Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY...Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2019 were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group(n=39,treated with clavicular hook plate)and the observation group(n=41,treated with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair)by the random number table method.The clinical efficacy in 12 months after operation,related clinical indicators,12-month postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate was 92.68%(38/41)in 12 months after operation in the observation group,which was higher than that(76.92%,30/39)in the control group(p<.05).There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery,intraoperative blood loss and HLOS between the observation group and the control group(p>.05).In 12 months after operation,abduction activity and forward flexion activity of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and visual analogue score(VAS)was lower than that of the control group(p<.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(p>.05).Conclusions:For TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation,clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair has a good clinical efficacy.It can improve shoulder joint function,alleviate shoulder pain and have fewer complications.It can provide a reference for clinical treatment of this type of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.展开更多
目的:比较双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析顺昌县医院2018年3月—2021年3月手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位63例患者的临床资料,带袢钢板组31例采用双Endobutton带袢钢板...目的:比较双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析顺昌县医院2018年3月—2021年3月手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位63例患者的临床资料,带袢钢板组31例采用双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补术,锁骨钩钢板组32例采用锁骨钩钢板治疗。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肩部功能Constant-Murley评分(CMS)、肩上举活动度(range of motion,ROM)等相关指标。结果:两组患者术中出血量、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),锁骨钩钢板组手术时间较带袢钢板组短,两组患者术后1 d及术后1年VAS评分均较术前显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1 d及术后1年,带袢钢板组VAS评分显著低于锁骨钩钢板组,CMS、肩上举ROM均显著高于锁骨钩钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补术相较于锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位,具有缓解术后疼痛、改善肩关节功能、并发症少的优点。展开更多
基金Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region(2019MS08045).
文摘Objective:To explore the treatment of TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair and its clinical effect.Methods:80 patients with TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to January 2019 were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group(n=39,treated with clavicular hook plate)and the observation group(n=41,treated with clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair)by the random number table method.The clinical efficacy in 12 months after operation,related clinical indicators,12-month postoperative recovery and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate was 92.68%(38/41)in 12 months after operation in the observation group,which was higher than that(76.92%,30/39)in the control group(p<.05).There were no significant differences in the duration of surgery,intraoperative blood loss and HLOS between the observation group and the control group(p>.05).In 12 months after operation,abduction activity and forward flexion activity of the observation group were higher than those of the control group,and visual analogue score(VAS)was lower than that of the control group(p<.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that in the control group,but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(p>.05).Conclusions:For TOSSY type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation,clavicular hook plate combined with coracoclavicular ligament repair has a good clinical efficacy.It can improve shoulder joint function,alleviate shoulder pain and have fewer complications.It can provide a reference for clinical treatment of this type of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
文摘目的:比较双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析顺昌县医院2018年3月—2021年3月手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位63例患者的临床资料,带袢钢板组31例采用双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补术,锁骨钩钢板组32例采用锁骨钩钢板治疗。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、肩部功能Constant-Murley评分(CMS)、肩上举活动度(range of motion,ROM)等相关指标。结果:两组患者术中出血量、住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),锁骨钩钢板组手术时间较带袢钢板组短,两组患者术后1 d及术后1年VAS评分均较术前显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1 d及术后1年,带袢钢板组VAS评分显著低于锁骨钩钢板组,CMS、肩上举ROM均显著高于锁骨钩钢板组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双Endobutton带袢钢板联合肩锁韧带修补术相较于锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位,具有缓解术后疼痛、改善肩关节功能、并发症少的优点。
