Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with anti-angiogenesis agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has been proven to be an ideal choice for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).HAIC-based treatment showed great potential for treating uHCC.However,large-scale studies on HAIC-based treatments and meta-analyses of first-line treatments for uHCC are lacking.AIM To investigate better first-line treatment options for uHCC and to assess the safety and efficacy of HAIC combined with angiogenesis inhibitors,programmed cell death of protein 1(PD-1)and its ligand(PD-L1)blockers(triple therapy)under real-world conditions.METHODS Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials for this meta-analysis.Study-level pooled analyses of hazard ratios(HRs)and odds ratios(ORs)were performed.This was a retrospective single-center study involving 442 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy or angiogenesis inhibitors plus PD-1/PD-L1 blockades(AIPB)at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2018 to April 2023.Propensity score matching(PSM)was performed to balance the bias between the groups.The Kaplan-Meier method and cox regression were used to analyse the survival data,and the log-rank test was used to compare the suvival time between the groups.RESULTS A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included.HAIC alone and in combination with sorafenib were found to be effective treatments(P values for ORs:HAIC,0.95;for HRs:HAIC+sorafenib,0.04).After PSM,176 HCC patients were included in the analysis.The triple therapy group(n=88)had a longer median overall survival than the AIPB group(n=88)(31.6 months vs 14.6 months,P<0.001)and a greater incidence of adverse events(94.3%vs 75.4%,P<0.001).CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that HAIC-based treatments are likely to be the best choice for uHCC.Our findings confirm that triple therapy is more effective for uHCC patients than AIPB.

Predicting the prognosis of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)has good clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC);however,its efficacy varies.This review summarized the ability of various markers to predict the efficacy of HAIC and provided a reference for clinical applications.As of October 25,2023,51 articles have been retrieved based on keyword predictions and HAIC.Sixteen eligible articles were selected for inclusion in this study.Comprehensive literature analysis found that methods used to predict the efficacy of HAIC include serological testing,gene testing,and imaging testing.The above indicators and their combined forms showed excellent predictive effects in retrospective studies.This review summarized the strategies currently used to predict the efficacy of HAIC in middle and advanced HCC,analyzed each marker's ability to predict HAIC efficacy,and provided a reference for the clinical application of the prediction system.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma:A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations.However,there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study.The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),tumor response and adverse events.Hazard ratios(HR)and odds ratios(OR)with a 95% confidence interval(CI)were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib(HR=0.55,95%CI:0.42-0.72;HR=0.51,95%CI:0.33-0.78;OR=2.86,95%CI:1.37-5.98;OR=5.45,95%CI:3.57-8.30;OR=7.15,95%CI:4.06-12.58;OR=2.89,95%CI:1.99-4.19;OR=0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.92,respectively)and transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)(HR=0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.75;HR=0.62,95%CI:0.39-0.98;OR=3.08,95%CI:1.36-6.98;OR=2.07,95%CI:1.54-2.80;OR=3.16,95%CI:1.71-5.85;OR=2.67,95%CI:1.59-4.50;OR=0.16,95%CI:0.05-0.54,respectively)in terms of efficacy and safety.HAIC+lenvatinib+ablation,HAIC+ablation,HAIC+anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1),and HAIC+radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone.HAIC+TACE+S-1,HAIC+lenvatinib,HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE,and HAIC+sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC.HAIC+PD-1,HAIC+TACE+S-1 and HAIC+TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE.Furthermore,combined with other interventions,HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX) for unresectable hepatocarcinoma

BACKGROUND The advent of cutting-edge systemic therapies has driven advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),and therapeutic strategies with multiple modes of delivery have been shown to be more efficacious than mono-therapy.However,the mechanisms underlying this innovative treatment modality have not been elucidated.AIM To evaluate the clinical efficacy of targeted therapy plus immunotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)of FOLFOX in patients with unresectable HCC.METHODS We enrolled 53 patients with unresectable HCC who received a combination of targeted therapy,immunotherapy,and HAIC of FOLFOX between December 2020 and June 2021 and assessed the efficacy and safety of the treatment regimen.RESULTS The objective response rate was 60.4%(32/53),complete response was 24.5%(13/53),partial response was 35.9%(19/53),and stable disease was 39.6%(21/53).The median duration of response and median progression-free survival were 9.1 and 13.9 months,respectively.The surgical conversion rate was 34.0%(18/53),and 1-year overall survival was 83.0%without critical complicating diseases or adverse events(AEs).CONCLUSION The regimen of HAIC of FOLFOX,targeted therapy,and immunotherapy was curative for patients with unresectable HCC,with no serious AEs and a high rate of surgical conversion.

Camrelizumab,apatinib and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with microwave ablation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and camrelizumab plus apatinib(TRIPLET protocol)is promising for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(Ad-HCC).However,the usefulness of microwave ablation(MWA)after TRIPLET is still controversial.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of TRIPLET alone(T-A)vs TRIPLET-MWA(TM)for Ad-HCC.METHODS From January 2018 to March 2022,217 Ad-HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled.Among them,122 were included in the T-A group,and 95 were included in the T-M group.A propensity score matching(PSM)was applied to balance bias.Overall survival(OS)was compared using the Kaplan-Meier curve with the log-rank test.The overall objective response rate(ORR)and major complications were also assessed.RESULTS After PSM,82 patients were included both the T-A group and the T-M group.The ORR(85.4%)in the T-M group was significantly higher than that(65.9%)in the T-A group(P<0.001).The cumulative 1-,2-,and 3-year OS rates were 98.7%,93.4%,and 82.0%in the T-M group and 85.1%,63.1%,and 55.0%in the T-A group(hazard ratio=0.22;95%confidence interval:0.10-0.49;P<0.001).The incidence of major complications was 4.9%(6/122)in the T-A group and 5.3%(5/95)in the T-M group,which were not significantly different(P=1.000).CONCLUSION T-M can provide better survival outcomes and comparable safety for Ad-HCC than T-A.

Current research status of transarterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma

With continuous advancements in interventional radiology,considerable progress has been made in transarterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)in recent years,and an increasing number of research papers on transarterial therapies for HCC have been published.In this editorial,we comment on the article by Ma et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology:“Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable HCC”.We focus specifically on the current research status and future directions of transarterial therapies.In the future,more studies are needed to determine the optimal transarterial local treatment for HCC.With the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy modalities,it is expected that the results of trials of transarterial local therapy combined with systemic therapy will bring new hope to HCC patients.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:a prospective non.randomized study

Background: Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large(> 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX(mFOLFOX) regimen and those ofTACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen(oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin,400 mg/m^2 intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m2 bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m^2 continuous infusion)every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression(TTP), and safety were assessed.Results: A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group(52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001;83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months(hazard radio[HR] = 2.35,95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection(10 vs. 3,P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events(AE) and serious adverse events(SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group(grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007;SAEs: 6 vs. 15,p = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent(10 vs. 2,P = 0.026).Conclusions: HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.

Treatment strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma:Sorafenib vs hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

Sorafenib is used worldwide as a first-line standardsystemic agent for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) on the basis of the results of two large-scale Phase Ⅲ trials. Conversely,hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) is one of the most recommended treatments in Japan. Although there have been no randomized controlled trials comparing sorafenib with HAIC,several retrospective analyses have shown no significant differences in survival between the two therapies. Outcomes are favorable for HCC patients exhibiting macroscopic vascular invasion when treated with HAIC rather than sorafenib,whereas in HCC patients exhibiting extrahepatic spread or resistance to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization,good outcomes are achieved by treatment with sorafenib rather than HAIC. Additionally,sorafenib is generally used to treat patients with Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is indicated for those with either Child-Pugh A or B. Based on these findings,we reviewed treatment strategies for advanced HCC. We propose that sorafenib might be used as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC patients without macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A,while HAIC is recommended for those with macroscopic vascular invasion or Child-Pugh A or B. Additional research is required to determine the best second-line treatment for HAIC non-responders with Child-Pugh B through future clinical trials.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic factors and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. METHODS: Fifty hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were treated using hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) via a subcutaneously implanted port. The epirubicin-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (ECF) chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of 35 mg/m 2 epirubicin on day 1, 60 mg/m 2 cisplatin for 2 h on day 2, and 500 mg/m 2 5-fluorouracil for 5 h on days 1-3. The treatments were repeated every 3 or 4 wk. RESULTS: Three (6%) of the 50 patients achieved a complete response (CR), 13 (26%) showed partial responses (PR), and 22 (44%) had stable disease (SD).The median survival and time to progression were 7 and 2 mo, respectively. After 2 cycles of HAIC, CR was achieved in 1 patient (2%), PR in 10 patients (20%) and SD in 26 patients (52%). Significant pre-treatment prognostic factors were a tumor volume of < 400 cm 3 (P = 0.01) and normal levels of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist (PIVKA)-Ⅱ (P = 0.022). After 2 cycles of treatment, disease control (CR + PR + SD) (P = 0.001), PVTT response (P = 0.003) and α-fetoprotein reduction of over 50% (P = 0.02) were independent factors for survival. Objective response (CR + PR), disease control, PVTT response, and combination therapy during the HAIC were also significant prognostic factors. Adverse events were tolerable and successfully managed. CONCLUSION: HAIC may be an effective treatment modality for advanced HCC with PVTT in patients with tumors < 400 cm 3 and good prognostic factors.

Sorafenib combined with embolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).It is important to identify that patients with intermediate and advanced HCC are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.AIM To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with HAIC with folinic acid,5-fluorouracil(5-FU),and oxaliplatin(FOLFOX)after TACE for intermediate and advanced HCC.METHODS This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who underwent treatment with sorafenib combined with TACEHAIC.All patients initially received the standard 400 mg dose of sorafenib twice daily before TACE-HAIC.Participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC underwent routine TACE.Then,the catheter used for embolization was kept in place in the hepatic artery,and oxaliplatin was intraarterially administered for 6 h,followed by 5-FU for 18 h,and folinic acid was intravenously administered for 2 h.The primary endpoints were safety,as evaluated by the Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0,and 12-mo progression-free survival(PFS),as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.As secondary endpoints,the objective response rate(ORR)was evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors,and survival time[overall survival(OS)]was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS Sixty-six participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC were enrolled in this prospective study(mean age,53.3±11.7 years).Approximately 56.1%of participants had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)stage C disease,and 43.9%had BCLC stage B disease.The ORR was 42.4%.The disease control rate was 87.9%.The grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia(4.5%),neutropenia(3.0%),and elevated aspartate aminotransferase(12.2%).Hand-foot skin reaction was also observed(40.9%).The median PFS was 13.1 mo(13.5 mo in the BCLC stage B participants and 9.4 mo in the BCLC stage C participants).The 6-mo,12-mo,and 24-mo PFS rates were 75.0%,54.7%,and 30.0%,respectively.The median OS was 21.8 mo.CONCLUSION Sorafenib combined with HAIC(FOLFOX)after TACE may be a feasible treatment choice for intermediate and advanced HCC because this treatment met the prespecified endpoint of a 6-mo PFS rate exceeding 50%and had good patient tolerance.Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of this combination therapy.

Is hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to transarterial chemoembolization?

AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) resistant to transarterial chemoembolization(TACE).METHODS:This study was conducted on 42 patients who received HAIC for advanced HCC between 2001and 2010 at our hospital.5-fluorouracil(5-FU) was administered continuously for 24 h from day 1 to day 5 every 2-4 wk via an injection reservoir.Intra-arterial cisplatin or subcutaneous interferon was administered in combination with the 5-FU.The patients enrolled in this retrospective study were divided into two groups according to whether or not they fulfilled the criteria for resistance to TACE proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology in 2010(written in Japanese);one group of patients who did not fulfill the criteria for TACE resistance(group A,n = 23),and another group who fulfilled the criteria for TACE resistance(group B,n = 19).We compared the outcomes in terms of the response and survival rates between the two groups.RESULTS:Both the response rate and tumor suppression rate following HAIC were significantly superior in group A than in group B(response rate:48% vs 16%,P = 0.028,tumor suppression rate:87% vs 53%,P = 0.014).Furthermore,both the progression-free survival rate and survival time were significantly superior in group A than in group B(3-,6-,12-,and 24-mo = 83%,70%,29% and 20% vs 63%,42%,16% and 0%,respectively,P = 0.040,and 9.8 mo vs 6.2 mo,P = 0.040).A multivariate analysis(Cox proportional hazards regression model) showed that resistance to TACE was an independent predictor of poor survival(P = 0.007).CONCLUSION:HAIC administrating 5-FU was not effective against advanced HCC resistant to TACE.Other tools for treatment,i.e.,molecular-targeting agents may be considered for these cases.

Safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin post-transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective:To investigate the safety,efficacy,and prognostic factors of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin post-transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(uHCC).Methods:Thirty-seven patients with uHCC who received HAIC with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin post-TACE between June 2014 and December 2016 at our hospital were recruited.The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS),and secondary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS).The overall response rate(ORR)was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(v4.0).The OS and prognostic factors were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method,log-rank test,and Cox regression models.Results:Three(8.1%)patients achieved complete response,17(46.0%)patients achieved partial response,and the ORR was54.0%.The median OS and median PFS were 19.0 months and 12.0 months,respectively.The common toxicities included grade 3-4 increased aspartate aminotransferase levels(8/37,21.6%),grade 1-2 hyperbilirubinemia(75.7%,28/37),nonspecific abdominal pain and fever,and grade 2-3 thrombocytopenia(18.9%,7/37);no patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia.Univariate analysis showed that the tumor diameter(≤50 mm,p=0.028),Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer(BCLC)stage(p=0.012),hepatitis B virus DNA level(p=0.033),and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(dNLR;derived neutrophils/leukocytes minus neutrophils)(p=0.003)were predictive factors for prognosis.Multivariate analysis showed that patients with BCLC stage B disease(p=0.029)and dNLR<2 before therapy(p=0.004)had better prognosis.Conclusions:HAIC with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin post-TACE is a safe and efficacious therapy for patients with uHCC;in particular,those with BCLC stage B and dNLR<2 have better prognosis.

Effect of double platinum agents, combination of miriplatintransarterial oily chemoembolization and cisplatinhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Report of two cases

Hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the third highest cause of cancerassociated mortality worldwide. The treatment of HCC is complicated by its variable biological behavior and the frequent coexistence of chronic liver disease, particularly cirrhosis. To date, multiple treatment modalities have been developed according to the stage of the tumor and the hepatic functional reserve, including transarterial treatments such as transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial oily chemoembolization(TOCE), and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC). We conducted a phase I and II study of the combination therapy with double platinum agents, miriplatin and cisplatin, and confirmed its safety and efficacy. Here, we describe two cases of unresectable HCC who were successfully treated by miriplatin-TOCE/cisplatin-HAIC combination therapy, resulting in complete responses with no significant adverse events. This report will provide that the combination therapy can be the therapeutic option for HCC patients in the advanced stage.

Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with oxaliplatin versus sorafenib alone for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective:To compare the efficacy of sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)with oxaliplatin to that of sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods:This was a retrospective,single-center trial.Between April 3,2017 and July 2,2018,104 patients with Child-Pugh A and advanced HCC received either 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily plus HAIC with oxaliplatin(oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2,every 3 weeks via repetitive catheterization)(n=46,soraOXA group)or 400 mg of only sorafenib orally twice daily(n=58,sorafenib group).Overall survival,progression-free survival,objective response rate,and treatment-related adverse events were compared.Results:The median overall survival was 9.37 months(95%CI,7.05-11.68)in the soraOXA group versus 4.8 months(95%CI,2.98-6.62)in the sorafenib group(HR 0.46[95%CI,0.29-0.72];P<0.001).The soraOXA group also showed a higher objective response rate(16[34.8%]vs 1[1.7%];P<0.001)and a longer progressionfree survival rate(5.5 months[95%CI,2.32-8.68]vs 2.4 months[95%CI,1.65-3.15],HR 0.54[95%CI,0.36-0.81],P=0.003)than the sorafenib group.There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of any grade adverse events,grade 3/4 adverse events,serious adverse events,or incidence of treatment termination due to adverse events between the two groups.Conclusion:Compared with sorafenib alone,sorafenib plus HAIC with oxaliplatin showed favorable treatment outcomes in patients with advanced HCC.The merits of this approach need to be established with a prospective trial.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM:To investigate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC) using floxuridine(FUDR) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) confined to the liver.METHODS:Thirty-four patients who had advanced HCC with unresectability or unsuccessful previous therapy in the absence of extrahepatic metastasis were treated with intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy at ourhospital between March 2005 and May 2008.Among the 34 patients,9 patients were classified as Child class C,and 18 patients had portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT).One course of chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion of FUDR(0.3 mg/kg during day 1-14) and dexamethasone(10 mg on day 1,4,7 and 11),and this treatment was repeated every 28 d.RESULTS:Two patients(5.9%) displayed a complete response,and 12 patients(35.3%) had a partial response.The tumor control rate was 61.8%.The median overall survival times were 15.3 mo,12.4 mo and 4.3 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0392).The progression-free survival was 12.9 mo,7.7 mo and 2.6 mo for the patients who were classified as Child class A,Child class B and Child class C,respectively(P = 0.0443).The cumulative survival differed significantly according to the Child-Pugh classification and the presence of PVTT.In addition to hepatic reserve capacity and PVTT,the extent of HCC was an independent factor in determining a poor prognosis.The most common adverse reactions to HAIC were mucositis,diarrhea and peptic ulcer disease,but most of these complications were improved by medical treatment and/or a delay of HAIC.CONCLUSION:The present study demonstrates that intra-arterial FUDR chemotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for advanced HCC that is recalcitrant to other therapeutic modalities,even in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Transarterial chemoembolization with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus S-1 for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy(HAIC)have shown promising local benefits for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).S-1,a composite preparation of a 5-fluorouracil prodrug,has proven to be a convenient oral chemotherapeutic agent with definite efficacy against advanced HCC.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE followed by HAIC with or without oral S-1 for treating advanced HCC.METHODS In this single-center,open-label,prospective,randomized controlled trial,117 participants with advanced HCC were randomized to receive TACE followed by oxaliplatin-based HAIC either with(TACE/HAIC+S-1,n=56)or without(TACE/HAIC,n=61)oral S-1 between December 2013 and September 2017.Two participants were excluded from final analysis for withdrawing consent.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS)and secondary endpoints included overall survival(OS),objective response rate,disease control rate and safety.RESULTS In total,115 participants(100 males and 15 females;mean age,57.7 years±11.9)were analyzed.The median PFS and OS were 5.0 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%confidence interval(CI):3.82 to 6.18)vs 4.4 mo(1.1–54.4 mo)(95%CI:2.54 to 6.26;P=0.585)and 8.4 mo(0.4–58.6 mo)(95%CI:6.88 to 9.92)vs 8.3 mo(1.4–54.4 m)(95%CI:5.71 to 10.96;P=0.985)in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.The objective response rate and disease control rate were 30.9%vs 18.4%and 72.7%vs 56.7%in the TACE/HAIC+S-1 and TACE/HAIC groups,respectively.Grade 3/4 adverse events had a similar frequency in both treatment groups.CONCLUSION No improvements in tumor response rates,PFS or OS were observed with the addition of S-1 to TACE/HAIC in advanced HCC.Both treatment regimens had a similar safety profile.

Efficacy of 5-Fluorouracil and High-Concentration Cisplatin Suspended in Lipiodol by Short-Term Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis

Background: Since advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is potentially fatal, and patients’ quality of life (QOL) often deteriorates during their treatment, improving the prognosis and QOL of patients given chemotherapy is very important. In addition, cost-effective treatments are highly desirable when chemotherapy must be given repeatedly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and usefulness of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and high-concentration cisplatin by short-term hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (3-day FPL) in advanced HCC patients. Methods: Thirty patients with unresectable advanced HCC were enrolled. The patients underwent hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy via the implanted port system with 5-FU on days 1 - 3 and a fine-powder formulation of cisplatin in suspended pre-warmed lipiodol on day 2 every 4 to 10 weeks. Tumor response was assessed one month later with CT. Results: All patients had evidence of portal vein invasion (Vp2-4). Four patients achieved a complete response (CR), 8 patients achieved a partial response (PR), and 7 patients had stable disease (SD). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 198 days and 452 days, respectively. The OS was significantly longer in the successful disease control group (CR, PR, and SD) than in the progressive disease group (P < 0.005). Conclusions: Three-day FPL was effective and tolerable in advanced HCC patients due to its shorter time of administration than conventional FP therapy. Therefore, repetitive 3-day FPL appears useful and contributes to improving the prognosis and QOL of patients with advanced HCC. In addition, this protocol is a cost-effective treatment.

Analysis of the efficacy of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of infusion of gemcitabine(GEM) and fluorouracil(5-FU)through the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma(PC).Methods:We analyzed 20 patients diagnosed clinically or pathologically with PC,without metastases,who had an estimated survival duration of>3 months in our department from May 2009 to December 2014.Nine patients were treated directly without surgical resection of the tumor,while the other 11 patients were treated after surgery.In all patients,the femoral artery was punctured using the Seldinger technique,and a catheter was placed in the opening of the celiac artery or the superior mesenteric artery.We administered 500 mg/m2 GEM and 500 mg/m2 5-FU.Observational data included data on clinical efficacy and survival rates during the follow-up period of 3-72 months.Results:Twenty patients were treated 85 times with transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy(TAI).The survival rates were 80%,40%,35%,20%,10%,and 5% at 3,6,12,24,and 72 months,respectively.Conclusion: TAI chemotherapy with GEM and 5-FU may be a therapeutic option for the treatment of PC.

PERIPANCREATIC ARTERIAL LIGATION COMBINED WITH ARTERIAL INFUSION REGIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR TREATING PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CARCINOMA

Objective To find out a new treatment method for advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Twenty nine patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases were randomly divided into 2 groups.Group A ( n =11) underwent bilio enterostomy and/or gastro enterostomy combined with systemic chemotherapy after operation;Group B( n =18) underwent bilio enterostomy and/or gastro enterostomy combined with peripancreatic arterial ligation and arterial infusion regional chemotherapy.The alleviation of clinical symptom,the change of carcinoma volume by BUS and CT scan,survival period and serum CEA were observed in two groups. Results The symptoms were alleviated apparently in most cases in Group B;BUS and CT scan showed that the tumor volume decreased apparently in Group B;The response rate was 67.7% in Group B,and 18.2% in Group A,respectively( P <0.01);the mean survival period was (4.8±0.6) months in Group A,and (12.5±1.2) months in Group B,respectively( P <0.01),there was significant difference between the two groups.The decrease of serum CEA was 54% in Group A and 60% in Group B,but the difference was not significant( P >0.05). Conclusion Peripancreatic arterial ligation combined with arterial infusion regional chmotherapy is believed to be effective against both pancreatic carcinoma and liver metastases,and it can alleviate the clinical symptoms,postpone the growth speed of tumor,and prolong the survival period.

Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy and embolization for primary lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND Although tumors of the lacrimal sac are rare,they represent a potentially lifethreatening situation that can easily be overlooked since patients present with features consistent with chronic dacryocystitis.Lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma is the most common lacrimal sac malignancy,but no definitive treatment is currently available.CASE SUMMARY We describe a 34-year-old unmarried male who presented with a red and swollen right lower eyelid,which gradually developed into a mass of the lower eyelid that obstructed vision in his right eye.He was treated with transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy and interventional embolization based on the tumor characteristics,and we also administered intensity-modulated radiotherapy and targeted therapy after tumor shrinkage.The tumor treatment demonstrated good efficacy,and the patient’s condition was stable after 10 mo of follow-up.CONCLUSION To our knowledge,this is the first report of lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy and interventional embolization,which might expand clinical treatment options for lacrimal sac carcinoma.