目的 :探讨针刀治疗跟痛症的应用及疗效。方法 :将67例跟痛症患者(左足29例,右足36例,双侧5例)随机分为两组,治疗组33例,采用针刀治疗,7 d 1次,3次为1个疗程,1~2个疗程。对照组34例,采用电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗,隔日1次,5次为1个...目的 :探讨针刀治疗跟痛症的应用及疗效。方法 :将67例跟痛症患者(左足29例,右足36例,双侧5例)随机分为两组,治疗组33例,采用针刀治疗,7 d 1次,3次为1个疗程,1~2个疗程。对照组34例,采用电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗,隔日1次,5次为1个疗程,共2个疗程。疗程结束后,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较疗效结果。结果:治疗组治疗后及4个月后的VAS值分别为(1.06±1.27)分和(1.03±1.26)分,低于治疗前的(6.39±0.56)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);对照组则分别为(3.94±1.37)分和(3.94±1.28)分,低于治疗前的(6.71±0.80)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。两组间VAS值差异亦有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。结论:针刀治疗跟痛症有较好的临床疗效,明显优于电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗。展开更多
This article explores the mechanism, the clinical manifestation, the diagnosis and the treatment of calcanodynia caused by the strain of plantar aponeurosis and the spur of calcaneus. The two different manipulations f...This article explores the mechanism, the clinical manifestation, the diagnosis and the treatment of calcanodynia caused by the strain of plantar aponeurosis and the spur of calcaneus. The two different manipulations for these two cases are also discussed.展开更多
文摘目的 :探讨针刀治疗跟痛症的应用及疗效。方法 :将67例跟痛症患者(左足29例,右足36例,双侧5例)随机分为两组,治疗组33例,采用针刀治疗,7 d 1次,3次为1个疗程,1~2个疗程。对照组34例,采用电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗,隔日1次,5次为1个疗程,共2个疗程。疗程结束后,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)比较疗效结果。结果:治疗组治疗后及4个月后的VAS值分别为(1.06±1.27)分和(1.03±1.26)分,低于治疗前的(6.39±0.56)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);对照组则分别为(3.94±1.37)分和(3.94±1.28)分,低于治疗前的(6.71±0.80)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。两组间VAS值差异亦有统计学意义(P〈0.001)。结论:针刀治疗跟痛症有较好的临床疗效,明显优于电针联合特定电磁波谱治疗。
文摘This article explores the mechanism, the clinical manifestation, the diagnosis and the treatment of calcanodynia caused by the strain of plantar aponeurosis and the spur of calcaneus. The two different manipulations for these two cases are also discussed.