Background:Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration.However,the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing(FC)and grazing(GZ)remain poorly understood,especially the vegetation–so...Background:Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration.However,the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing(FC)and grazing(GZ)remain poorly understood,especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination(C_(d))mechanism.This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.Methods:A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland,with degraded grassland as the control(CK).Plant and soil properties and C_(d) were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and principal component analysis(PCA).Results:The order of soil comprehensive evaluation(SCE)was GZ>FC>CK,while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation(VCE)was FC>GZ>CK.The C_(d) of CK was 0.39(mild imbalance),while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54,respectively(little coordination).The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48(soil lag type),and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35,respectively(vegetation lag and vegetation loss type,respectively).Conclusions:Both GZ and FC improved C_(d) and facilitated recovery.However,degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China,Grant/Award Number:42041005。
文摘Background:Revegetation is widely used in degraded grassland restoration.However,the responses of grassland plant and soil properties to fencing(FC)and grazing(GZ)remain poorly understood,especially the vegetation–soil coupling coordination(C_(d))mechanism.This study explored single and interactive responses of vegetation and soil properties under FC and GZ after revegetation.Methods:A field experiment with FC and GZ treatments was conducted in Loess Plateau reconstructed grassland,with degraded grassland as the control(CK).Plant and soil properties and C_(d) were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)and principal component analysis(PCA).Results:The order of soil comprehensive evaluation(SCE)was GZ>FC>CK,while that of vegetation comprehensive evaluation(VCE)was FC>GZ>CK.The C_(d) of CK was 0.39(mild imbalance),while the values of FC and GZ were 0.57 and 0.54,respectively(little coordination).The VCE/SCE of FC was 1.48(soil lag type),and the values of GZ and CK were 0.69 and 0.35,respectively(vegetation lag and vegetation loss type,respectively).Conclusions:Both GZ and FC improved C_(d) and facilitated recovery.However,degraded grasslands should be restored via moderate grazing for sustainable ecological and economic development.
