AIM:To evaluate the treatment outcomes of clevudine compared with entecavir in antiviral-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of CHB patients treated with ...AIM:To evaluate the treatment outcomes of clevudine compared with entecavir in antiviral-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of CHB patients treated with clevudine 30 mg/d and compared their clinical outcomes with patients treated with entecavir 0.5 mg/d.The biochemical response,as assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT) activity,virologic response,as assessed by serum hepatitis B virus DNA(HBV DNA) titer,serologic response,as assessed by hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg) status,and virologic breakthrough with genotypic mutations were assessed.RESULTS:Two-hundred and fifty-four patients [clevudine(n = 118) vs entecavir(n = 136)] were enrolled.In clevudine-treated patients,the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 83.9% at week 48 and 91.5% at week 96(80.9% and 91.2% in the entecavir group,respectively),the mean titer changes in serum HBV DNA were-6.03 and-6.55 log 10 copies/mL(-6.35 and-6.86 log 10 copies/mL,respectively,in the entecavir group),and the cumulative non-detection rates of serum HBV DNA were 72.6% and 83.1%(74.4% and 83.8%,respectively,in the entecavir group).These results were similar to those of entecavir-treated patients.The cumulative rates of HBeAg seroconversion were 21.8% at week 48 and 25.0% at week 96 in patients treated with clevudine,which was similar to patients treated with entecavir(22.8% and 27.7%,respectively).The virologic breakthrough in the clevudine group occurred in 9(7.6%) patients at weeks 48 and 15(12.7%) patients at week 96,which primarily corresponded to genotypic mutations of rtM204I and/or rtL180M.There was no virologic breakthrough in the entecavir group.CONCLUSION:In antiviral-naive CHB patients,longterm treatment outcomes of clevudine were not inferior to those of entecavir,except for virologic breakthrough.展开更多
BACKGROUND: Currently, more and more nucleos(t)ide analogs are appearing as therapeutic options in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Their efficacy and safety profile in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection hav...BACKGROUND: Currently, more and more nucleos(t)ide analogs are appearing as therapeutic options in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Their efficacy and safety profile in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have already been studied in detail worldwide. This review summarizes the efficacy of lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir and newer antiviral agents such as emtricitabine, telbivudine and clevudine in the treatment of hepatitis B in different clinical situations. DATA SOURCES: An English-language literature search using OVID and MEDLINE was performed and a total of 40 articles on the treatment of chronic hepatitis with nucleos(t)ide analogues were selected. RESULTS: Nucleos(t)ide analogs such as lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir are well tolerated and induce a decrease in serum HBV-DNA levels associated with normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. But their sustained response with HBeAg to anti-HBe seroconversion is rarely obtained and HBsAg loss is exceptional. The response is maintained during therapy which needs to be continued indefinitely in the majority of patients since withdrawal of treatment is generally followed by a rapid reactivation of hepatitis B. However, drug resistant mutations can be induced in long-term treatment. Other newer antiviral agents such as emtricitabine, telbivudine and clevudine in the treatment of hepatitis B are still under phaseⅡorⅢclinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Nucleos(t)ide analogs play an important role in the therapy of hepatitis B now and in the future. Lamivudine is limited by the frequent emergence of drugresistant (HBV) mutants (YMDD). Adefovir and entecavir appear to be effective against both YMDD mutation and wild type. Therapeutic options against hepatitis B virus remain a major clinical challenge.展开更多
文摘AIM:To evaluate the treatment outcomes of clevudine compared with entecavir in antiviral-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B(CHB).METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of CHB patients treated with clevudine 30 mg/d and compared their clinical outcomes with patients treated with entecavir 0.5 mg/d.The biochemical response,as assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase(ALT) activity,virologic response,as assessed by serum hepatitis B virus DNA(HBV DNA) titer,serologic response,as assessed by hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg) status,and virologic breakthrough with genotypic mutations were assessed.RESULTS:Two-hundred and fifty-four patients [clevudine(n = 118) vs entecavir(n = 136)] were enrolled.In clevudine-treated patients,the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 83.9% at week 48 and 91.5% at week 96(80.9% and 91.2% in the entecavir group,respectively),the mean titer changes in serum HBV DNA were-6.03 and-6.55 log 10 copies/mL(-6.35 and-6.86 log 10 copies/mL,respectively,in the entecavir group),and the cumulative non-detection rates of serum HBV DNA were 72.6% and 83.1%(74.4% and 83.8%,respectively,in the entecavir group).These results were similar to those of entecavir-treated patients.The cumulative rates of HBeAg seroconversion were 21.8% at week 48 and 25.0% at week 96 in patients treated with clevudine,which was similar to patients treated with entecavir(22.8% and 27.7%,respectively).The virologic breakthrough in the clevudine group occurred in 9(7.6%) patients at weeks 48 and 15(12.7%) patients at week 96,which primarily corresponded to genotypic mutations of rtM204I and/or rtL180M.There was no virologic breakthrough in the entecavir group.CONCLUSION:In antiviral-naive CHB patients,longterm treatment outcomes of clevudine were not inferior to those of entecavir,except for virologic breakthrough.
文摘BACKGROUND: Currently, more and more nucleos(t)ide analogs are appearing as therapeutic options in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Their efficacy and safety profile in hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have already been studied in detail worldwide. This review summarizes the efficacy of lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir and newer antiviral agents such as emtricitabine, telbivudine and clevudine in the treatment of hepatitis B in different clinical situations. DATA SOURCES: An English-language literature search using OVID and MEDLINE was performed and a total of 40 articles on the treatment of chronic hepatitis with nucleos(t)ide analogues were selected. RESULTS: Nucleos(t)ide analogs such as lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir are well tolerated and induce a decrease in serum HBV-DNA levels associated with normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. But their sustained response with HBeAg to anti-HBe seroconversion is rarely obtained and HBsAg loss is exceptional. The response is maintained during therapy which needs to be continued indefinitely in the majority of patients since withdrawal of treatment is generally followed by a rapid reactivation of hepatitis B. However, drug resistant mutations can be induced in long-term treatment. Other newer antiviral agents such as emtricitabine, telbivudine and clevudine in the treatment of hepatitis B are still under phaseⅡorⅢclinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Nucleos(t)ide analogs play an important role in the therapy of hepatitis B now and in the future. Lamivudine is limited by the frequent emergence of drugresistant (HBV) mutants (YMDD). Adefovir and entecavir appear to be effective against both YMDD mutation and wild type. Therapeutic options against hepatitis B virus remain a major clinical challenge.
