Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our...Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.展开更多
Background: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is widely used in clinical anesthesia due to its rapid onset, reliable anesthetic effect, and strong controllability. Although advancements in technique have redu...Background: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is widely used in clinical anesthesia due to its rapid onset, reliable anesthetic effect, and strong controllability. Although advancements in technique have reduced the frequency and severity of common complications, reports of rare and serious complications such as pneumocephalus, remain scarce. Case Report: This article presents a case of pneumocephalus following CSEA in a middle-aged female patient undergoing surgery for an intrauterine space-occupying lesion. The patient experienced severe headache postoperatively, and imaging confirmed the presence of intracranial air. After receiving active symptomatic treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of adhering to standard anesthesia protocols and increasing awareness of rare CSEA complications, particularly the risk of pneumocephalus. Early recognition and timely management are crucial. There is a need to further enhance training and research in anesthetic procedures to improve clinical anesthesia quality and ensure patient safety.展开更多
<strong>Background:</strong> Lower extremity surgeries performed in elderly people usually have high prevalence of peri-operative medical problems related to anaesthesia. The overall objective of peri-oper...<strong>Background:</strong> Lower extremity surgeries performed in elderly people usually have high prevalence of peri-operative medical problems related to anaesthesia. The overall objective of peri-operative care of geriatric population is to fast recovery from anaesthesia and avoid functional decline.<strong> Objective: </strong>To compare the peri-operative pulmonary status of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA) in geriatric patients underwent lower extremity surgeries. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2016 to June 2018. A total of 70 geriatric cases that underwent lower extremity surgeries were included in this study. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups;35 in Group A (CSEA) and 35 in Group B (SAB). The different outcome variables between the groups like-duration of anaesthesia, respiratory rates (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), breath holding test (BHT), peri-operative side effects of anaesthesia and post-operative visual analogue score (VAS) were analyzed and compared by statistical tests. <strong>Results: </strong>The mean age, weight, BMI of Group A and Group B patients were not significantly different (<em>p</em> > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in duration of surgery, gender and ASA grade between the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Mean duration of anaesthesia, mean time to achieve target level of sensory block and mean time to achieve complete motor block were significantly higher in Group A (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Mean RR, SpO2, EtCO<sub>2</sub>, PEFR and BHT of both groups were not significantly different (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Peri-operative side effects of anaesthesia and post-operative VAS were significantly less in group A patients (<em>p </em>< 0.05). <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is effective and safe;produces stable peri-operative pulmonary status with prolonging analgesia and fewer side effects as compared to spinal anaesthesia in geriatric patients.展开更多
Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eight...Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2017 to April 2019 were enrolled in the hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the patient's anesthesia. Fourty patients receiving epidural anesthesia were included in the control group, and another 40 patients received lumbar stiffness. The combined anesthesia patient was included in the observation group. Changes in pain mediators [Serum neuropeptide Y (NPY), endorphin (β-EP), substance P (SP)], stress indicators [Serum cortisol (Cor), C-peptide (C-P), advanced oxidative protein product (AOPP)], inflammatory factor levels [Hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)], and immunoglobulin levels [Serum IgA, IgG, IgM] were compared between the two groups. Results: Before anesthesia, there were no significant difference in pain media, stress index, inflammatory factor level and immunoglobulin level between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 h after operation, the two groups of patients were NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor. The levels of C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were lower than those before operation (P<0.05). Among them, observation group NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor, C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The serum levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia can more effectively alleviate maternal pain in high altitude cesarean section, more effectively reduce the inflammatory stress response of patients, promote the humoral immune function of patients, and is beneficial to the early recovery of maternal postoperative, and has high clinical value.展开更多
目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润...目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉组(F/I组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(CSEA组),每组60例。F/I组中男32例,女28例,年龄(38.75±11.35)岁;CSEA组中男25例,女35例,年龄(37.80±10.85)岁。比较两组术中补救例数、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后感觉恢复时间及首次下地活动时间、术后并发症、住院花费及住院天数等指标的差异。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验、Fisher确切概率法。结果F/I组术后6 h VAS评分低于CSEA组[(2.08±0.61)分比(2.54±0.64)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.484,P=0.018)。F/I组感觉恢复时间长于CSEA组[(6.25±0.40)h比(3.60±0.31)h,首次下地活动时间短于CESA组[(2.99±1.05)h比(8.14±1.88)h],差异均有统计学意义(t=14.095、-12.263,均P<0.001)。术后并发症:F/I组术中加用麻醉发生率3.3%(2/60)、尿潴留发生率0、下肢静脉血栓发生率1.7%(1/60)、恶心呕吐发生率3.3%(2/60),CSEA组术中加用麻醉发生率0、尿潴留发生率10.0%(6/60)、下肢静脉血栓发生率5.0%(3/60)、恶心呕吐发生率16.7%(10/60),两组尿潴留、恶心呕吐发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。F/I组住院时间为(3.90±0.63)d、住院费用为(9612.67±507.15)元,CESA组分别为(5.27±0.75)d、(11401.52±530.01)元,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.862、-15.425,均P<0.001)。结论股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中能够减少术后并发症、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用,并提供良好的麻醉效果。展开更多
目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗...目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗组给予间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉。比较两组麻醉前、术后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、心率(HR)、心脏指数(CI),手术指标,新生儿缺氧情况及不良反应。结果:术后,两组DBP、SBP、MAP下降,但联合治疗组DBP、SBP、MAP均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,两组HR、CO、CI均降低,但联合治疗组HR、CO、CI均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中失血量、术中液体输注量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合治疗组不良反应发生率低于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇进行干预,能较好地维护产妇血压、心率水平,调节产妇血流动力学,对新生儿Apgar评分有较小的影响,效果显著。展开更多
基金Weifang Municipal Science and Technology Bureau(Medical)Project“Effects and Mechanisms of Oxycodone and Alfentanil on IgFs in Mouse Ovarian Granulosa Cells”(2021YX035)。
文摘Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.
文摘Background: Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is widely used in clinical anesthesia due to its rapid onset, reliable anesthetic effect, and strong controllability. Although advancements in technique have reduced the frequency and severity of common complications, reports of rare and serious complications such as pneumocephalus, remain scarce. Case Report: This article presents a case of pneumocephalus following CSEA in a middle-aged female patient undergoing surgery for an intrauterine space-occupying lesion. The patient experienced severe headache postoperatively, and imaging confirmed the presence of intracranial air. After receiving active symptomatic treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged. Conclusion: This case underscores the importance of adhering to standard anesthesia protocols and increasing awareness of rare CSEA complications, particularly the risk of pneumocephalus. Early recognition and timely management are crucial. There is a need to further enhance training and research in anesthetic procedures to improve clinical anesthesia quality and ensure patient safety.
文摘<strong>Background:</strong> Lower extremity surgeries performed in elderly people usually have high prevalence of peri-operative medical problems related to anaesthesia. The overall objective of peri-operative care of geriatric population is to fast recovery from anaesthesia and avoid functional decline.<strong> Objective: </strong>To compare the peri-operative pulmonary status of combined spinal epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA) in geriatric patients underwent lower extremity surgeries. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2016 to June 2018. A total of 70 geriatric cases that underwent lower extremity surgeries were included in this study. Cases were randomly allocated into two groups;35 in Group A (CSEA) and 35 in Group B (SAB). The different outcome variables between the groups like-duration of anaesthesia, respiratory rates (RR), oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (EtCO<sub>2</sub>), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), breath holding test (BHT), peri-operative side effects of anaesthesia and post-operative visual analogue score (VAS) were analyzed and compared by statistical tests. <strong>Results: </strong>The mean age, weight, BMI of Group A and Group B patients were not significantly different (<em>p</em> > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in duration of surgery, gender and ASA grade between the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Mean duration of anaesthesia, mean time to achieve target level of sensory block and mean time to achieve complete motor block were significantly higher in Group A (<em>p</em> < 0.001). Mean RR, SpO2, EtCO<sub>2</sub>, PEFR and BHT of both groups were not significantly different (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Peri-operative side effects of anaesthesia and post-operative VAS were significantly less in group A patients (<em>p </em>< 0.05). <strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is effective and safe;produces stable peri-operative pulmonary status with prolonging analgesia and fewer side effects as compared to spinal anaesthesia in geriatric patients.
基金supported by Scientific Project of Sichuan Hygiene and Family Planning Committee(No.18PJ169).
文摘Objective: To discuss the effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on the levels of pain media, stress indicators and inflammatory factors in patients undergoing high altitude cesarean section. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from January 2017 to April 2019 were enrolled in the hospital. They were divided into two groups according to the patient's anesthesia. Fourty patients receiving epidural anesthesia were included in the control group, and another 40 patients received lumbar stiffness. The combined anesthesia patient was included in the observation group. Changes in pain mediators [Serum neuropeptide Y (NPY), endorphin (β-EP), substance P (SP)], stress indicators [Serum cortisol (Cor), C-peptide (C-P), advanced oxidative protein product (AOPP)], inflammatory factor levels [Hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)], and immunoglobulin levels [Serum IgA, IgG, IgM] were compared between the two groups. Results: Before anesthesia, there were no significant difference in pain media, stress index, inflammatory factor level and immunoglobulin level between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 h after operation, the two groups of patients were NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor. The levels of C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were lower than those before operation (P<0.05). Among them, observation group NPY, β-EP, SP, Cor, C-P, AOPP, hs-CRP and TNF-α were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The serum levels of IgA, IgG and IgM were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia can more effectively alleviate maternal pain in high altitude cesarean section, more effectively reduce the inflammatory stress response of patients, promote the humoral immune function of patients, and is beneficial to the early recovery of maternal postoperative, and has high clinical value.
文摘目的评价股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中的安全性和有效性。方法选择滨州医学院附属医院骨关节外科2022年1月至6月因半月板损伤、游离体、骨性关节炎计划行单侧膝关节镜手术患者120例,随机分为股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉组(F/I组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(CSEA组),每组60例。F/I组中男32例,女28例,年龄(38.75±11.35)岁;CSEA组中男25例,女35例,年龄(37.80±10.85)岁。比较两组术中补救例数、术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后感觉恢复时间及首次下地活动时间、术后并发症、住院花费及住院天数等指标的差异。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验、Fisher确切概率法。结果F/I组术后6 h VAS评分低于CSEA组[(2.08±0.61)分比(2.54±0.64)分],差异有统计学意义(t=-2.484,P=0.018)。F/I组感觉恢复时间长于CSEA组[(6.25±0.40)h比(3.60±0.31)h,首次下地活动时间短于CESA组[(2.99±1.05)h比(8.14±1.88)h],差异均有统计学意义(t=14.095、-12.263,均P<0.001)。术后并发症:F/I组术中加用麻醉发生率3.3%(2/60)、尿潴留发生率0、下肢静脉血栓发生率1.7%(1/60)、恶心呕吐发生率3.3%(2/60),CSEA组术中加用麻醉发生率0、尿潴留发生率10.0%(6/60)、下肢静脉血栓发生率5.0%(3/60)、恶心呕吐发生率16.7%(10/60),两组尿潴留、恶心呕吐发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。F/I组住院时间为(3.90±0.63)d、住院费用为(9612.67±507.15)元,CESA组分别为(5.27±0.75)d、(11401.52±530.01)元,差异均有统计学意义(t=-8.862、-15.425,均P<0.001)。结论股神经阻滞联合关节腔浸润麻醉在膝关节镜手术中能够减少术后并发症、缩短住院时间、降低住院费用,并提供良好的麻醉效果。
文摘目的:探究间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇的影响。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年10月泉州市第一医院收治的100例待剖宫产产妇。根据随机数表法将其分为腰硬联合麻醉组和联合治疗组,各50例。腰硬联合麻醉组给予腰硬联合麻醉,联合治疗组给予间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉。比较两组麻醉前、术后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心输出量(CO)、心率(HR)、心脏指数(CI),手术指标,新生儿缺氧情况及不良反应。结果:术后,两组DBP、SBP、MAP下降,但联合治疗组DBP、SBP、MAP均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后,两组HR、CO、CI均降低,但联合治疗组HR、CO、CI均高于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组手术时间、术中失血量、术中液体输注量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组新生儿1 min和5 min Apgar评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合治疗组不良反应发生率低于腰硬联合麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:间羟胺联合腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产产妇进行干预,能较好地维护产妇血压、心率水平,调节产妇血流动力学,对新生儿Apgar评分有较小的影响,效果显著。
