We reported two cases of liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombus that developed after liver transplantation for hepato cellular carcinoma (HCC). Both the patients were women aged 43 and 55 years, who had live...We reported two cases of liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombus that developed after liver transplantation for hepato cellular carcinoma (HCC). Both the patients were women aged 43 and 55 years, who had liver metastasis and portal vein tumor thrombus formation after liver transplantations for HCC.展开更多
Objective: To study the role of 125 I and 125 I plus gemcitabine (GEM) in treatment of unresectable carcinoma of pancreas. Methods: From April 2000 to April 2003, 38 untreated patients with locally advanced pan...Objective: To study the role of 125 I and 125 I plus gemcitabine (GEM) in treatment of unresectable carcinoma of pancreas. Methods: From April 2000 to April 2003, 38 untreated patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were collected and randomized into two groups: Arm A 125 I (18 patients) and Arm B 125 I+GEM (20 patients). Eligibility criteria were: cytologically and pathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma, Karnofsky performance status (kps) 60 80, age 18 75 years, adequate hematological, renal and liver function, and controllable pain. Arm A patients were treated with 125 I implants. Arm B patients started chemotherapy within 10 14 d post operatively following the implant procedure. Chemotherapy doses were as follows: GEM 1 000 mg/m 2 weekly × 3 followed by 1 week of rest for 3 cycles. In addition, all patients underwent laparotomy and surgical staging. The surgical procedures performed were biopsy, gastric bypass and biliary bypass. The total activity and number of seeds used were as recommended by Anderson. The mean activity, minimal peripheral dose (MPD), and volume of implants were 20 mCi, 14 000 cGy, and 53 cm 3, respectively. Results: Overall response rate (CR+PR) in Arm A was 37.6% and in Arm B it was 44.5% ( P >0.05). PR median duration in Arm A was 6.7 months and in Arm B it was 4.8 months ( P <0.05). Clinical benefit response was experienced by 11.7 % of Arm A compared with 42.1% of Arm B ( P <0.05). The incidences of hematological toxicity (such as neutropenia) between Arm A and Arm B were 5.8% and 21.1%, respectively ( P >0.05). The survival rates of 12 and 24 month were 32.5%, 16.3% for Arm A and 61%, 38.7% for Arm B ( P =0.04). The rate of complication of Arm A was lower than that of Arm B without statistical significance. Conclusion: To some extent, 125 I or 125 I plus GEM is able to lead to a moderate objective response for LAPC with obstructive jaundice on the base of biliary bypass or/and gastric bypass, but 125 I plus GEM is more effective than 125 I in improvement of the quality of life and survival rate in patients with LAPC.展开更多
Early stage cancers of tongue are treated traditionally with a wide local excision or hemiglossectomy, but the preservation of normal speech and swallowing are hampered. Most of the patients are treated with external ...Early stage cancers of tongue are treated traditionally with a wide local excision or hemiglossectomy, but the preservation of normal speech and swallowing are hampered. Most of the patients are treated with external beam irradiation to achieve the best locoregional control as only a limited number of tongue cancers can be excised. Underdeveloped nations with finite resources are still dependent on cobalt based external beam radiotherapy and sometimes a Linear Accelerator with two dimensional planning. This treatment has many limitations, as the large radiation fields irradiate not only the tumor but also normal tissue. The sequalae include mucositis, dry mouth, teeth and gum injury, spinal cord damage and rarely mandibular necrosis. Intensity modulated radiotherapy, which can abrogate these side effects, is not available to these patients. Irradiation using implanted solid radioactive sources into the tumor tissue is a viable option in this context. This kind of treatment is termed as brachytherapy and if the implant is introduced into the tissue then it is interstitial brachytherapy. This report details our experience in interstitial implantation, planning, dosimetry and treatment. Diagnosed cancers of anterior 2/3rd of lateral border of tongue with T1 N0M0 or T2 N0M0 stages were subjected to Iridium implantation under general anesthesia. Orthogonal films were taken and planning done with brachyvision treatment planning system. High dose rate radiotherapy was delivered as per the prescription. Excellent local control of the tumor was achieved with no undue morbidity to the adjacent structures. The patients were asked to undergo regular follow up. Surgical salvage was advised in cases of nodal recurrence. Interstitial implantation is a treatment that can be safely administered in early stage cancers of the tongue. This has remarkable efficacy and is also a patient friendly procedure.展开更多
Background: Patient setup errors in External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) are minimized to a great extent, due to recent technological developments but in contrary brachytherapy received least attention in inter-fraction ...Background: Patient setup errors in External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) are minimized to a great extent, due to recent technological developments but in contrary brachytherapy received least attention in inter-fraction catheter movement and its impact in dose delivery. This article deals with inter-fraction interstitial catheter movement and its impact in dose delivery to the target. An attempt is made to study the dosimetric impact of this variation. Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the inter-fraction variation in the position of implanted interstitial applicators and to assess the dosimetric impact in interstitial High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Materials and Methods: 55 patients treated for carcinoma tongue, breast, buccal mucosa, cervix, floor of mouth and soft tissue sarcoma over a period of 2 years (December 2011-May 2013) were considered. All the patients underwent CT scan on the next day of the implant and 3D planning was done either by Eclipse or Oncentra Master plan Treatment Planning System (TPS). Patients were treated by HDR brachytherapy remote after-loading units, either by Gamma Med iX plus or Microselectron. At the end of the last fraction, CT scan was repeated and re-planning done. The variation in position of the implanted applicators/catheters and its impact on dosimetric parameters were evaluated and analyzed. Results: The range of positional displacement of the interstitial catheters ranges from 4.5 mm to 6.8 mm. The maximum variation in prescribed dose to D90 of Clinical Target Volume was 10.88%. Conclusions: If the total duration of interstitial implant of HDR brachytherapy extends for more than a week from the day of imaging, it is recommended to do CT imaging and re-plan again. It is mandatory to suture the buttons of the implant to the skin. Edema and movement of organs (e.g., tongue) are the main cause for the positional variation of the catheters.展开更多
文摘We reported two cases of liver metastasis with portal vein tumor thrombus that developed after liver transplantation for hepato cellular carcinoma (HCC). Both the patients were women aged 43 and 55 years, who had liver metastasis and portal vein tumor thrombus formation after liver transplantations for HCC.
文摘Objective: To study the role of 125 I and 125 I plus gemcitabine (GEM) in treatment of unresectable carcinoma of pancreas. Methods: From April 2000 to April 2003, 38 untreated patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were collected and randomized into two groups: Arm A 125 I (18 patients) and Arm B 125 I+GEM (20 patients). Eligibility criteria were: cytologically and pathologically proven pancreatic carcinoma, Karnofsky performance status (kps) 60 80, age 18 75 years, adequate hematological, renal and liver function, and controllable pain. Arm A patients were treated with 125 I implants. Arm B patients started chemotherapy within 10 14 d post operatively following the implant procedure. Chemotherapy doses were as follows: GEM 1 000 mg/m 2 weekly × 3 followed by 1 week of rest for 3 cycles. In addition, all patients underwent laparotomy and surgical staging. The surgical procedures performed were biopsy, gastric bypass and biliary bypass. The total activity and number of seeds used were as recommended by Anderson. The mean activity, minimal peripheral dose (MPD), and volume of implants were 20 mCi, 14 000 cGy, and 53 cm 3, respectively. Results: Overall response rate (CR+PR) in Arm A was 37.6% and in Arm B it was 44.5% ( P >0.05). PR median duration in Arm A was 6.7 months and in Arm B it was 4.8 months ( P <0.05). Clinical benefit response was experienced by 11.7 % of Arm A compared with 42.1% of Arm B ( P <0.05). The incidences of hematological toxicity (such as neutropenia) between Arm A and Arm B were 5.8% and 21.1%, respectively ( P >0.05). The survival rates of 12 and 24 month were 32.5%, 16.3% for Arm A and 61%, 38.7% for Arm B ( P =0.04). The rate of complication of Arm A was lower than that of Arm B without statistical significance. Conclusion: To some extent, 125 I or 125 I plus GEM is able to lead to a moderate objective response for LAPC with obstructive jaundice on the base of biliary bypass or/and gastric bypass, but 125 I plus GEM is more effective than 125 I in improvement of the quality of life and survival rate in patients with LAPC.
文摘Early stage cancers of tongue are treated traditionally with a wide local excision or hemiglossectomy, but the preservation of normal speech and swallowing are hampered. Most of the patients are treated with external beam irradiation to achieve the best locoregional control as only a limited number of tongue cancers can be excised. Underdeveloped nations with finite resources are still dependent on cobalt based external beam radiotherapy and sometimes a Linear Accelerator with two dimensional planning. This treatment has many limitations, as the large radiation fields irradiate not only the tumor but also normal tissue. The sequalae include mucositis, dry mouth, teeth and gum injury, spinal cord damage and rarely mandibular necrosis. Intensity modulated radiotherapy, which can abrogate these side effects, is not available to these patients. Irradiation using implanted solid radioactive sources into the tumor tissue is a viable option in this context. This kind of treatment is termed as brachytherapy and if the implant is introduced into the tissue then it is interstitial brachytherapy. This report details our experience in interstitial implantation, planning, dosimetry and treatment. Diagnosed cancers of anterior 2/3rd of lateral border of tongue with T1 N0M0 or T2 N0M0 stages were subjected to Iridium implantation under general anesthesia. Orthogonal films were taken and planning done with brachyvision treatment planning system. High dose rate radiotherapy was delivered as per the prescription. Excellent local control of the tumor was achieved with no undue morbidity to the adjacent structures. The patients were asked to undergo regular follow up. Surgical salvage was advised in cases of nodal recurrence. Interstitial implantation is a treatment that can be safely administered in early stage cancers of the tongue. This has remarkable efficacy and is also a patient friendly procedure.
文摘Background: Patient setup errors in External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) are minimized to a great extent, due to recent technological developments but in contrary brachytherapy received least attention in inter-fraction catheter movement and its impact in dose delivery. This article deals with inter-fraction interstitial catheter movement and its impact in dose delivery to the target. An attempt is made to study the dosimetric impact of this variation. Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate the inter-fraction variation in the position of implanted interstitial applicators and to assess the dosimetric impact in interstitial High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Materials and Methods: 55 patients treated for carcinoma tongue, breast, buccal mucosa, cervix, floor of mouth and soft tissue sarcoma over a period of 2 years (December 2011-May 2013) were considered. All the patients underwent CT scan on the next day of the implant and 3D planning was done either by Eclipse or Oncentra Master plan Treatment Planning System (TPS). Patients were treated by HDR brachytherapy remote after-loading units, either by Gamma Med iX plus or Microselectron. At the end of the last fraction, CT scan was repeated and re-planning done. The variation in position of the implanted applicators/catheters and its impact on dosimetric parameters were evaluated and analyzed. Results: The range of positional displacement of the interstitial catheters ranges from 4.5 mm to 6.8 mm. The maximum variation in prescribed dose to D90 of Clinical Target Volume was 10.88%. Conclusions: If the total duration of interstitial implant of HDR brachytherapy extends for more than a week from the day of imaging, it is recommended to do CT imaging and re-plan again. It is mandatory to suture the buttons of the implant to the skin. Edema and movement of organs (e.g., tongue) are the main cause for the positional variation of the catheters.
