Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of conventional radiotherapy of chest wall and clavicular field and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients after modified radical mastectomy.Methods: A total ...Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of conventional radiotherapy of chest wall and clavicular field and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients after modified radical mastectomy.Methods: A total of 84 patients who were admitted in our hospital after modified radical mastectomy were included in the study and divided into the conventional radiotherapy group (n=42) and the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group (n=42) according to different radiotherapy methods. The patients in the conventional radiotherapy group were given conventional radiotherapy of chest wall and clavicular field, while the patients in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group were given three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The serum tumor markers and peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets 6-8 weeks after treatment in the two groups were detected. The clinical efficacy, and toxic and side effects in the two groups were evaluated.Results: The serum CA15-3, CA125, CEA, and CK19 levels after treatment in the two groups were significantly reduced when compared with before treatment, CD3+,CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ were significantly elevated, while CD8+ was significantly reduced when compared with before treatment, but the comparison of the above indicators between the two groups was not statistically significant. The occurrence rate of radioactive skin damage and pneumonia after treatment in the conventional radiotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group. Conclusions:The two kinds of radiotherapy schemes have an equal efficacy, but the toxic and side effects of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy are significantly lower than those by the conventional radiotherapy, with a certain advantage.展开更多
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy （3DCRT） for non- small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV ...OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy （3DCRT） for non- small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC were treated with 3DCRT. Cross analysis of the clinical data was conducted in the comparison between the 52 cases with 3DCRT and the other 50 cases with the conventional radiation therapy （CRT）. In the 3DCRT group, only the primary tumor and positive lymph-node draining area were included in the clinical target area, setting 4 to 6 coplanar or non-coplanar irradiation fields, with 2 Gy or 3 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day and 5 fractions per week. The total dose ranged from a test dose （DT） of 66 Gy to 72 Gy. In the CRT group, the field area contained the primary tumor plus the homolateral hilum of the lung, the mediastinum superior or hol-mediastinum, and opposed anteroposterior irradiation. When the dosage reached DT 36-40 Gy, an oblique portal administered radiation was conducted in order to avoid injuring the spinal cord. The DT was 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day, 5 fractions per week, with a total dose of 60 Gy to 70 Gy. RESULTS The therapeutic effect （CR ＋ PR） was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group, and was 72% in the CRT group. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups, P 〈 0.01. There was a clinical symptom improvement attained by 96.5% and 86.4% respectively in the two groups, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups, P 〈 0.01. The 6-month, 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3%, 75.0% and 42.3% in the 3DCRT group, and 76%, 60% and 30% in the CRT group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the 6-month overall survival rate between the groups, P 〈 0.05. There was no obvious significant difference in the 1 and 2-year overall survival rates between the two groups, P 〉 0.05. The toxic reaction was 12.5% and 23.7% respectively in the 3DCRT and CRT groups. Acute radioactive esophagitis and leucopenia were markedly lower in the 3DCRT group than in the CRT group. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups, P 〈 0.05. No toxic reaction of Stage-III and over was found in the 3DCRT group during radiation therapy. CONCLUSION The 3DCRT method has a satisfactory shortterm efficacy and improvement of clinical symptoms in treating NSCLC, with a mild toxic reaction and good tolerance in patients. It can be used for enhancing the tumor-control rate and bettering the quality of life.展开更多
Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. ...Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. We aimed to compare the treatment results and radiation toxicities between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy （3D-CRT） and conventional radiotherapy （CR） for patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Methods： From June 2004 to December 2006, a random study was performed on 106 patients treated with 3D-CRT or CR, 53 patients in each group. The patients in CR group received conventional radiotherapy in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 66-70 Gy in 6.5 or 7 weeks. The patients in 3D-CRT group were treated by 3D-CRT in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 64-70 Gy in 6 weeks. The local control rates, survival rates and radiation toxicities for the two groups were investigated. Results： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates were 83.0% and 60.4% in 3D-CRT group and 64.2% （x^2 = 4.853, P = 0.028） and 32.1% （x^2 = 9.812, P = 0.002） in CR group. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 73.6% and 50.9% in 3D-CRT group and 54.7% （x^2 = 4.102, P = 0.043） and 32.1% （x^2 = 3.886, P = 0.049） in CR group. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in radiation toxicities. Conclusien： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates and survival rates of patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by 3D-CRT is superior to CR. However, longer-term results and radiation toxicity need further study which involves more patients and prolonged follow-up.展开更多
文摘Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of conventional radiotherapy of chest wall and clavicular field and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients after modified radical mastectomy.Methods: A total of 84 patients who were admitted in our hospital after modified radical mastectomy were included in the study and divided into the conventional radiotherapy group (n=42) and the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group (n=42) according to different radiotherapy methods. The patients in the conventional radiotherapy group were given conventional radiotherapy of chest wall and clavicular field, while the patients in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group were given three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The serum tumor markers and peripheral blood T lymphocyte subsets 6-8 weeks after treatment in the two groups were detected. The clinical efficacy, and toxic and side effects in the two groups were evaluated.Results: The serum CA15-3, CA125, CEA, and CK19 levels after treatment in the two groups were significantly reduced when compared with before treatment, CD3+,CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ were significantly elevated, while CD8+ was significantly reduced when compared with before treatment, but the comparison of the above indicators between the two groups was not statistically significant. The occurrence rate of radioactive skin damage and pneumonia after treatment in the conventional radiotherapy group was significantly higher than that in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy group. Conclusions:The two kinds of radiotherapy schemes have an equal efficacy, but the toxic and side effects of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy are significantly lower than those by the conventional radiotherapy, with a certain advantage.
基金supported by a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region,China(No.NZ0680)
文摘OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical efficacy and toxic effect of the 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy （3DCRT） for non- small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. METHODS Fifty-two patients with the Stage-I and IV NSCLC were treated with 3DCRT. Cross analysis of the clinical data was conducted in the comparison between the 52 cases with 3DCRT and the other 50 cases with the conventional radiation therapy （CRT）. In the 3DCRT group, only the primary tumor and positive lymph-node draining area were included in the clinical target area, setting 4 to 6 coplanar or non-coplanar irradiation fields, with 2 Gy or 3 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day and 5 fractions per week. The total dose ranged from a test dose （DT） of 66 Gy to 72 Gy. In the CRT group, the field area contained the primary tumor plus the homolateral hilum of the lung, the mediastinum superior or hol-mediastinum, and opposed anteroposterior irradiation. When the dosage reached DT 36-40 Gy, an oblique portal administered radiation was conducted in order to avoid injuring the spinal cord. The DT was 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction, 1 fraction a day, 5 fractions per week, with a total dose of 60 Gy to 70 Gy. RESULTS The therapeutic effect （CR ＋ PR） was 90.4% in the 3DCRT group, and was 72% in the CRT group. There was statistically significant difference between the two groups, P 〈 0.01. There was a clinical symptom improvement attained by 96.5% and 86.4% respectively in the two groups, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups, P 〈 0.01. The 6-month, 1 and 2-year overall survival rates were 92.3%, 75.0% and 42.3% in the 3DCRT group, and 76%, 60% and 30% in the CRT group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the 6-month overall survival rate between the groups, P 〈 0.05. There was no obvious significant difference in the 1 and 2-year overall survival rates between the two groups, P 〉 0.05. The toxic reaction was 12.5% and 23.7% respectively in the 3DCRT and CRT groups. Acute radioactive esophagitis and leucopenia were markedly lower in the 3DCRT group than in the CRT group. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups, P 〈 0.05. No toxic reaction of Stage-III and over was found in the 3DCRT group during radiation therapy. CONCLUSION The 3DCRT method has a satisfactory shortterm efficacy and improvement of clinical symptoms in treating NSCLC, with a mild toxic reaction and good tolerance in patients. It can be used for enhancing the tumor-control rate and bettering the quality of life.
文摘Objective： Radiation therapy is an important component of the multidisciplinary management of esophageal carcinoma. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy requires the precise definition of the target volume. We aimed to compare the treatment results and radiation toxicities between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy （3D-CRT） and conventional radiotherapy （CR） for patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Methods： From June 2004 to December 2006, a random study was performed on 106 patients treated with 3D-CRT or CR, 53 patients in each group. The patients in CR group received conventional radiotherapy in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 66-70 Gy in 6.5 or 7 weeks. The patients in 3D-CRT group were treated by 3D-CRT in 2.0 Gy/f, 5 f/week and total dose was 64-70 Gy in 6 weeks. The local control rates, survival rates and radiation toxicities for the two groups were investigated. Results： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates were 83.0% and 60.4% in 3D-CRT group and 64.2% （x^2 = 4.853, P = 0.028） and 32.1% （x^2 = 9.812, P = 0.002） in CR group. The 1-year and 3-year survival rates were 73.6% and 50.9% in 3D-CRT group and 54.7% （x^2 = 4.102, P = 0.043） and 32.1% （x^2 = 3.886, P = 0.049） in CR group. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in radiation toxicities. Conclusien： The 1-year and 3-year local control rates and survival rates of patients with esophageal carcinoma treated by 3D-CRT is superior to CR. However, longer-term results and radiation toxicity need further study which involves more patients and prolonged follow-up.
