AIM:To compare the effects of first and second generation silicone hydrogel(SiH) contact lens wear on tear film osmolarity.METHODS:The healthy subjects who have never used contact lenses before were enrolled in the st...AIM:To compare the effects of first and second generation silicone hydrogel(SiH) contact lens wear on tear film osmolarity.METHODS:The healthy subjects who have never used contact lenses before were enrolled in the study.Tear film osmolarity values of 16 eyes(group 1) who wore first generation SiH contact lenses were compared with those of 18 eyes(group 2) who wore second generation SiH contact lenses after three months follow-up.RESULTS:Beforecontactlenswear,tearfilmosmolarity of groups 1 and 2 were 305.02±49.08 milliosmole(mOsm) and 284.66±30.18mOsm,respectively.After three months of contact lens wear,osmolarity values were found 317.74±60.23mOsm in group 1 and 298.40±37.77mOsm in group 2.Although osmolarity values for both groups of SiH contact lens wear after three months periods were slightly higher than before the contact lens wear,the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:Contact lens wear may cause evaporation from the tear film and can increase tear film osmolarity leading to symptoms of dry eye disease.In the current study,there is a tendency to increase tear film osmolarity for both groups of SiH contact lens wear,but the difference is not statistically significant.展开更多
Relative contact angle and heat of wetting can be used to provide a measurement of surface wettability of synthetic magnetite. The comparison between synthetic and natural magnetite in terms of surface wettability sho...Relative contact angle and heat of wetting can be used to provide a measurement of surface wettability of synthetic magnetite. The comparison between synthetic and natural magnetite in terms of surface wettability showed that, using the same kind of wetting liquid, the difference in the relative contact angle was 10° between the concentrate and tailings obtained from reverse fl otation of synthetic magnetite, while the difference was more than 20° between the concentrate and tailings obtained from reverse fl otation of natural magnetite. As for the concentrate and tailings from reverse fl otation of synthetic magnetite with water as wetting liquid, the relative ratio of their wetting heat was 106.21%. In comparison, the relative ratio of wetting heat was 176.59% for concentrate and tailings from reverse fl otation of natural magnetite, showing a 70.38% difference.展开更多
文摘AIM:To compare the effects of first and second generation silicone hydrogel(SiH) contact lens wear on tear film osmolarity.METHODS:The healthy subjects who have never used contact lenses before were enrolled in the study.Tear film osmolarity values of 16 eyes(group 1) who wore first generation SiH contact lenses were compared with those of 18 eyes(group 2) who wore second generation SiH contact lenses after three months follow-up.RESULTS:Beforecontactlenswear,tearfilmosmolarity of groups 1 and 2 were 305.02±49.08 milliosmole(mOsm) and 284.66±30.18mOsm,respectively.After three months of contact lens wear,osmolarity values were found 317.74±60.23mOsm in group 1 and 298.40±37.77mOsm in group 2.Although osmolarity values for both groups of SiH contact lens wear after three months periods were slightly higher than before the contact lens wear,the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION:Contact lens wear may cause evaporation from the tear film and can increase tear film osmolarity leading to symptoms of dry eye disease.In the current study,there is a tendency to increase tear film osmolarity for both groups of SiH contact lens wear,but the difference is not statistically significant.
基金Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51144003)
文摘Relative contact angle and heat of wetting can be used to provide a measurement of surface wettability of synthetic magnetite. The comparison between synthetic and natural magnetite in terms of surface wettability showed that, using the same kind of wetting liquid, the difference in the relative contact angle was 10° between the concentrate and tailings obtained from reverse fl otation of synthetic magnetite, while the difference was more than 20° between the concentrate and tailings obtained from reverse fl otation of natural magnetite. As for the concentrate and tailings from reverse fl otation of synthetic magnetite with water as wetting liquid, the relative ratio of their wetting heat was 106.21%. In comparison, the relative ratio of wetting heat was 176.59% for concentrate and tailings from reverse fl otation of natural magnetite, showing a 70.38% difference.
