<strong>Background</strong><strong>:</strong><b><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></b><span style="font-family:;" "=&qu...<strong>Background</strong><strong>:</strong><b><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></b><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Septic shock is a rapidly changing and fatal syndrome that can </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cause comprehensive deterioration of cardiopulmonary and renal function and multiple organ failure. At the same time, septic shock has the complex clinical manifestations and hemodynamics. PiCCO can accurately </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">monitor blood flow, physical and volume indicators, and active and effective fluid resuscitation are important measures to reduce the fatality rate of septic shock and improve the prognosis of patients. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the application an</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d nursing of PiCCO in early fluid resuscitation in patie</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nts with septic shock. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Me</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This was a retrospective observ</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ational study. The observation group and the control group each had 30 cases. The observation group used PiCCO to guide fluid resuscitation;the control group used conventional methods to guide fluid resuscitation.</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The changes in CVP, HR, MAP, and urine volume per hour were observed in the two groups. The changes of various indicators before and after fluid resuscitation, the length of stay in ICU and the mortality rate were compared between the two groups. All the outcomes were collected from the electronic medical case system after patients’ discharge from the hospital. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">APACHE </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">II</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, CVP, HR, MAP were compared between th</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e obse</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rvation group and th</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e control group, and the differences w</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere statistically significant (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span></span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05). The blood volume of patients in the observatio</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">n group was significantly improved after fluid supplementation</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span></span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05). Compared with the control group, the length of stay in ICU in the observation group was significantly shorter, and the mortality rate was also significantly reduced</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span><span> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> PiCCO can be better used in early fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock.</span></span>展开更多
Objective To determine whether continuous or cyclic hormone replacement therapy (estrogen and progestogen) is better.Methods One hundred and forty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into seven groups. The 1st...Objective To determine whether continuous or cyclic hormone replacement therapy (estrogen and progestogen) is better.Methods One hundred and forty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into seven groups. The 1st and 2nd groups were normal estrous and ovariectomy (OVX) controls. Treatment of the other groups imitated the clinical regimen (continuous and cyclic) with estradiol valerate (E2V) and medroxy progesterone (MPA) in different ratios of combination. The rats were sacrificed and sections of uterus were stained with HE and histochemical metheds to detect mitosis and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), respectively. The mitotic index (MI) and PCNA index were calculated.Results The MI and PCNA index were similar in luminal and glandular cells. Both markers were low in the two control groups. When E2V was given for 1 to 6 days, both the MI and PCNA index increased with duration of treatment. When MPA was added, both markers were reduced to a very low level. In the continuous regimen, both markers decreased as the MPA dosage increased. The ratio of E2V∶MPA=1∶0.5 was enough to suppress markers to a low level similar to that of normal estrous rats. A further increase in the ratio to 1∶1.0 showed no further decrease in PCNA index. In the cyclic regimen, MPA was added for the last 5 days. The mitotic index reached a significantly low level near 0 in all ratios, but the PCNA index in each subgroup was still as high as the positive control, even though the dosage of MPA was increased several times to 1∶8.0. When MPA was added for the last 10 days, the PCNA index at a ratio of 1∶4.0 could be reduced to a low level.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that the continuous regimen was better than the cyclic regimen in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Progestin should be given for at least 10 days in the cyclic regimen.展开更多
文摘<strong>Background</strong><strong>:</strong><b><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></b><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Septic shock is a rapidly changing and fatal syndrome that can </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cause comprehensive deterioration of cardiopulmonary and renal function and multiple organ failure. At the same time, septic shock has the complex clinical manifestations and hemodynamics. PiCCO can accurately </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">monitor blood flow, physical and volume indicators, and active and effective fluid resuscitation are important measures to reduce the fatality rate of septic shock and improve the prognosis of patients. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Objectives: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">To explore the application an</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d nursing of PiCCO in early fluid resuscitation in patie</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">nts with septic shock. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Me</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">thods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> This was a retrospective observ</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ational study. The observation group and the control group each had 30 cases. The observation group used PiCCO to guide fluid resuscitation;the control group used conventional methods to guide fluid resuscitation.</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The changes in CVP, HR, MAP, and urine volume per hour were observed in the two groups. The changes of various indicators before and after fluid resuscitation, the length of stay in ICU and the mortality rate were compared between the two groups. All the outcomes were collected from the electronic medical case system after patients’ discharge from the hospital. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">APACHE </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">II</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, CVP, HR, MAP were compared between th</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e obse</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">rvation group and th</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">e control group, and the differences w</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere statistically significant (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span></span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05). The blood volume of patients in the observatio</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">n group was significantly improved after fluid supplementation</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span></span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05). Compared with the control group, the length of stay in ICU in the observation group was significantly shorter, and the mortality rate was also significantly reduced</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span></i></span><span> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.05</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> PiCCO can be better used in early fluid resuscitation of patients with septic shock.</span></span>
文摘Objective To determine whether continuous or cyclic hormone replacement therapy (estrogen and progestogen) is better.Methods One hundred and forty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into seven groups. The 1st and 2nd groups were normal estrous and ovariectomy (OVX) controls. Treatment of the other groups imitated the clinical regimen (continuous and cyclic) with estradiol valerate (E2V) and medroxy progesterone (MPA) in different ratios of combination. The rats were sacrificed and sections of uterus were stained with HE and histochemical metheds to detect mitosis and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), respectively. The mitotic index (MI) and PCNA index were calculated.Results The MI and PCNA index were similar in luminal and glandular cells. Both markers were low in the two control groups. When E2V was given for 1 to 6 days, both the MI and PCNA index increased with duration of treatment. When MPA was added, both markers were reduced to a very low level. In the continuous regimen, both markers decreased as the MPA dosage increased. The ratio of E2V∶MPA=1∶0.5 was enough to suppress markers to a low level similar to that of normal estrous rats. A further increase in the ratio to 1∶1.0 showed no further decrease in PCNA index. In the cyclic regimen, MPA was added for the last 5 days. The mitotic index reached a significantly low level near 0 in all ratios, but the PCNA index in each subgroup was still as high as the positive control, even though the dosage of MPA was increased several times to 1∶8.0. When MPA was added for the last 10 days, the PCNA index at a ratio of 1∶4.0 could be reduced to a low level.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that the continuous regimen was better than the cyclic regimen in postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Progestin should be given for at least 10 days in the cyclic regimen.