A six-element Yagi-Uda array is optimally designed using Central Force Optimization (CFO) with a small amount of pseudo randomly injected negative gravity. CFO is a simple, deterministic metaheuristic analogizing grav...A six-element Yagi-Uda array is optimally designed using Central Force Optimization (CFO) with a small amount of pseudo randomly injected negative gravity. CFO is a simple, deterministic metaheuristic analogizing gravitational kinematics (motion of masses under the influence of gravity). It has been very effective in addressing a wide range of antenna and other problems and normally employs only positive gravity. With positive gravity the six element CFO-designed Yagi array described here exhibits excellent performance with respect to the objectives of impedance bandwidth and forward gain. This paper addresses the question of what happens when a small amount of negative gravity is injected into the CFO algorithm. Does doing so have any effect, beneficial, negative or neutral? In this particular case negative gravity improves CFO’s exploration and creates a region of optimality containing many designs that perform about as well as or better than the array discovered with only positive gravity. Without some negative gravity these array configurations are overlooked. This Yagi-Uda array design example suggests that antennas optimized or designed using deterministic CFO may well benefit by including a small amount of negative gravity, and that the negative gravity approach merits further study.展开更多
This paper investigates the effect of adding three extensions to Central Force Optimization when it is used as the Global Search and Optimization method for the design and optimization of 6-elementYagi-Uda arrays. Tho...This paper investigates the effect of adding three extensions to Central Force Optimization when it is used as the Global Search and Optimization method for the design and optimization of 6-elementYagi-Uda arrays. Those exten</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sions are </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Negative</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gravity</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Elitism</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Dynamic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Threshold</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Optimization</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. T</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">he basic CFO heuristic does not include any of these, but adding them substan</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tially improves the algorithm’s performance. This paper extends the work r</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">eported in a previous paper that considered only negative gravity and which </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showed a significant performance improvement over a range of optimized a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rrays. Still better results are obtained by adding to the mix </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Elitism</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">DTO</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. An overall improvement in best fitness of 19.16% is achieved by doing so. While the work reported here was limited to the design/optimization of 6-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">element Yagis, the reasonable inference based on these data is that any antenna design/optimization problem, indeed any Global Search and Optimiza</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tion problem, antenna or not, utilizing Central Force Optimization as the Gl</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">obal Search and Optimization engine will benefit by including all three extensions, probably substantially.展开更多
文摘A six-element Yagi-Uda array is optimally designed using Central Force Optimization (CFO) with a small amount of pseudo randomly injected negative gravity. CFO is a simple, deterministic metaheuristic analogizing gravitational kinematics (motion of masses under the influence of gravity). It has been very effective in addressing a wide range of antenna and other problems and normally employs only positive gravity. With positive gravity the six element CFO-designed Yagi array described here exhibits excellent performance with respect to the objectives of impedance bandwidth and forward gain. This paper addresses the question of what happens when a small amount of negative gravity is injected into the CFO algorithm. Does doing so have any effect, beneficial, negative or neutral? In this particular case negative gravity improves CFO’s exploration and creates a region of optimality containing many designs that perform about as well as or better than the array discovered with only positive gravity. Without some negative gravity these array configurations are overlooked. This Yagi-Uda array design example suggests that antennas optimized or designed using deterministic CFO may well benefit by including a small amount of negative gravity, and that the negative gravity approach merits further study.
文摘This paper investigates the effect of adding three extensions to Central Force Optimization when it is used as the Global Search and Optimization method for the design and optimization of 6-elementYagi-Uda arrays. Those exten</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sions are </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Negative</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Gravity</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Elitism</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Dynamic</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Threshold</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Optimization</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. T</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">he basic CFO heuristic does not include any of these, but adding them substan</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tially improves the algorithm’s performance. This paper extends the work r</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">eported in a previous paper that considered only negative gravity and which </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">showed a significant performance improvement over a range of optimized a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rrays. Still better results are obtained by adding to the mix </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Elitism</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">DTO</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. An overall improvement in best fitness of 19.16% is achieved by doing so. While the work reported here was limited to the design/optimization of 6-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">element Yagis, the reasonable inference based on these data is that any antenna design/optimization problem, indeed any Global Search and Optimiza</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tion problem, antenna or not, utilizing Central Force Optimization as the Gl</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">obal Search and Optimization engine will benefit by including all three extensions, probably substantially.