目的比较悬吊循经弹拨结合麦肯基疗法与两者分别单一治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效差异并探讨其疗效机制。方法将88例符合标准的患者按照随机数字表法分为综合组(29例)、对照1组(30例)、对照2组(29例)。对照1组采用悬吊循经弹拨法,对照2组...目的比较悬吊循经弹拨结合麦肯基疗法与两者分别单一治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效差异并探讨其疗效机制。方法将88例符合标准的患者按照随机数字表法分为综合组(29例)、对照1组(30例)、对照2组(29例)。对照1组采用悬吊循经弹拨法,对照2组采用麦肯基疗法,综合组将对照组的治疗方法相结合,5 d为1疗程,共观察2个疗程。应用颈椎病临床评价量表(clinical assessment scale for cervical spondylosis,CASCS)、利用表面肌电图比较2个疗程治疗前后颈椎功能情况以及胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌上部纤维平均功率频率(mean power frequency,MPF)和中位频率(median frequency,MF)数值变化(对应肌肉的疲劳度改变)。结果治疗结束后,综合组总有效率96.55%,优于对照1组总有效率80.00%和对照2组75.86%(P<0.05或P<0.01),且综合组颈椎功能情况及胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌上部纤维MPF、MF值的治疗效果均优于对照1组和对照2组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论悬吊循经弹拨法结合麦肯基疗法能有效治疗颈型颈椎病,其效果优于单纯悬吊循经弹拨法和单纯麦肯基疗法,能更好地修复颈部软组织张力,实现生物力学平衡,恢复颈椎运动功能,因此临床上可推广此法治疗颈型颈椎病。展开更多
目的探究Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术在神经根型颈椎病治疗中的应用。方法根据数字随机表将2017年2月—2020年2月收治神经根型颈椎病患者(86例),分为联合组和常规组,每组43例。常规组给予常规康复手术,联合组给予Mulligan...目的探究Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术在神经根型颈椎病治疗中的应用。方法根据数字随机表将2017年2月—2020年2月收治神经根型颈椎病患者(86例),分为联合组和常规组,每组43例。常规组给予常规康复手术,联合组给予Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术,观察联合组和常规治疗前后颈椎病临床评价量表(Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis,CASCS)、颈椎功能障碍指数量表(Neck Disability Index,NDI)评分、颈部屈曲和颈部主动活动范围(Active Range Of Motion,AROM)以及简明健康测量量表(Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire,SF-36)、视觉模拟疼痛评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS),并对患者治疗前后肌肉压痛阈值进行测量。结果联合组CASCS、AROM、SF-36明显高于常规组,NDI、VAS评分低于常规组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组斜方肌、提肩胛肌、枕骨下肌的肌肉压痛阈值明显低于常规组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术可改善颈椎病临床症状,降低颈椎功能障碍程度,增加颈部关节活动度,降低疼痛感,改善患者生活质量。展开更多
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of combined acupuncture and kinesiotherapy on upper cross syndrome(UCS) by a parallel randomized clinical trial.Methods:A total of 45 patients with UCS were recruited from the ...Objective:To observe the clinical effect of combined acupuncture and kinesiotherapy on upper cross syndrome(UCS) by a parallel randomized clinical trial.Methods:A total of 45 patients with UCS were recruited from the outpatients of AcupunctureMoxibustion,Tuina and Rehabilitation Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,the students of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine and the patients from the nearby communities in accordance with the inclusion criteria.Using the random number table method,they were divided into a combined treatment group(acupuncture plus kinesiotherapy,23 cases) and a simple kinesiotherapy group(22 patients).Treatment for 4 weeks was one course,and two consecutive courses were required.The visual analog scale(VAS) score,the score of the assessment scale for cervical spondylosis,the value of surface electromyography(root mean square,RMS),and the cervical curvature value were used in the evaluation.The allocation scheme was concealed from the outcome assessors.Results:The data from 23 cases of the combined treatment group and 22 cases of the simple kinesiotherapy group were analyzed.Before treatment,the differences were not statistically significant in the general conditions,VAS score,assessment score of cervical spondylosis,cervical curvature value,and RMS in UCS patients between the two groups(all P> 0.05).After treatment,the VAS score was reduced compared with that before treatment in both groups(all P <0.05).In two courses of treatment,the VAS score decreased as compared with that in one course of treatment in both groups(both P <0.05),and the VAS score in the combined treatment group decreased more obviously after each course of treatment(both P <0.05).The RMS decreased compared with that before treatment in each group(both P <0.05),and the decrease in the combined treatment group was more obvious(P <0.05).After treatment of each course,the assessment score was all increased as compared with that before treatment in two groups(all P <0.05).In two courses of treatment,the assessment score was increased as compared with that in one course of treatment in both groups(both P <0.05),and the score in the combined treatment group was increased more obviously in the two courses of treatment(P <0.05).Regarding either the intra-group comparison or the inter-group comparison before and after treatment,the differences were not statistically significant(all P> 0.05),suggesting no obvious improvement of cervical curvature in the two courses of treatment in patients with UCS.However,cervical curvature tended to improve in the combined treatment group.The total effective rate was significantly different between the two groups(P <0.05),indicating that the total effective rate in the combined treatment group was better than that in the simple kinesiotherapy group.No any adverse reactions occurred.Conclusion:Combined treatment with acupuncture,kinesiotherapy,and kinesiotherapy alleviated pain,relieved the symptoms and physical signs,and improved the daily movement of the patients.However,the combined treatment of acupuncture and kinesiotherapy had a much better effect on UCS.展开更多
文摘目的比较悬吊循经弹拨结合麦肯基疗法与两者分别单一治疗颈型颈椎病的临床疗效差异并探讨其疗效机制。方法将88例符合标准的患者按照随机数字表法分为综合组(29例)、对照1组(30例)、对照2组(29例)。对照1组采用悬吊循经弹拨法,对照2组采用麦肯基疗法,综合组将对照组的治疗方法相结合,5 d为1疗程,共观察2个疗程。应用颈椎病临床评价量表(clinical assessment scale for cervical spondylosis,CASCS)、利用表面肌电图比较2个疗程治疗前后颈椎功能情况以及胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌上部纤维平均功率频率(mean power frequency,MPF)和中位频率(median frequency,MF)数值变化(对应肌肉的疲劳度改变)。结果治疗结束后,综合组总有效率96.55%,优于对照1组总有效率80.00%和对照2组75.86%(P<0.05或P<0.01),且综合组颈椎功能情况及胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌上部纤维MPF、MF值的治疗效果均优于对照1组和对照2组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论悬吊循经弹拨法结合麦肯基疗法能有效治疗颈型颈椎病,其效果优于单纯悬吊循经弹拨法和单纯麦肯基疗法,能更好地修复颈部软组织张力,实现生物力学平衡,恢复颈椎运动功能,因此临床上可推广此法治疗颈型颈椎病。
文摘目的探究Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术在神经根型颈椎病治疗中的应用。方法根据数字随机表将2017年2月—2020年2月收治神经根型颈椎病患者(86例),分为联合组和常规组,每组43例。常规组给予常规康复手术,联合组给予Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术,观察联合组和常规治疗前后颈椎病临床评价量表(Clinical Assessment Scale for Cervical Spondylosis,CASCS)、颈椎功能障碍指数量表(Neck Disability Index,NDI)评分、颈部屈曲和颈部主动活动范围(Active Range Of Motion,AROM)以及简明健康测量量表(Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire,SF-36)、视觉模拟疼痛评分(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS),并对患者治疗前后肌肉压痛阈值进行测量。结果联合组CASCS、AROM、SF-36明显高于常规组,NDI、VAS评分低于常规组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组斜方肌、提肩胛肌、枕骨下肌的肌肉压痛阈值明显低于常规组,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论Mulligan动态关节松动术联合肌肉能量技术可改善颈椎病临床症状,降低颈椎功能障碍程度,增加颈部关节活动度,降低疼痛感,改善患者生活质量。
基金Supported by Leading Talents Training Program of Hunan Province High-Level Health Talents 225 Project (Hunan Health-20N9-N9S)。
文摘Objective:To observe the clinical effect of combined acupuncture and kinesiotherapy on upper cross syndrome(UCS) by a parallel randomized clinical trial.Methods:A total of 45 patients with UCS were recruited from the outpatients of AcupunctureMoxibustion,Tuina and Rehabilitation Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,the students of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine and the patients from the nearby communities in accordance with the inclusion criteria.Using the random number table method,they were divided into a combined treatment group(acupuncture plus kinesiotherapy,23 cases) and a simple kinesiotherapy group(22 patients).Treatment for 4 weeks was one course,and two consecutive courses were required.The visual analog scale(VAS) score,the score of the assessment scale for cervical spondylosis,the value of surface electromyography(root mean square,RMS),and the cervical curvature value were used in the evaluation.The allocation scheme was concealed from the outcome assessors.Results:The data from 23 cases of the combined treatment group and 22 cases of the simple kinesiotherapy group were analyzed.Before treatment,the differences were not statistically significant in the general conditions,VAS score,assessment score of cervical spondylosis,cervical curvature value,and RMS in UCS patients between the two groups(all P> 0.05).After treatment,the VAS score was reduced compared with that before treatment in both groups(all P <0.05).In two courses of treatment,the VAS score decreased as compared with that in one course of treatment in both groups(both P <0.05),and the VAS score in the combined treatment group decreased more obviously after each course of treatment(both P <0.05).The RMS decreased compared with that before treatment in each group(both P <0.05),and the decrease in the combined treatment group was more obvious(P <0.05).After treatment of each course,the assessment score was all increased as compared with that before treatment in two groups(all P <0.05).In two courses of treatment,the assessment score was increased as compared with that in one course of treatment in both groups(both P <0.05),and the score in the combined treatment group was increased more obviously in the two courses of treatment(P <0.05).Regarding either the intra-group comparison or the inter-group comparison before and after treatment,the differences were not statistically significant(all P> 0.05),suggesting no obvious improvement of cervical curvature in the two courses of treatment in patients with UCS.However,cervical curvature tended to improve in the combined treatment group.The total effective rate was significantly different between the two groups(P <0.05),indicating that the total effective rate in the combined treatment group was better than that in the simple kinesiotherapy group.No any adverse reactions occurred.Conclusion:Combined treatment with acupuncture,kinesiotherapy,and kinesiotherapy alleviated pain,relieved the symptoms and physical signs,and improved the daily movement of the patients.However,the combined treatment of acupuncture and kinesiotherapy had a much better effect on UCS.
