Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy and to investigate its treatment.Methods Clinical case records of 45 cases of caesarean scar pregnancy from June 2003 to September 2007 w...Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy and to investigate its treatment.Methods Clinical case records of 45 cases of caesarean scar pregnancy from June 2003 to September 2007 were reviewed. The characteristics and management of cases were analyzed.Results The women's average age was 32.8 ± 5.1 years. All cases had amenorrhoea, and 27 cases had vaginal bleeding from spotting to morderate. Seven cases were misdiagnosed as normal early intrauterine pregnancy or inevitable miscarriage before dilation and curettage(D & C). In case of massive bleeding, caesarean scar pregnancy was diagnosed after D & C. Bleeding was controlled and uterus was conserved in 6 cases, and 1 case underwent hysterectomy because of uncontrollable bleeding. The remaining 38 cases had ultrasound scan, which indicated scar pregnancy before primary treatment, Eight cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage, in which only 2 cases had slight bleeding in the operation and no further treatment, Nineteen cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage after uterine artery embolization, in which 17 cases needed no further treatment and had no complications. The success rate was 89.4% (17/19). Eleven cases were primarily treated with trichosanthin 1.2 mg intramuscular. No one encountered massive bleeding, but 7 cases of these 11 cases needed extra treatment.Conclusion Caesarean scar pregnancy must be cautious of especially in cases of inevitable miscarriage. Dilation and curettage followed uterine artery embolization can be used as the primary treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy.展开更多
Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy (CSEP) is a rare, but potentially catastrophic complication of a previous Caesarean Section (CS) birth. This is a review of 5 cases of CSEP managed in our Early Pregnancy Unit at Watfo...Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy (CSEP) is a rare, but potentially catastrophic complication of a previous Caesarean Section (CS) birth. This is a review of 5 cases of CSEP managed in our Early Pregnancy Unit at Watford General Hospital within a 10-month period. Two patients had only one previous CS, whilst 2 had two and the last had 3 previous CS. All our patients presented within the first trimester of pregnancy (range 6 to 11 weeks’ gestation) with light vaginal bleeding;4 of them had associated mild to moderate abdominal pain. All were diagnosed using transvaginal ultrasound scan. Three of our patients were managed surgically by Suction Evacuation under Ultrasound guidance and insertion of a Foley’s catheter prophylactically for tamponade in order to reduce blood loss both intra- and post-operatively. One of our patients had a heterotopic pregnancy with a viable intrauterine pregnancy and a live CSEP. She declined any intervention so she was managed conservatively with weekly Consultant appointments and scans. There was a subsequent demise of the CSEP and she continued with a singleton pregnancy. None of our patients were managed medically. There is no absolute consensus on diagnostic criteria and there is no standard management protocol so each woman should be given all the available information and the opportunity to decide on the management of her pregnancy. The risk of a CSEP in a subsequent pregnancy should be part of the consent process for CS.展开更多
Caesarean section is dramatically increased throughout the world in recent years. Rupture of the uterus is a devastating complication in trial of labour following previous Caesarean section. Evidence suggests that the...Caesarean section is dramatically increased throughout the world in recent years. Rupture of the uterus is a devastating complication in trial of labour following previous Caesarean section. Evidence suggests that the size of the uterine scar and the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) are associated directly with the risk of uterine rupture and risk of dehiscence in subsequent deliveries. Impact of the prelabour and labour Cesarean section on the RMT has not been studied in detail. Objectives: To compare RMT, Caesarean scar defects and to evaluate the elasticity of the Caesarean scar between women who underwent prelabour and labour Caesarean sections. Methods: This was a Cross sectional analytical study. Women who underwent Caesarean section in their first pregnancy were recruited. Sample was stratified to prelabour and labour Caesarean section groups. Transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed six months following the Caesarean section. Dimensions of the uterus, uterine scar defect, RMT and elastosonography of the uterine scar were assessed. Results: A total of 240 postpartum women were analyzed. Uterine niche was detectable in 194 subjects. Prelabour CS group had demonstrated 91.7% (n = 110) scar defects (uterine niche) out of 120 cases and the rate among labour CS group was 70% (n = 84). There was a significant difference in the presence of uterine niche among 2 groups as Prelabour group was found to have more scar defects (p mm (SD 1.2) and 4.99 mm (SD 1.3) respectively and there was no significant difference (t = 0.38, p = 0.71). There was no significant difference between the dimensions of the uterine CS defects of the studied groups. Prelabour CS group had significantly higher Target strain [0.28 vs. 0.24 (t = 2.12, p = 0.04)] and significantly less strain ratio [1.45 vs. 1.55 (t -2.42, p = 0.04)] than labour CS group indicating a better scar in prelabour group. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in RMT and uterine scar defects between prelabour and labour Caesarean section groups. But prelabour Caesarean section scars were less stiff than labour Caesarean section scars. Further studies are warranted to elaborate on the association.展开更多
<strong>Background: </strong>The rate of uterus is successfully conserved following the treatment of scar pregnancy which is high so pregnancy outcome following caesarean scar ectopics is getting more and ...<strong>Background: </strong>The rate of uterus is successfully conserved following the treatment of scar pregnancy which is high so pregnancy outcome following caesarean scar ectopics is getting more and more attention. <strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess pregnancy course and outcome after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. <strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective case series of 40 patients become pregnancy after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by Foley or Methotrexate and aspiration. Patients in present study were treated at Hung Vuong and Tu Du Hospital between 2015 and 2017. A telephone follow-up was conducted after cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment. The outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery were all recorded. <strong>Results:</strong> In 40 pregnancies, there are 22 cases of intrauterine pregnancy with childbirth (55%);all babies were born healthy, with no complications recorded in pregnancy. 12 Women had recurrent scar ectopic (30%). There were 2 abortion cases, 2 cases of ectopic pregnancy, and 2 cases of early miscarriage. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our study shows that reproductive outcomes following treatment of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are favourable. The risk of recurrent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a concern.展开更多
Introduction: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is defined as implantation of gestational sac at the site of cesarean scar. It’s a serious diagnosis that has become more prevalent in recent years and related to the incre...Introduction: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is defined as implantation of gestational sac at the site of cesarean scar. It’s a serious diagnosis that has become more prevalent in recent years and related to the increasing rate of cesarean sections reported worldwide. Identifying these cases and treating them is challenging, with no agreed upon universal protocol for successful treatment. We aim to evaluate the success rate and outcome of medical management for Cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: It was a retrospective descriptive study of all cesarean scar pregnancies managed at fetal medicine unit at Latifa Hospital in Dubai, UAE the main obstetrics & Gynecology tertiary hospital in Dubai Emirate, UAE from 2015 to 2017. Certainly, a set of diagnostic criteria were implemented to confirm the diagnosis of CSP. The cases were then offered our proposed management which is systemic methotrexate injections ± KCL. Follow up made by serial βhcg and ultrasound scan. The data were collected used specified data collection sheet for this purpose then analyzed and presented using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 26. Results: 33 cases of cesarean scar pregnancies are confirmed and medically managed during the study period. The study subjects composed of a group of patients who had a viable CSP and received local KCL injection + systemic methotrexate, a second group who had non-viable CSP and received systemic methotrexate 20 cases were viable pregnancies who received combined local potassium chloride plus systemic methotrexate, and 13 were non-viable received systemic methotrexate only. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 8 weeks (SD ± 1.8). On average our cases had a history of 3 previous cesarean sections (range 1 - 6). Overall, the success rate calculated from our study population for medical management of CSP was 77.8%;this varied between viable CSP which had a success rate of 66.7% and non-viable CSP which had a success rate of 100%. The average period of outpatient follow-up for the patients to achieve complete resolution was 14 weeks (SD ± 7.5). Conclusions: Medical management of CSP in the form of systemic methotrexate ± local KCL injections proves to have acceptability and a good success rate especially for non-viable CSP, low complications rate and with the benefit of preserving future fertility.展开更多
Objective: This study was aimed at identifying predictive factors of complications during vaginal delivery on scarred uterus. Methodology: During 9 months, from October 1st, 2015 to June 30th, 2016, a case control stu...Objective: This study was aimed at identifying predictive factors of complications during vaginal delivery on scarred uterus. Methodology: During 9 months, from October 1st, 2015 to June 30th, 2016, a case control study was carried out at the Yaoundé Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital. Eighty nine women each with a single scarred uterus who presented with complications during delivery (cases) were compared to eighty nine others who had a successfully trial of scar (control) during the study period. Data were analyzed using the CSPro version 6.0 and SPSS version 20.0 softwares with statistical significance set at P Results: We recruited 2 groups of 89 women, aged 17 to 40 years, with an average age of 29.05 years. The majority of women with complications were married (50.6%) and unemployed (42.8%). Following univariate analysis, predictive factors of complications were: prematurity (OR = 7.4), post-term (OR = 13.7), no history of vaginal delivery on scarred uterus (OR = 4.3), inter-pregnancy spacing period greater than 60 months (five years) (OR = 2.9), History of caesarian delivery indicated for cephalo-pelvic disproportion (OR = 6.6), less than four ante-natal consultations (OR = 3.6), antenatal consultations done in a Health Centre (OR = 2.7), ante-natal follow up conducted by a nurse (OR = 2.4;IC = [1.2 - 4.7]), referral from a different health unit (OR = 4.4, IC = 2.0 - 9.4), a Bishop score less than 7 on admission (OR = 12.4, IC = 5.6 - 27.4), a meconium stained amniotic fluid (OR = 9.9;CI = [3.6 - 26.8]). After logistic regression, the retained factors associated with complications were post-term (aOR = 34.5), absence of vaginal birth after caesarian delivery, (aOR = 11.7), previous caesarean section indicated for cephalo-pelvic disproportion (aOR = 6.1), a bishop score less than 7 (aOR = 12.0), meconium stained amniotic fluid (aOR = 13.6). Conclusion: Predictive factors of complications can help anticipate negative obstetric outcomes.展开更多
目的:探讨子宫肌层3层缝合对剖宫产术后憩室大小的影响及子宫切口憩室(CSD)形成的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2022年4~11月于华东师范大学附属芜湖医院行剖宫产术的240例产妇的临床资料,根据子宫肌层缝合方式的不同分为3层缝合组(124例)...目的:探讨子宫肌层3层缝合对剖宫产术后憩室大小的影响及子宫切口憩室(CSD)形成的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2022年4~11月于华东师范大学附属芜湖医院行剖宫产术的240例产妇的临床资料,根据子宫肌层缝合方式的不同分为3层缝合组(124例)和双层缝合组(116例);另根据术后是否形成CSD将产妇分为CSD组(23例)和非CSD组(217例)。对比3层缝合组与双层缝合组产妇的临床特点,采用多因素Logistic回归分析CSD形成的独立影响因素并构建人工神经网络模型;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线进行模型验证。结果:①3层缝合组产妇的子宫肌层瘢痕厚度显著高于双层缝合组(7.06±2.09 mm vs.5.68±1.97 mm);而CSD形成情况(4.03%vs.15.52%)和憩室大小(0.36±0.09 ml vs.0.47±0.12 ml)则显著低于双层缝合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);②多因素分析示,子宫后屈、剖宫产次数≥2次、胎膜早破、围产期感染、剖宫产时机(择期)是影响CSD形成的独立危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05),而子宫肌层3层缝合是保护性因素(OR<1,P<0.05);③人工神经网络预测模型显示剖宫产次数、胎膜早破以及是否进行3层缝合所占权重均较高,经ROC曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线验证表明该模型预测能力良好。结论:CSD的形成与子宫后屈、剖宫产次数、胎膜早破、围产期感染、剖宫产时机等指标有关,临床应重点关注,此外,子宫肌层3层缝合可降低CSD的形成概率,在临床上值得推广应用。展开更多
目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合...目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合传统美容缝合的60例患者纳入B组,两组出院后均随访6个月。比较两组切口缝合时间、切口愈合时间及住院时间,术后24 h、72 h、7 d切口疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],术后1个月切口愈合情况、切口并发症发生率,术后6个月切口瘢痕情况[温哥华瘢痕评定量表(VSS)]、缝合效果满意度。结果:两组切口缝合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组切口愈合时间与住院时间均短于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后24 h、72 h VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后7 d VAS评分低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,A组伤口愈合等级优于B组,A组切口并发症总发生率低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组VSS评分低于B组,A组缝合效果满意度高于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪在剖宫产患者中应用价值高,能有效促进术后患者腹部切口愈合,减少术后疼痛,降低切口并发症发生及瘢痕增生风险,并获得更高的患者满意度。展开更多
文摘Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of caesarean scar pregnancy and to investigate its treatment.Methods Clinical case records of 45 cases of caesarean scar pregnancy from June 2003 to September 2007 were reviewed. The characteristics and management of cases were analyzed.Results The women's average age was 32.8 ± 5.1 years. All cases had amenorrhoea, and 27 cases had vaginal bleeding from spotting to morderate. Seven cases were misdiagnosed as normal early intrauterine pregnancy or inevitable miscarriage before dilation and curettage(D & C). In case of massive bleeding, caesarean scar pregnancy was diagnosed after D & C. Bleeding was controlled and uterus was conserved in 6 cases, and 1 case underwent hysterectomy because of uncontrollable bleeding. The remaining 38 cases had ultrasound scan, which indicated scar pregnancy before primary treatment, Eight cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage, in which only 2 cases had slight bleeding in the operation and no further treatment, Nineteen cases were primarily treated with dilation and curettage after uterine artery embolization, in which 17 cases needed no further treatment and had no complications. The success rate was 89.4% (17/19). Eleven cases were primarily treated with trichosanthin 1.2 mg intramuscular. No one encountered massive bleeding, but 7 cases of these 11 cases needed extra treatment.Conclusion Caesarean scar pregnancy must be cautious of especially in cases of inevitable miscarriage. Dilation and curettage followed uterine artery embolization can be used as the primary treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy.
文摘Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy (CSEP) is a rare, but potentially catastrophic complication of a previous Caesarean Section (CS) birth. This is a review of 5 cases of CSEP managed in our Early Pregnancy Unit at Watford General Hospital within a 10-month period. Two patients had only one previous CS, whilst 2 had two and the last had 3 previous CS. All our patients presented within the first trimester of pregnancy (range 6 to 11 weeks’ gestation) with light vaginal bleeding;4 of them had associated mild to moderate abdominal pain. All were diagnosed using transvaginal ultrasound scan. Three of our patients were managed surgically by Suction Evacuation under Ultrasound guidance and insertion of a Foley’s catheter prophylactically for tamponade in order to reduce blood loss both intra- and post-operatively. One of our patients had a heterotopic pregnancy with a viable intrauterine pregnancy and a live CSEP. She declined any intervention so she was managed conservatively with weekly Consultant appointments and scans. There was a subsequent demise of the CSEP and she continued with a singleton pregnancy. None of our patients were managed medically. There is no absolute consensus on diagnostic criteria and there is no standard management protocol so each woman should be given all the available information and the opportunity to decide on the management of her pregnancy. The risk of a CSEP in a subsequent pregnancy should be part of the consent process for CS.
文摘Caesarean section is dramatically increased throughout the world in recent years. Rupture of the uterus is a devastating complication in trial of labour following previous Caesarean section. Evidence suggests that the size of the uterine scar and the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) are associated directly with the risk of uterine rupture and risk of dehiscence in subsequent deliveries. Impact of the prelabour and labour Cesarean section on the RMT has not been studied in detail. Objectives: To compare RMT, Caesarean scar defects and to evaluate the elasticity of the Caesarean scar between women who underwent prelabour and labour Caesarean sections. Methods: This was a Cross sectional analytical study. Women who underwent Caesarean section in their first pregnancy were recruited. Sample was stratified to prelabour and labour Caesarean section groups. Transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed six months following the Caesarean section. Dimensions of the uterus, uterine scar defect, RMT and elastosonography of the uterine scar were assessed. Results: A total of 240 postpartum women were analyzed. Uterine niche was detectable in 194 subjects. Prelabour CS group had demonstrated 91.7% (n = 110) scar defects (uterine niche) out of 120 cases and the rate among labour CS group was 70% (n = 84). There was a significant difference in the presence of uterine niche among 2 groups as Prelabour group was found to have more scar defects (p mm (SD 1.2) and 4.99 mm (SD 1.3) respectively and there was no significant difference (t = 0.38, p = 0.71). There was no significant difference between the dimensions of the uterine CS defects of the studied groups. Prelabour CS group had significantly higher Target strain [0.28 vs. 0.24 (t = 2.12, p = 0.04)] and significantly less strain ratio [1.45 vs. 1.55 (t -2.42, p = 0.04)] than labour CS group indicating a better scar in prelabour group. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in RMT and uterine scar defects between prelabour and labour Caesarean section groups. But prelabour Caesarean section scars were less stiff than labour Caesarean section scars. Further studies are warranted to elaborate on the association.
文摘<strong>Background: </strong>The rate of uterus is successfully conserved following the treatment of scar pregnancy which is high so pregnancy outcome following caesarean scar ectopics is getting more and more attention. <strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess pregnancy course and outcome after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. <strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective case series of 40 patients become pregnancy after conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy by Foley or Methotrexate and aspiration. Patients in present study were treated at Hung Vuong and Tu Du Hospital between 2015 and 2017. A telephone follow-up was conducted after cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment. The outcomes of these subsequent pregnancies and mode of delivery were all recorded. <strong>Results:</strong> In 40 pregnancies, there are 22 cases of intrauterine pregnancy with childbirth (55%);all babies were born healthy, with no complications recorded in pregnancy. 12 Women had recurrent scar ectopic (30%). There were 2 abortion cases, 2 cases of ectopic pregnancy, and 2 cases of early miscarriage. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our study shows that reproductive outcomes following treatment of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies are favourable. The risk of recurrent caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a concern.
文摘Introduction: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is defined as implantation of gestational sac at the site of cesarean scar. It’s a serious diagnosis that has become more prevalent in recent years and related to the increasing rate of cesarean sections reported worldwide. Identifying these cases and treating them is challenging, with no agreed upon universal protocol for successful treatment. We aim to evaluate the success rate and outcome of medical management for Cesarean scar pregnancy. Methods: It was a retrospective descriptive study of all cesarean scar pregnancies managed at fetal medicine unit at Latifa Hospital in Dubai, UAE the main obstetrics & Gynecology tertiary hospital in Dubai Emirate, UAE from 2015 to 2017. Certainly, a set of diagnostic criteria were implemented to confirm the diagnosis of CSP. The cases were then offered our proposed management which is systemic methotrexate injections ± KCL. Follow up made by serial βhcg and ultrasound scan. The data were collected used specified data collection sheet for this purpose then analyzed and presented using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 26. Results: 33 cases of cesarean scar pregnancies are confirmed and medically managed during the study period. The study subjects composed of a group of patients who had a viable CSP and received local KCL injection + systemic methotrexate, a second group who had non-viable CSP and received systemic methotrexate 20 cases were viable pregnancies who received combined local potassium chloride plus systemic methotrexate, and 13 were non-viable received systemic methotrexate only. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 8 weeks (SD ± 1.8). On average our cases had a history of 3 previous cesarean sections (range 1 - 6). Overall, the success rate calculated from our study population for medical management of CSP was 77.8%;this varied between viable CSP which had a success rate of 66.7% and non-viable CSP which had a success rate of 100%. The average period of outpatient follow-up for the patients to achieve complete resolution was 14 weeks (SD ± 7.5). Conclusions: Medical management of CSP in the form of systemic methotrexate ± local KCL injections proves to have acceptability and a good success rate especially for non-viable CSP, low complications rate and with the benefit of preserving future fertility.
文摘Objective: This study was aimed at identifying predictive factors of complications during vaginal delivery on scarred uterus. Methodology: During 9 months, from October 1st, 2015 to June 30th, 2016, a case control study was carried out at the Yaoundé Gynaeco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital. Eighty nine women each with a single scarred uterus who presented with complications during delivery (cases) were compared to eighty nine others who had a successfully trial of scar (control) during the study period. Data were analyzed using the CSPro version 6.0 and SPSS version 20.0 softwares with statistical significance set at P Results: We recruited 2 groups of 89 women, aged 17 to 40 years, with an average age of 29.05 years. The majority of women with complications were married (50.6%) and unemployed (42.8%). Following univariate analysis, predictive factors of complications were: prematurity (OR = 7.4), post-term (OR = 13.7), no history of vaginal delivery on scarred uterus (OR = 4.3), inter-pregnancy spacing period greater than 60 months (five years) (OR = 2.9), History of caesarian delivery indicated for cephalo-pelvic disproportion (OR = 6.6), less than four ante-natal consultations (OR = 3.6), antenatal consultations done in a Health Centre (OR = 2.7), ante-natal follow up conducted by a nurse (OR = 2.4;IC = [1.2 - 4.7]), referral from a different health unit (OR = 4.4, IC = 2.0 - 9.4), a Bishop score less than 7 on admission (OR = 12.4, IC = 5.6 - 27.4), a meconium stained amniotic fluid (OR = 9.9;CI = [3.6 - 26.8]). After logistic regression, the retained factors associated with complications were post-term (aOR = 34.5), absence of vaginal birth after caesarian delivery, (aOR = 11.7), previous caesarean section indicated for cephalo-pelvic disproportion (aOR = 6.1), a bishop score less than 7 (aOR = 12.0), meconium stained amniotic fluid (aOR = 13.6). Conclusion: Predictive factors of complications can help anticipate negative obstetric outcomes.
文摘目的:探讨子宫肌层3层缝合对剖宫产术后憩室大小的影响及子宫切口憩室(CSD)形成的相关因素。方法:回顾性分析2022年4~11月于华东师范大学附属芜湖医院行剖宫产术的240例产妇的临床资料,根据子宫肌层缝合方式的不同分为3层缝合组(124例)和双层缝合组(116例);另根据术后是否形成CSD将产妇分为CSD组(23例)和非CSD组(217例)。对比3层缝合组与双层缝合组产妇的临床特点,采用多因素Logistic回归分析CSD形成的独立影响因素并构建人工神经网络模型;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线进行模型验证。结果:①3层缝合组产妇的子宫肌层瘢痕厚度显著高于双层缝合组(7.06±2.09 mm vs.5.68±1.97 mm);而CSD形成情况(4.03%vs.15.52%)和憩室大小(0.36±0.09 ml vs.0.47±0.12 ml)则显著低于双层缝合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);②多因素分析示,子宫后屈、剖宫产次数≥2次、胎膜早破、围产期感染、剖宫产时机(择期)是影响CSD形成的独立危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05),而子宫肌层3层缝合是保护性因素(OR<1,P<0.05);③人工神经网络预测模型显示剖宫产次数、胎膜早破以及是否进行3层缝合所占权重均较高,经ROC曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线验证表明该模型预测能力良好。结论:CSD的形成与子宫后屈、剖宫产次数、胎膜早破、围产期感染、剖宫产时机等指标有关,临床应重点关注,此外,子宫肌层3层缝合可降低CSD的形成概率,在临床上值得推广应用。
文摘目的构建并验证剖宫产术后再妊娠女性发生剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(caesarean scar pregnancy,CSP)的风险预测模型。方法收集2018~2022年于乌鲁木齐市妇幼保健院剖宫产术后再妊娠女性663例,按7∶3随机划分为训练集(n=460)和测试集(n=203),将训练集病例分为CSP组(n=239)和非CSP组(n=221)。采用单因素以及多因素Logistic回归分析评价CSP发生的危险因素。基于以上结果构建列线图模型,分别在测试集和训练集中进行验证并评价。通过受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)、Hosmer-Lemeshow检验等评价模型的预测效能,使用临床决策曲线分析(decision curve analysis,DCA)评估模型的临床应用价值。结果多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,剖宫产次数>1次、子宫后位、流产次数>1次、剖宫产瘢痕憩室、本次妊娠距前次剖宫产间流产史是CSP发生的危险因素(P<0.05),剖宫产时机为产程中是CSP发生的保护因素(P<0.05)。基于以上结果构建列线图预测模型,模型在训练集中AUC为0.813(95%CI:0.773~0.852);在测试集中AUC为0.817(95%CI:0.755~0.878);训练集和测试集Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验该模型拟合度良好(χ^(2)=7.647,P=0.469;χ^(2)=6.162,P=0.629)。校准曲线显示,该模型在预测剖宫产术后再妊娠发生CSP具有较好的一致性,DCA曲线显示,模型在训练集和测试集中均具有较高的临床效能。结论以上研究构建的预测模型能有效预测CSP的发生,可为高风险人群早期识别和预防性治疗提供参考。
文摘目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合传统美容缝合的60例患者纳入B组,两组出院后均随访6个月。比较两组切口缝合时间、切口愈合时间及住院时间,术后24 h、72 h、7 d切口疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],术后1个月切口愈合情况、切口并发症发生率,术后6个月切口瘢痕情况[温哥华瘢痕评定量表(VSS)]、缝合效果满意度。结果:两组切口缝合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组切口愈合时间与住院时间均短于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后24 h、72 h VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后7 d VAS评分低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,A组伤口愈合等级优于B组,A组切口并发症总发生率低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组VSS评分低于B组,A组缝合效果满意度高于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪在剖宫产患者中应用价值高,能有效促进术后患者腹部切口愈合,减少术后疼痛,降低切口并发症发生及瘢痕增生风险,并获得更高的患者满意度。