BACKGROUND Current tumor regression grade(TRG)evaluations are based on various systems which brings confusion for oncologists and pathologists when interpreting results.The recent six-tier system(JGCA2017-TRG)recommen...BACKGROUND Current tumor regression grade(TRG)evaluations are based on various systems which brings confusion for oncologists and pathologists when interpreting results.The recent six-tier system(JGCA2017-TRG)recommended by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association(JGCA)is worth investigating,as four-tier TRG systems are favored in various parts of the world.AIM To compare the predictive accuracies of five published TRG systems.METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC)who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 Lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and January 2014 at our institution.Outcomes were overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS),which were evaluated separately using the following TRG systems:JGCA2017,JGCA,Becker,AJCC/CAP,and Mandard.RESULTS All five published TRG systems were independent predictors for OS and DFS.Concordance indices of the JGCA2017,JGCA,Becker,AJCC/CAP-TRG,and Mandard systems were 0.651/0.6480.652/0.649,0.693/0.695,0.688/0.685,and 0.674/0.675 for OS and DFS,respectively.The four-tier Becker system showed the highest c-index,which was significantly greater than that of the six-tier JGCA2017 and five-tier JGCA systems(P<0.05 in OS and DFS).When residual tumor percentages were reset as:“no residual tumor”,<10%,<100%,and“no response”,the rearranged cutoff values achieved a maximum c-index with 0.728 for OS and 0.737 for DFS,which was superior to the other five systems.CONCLUSION The newly introduced six-tier JGCA-TRG system cannot increase prognostic stratification.The four-tier Becker system is more suitable for LAGC patients.A population-based study is warranted to define the optimal criterion for TRG in LAGC patients.展开更多
基金the Beijing Municipal Health Commission,No.DFL20181103 and No.ZYLX201701.
文摘BACKGROUND Current tumor regression grade(TRG)evaluations are based on various systems which brings confusion for oncologists and pathologists when interpreting results.The recent six-tier system(JGCA2017-TRG)recommended by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association(JGCA)is worth investigating,as four-tier TRG systems are favored in various parts of the world.AIM To compare the predictive accuracies of five published TRG systems.METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC)who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by D2 Lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and January 2014 at our institution.Outcomes were overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS),which were evaluated separately using the following TRG systems:JGCA2017,JGCA,Becker,AJCC/CAP,and Mandard.RESULTS All five published TRG systems were independent predictors for OS and DFS.Concordance indices of the JGCA2017,JGCA,Becker,AJCC/CAP-TRG,and Mandard systems were 0.651/0.6480.652/0.649,0.693/0.695,0.688/0.685,and 0.674/0.675 for OS and DFS,respectively.The four-tier Becker system showed the highest c-index,which was significantly greater than that of the six-tier JGCA2017 and five-tier JGCA systems(P<0.05 in OS and DFS).When residual tumor percentages were reset as:“no residual tumor”,<10%,<100%,and“no response”,the rearranged cutoff values achieved a maximum c-index with 0.728 for OS and 0.737 for DFS,which was superior to the other five systems.CONCLUSION The newly introduced six-tier JGCA-TRG system cannot increase prognostic stratification.The four-tier Becker system is more suitable for LAGC patients.A population-based study is warranted to define the optimal criterion for TRG in LAGC patients.
