Long-term follow-up study of elderly patients with covered stent implantation after coronary perforation

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy of covered stent implantation in the treatment of elderly patients with coronary perforation while undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）.MethodsFrom June 2004 to June 2012, our center has followed ten elderly patients （age≥ 60 years） who sustained coronary perforation during PCI. The major adverse cardiac events （MACE） were observed as well. The patients were advised to take 75 mg/day Clopidogrel for two years, and indefinite use of 100 mg/day enteric-coated aspirin.ResultsSix out of the 10 patients aged from 60 to 76 years old （mean 68.6 ± 5.2 years） were male, four were female. The average diameter of the implanted stents was 3.3 ± 0.3 mm, and the average length was 22.1 ± 3.7 mm. All the ruptures were successfully sealed without intra-procedural death. The follow-up duration ranged from 0.6 to 67 months （mean 31.7 ± 24.5 months）. One patient died of multiple organ failure due to lung infection in 19 days after PCI; one died of cardiac sudden death in 13 months after PCI; one had angina pectoris in 53 months after PCI; one underwent multi-slice CT examination in six months after PCI, and no in-stent restenosis was found. The other four patients received angiography follow-up, and the results showed that three patients had no intra-stent restenosis, while one had left anterior descending （LAD） restenosis in the covered stent in 67 months after PCI. The in-hospital mortality was 10% （1/10）. The MACE rate in 12 months after PCI was 10% （1/10）. During the entire followed-up period, the restenosis rate in target vessels was 20% （1/5）, mortality was 20% （2/10）, and the MACE rate was 40% （4/10）.ConclusionTreatment of coronary perforation by using covered stents can achieve favorable long-term results; a two-year dual antiplatelet therapy （DAPT） after PCI can effectively prevent intra-stent thrombosis.

Dissecting Sub-epicardial Hematoma Due to Coronary Perforation and Non-developing Stent

We report a 65-year-old man who presented with anastomotic perforation of the distal right coronary artery due to stent deployment, complicated by a small and stable dissecting sub-epicardial hematoma, and non-developing stent. The cause was unknown.

Polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent implantation with double guiding catheter technique for the treatment of type III coronary perforation after stenting

Coronary artery perforation is a life-threatening , complication during percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） although it occurs rarely in contemporary era with incidence ranging from 0.1% to 0.8%. The overall mortality remains quite high and varied with thestype of perforation, with higher risk in type Ⅱ and Ⅲ

Novel economic treatment for coronary wire perforation:A case report

BACKGROUND Coronary artery perforation is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),however if recognized and managed promptly,its adverse consequences can be minimized.Risk factors include the use of advanced PCI technique(such as atherectomy and chronic total occlusion interventions)and treatment of severely calcified lesions.Large vessel perforation is usually treated with implantation of a covered stent,whereas distal and collateral vessel perforations are usually treated with embolization of coils,fat,thrombin,or collagen.We describe a novel and cost-effective method of embolisation using a cut remnant of a used angioplasty balloon that was successful in sealing a distal wire perforation.we advocate this method as a simple method of managing distal vessel perforation.CASE SUMMARY A 73-year-old male with previous coronary Bypass graft operation and recurrent angina on minimal exertion had undergone rotablation and PCI to his dominant left circumflex.At the end of the procedure there was evidence of wire perforation at the distal branch and despite prolonged balloon tamponade there continued to be extravasation and the decision was made to seal this perforation.A cut piece of an angioplasty balloon was used and delivered on the original angioplasty wire to before the perforation area and released which resulted in sealing of the perforation with no unwanted clinical consequences.CONCLUSION The use of a balloon remnant for embolization in coronary perforation presents a simple,efficient and cost-effective method for managing coronary perforations and may be an alternative for achieving hemostasis and preventing poor outcome.Prevention remains the most important part with meticulous attention to the distal wire position,particularly with hydrophilic wires.

Coronary Artery Perforation Complicated With Acute Aortic Valve Regurgitation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention:Report of Two Cases

CORONARY artery perforation catastrophic complication （CAP） is a rare, of percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）. CAP during PCI procedure is invariably associated with high riskpatients with complex coronary artery disease such as coronary calcified lesions, multi-vessel lesions, coronary chronic total occlusion and so on,

SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF CORONARY ARTERY PERFORATION WITH EMERGENCY INTRACORONARY COATED STENT IMPLANTATION

Coronary artery perforation is a rare but catatrophic complication of percutaneous coronary intervention.We report a case of type Ⅲ coronary artery perforation following stenting at calcified mid-segment of left anterior descending artery.The perforation was successfully covered using a PTFE-coated stent with an excellent clinical and angiographic outcomes.

Fatal complication, rescue therapy;covered stent for coronary artery perforation

Introduction: Although coronary perforation is a rare complication observed during intervenetional procedures, it has a considerably high mortality rate. The prevelance of coronary perforation has been reported to be 0.20%-0.6%. Its sudden development, the patient’s agitation and development of rapid collapse render intervention difficult. Materials and Method: The presence of perfusion balloon and covered stent in clinics is life-saving. In the present study, we retrospectively reviewed 17 cases with coronary artery perforation that were treated between 2009 and 2012. Of these patients, 10 (58.8%) were men and 7 (41.2%) were women;the median age was 62.8 ± 8.3 years. The coronary artery perforation resulted from guide wire in 23.5%, balloon dilatation in 58.8% and stent implantation in 17.6%. All the lesions were either type B or C lesions. Results: The extensiveness of perforation was Ellis grade I in 23.5%, grade II in 47.1% and grade III in 29.4% of the cases. In the treatment of the perforation, polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft was implemented in 9 (52.9%) patients, whilst conventional and emergency surgical therapy was performed in 8 (47.1%) patients. Grade I perforations occurred due to the guide wire and were managed with conventional therapy (p < 0.05). Grade II and III perforations resulted from balloon and stent. The majority of these patients were inserted Graft Stent (stent graft in 52.9% and conventional therapy in 23.5% of the cases (p < 0.05). Although all the stent grafts were successfully implanted, the complete control of bleeding was achieved only in 77.7% of the patients. Mortality was not observed in grade I perforation, whilst all cases resulted in mortality had grade III perforation. Conclusion: These data indicate that there is a need for further advanced technology in the coronary artery perforation despite of currently available therapeutic options.

Management of coronary artery perforation by embolization:nursing experience from 3 cases

INTRODUCTION With the development of economy and improvement of life quality,the incidences of hypertension,hyper-cholesterolemia,diabetes,obesity and smoking have been increased in China,which has led to a significant increase in the morbidity and mortality of coronary artery disease（CAD）~1.Since it was introduced into China in 1984,coronary intervention（PCI）has developed rapidly and has become the major treatment of CAD because of its unique characteristics of minimal invasive and effective outcome.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion lesions in remote hospitals without on-site surgical support

Background The safety of percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for chronic total occlusion （CTO） lesions in remote hospitals without surgical facilities remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate three-year outcomes after CTO for PCI in ten centers around China where no on-site coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） support was available. Methods A total of 152 patients from 10 Chinese hospitals without on-site surgical facilities were prospectively studied. Intra-procedural and in-hospital events were assessed. Angiographic follow-up was indexed eight months after the initial procedure. Clinical follow-up was extended to three years. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events （MACE）, defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target-vessel revascularization （TVR）. Results The incidence of CTO was 7.9% in patients who underwent PCI, Successful recanalization was achieved in 132 patients （86.8%）. Compared with patients in the PCI success group, patients with PCI procedural failure had longer lesion lengths （（42.32±22.08） mm vs （27.61±22.85） mm, P=0.023）, a higher rate of perforation （25.0% vs 0, P=0.014）, and a greater need for pericardial puncture. There were significant differences in MACE in-hospital and at one year and three years between the failure （10.0%, 30.0% and 35.0%） and the success （3.0%, 12.1% and 14.4%） groups （P=0.037, 0.034 and 0.040, respectively）. These led to a significant decrease in the MACE-free survival rate at one and three years in the failure group, compared with the success group （P=0.031 and 0.023, respectively）. Stump was the only predictor of recanalization success （HR 0.158, 95% Cl 0.041-0.612, P=0.008）, whereas procedural failure （OR 13.023, 95% CI 6.67-13.69, P=0.002）, incomplete revascularization （OR 9.71, 95% CI 2.93-5.59, P=0.005）, and total stent length （OR 6.02, 95% Cl 1.55-11.93, P=0.027） were three independent predictors of MACE. Conclusions PCI for CTO was unsafe in remote hospitals without CABG facilities. Paying attention to coronary perforation is important for successful procedures.