The general problem of this research was how students respond to hate speech.The purpose of the study was to obtain an overview of(1)perceptions;(2)attitudes;and(3)student actions/participation towards hate speech.The...The general problem of this research was how students respond to hate speech.The purpose of the study was to obtain an overview of(1)perceptions;(2)attitudes;and(3)student actions/participation towards hate speech.The research approach used was quantitative and descriptive with survey method.The population of this study was all the administrators of the student executive board in UNTAN,IAIN,and IKIP PGRI Pontianak totaling 162 students.The number of research samples was 115 students determined by Slovin formula.The respondents were choosen randomly.Data collection used a questionnaire.Data analysis used percentage quantitative descriptive analysis techniques.The general conclusion of the study shows that student responses to hate speech are good.Specific conclusions of the study are:(1)student perceptions(knowledge)of hate speech are on average 78.26%know and 21.74%do not know about the utterances of hatred;(2)student attitudes towards hate speech are on average 78.14%students do not agree with hate speech and 21.86%agree;and(3)student actions or participation in hate speech are on average 78.51%students never take acts in hate speech and 21.49%ever.展开更多
The debate over whether boarding school is beneficial for students still exists in both developing and developed countries. In rural China, as a result of a national school merger program that began in 2001, the numbe...The debate over whether boarding school is beneficial for students still exists in both developing and developed countries. In rural China, as a result of a national school merger program that began in 2001, the number of boarding students has increased dramatically. Little research has been done, however, to measure how boarding status may be correlated with nutrition, health and educational outcomes. In this paper, we compare the outcomes of boarding to those of non-boarding students using a large, aggregate dataset that includes 59 rural counties across five provinces in China. We find that for all outcomes boarding students perform worse than non-boarding students. Despite these differences, the absolute levels of all outcomes are low for both boarding and non-boarding students, indicating a need for new policies that will target all rural students regardless of their boarding status.展开更多
IN a test. Li Xiangmei, a sixth grade student at the Central Primary School of Majuqiao Township, Tongxian County in the suburbs of Beijing, didn’t do well. She scored only 70-odd marks out of 100, and when she took ...IN a test. Li Xiangmei, a sixth grade student at the Central Primary School of Majuqiao Township, Tongxian County in the suburbs of Beijing, didn’t do well. She scored only 70-odd marks out of 100, and when she took the test home, her mother got so angry that she tore her textbooks to bits and wouldn’t allow her any lunch as a punishment.展开更多
文摘The general problem of this research was how students respond to hate speech.The purpose of the study was to obtain an overview of(1)perceptions;(2)attitudes;and(3)student actions/participation towards hate speech.The research approach used was quantitative and descriptive with survey method.The population of this study was all the administrators of the student executive board in UNTAN,IAIN,and IKIP PGRI Pontianak totaling 162 students.The number of research samples was 115 students determined by Slovin formula.The respondents were choosen randomly.Data collection used a questionnaire.Data analysis used percentage quantitative descriptive analysis techniques.The general conclusion of the study shows that student responses to hate speech are good.Specific conclusions of the study are:(1)student perceptions(knowledge)of hate speech are on average 78.26%know and 21.74%do not know about the utterances of hatred;(2)student attitudes towards hate speech are on average 78.14%students do not agree with hate speech and 21.86%agree;and(3)student actions or participation in hate speech are on average 78.51%students never take acts in hate speech and 21.49%ever.
基金The authors acknowledge the financial assistance of the National Natural Science Foundation of China （grant number 71473239） and the 111 talent recruitment base of the Chinese Ministry of Education and State Administration of Foreign Expert Affairs （grant number B16031）.
文摘The debate over whether boarding school is beneficial for students still exists in both developing and developed countries. In rural China, as a result of a national school merger program that began in 2001, the number of boarding students has increased dramatically. Little research has been done, however, to measure how boarding status may be correlated with nutrition, health and educational outcomes. In this paper, we compare the outcomes of boarding to those of non-boarding students using a large, aggregate dataset that includes 59 rural counties across five provinces in China. We find that for all outcomes boarding students perform worse than non-boarding students. Despite these differences, the absolute levels of all outcomes are low for both boarding and non-boarding students, indicating a need for new policies that will target all rural students regardless of their boarding status.
文摘IN a test. Li Xiangmei, a sixth grade student at the Central Primary School of Majuqiao Township, Tongxian County in the suburbs of Beijing, didn’t do well. She scored only 70-odd marks out of 100, and when she took the test home, her mother got so angry that she tore her textbooks to bits and wouldn’t allow her any lunch as a punishment.
