Policy Suggestions on Procurement of Basic Infusion Against the Background of Volume Procurement

Objective To evaluate the clinical value of basic infusion packaging materials for providing suggestions on formulating basic infusion volume procurement policies.Methods Combined with market data,questionnaire surveys were used to rank different basic infusion packaging materials.Pharmacists,nurses,and experts in the field of packaging respectively assess the safety,compatibility,effectiveness,convenience,and environmental friendliness of the materials.Results and Conclusion Products with the best clinical value have a lower market share than other products with average clinical value.The best three packaging materials only account for 15%of the market share.The order of clinical value from good to bad is inner-sealed polypropylene infusion bag(BFS)>soft aseptic bag with double valves and layers>upright polypropylene infusion bag>non-PVC soft bag>plastic bottle>glass bottle.The order of market share is non-PVC soft bag>soft aseptic bag with double valves and layers>plastic bottle>vertical polypropylene infusion bag>inner-sealed polypropylene infusion bag(BFS)>glass bottle.Therefore,the clinical values of various basic infusion packaging materials are different.The following countermeasures are put forward such as separating bidding for basic infusions with different packaging materials,combining volume and price with procurement,and priority procurement of packaging materials with better clinical values.

Controversies on the Values for Health Instruments of Chinese Medicine

Currently, there are increasing debates on the necessity of health instruments in Chinese medicine（CM） emerging in China. This study aims to reevaluate its status and values. Analyzing the causes, limits, advantages, and properties characters of health instruments in CM, it is found that weak fundamental research, incomplete self-awareness, and complicated social factors are the primary causes of debates. A comprehensive analysis showed health instruments in CM have health evaluation benefits to people from a dominant Chinese culture, meet the requirements of cultural background, and bring long-term value to Chinese instrument researches. However, its values and status should be treated differently depending on various subtypes. Although little theoretical and practical evidences proved that patients-reported health instruments in CM should be proposed independently, the doctors- and nurses-reported questionnaires are necessary. With this in mind, the study group proposes the ＇Chinese cultural instruments（CCIs）＇ and ＇health-related CCIs＇. The latter one aims to evaluate the health status of people in a dominant Chinese culture. The CCIs theory represents Chinese instrument researches on a larger regional and higher level, and resolves the debates on instruments between CM and Western medicine in China. Health instruments in CM bring more scientific and social benefits for Chinese instrument researches. However, it does not include cultural demands, and lacks scientific significance. CCIs have all its virtues, and add solutions to the latter＇s theory bottleneck and scientific debates, thus bringing increased benefits to clinical assessment in complementary and alternative medicine researches.