期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
鲤疱疹病毒2型微滴式数字PCR检测方法的建立及比较分析 被引量:10
1
作者 赵欣 贾鹏 +8 位作者 刘莹 王津津 史秀杰 潘广 郑晓聪 于力 何俊强 刘荭 吴志新 《渔业科学进展》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第4期126-133,共8页
本研究建立了定量检测鲤疱疹病毒2型(Cyprinid herpesvirus 2,CyHV-2)的微滴式数字PCR(Droplet digital PCR,ddPCR)检测方法,并与实时荧光定量PCR(Quantitative real-time PCR,qPCR)检测方法的灵敏性、重复性、特异性和临床样品检测做... 本研究建立了定量检测鲤疱疹病毒2型(Cyprinid herpesvirus 2,CyHV-2)的微滴式数字PCR(Droplet digital PCR,ddPCR)检测方法,并与实时荧光定量PCR(Quantitative real-time PCR,qPCR)检测方法的灵敏性、重复性、特异性和临床样品检测做了比较分析。结果表明,与qPCR相比,ddPCR具有相同的特异性,其灵敏性比qPCR低20倍。在定量CyHV-2 DNA时,ddPCR(R^2=0.994)和qPCR(R^2=0.994)均表现出良好的线性关系,且2种检测方法间的定量值呈正相关(R^2=0.989)。在定量检测相同稀释度的CyHV-2 DNA时,qPCR的定量值始终比ddPCR高10倍。ddPCR的组内和组间重复变异系数(CV)分别为0.59%–11.26%和6.55%–23.21%,而qPCR为16.57%–27.56%和22.31%–56.73%,说明ddPCR具有更好的稳定性。在临床样品定量检测时,ddPCR的检出率稍高于qPCR。本研究建立的ddPCR能够准确定量检测CyHV-2,将为CyHV-2相关研究提供有益参考。 展开更多
关键词 微滴式数字PCR 鲤疱疹病毒2 实时荧光定量PCR 定量检测
下载PDF
Micro-droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Technologies Provide Highly Sensitive and Accurate Detection of Zika Virus 被引量:6
2
作者 Yuan Hui Zhiming Wu +12 位作者 Zhiran Qin Li Zhu Junhe Liang Xujuan Li Hanmin Fu Shiyu Feng Jianhai Yu Xiaoen He Weizhi Lu Weiwei Xiao Qinghua Wu Bao Zhang Wei Zhao 《Virologica Sinica》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第3期270-277,共8页
The establishment of highly sensitive diagnostic methods is critical in the early diagnosis and control of Zika virus(ZIKV)and in preventing serious neurological complications of ZIKV infection. In this study, we esta... The establishment of highly sensitive diagnostic methods is critical in the early diagnosis and control of Zika virus(ZIKV)and in preventing serious neurological complications of ZIKV infection. In this study, we established micro-droplet digital polymerase chain reaction(ddPCR) and real-time quantitative PCR(RT-qPCR) protocols for the detection of ZIKV based on the amplification of the NS5 gene. For the ZIKV standard plasmid, the RT-qPCR results showed that the cycle threshold(Ct) value was linear from 10~1 to 10~8 copy/l L, with a standard curve R^2 of 0.999 and amplification efficiency of 92.203%;however, a concentration as low as 1 copy/l L could not be detected. In comparison with RT-qPCR, the dd PCR method resulted in a linear range of 10~1–10~4 copy/l L and was able to detect concentrations as low as 1 copy/l L. Thus, for detecting ZIKV from clinical samples, RT-qPCR is a better choice for high-concentration samples(above 10~1 copy/l L),while ddPCR has excellent accuracy and sensitivity for low-concentration samples. These results indicate that the ddPCR method should be of considerable use in the early diagnosis, laboratory study, and monitoring of ZIKV. 展开更多
关键词 聚合酶链反应技术 敏感 微滴 病毒 样品检测 实时 诊断方法 标准曲线
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部