In the process of formulating the General Provisions of the Civil Law of P. R. China, the attribute of virtual property rights has changed from real rights to non-real rights. Article No. 127 thereof does not clarify ...In the process of formulating the General Provisions of the Civil Law of P. R. China, the attribute of virtual property rights has changed from real rights to non-real rights. Article No. 127 thereof does not clarify the nature of virtual property rights after all, and the place where virtual property is put in the "Civil Rights" chapter of General Provisions of the Civil Law makes the concept even more complex and confusing. The "relationships paradigm" protection of virtual property does not have a definite classification criterion, nor stands opposite to the "rights paradigm." There are two different ways to justify the "theory of virtual property as a real right" under the "rights paradigm" protection, namely, essentialism and consequentialism. The former resulted from utilizing features in a demonstration and identifying disposal rights with real rights, while the latter resulted from adherence to the dichotomy system of property rights comprising real rights and creditor's rights. From the perspective of larceny in Criminal Law and virtual property insurance in The Social Insurance Law, the attribute of virtual property rights is irrelevant to creditor's rights. The attribute of virtual property rights shall be defined as virtual property rights so that it can be included in the system of civil rights. The uniqueness of virtual property is enough to become an object of emerging civil rights; intangible property rights as a superordinate theoretical concept cannot reflect the essence of virtual property rights. The legislative frame of virtual property rights shall be comprised of the subject, object, exercise, publication and change of the rights.展开更多
数字版权管理(digital rights management,DRM)是我国信息化建设的重要内容.但高昂的投资成本和欠佳的用户体验是其进一步推广的瓶颈.而已有的采用云计算解决DRM瓶颈问题的研究大都只着眼于云计算的存储服务功能,较少关注云计算的计算优...数字版权管理(digital rights management,DRM)是我国信息化建设的重要内容.但高昂的投资成本和欠佳的用户体验是其进一步推广的瓶颈.而已有的采用云计算解决DRM瓶颈问题的研究大都只着眼于云计算的存储服务功能,较少关注云计算的计算优势.提出了一种云计算环境下支持属性撤销的外包解密DRM方案.考虑到DRM中用户隐私保护的问题,提出用户通过匿名标签购买许可证.此外,为了充分发挥云计算在计算上的优势以及可以灵活、细粒度地撤销用户的属性,提出了一种支持属性撤销的外包解密CP-ABE(ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption)机制.与已有的基于云计算的数字版权保护方案相比,提出的方案在保护内容和用户隐私的同时,支持灵活的访问控制机制和细粒度的用户属性撤销,并且支持CP-ABE的解密外包计算,方案具有较好的实用性.展开更多
基金a phase achievement of Research on the Legal Problem of Third Party Infringing Contract Conclusion Interestsa general item under the national social sciences foundation(item number:16BFX1l0)Research on Expansion of Non-normative Provisions in Civil Legislation,one of the national subjects on rule of law and legal theory(item number:16SFB3031)
文摘In the process of formulating the General Provisions of the Civil Law of P. R. China, the attribute of virtual property rights has changed from real rights to non-real rights. Article No. 127 thereof does not clarify the nature of virtual property rights after all, and the place where virtual property is put in the "Civil Rights" chapter of General Provisions of the Civil Law makes the concept even more complex and confusing. The "relationships paradigm" protection of virtual property does not have a definite classification criterion, nor stands opposite to the "rights paradigm." There are two different ways to justify the "theory of virtual property as a real right" under the "rights paradigm" protection, namely, essentialism and consequentialism. The former resulted from utilizing features in a demonstration and identifying disposal rights with real rights, while the latter resulted from adherence to the dichotomy system of property rights comprising real rights and creditor's rights. From the perspective of larceny in Criminal Law and virtual property insurance in The Social Insurance Law, the attribute of virtual property rights is irrelevant to creditor's rights. The attribute of virtual property rights shall be defined as virtual property rights so that it can be included in the system of civil rights. The uniqueness of virtual property is enough to become an object of emerging civil rights; intangible property rights as a superordinate theoretical concept cannot reflect the essence of virtual property rights. The legislative frame of virtual property rights shall be comprised of the subject, object, exercise, publication and change of the rights.
文摘数字版权管理(digital rights management,DRM)是我国信息化建设的重要内容.但高昂的投资成本和欠佳的用户体验是其进一步推广的瓶颈.而已有的采用云计算解决DRM瓶颈问题的研究大都只着眼于云计算的存储服务功能,较少关注云计算的计算优势.提出了一种云计算环境下支持属性撤销的外包解密DRM方案.考虑到DRM中用户隐私保护的问题,提出用户通过匿名标签购买许可证.此外,为了充分发挥云计算在计算上的优势以及可以灵活、细粒度地撤销用户的属性,提出了一种支持属性撤销的外包解密CP-ABE(ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption)机制.与已有的基于云计算的数字版权保护方案相比,提出的方案在保护内容和用户隐私的同时,支持灵活的访问控制机制和细粒度的用户属性撤销,并且支持CP-ABE的解密外包计算,方案具有较好的实用性.
