnel design with the internal water pressure.
文摘提出一种静压钢管注浆微型桩成桩工艺,包括混合注浆液(磷尾矿砂、水泥两种粉料与水混合)的配比设计与微型桩成桩施工方法。通过配比试验,分析水灰比(w/c)、磷尾矿砂与水泥质量比(s/c)对抗压强度的影响。通过现场7根短桩、6根长桩的注浆与抗压承载力试验,研究注浆液类型、两阶段注浆工艺、注浆体积与微型桩抗压极限承载力之间的关系,将实测结果与现行桩基规范及FHWA(Federal High Way Administration)微型桩施工手册和施工指导手册的计算结果进行了比较,研究结果表明,混合注浆液比水泥净浆早期硬化快,28d强度相当,配比为w/c=0.6、s/c=0.5时可以满足强度与注浆工艺要求;注浆后微型钢管桩抗压极限承载力提高了75%~150%;注浆量为3倍钢管体积的微型桩,极限承载力实测值约是现行规范计算值的1.33倍,与FHWA计算结果接近。
